1
|
Klepac B, Krahe M, Spaaij R, Craike M. Six Public Policy Recommendations to Increase the Translation and Utilization of Research Evidence in Public Health Practice. Public Health Rep 2023; 138:715-720. [PMID: 36239490 PMCID: PMC10467493 DOI: 10.1177/00333549221129355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bojana Klepac
- Mitchell Institute for Education and Health Policy, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Ramon Spaaij
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Governance, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Melinda Craike
- Mitchell Institute for Education and Health Policy, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
- Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ribeiro B, Forte P, Vinhas R, Marinho DA, Faíl LB, Pereira A, Vieira F, Neiva HP. Reply to: Comment on: "The Benefits of Resistance Training in Obese Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". SPORTS MEDICINE - OPEN 2023; 9:12. [PMID: 36752888 PMCID: PMC9908782 DOI: 10.1186/s40798-022-00547-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Ribeiro
- grid.7427.60000 0001 2220 7094Department of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200 Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Pedro Forte
- grid.513237.1Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, 6200-151 Covilhã, Portugal ,grid.34822.3f0000 0000 9851 275XInstituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal ,Higher Institute of Educational Sciences of the Douro, Penafiel, Portugal
| | - Raquel Vinhas
- grid.10772.330000000121511713NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Daniel A. Marinho
- grid.7427.60000 0001 2220 7094Department of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200 Covilhã, Portugal ,grid.513237.1Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, 6200-151 Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Luís B. Faíl
- grid.7427.60000 0001 2220 7094Department of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200 Covilhã, Portugal ,grid.513237.1Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, 6200-151 Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Ana Pereira
- grid.421114.30000 0001 2230 1638Department of Science and Technology, Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, 2910-761 Setúbal, Portugal
| | - Fernando Vieira
- KinesioLab – Research Unit in Human Movement, Piaget Institute, Lisbon, Portugal ,RECI – Research Unit in Education and Community Intervention, Piaget Institute, Lisbon, Portugal ,ISEIT de Almada, Piaget Instituto, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Henrique P. Neiva
- grid.7427.60000 0001 2220 7094Department of Sports Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6200 Covilhã, Portugal ,grid.513237.1Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, 6200-151 Covilhã, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
LaKind JS, Burns CJ, Mattison DR. Commentary: Systematic reviews and observational epidemiology: The more things change…. GLOBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2022; 4:100088. [PMID: 37637020 PMCID: PMC10446007 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Judy S. LaKind
- LaKind Associates, LLC, 106 Oakdale Avenue, Catonsville, Maryland 21228 USA; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Carol J. Burns
- Burns Epidemiology Consulting, LLC, 255 W. Sunset Ct., Sanford, MI 48657, USA
| | - Donald R. Mattison
- Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology University of South Carolina, 921 Assembly Street, Columbia, SC 29208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Griffin B, Cabilan C, Ayoub B, Xu H(G, Palmieri T, Kimble R, Singer Y. The effect of 20 minutes of cool running water first aid within three hours of thermal burn injury on patient outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australas Emerg Care 2022; 25:367-376. [DOI: 10.1016/j.auec.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
5
|
Hohenschurz-Schmidt D, Kleykamp BA, Draper-Rodi J, Vollert J, Chan J, Ferguson M, McNicol E, Phalip J, Evans SR, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Rice AS. Pragmatic trials of pain therapies: a systematic review of methods. Pain 2022; 163:21-46. [PMID: 34490854 PMCID: PMC8675058 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Pragmatic randomised clinical trials aim to directly inform clinical or health policy decision making. Here, we systematically review methods and design of pragmatic trials of pain therapies to examine methods, identify common challenges, and areas for improvement. Seven databases were searched for pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trials that assessed pain treatment in a clinical population of adults reporting pain. All screening steps and data extractions were performed twice. Data were synthesised descriptively, and correlation analyses between prespecified trial features and PRECIS-2 (PRagmatic-Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary 2) ratings and attrition were performed. Protocol registration: PROSPERO-ID CRD42020178954. Of 57 included trials, only 21% assessed pharmacological interventions, the remainder physical, surgical, psychological, or self-management pain therapies. Three-quarters of the trials were comparative effectiveness designs, often conducted in multiple centres (median: 5; Q1/3: 1, 9.25) and with a median sample size of 234 patients at randomization (Q1/3: 135.5; 363.5). Although most trials recruited patients with chronic pain, reporting of pain duration was poor and not well described. Reporting was comprehensive for most general items, while often deficient for specific pragmatic aspects. Average ratings for pragmatism were highest for treatment adherence flexibility and clinical relevance of outcome measures. They were lowest for patient recruitment methods and extent of follow-up measurements and appointments. Current practice in pragmatic trials of pain treatments can be improved in areas such as patient recruitment and reporting of methods, analysis, and interpretation of data. These improvements will facilitate translatability to other real-world settings-the purpose of pragmatic trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bethea A. Kleykamp
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Jerry Draper-Rodi
- Research Center, University College of Osteopathy, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Vollert
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica Chan
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - McKenzie Ferguson
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, IL, United States
| | - Ewan McNicol
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jules Phalip
- European School of Osteopathy, Maidstone, United Kingdom
| | - Scott R. Evans
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Biostatistics Center, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Dennis C. Turk
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Robert H. Dworkin
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Andrew S.C. Rice
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Keathley J, Garneau V, Zavala-Mora D, Heister RR, Gauthier E, Morin-Bernier J, Green R, Vohl MC. A Systematic Review and Recommendations Around Frameworks for Evaluating Scientific Validity in Nutritional Genomics. Front Nutr 2021; 8:789215. [PMID: 35004815 PMCID: PMC8728558 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.789215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There is a significant lack of consistency used to determine the scientific validity of nutrigenetic research. The aims of this study were to examine existing frameworks used for determining scientific validity in nutrition and/or genetics and to determine which framework would be most appropriate to evaluate scientific validity in nutrigenetics in the future.Methods: A systematic review (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021261948) was conducted up until July 2021 using Medline, Embase, and Web of Science, with articles screened in duplicate. Gray literature searches were also conducted (June-July 2021), and reference lists of two relevant review articles were screened. Included articles provided the complete methods for a framework that has been used to evaluate scientific validity in nutrition and/or genetics. Articles were excluded if they provided a framework for evaluating health services/systems more broadly. Citing articles of the included articles were then screened in Google Scholar to determine if the framework had been used in nutrition or genetics, or both; frameworks that had not were excluded. Summary tables were piloted in duplicate and revised accordingly prior to synthesizing all included articles. Frameworks were critically appraised for their applicability to nutrigenetic scientific validity assessment using a predetermined categorization matrix, which included key factors deemed important by an expert panel for assessing scientific validity in nutrigenetics.Results: Upon screening 3,931 articles, a total of 49 articles representing 41 total frameworks, were included in the final analysis (19 used in genetics, 9 used in nutrition, and 13 used in both). Factors deemed important for evaluating nutrigenetic evidence related to study design and quality, generalizability, directness, consistency, precision, confounding, effect size, biological plausibility, publication/funding bias, allele and nutrient dose-response, and summary levels of evidence. Frameworks varied in the components of their scientific validity assessment, with most assessing study quality. Consideration of biological plausibility was more common in frameworks used in genetics. Dose-response effects were rarely considered. Two included frameworks incorporated all but one predetermined key factor important for nutrigenetic scientific validity assessment.Discussion/Conclusions: A single existing framework was highlighted as optimal for the rigorous evaluation of scientific validity in nutritional genomics, and minor modifications are proposed to strengthen it further.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=261948, PROSPERO [CRD42021261948].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine Keathley
- Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
- School of Nutrition, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
- Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, United States
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Véronique Garneau
- Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
- School of Nutrition, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - Ellie Gauthier
- Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
- School of Nutrition, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Josiane Morin-Bernier
- Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
- School of Nutrition, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Robert Green
- Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, United States
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Marie-Claude Vohl
- Centre Nutrition, Santé et Société (NUTRISS), Institut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels (INAF), Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
- School of Nutrition, Université Laval, Québec City, QC, Canada
- *Correspondence: Marie-Claude Vohl
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Parmar NP, Thompson GL, Atack NE, Ireland AJ, Sherriff M, Haworth JA. Microbial colonisation associated with conventional and self-ligating brackets: a systematic review. J Orthod 2021; 49:151-162. [PMID: 34839734 PMCID: PMC9160783 DOI: 10.1177/14653125211056023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background: Decalcification and gingivitis caused by plaque
accumulation around brackets are common iatrogenic effects of fixed
appliances. The influence of conventional versus self-ligating bracket
design on microbial colonisation is unknown. Objective: To assess the levels of microbial colonisation associated
with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Search sources: Three databases were searched for publications from 2009
to 2021. Data selection: Randomised controlled trials comparing levels of
microbial colonisation before and during treatment with conventional and
self-ligating brackets were assessed independently and in duplicate. Data extraction: Data were extracted independently by two authors from the
studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias assessments were
made using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. The
quality of the included studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal
Skills Programme Checklist. Results: A total of 11 randomised controlled trials were included
in this systematic review. Six of the studies were found to be at low risk
of bias and five presented with some concerns. The studies were considered
moderate to high quality. Five trials reported no statistically significant
difference in microbial colonisation between bracket types. The remaining
studies showed mixed results, with some reporting increased colonisation of
conventional brackets and others increased colonisation of self-ligating
brackets. The heterogeneity of study methods and outcomes precluded
meta-analysis. Conclusion: Of the 11 studies included in this systematic review,
five found no differences in colonisation between conventional and
self-ligating brackets. The remaining studies showed mixed results. The
evidence is inconclusive regarding the association between bracket design
and levels of microbial colonisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidhi P Parmar
- Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Nikki E Atack
- Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yap TL, Bergstrom N, Horn SD, Kennerly SM. The State of Pressure Injury Science: Going Beyond Cochrane to Inform Prevention and Guideline Development. Adv Skin Wound Care 2021; 34:385-388. [PMID: 34125729 DOI: 10.1097/01.asw.0000753108.63550.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey L Yap
- Tracey L. Yap, PhD, RN, CNE, WCC, FGSA, FAAN, is Associate Professor, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina. Nancy Bergstrom, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Trumble Professor of Aging Research (retired), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston. Susan D. Horn, PhD, is Adjunct Professor (retired), University of Utah, Salt Lake City. Susan M. Kennerly, PhD, RN, CNE, WCC, FAAN, is Professor, East Carolina University College of Nursing, Greenville, North Carolina
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Perillat L, Baigrie BS. COVID-19 and the generation of novel scientific knowledge: Evidence-based decisions and data sharing. J Eval Clin Pract 2021; 27:708-715. [PMID: 33580747 PMCID: PMC8013509 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted every facet of society, including medical research. This paper is the second part of a series of articles that explore the intricate relationship between the different challenges that have hindered biomedical research and the generation of novel scientific knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the first part of this series, we demonstrated that, in the context of COVID-19, the scientific community has been faced with numerous challenges with respect to (1) finding and prioritizing relevant research questions and (2) choosing study designs that are appropriate for a time of emergency. METHODS During the early stages of the pandemic, research conducted on hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) sparked several heated debates with respect to the scientific methods used and the quality of knowledge generated. Research on HCQ is used as a case study in both papers. The authors explored biomedical databases, peer-reviewed journals, pre-print servers and media articles to identify relevant literature on HCQ and COVID-19, and examined philosophical perspectives on medical research in the context of this pandemic and previous global health challenges. RESULTS This second paper demonstrates that a lack of research prioritization and methodological rigour resulted in the generation of fleeting and inconsistent evidence that complicated the development of public health guidelines. The reporting of scientific findings to the scientific community and general public highlighted the difficulty of finding a balance between accuracy and speed. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic presented challenges in terms of (3) evaluating evidence for the purpose of making evidence-based decisions and (4) sharing scientific findings with the rest of the scientific community. This second paper demonstrates that the four challenges outlined in the first and second papers have often compounded each other and have contributed to slowing down the creation of novel scientific knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucie Perillat
- Faculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian S Baigrie
- Institute for the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Feldman-Winter L, Bartick M, Marinelli K, Seo T, Stehel E, Adams A. Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Recommendations on Changes to Classification of Levels of Evidence for Clinical Protocols. Breastfeed Med 2021; 16:185-188. [PMID: 33577370 DOI: 10.1089/bfm.2020.0272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lori Feldman-Winter
- Children's Regional Hospital, Cooper University Health Care, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Melissa Bartick
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mount Auburn Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathleen Marinelli
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Tomoko Seo
- Greenwoods Children Clinic, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Elizabeth Stehel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Amanda Adams
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Teufer B, Ebenberger A, Affengruber L, Kien C, Klerings I, Szelag M, Grillich L, Griebler U. Evidence-based occupational health and safety interventions: a comprehensive overview of reviews. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032528. [PMID: 31831544 PMCID: PMC6924871 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Occupational injuries and diseases are a huge public health problem and cause extensive suffering and loss of productivity. Nevertheless, many occupational health and safety (OHS) guidelines are still not based on the best available evidence. In the last decade, numerous systematic reviews on behavioural, relational and mixed interventions to reduce occupational injuries and diseases have been carried out, but a comprehensive synopsis is yet missing. The aim of this overview of reviews is to provide a comprehensive basis to inform evidence-based decision-making about interventions in the field of OHS. METHODS We conducted an overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), the Cochrane Library (Wiley), epistemonikos.org and Scopus (Elsevier) for relevant systematic reviews published between January 2008 and June 2018. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full-text publications and determined the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews with the ROBIS (Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews) tool. RESULTS We screened 2287 abstracts and 200 full-texts for eligibility. Finally, we included 25 systematic reviews with a low risk of bias for data synthesis and analysis. We identified systematic reviews on the prevention of occupational injuries, musculoskeletal, skin and lung diseases, occupational hearing impairment and interventions without specific target diseases. Several interventions led to consistently positive results on individual diseases; other interventions did not show any effects, or the studies are contradictory. We provide detailed results on all included interventions. DISCUSSION To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive overview of behavioural, relational and mixed interventions and their effectiveness in preventing occupational injuries and diseases. It provides policymakers with an important basis for making evidence-based decisions on interventions in this field. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018100341.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birgit Teufer
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Agnes Ebenberger
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Lisa Affengruber
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Christina Kien
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Irma Klerings
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Monika Szelag
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Ludwig Grillich
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria
| | - Ursula Griebler
- Department for Evidence-based Medicine and Evaluation, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kollock RO, Lyons M, Sanders G, Hale D. The effectiveness of the functional movement screen in determining injury risk in tactical occupations. INDUSTRIAL HEALTH 2019; 57:406-418. [PMID: 30393251 PMCID: PMC6685800 DOI: 10.2486/indhealth.2018-0086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
Injures are common in workers engaged in tactical occupations. Research suggests that the functional movement screen (FMS) may provide practitioners the ability to identify tactical athletes most at risk for injury. However, there exists controversy as to the effectiveness of the FMS as a tool for classifying injury risk. The purpose of the meta-analysis was to determine the predictive value of the FMS in determining injury risk in workers engaged in tactical occupations. We searched MEDLINE, Military and Government Collection (EBSCO), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Technical Information Center and PubMed databases for articles published between January 2000 and October 2017 [corrected]. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Multiple random-effects model meta-analyses were conducted, with an odds ratio as the effects metric. FMS cut-off score, occupation, injury type and sex were used as moderators for the analyses. The odds of injury were greatest for tactical athletes with FMS scores ≤14. Personnel scoring ≤14 had almost 2 times the odds of injury as compared to those scoring >14. However, the magnitude of the effects were small; thus the relationship between FMS cut scores and injury prediction does not support its use as a sole predictor of injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger O Kollock
- Department of Kinesiology and Rehabilitative Sciences, The University of Tulsa, USA
| | - Madeline Lyons
- Department of Kinesiology and Rehabilitative Sciences, The University of Tulsa, USA
| | - Gabe Sanders
- Department of Kinesiology and Health, Northern Kentucky University, USA
| | - Davis Hale
- Department of Kinesiology and Rehabilitative Sciences, The University of Tulsa, USA
| |
Collapse
|