Dexmedetomidine use in pediatric airway reconstruction

Use of Dexmedetomidine and Opioids in Hospitalized Preterm Infants

Importance

Dexmedetomidine, an α2-adrenergic agonist, is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in premature infants. However, the off-label use of dexmedetomidine in premature infants has increased 50-fold in the past decade. Currently, there are no large studies characterizing dexmedetomidine use in US neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) or comparing the use of dexmedetomidine vs opioids in infants.

Objectives

To describe dexmedetomidine use patterns in the NICU and examine the association between dexmedetomidine and opioid use in premature infants.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A multicenter, observational cohort study was conducted from November 11, 2022, to April 4, 2023. Participants were inborn infants born between 22 weeks, 0 days, and 36 weeks, 6 days, of gestation at 1 of 383 Pediatrix Medical Group NICUs across the US between calendar years 2010 and 2020.

Main Outcome and Measure

Exposure to medications of interest defined as total days of exposure, timing of use, and changes over time.

Results

A total of 395 122 infants were included in the analysis. Median gestational age was 34 (IQR, 32-35) weeks, and median birth weight was 2040 (IQR, 1606-2440) g. There were 384 infants (0.1% of total; 58.9% male) who received dexmedetomidine. Infants who received dexmedetomidine were born more immature, had lower birth weight, longer length of hospitalization, more opioid exposure, and more days of mechanical ventilation. Dexmedetomidine use increased from 0.003% in 2010 to 0.185% in 2020 (P < .001 for trend), while overall opioid exposure decreased from 8.5% in 2010 to 7.2% in 2020 (P < .001 for trend). The median postmenstrual age at first dexmedetomidine exposure was 31 (IQR, 27-36) weeks, and the median postnatal age at first dexmedetomidine exposure was 3 (IQR, 1-35) days. The median duration of dexmedetomidine receipt was 6 (IQR, 2-14) days.

Conclusion and Relevance

The findings of this multicenter cohort study of premature infants suggest that dexmedetomidine use increased significantly between 2010 and 2020, while overall opioid exposure decreased. Future studies are required to further examine the short- and long-term effects of dexmedetomidine in premature and critically ill infants.

Perioperative Analgesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Otolaryngologic Surgery

This article reviews the evidence regarding current perioperative pain management strategies in pediatric patients undergoing otolaryngologic surgery. Pediatric otolaryngology is a broad field with a wide variety of surgical procedures that each requires careful consideration for optimal perioperative pain management. Adequate pain control is vital to ensuring patient safety and achieving successful postoperative care, but many young children are limited in their capacity to communicate their pain experience. Current literature holds a disproportionate amount of focus on pain management for certain procedures, whereas there is a paucity of evidence-based literature informing most other procedures within the field.

Sedation withdrawal following single stage laryngotracheal reconstruction: Does dexmedetomidine help?

OBJECTIVES

Single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction (SS-LTR) requires a period of post-operative intubation, during which time adequate sedation is needed to ensure graft healing. Commonly used agents include benzodiazepines, opioids, and more recently, dexmedetomidine, a centrally-acting α₂ adrenoreceptor. This study aims to compare withdrawal outcomes between various sedation regimens following SS-LTR.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 56 patients who underwent SS-LTR between 2008 and 2018 at a tertiary free-standing children's hospital was performed. Of 47 patients with complete records, 18 patients received dexmedetomidine for >75% of their intubation period with midazolam (DexWM), 9 received dexmedetomidine for >75% without midazolam (DexWOM), and 20 received dexmedetomidine for <75% with midazolam (noDex).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in length of PICU or hospital stay between the groups. The noDex group trended toward a higher re-intubation rate of 25%, as compared with 11% of DexWOM and 5.6% of DexWM (p = 0.21). There was no significant difference in days of oral sedation taper required or Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1) score for post-extubation days 1 and 3. By post-extubation day 5, 100% of the DexWM group had WAT-1 scores <3 as compared with 71.4% of the noDex group (p = 0.037). Notably, lower average daily doses of dexmedetomidine and midazolam were used in the DexWM group, as compared with the DexWOM and noDex groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine as a primary sedation agent with midazolam allows for adequate sedation following SS-LTR. The combination of the two drugs in the DexWM group not only reduced the dosage of each drug needed, but also significantly improved WAT-1 scores by post-extubation day 5, as compared with the alternative sedation regimens.

Dexmedetomidine facilitates extubation in children who require intubation and respiratory support after airway foreign body retrieval: a case-cohort analysis of 57 cases

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate whether dexmedetomidine had sedative weaning advantage for extubation after airway foreign body (FB) removal in children.

METHODS

A retrospective case-cohort comparison study with total of 57 critical children who required mechanical ventilation after rigid bronchoscopy was performed. After tracheal intubation, group D (received dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg over 10 min, followed by an infusion of 0.8 µg/kg/h), and group RP (received remifentanil-propofol 6-10 µg/kg/h and 1-3 mg/kg/h, respectively). The primary outcome was successful extubation rate on first weaning trial. The minor outcomes included weaning time, emergency agitation, coughing score and the incidence of respiratory adverse complications on emergency.

MAIN RESULTS

All 57 patients were included in the analysis, with 30 patients in group D and 27 controlled cases in group RP. The success rate of first weaning trial in the D group was 96.7 vs 77.8% in the RP group, risk ratio (RR) 1.56, 95% CI [0.78-1.98]. Time for resuming spontaneous breathing after termination infusion was shorter in the D group (median 8 min, IQR 15 min) vs RP group (median 12 min, IQR 19 min, P = 0.02, RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.14-6.57).

CONCLUSIONS

In mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients following rigid bronchoscopy, in comparison to remifentanil-propofol, dexmedetomidine is proved to have high success rate for weaning strategy. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN?: Remifentanil is proved to be effective for weaning in ICU patients. Dexmedetomedine can provide similar rates of smooth extubation for pediatric patients who underwent airway surgery. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS?: Invasive ventilation is used for patients with severe comorbidity after airway surgery, but the correct strategy for pediatric extubation after removal of airway foreign body remains unclear. For these patients with short-term mechanical ventilation, dexmedetomedine may improve the extubation rate, when compared with remifentanil-propofol.

Dexmedetomidine Decreases Postoperative Pain and Narcotic Use in Children Undergoing Alveolar Bone Graft Surgery

Objective:

Dexmedetomidine is a parenteral agent that combines the benefits of cooperative sedation, anxiolysis, and analgesia without the risks of respiratory depression. Off-label use has been reported in children. We have introduced dexmedetomidine for use in patients having undergone alveolar bone graft (ABG). The objective is to demonstrate the value and safety of postoperative dexmedetomidine infusion in a non-ICU setting following ABG.

Design:

A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent ABG by the senior author. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received postoperative dexmedetomidine and those who received patient-controlled anesthesia.

Main Outcome Measure(s):

The primary study outcome measures included patient demographics, adverse events, length of stay, pain scores, and doses of narcotics during admission were collected.

Results:

Inclusion criteria were met by 54 patients; 39 received dexmedetomidine whereas 15 did not. There were no significant differences between groups in age, gender, and length of stay. The patients who received dexmedetomidine used oral narcotics less often ( P = .01). In addition, more patients reported no pain after surgery ( P = .05) and at the time of discharge if they received dexmedetomidine ( P < .01). There were no reported adverse effects.

Conclusions:

Dexmedetomidine provided superior pain control after surgery and at the time of discharge, as well as a significant decrease in the use of oral narcotics. In our institution, it has since replaced the PCA as a postoperative pain control modality. Absent the risk for respiratory depression, dexmedetomidine has demonstrated a safe option for postoperative pain control in our focused group of pediatric patients.

Dexmedetomidine and propofol total intravenous anesthesia for airway foreign body removal

PURPOSE

To detail our experience using dexmedetomidine in combination with propofol for airway foreign body removal in spontaneously breathing patients.

CLINICAL FEATURES

Dexmedetomidine and propofol intravenous anesthesia as a primary anesthetic was used for three pediatric patients with severe respiratory impairment due to foreign body aspiration and two elderly patients requiring airway foreign body removal by rigid bronchoscopy. All patients were spontaneously ventilating, and had successful airway foreign body removal without severe hypoxemia. The three pediatric patients maintained stable respiratory and hemodynamic profiles. However, dexmedetomidine caused a significant change in the hemodynamics of the elderly patients.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine and propofol intravenous anesthesia provided good anesthesia without causing respiratory depression. However, this technique related to more hemodynamic depression in elderly patients than in pediatrics.

Dexmedetomidine for rigid bronchoscopy in an infant with tracheal web after ventricular septal defect patch repair

We report herein successful rigid bronchoscopy with preserved spontaneous breathing of a 54-day-old infant with tracheal web associated with previous ventricular septal defect (VSD) repair. We considered the use of dexmedetomidine in conjunction with intermittent ketamine from the following three clinical aspects. First, this infant was suffering from respiratory distress with chest retraction, the cause of which was not revealed by a computerized scan of the neck and chest. Second, the patient was scheduled for rigid bronchoscopy, which is accompanied by brief but strong stimulation. Third, this infant underwent congenital VSD heart repair approximately 1 month earlier.

Development of a stable isotope dilution UPLC-MS/MS method for quantification of dexmedetomidine in a small amount of human plasma

Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is a selective central α2-agonist with anesthetic properties and has been used in clinical practice for sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) after operations. In this study, an analytical assay for the determination of Dex in a small amount of plasma was developed for the application to pediatric ICU trials. The quantification of Dex was constructed using the original stable isotope Dex-d3 for electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) in the selected reaction monitoring mode. A rapid ultra-performance liquid chromatography technique was adopted using ESI-MS/MS with a runtime of 3 min. Efficacious concentration levels (50 pg/mL to 5 ng/mL) could be evaluated using a very small amount of plasma (10 μL) from patients. The lower limit of the quantification was 5 pg/mL in the plasma (100 µL). For sample preparation, a solid-phase extraction was used along with the OASIS-HLB cartridge type. Recovery values ranged from 98.8 to 100.3% for the intra- [relative standard deviation (RSD), 0.9-1.3%] and inter- (RSD, 0.9-1.5%) day assays. A stable test had recovery values that ranged from 97.8 to 99.7% with an RSD of 1.0-1.9% for the process/wet extract, bench-top, freeze-thaw and long-term tests. This method was used to measure the Dex levels in plasma from pediatric ICU patients. In the clinical ICU trial, the small amount of blood (approximate plasma volume, 200 μL) remaining from blood gas analysis was reused and targeted for the clinical analysis of Dex in plasma.

Dexmedetomidine as a Primary Sedative Agent after Single-Stage Airway Reconstruction

Objective

To examine the outcomes of children receiving dexmedetomidine after single-stage airway reconstruction.

Study Design

Historical cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary care children’s hospital.

Subjects and Methods

Of 61 eligible patients, 50 children undergoing single-stage airway reconstruction were included in the study. Thirty children received dexmedetomidine (Dex) as a primary sedative agent, and 20 received a more traditional sedation protocol (no Dex). Primary outcomes included complications, intubation lengths, and lengths of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU)/hospital admission. Secondary analysis incorporating polypharmacy and age was performed using multivariate linear regression models.

Results

Median age was 18.0 months. Age, sex, and weight were similar between the groups. Intubation length was equal in the 2 groups, and there were no statistical differences between lengths of PICU or hospital stay after extubation. Similarly, overall and individual complications were all similar, and there was no difference between the 2 groups in the amount of polypharmacy administered. On multivariate analysis, polypharmacy and younger age were independently correlated with an increase in overall complications, and polypharmacy alone was correlated with an increased length of stay after extubation.

Conclusion

The use of dexmedetomidine as a primary sedation agent after single-stage airway surgery does not appear to improve outcomes or decrease the need for additional pharmacologic agents. Polypharmacy was associated with an increase in overall complications and an increased length of stay after extubation. Although success can be expected in greater than 90% of these surgical patients, the optimal postoperative sedation management remains challenging.