The developmental relation between adenoid tissue and paranasal sinus volumes in 3-dimensional computed tomography assessment

Maxillary sinus volume and mucosal thickening according to the septal deviation angle and age of the children

We examined the relationship between nasal septal deviation (SD) angle and maxillary sinus volumes by examining the paranasal sinus computed tomography (PNSCT) images in children. In this retrospective study, PNSCT images of 106 children with one-sided nasal SD were included. According to the SD angle, two groups were identified: Group 1 (n = 54): SD angle ≤ 11°, Group 2 (n = 52): SD angle > 11°. There were 23 children between 9 and 14 years and 83 children between 15 and 17 years. Maxillary sinus volume and mucosal thickening were evaluated. In 15- to 17-year age group, maxillary sinus volumes of males were higher than females bilaterally. For each of the males and females, ipsilateral maxillary sinus volume was significantly lower than the contralateral side in all children and in 15- to 17-year age group. In each of the SD angle values (≤11 or >11) separately, ipsilateral maxillary sinus volume was lower; and in the SD angle > 11° group, maxillary sinus mucosal thickening values were higher than those of the contralateral side. In young children in 9- to 14-year age group, bilateral maxillary sinus volumes decreased, in this group maxillary sinus volume was not affected according to the SD. However, in 15- to 17-year age groups, maxillary sinus volume was lower on the ipsilateral SD side; and ipsilateral and contralateral maxillary sinus volumes of the males were significantly higher than those in the females. SD should be treated at an appropriate time to prevent SD-related maxillary sinus volume shrinkage and rhinosinusitis.

Evaluation of the associations between maxillary sinus dimensions and adenoid hypertrophy using multislice computed tomography

INTRODUCTION

Adenoid hypertrophy is especially common in childhood, raising the concern that such growth might affect maxillary sinus volumes during the developmental period. This study evaluated the developmental relationships between maxillary sinus volumes and adenoid hypertrophy via computed tomography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was examined computed tomographic images of 118 individuals: 61 boys and 57 girls. The participants were divided into a healthy control group (n = 59) and an experimental group (with adenoid hypertrophy) (n = 59). Raw data were recorded in DICOM format and analysed using the ITK-SNA algorithm; it was measured the right, left, and total maxillary sinus volumes and adenoid tissue sizes.

RESULTS

It was found significant between-group differences in the three maxillary sinus volumes and adenoid tissue dimensions (linear maximum anterior and posterior depth; maximum upper and lower height, and maximum width to the right and left) (all p<0.001). On the contrary, there was no significant difference according to sex in terms of either maxillary sinus volumes or linear adenoid tissue measurements. Maxillary sinus volumes increased significantly according to age in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Adenoid hypertrophy decreases the maxillary sinus volumes, regardless of sex. The impacts of adenoid growth on maxillary sinus aeration and sinus disease should be further investigated.

Histomorphometric evaluation of different graft associations for maxillary sinus elevation in wide antral cavities: a randomized controlled clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

Pneumatization of the maxillary sinus can make it difficult, if not impossible, to install osseointegrated implants, and undertake their eventual functional rehabilitation, which may ultimately require regenerative techniques to achieve. This randomized controlled study proposed conducting a histological evaluation of the behavior of different graft materials in wide maxillary sinuses, at a height of 8 to 10 mm from the alveolar ridge, combined with bone remnants less than 3mm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients underwent a sinus elevation procedure through the lateral window. The sinuses were randomly filled with the following materials (n=12/group): group 1, xenogenic bone + autogenous bone (ratio 70:30, respectively); group 2, xenogenic bone + L-PRF; and group 3, xenogenic bone. At 8 months, bone biopsies of engrafted sites were harvested and analyzed histomorphometrically in order to quantify newly formed bone tissue.

RESULTS

The results showed a greater area of newly formed bone for G1, averaging 2678.37 (1116.40) μm², compared with G2 at 984.87 (784.27) μm², and G3 at 480.66 (384.76) μm² (p < 0.05). Additionally, fewer xenogenic bone particles and a large amount of connective tissue were observed in G2.

CONCLUSIONS

In maxillary sinuses with large antral cavities, autogenous bone combined with xenogenic bone seems to demonstrate better graft remodeling and improve bone formation, compared with the addition of L-PRF.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

L-PRF produces few advantages regarding new bone formation in the wide maxillary sinuses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (REBEC) number RBR-2pbbrvg.

Accuracy and precision of manual segmentation of the maxillary sinus in MR images-a method study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy and precision of segmentation of the maxillary sinus in MR images to evaluate the potential usefulness of this modality in longitudinal studies of sinus development.

METHODS

A total of 15 healthy subjects who had been both craniofacial CT and MR scanned were included and the 30 maxillary sinus volumes were evaluated using segmentation. Two of the authors did segmentation of MRI and one of these authors did double segmentation. Agreement in results between CT and MRI as well as inter- and intraexaminer errors were evaluated by statistical and three-dimensional analysis.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient for volume measurements for both method error, inter- and intraexaminer agreement were > 0.9 [maximal 95% confidence interval of 0.989-0.997, p < 0.001] and the limit of agreement for all parameters were < 5.1%. Segmentation errors were quantified in terms of overlap [Dice Coefficient (DICE) > 0.9 = excellent agreement] and border distance [95% percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD) < 2 mm = acceptable agreement]. The results were replicable and not influenced by systematic errors.

CONCLUSION

We found a high accuracy and precision of manual segmentation of the maxillary sinus in MR images. The largest mean errors were found close to the orbit and the teeth. Advances in knowledge: MRI can be used for 3D models of the paranasal sinuses with equally good results as CT and allows longitudinal follow-up of sinus development.

Computed tomography-based volumetric tool for standardized measurement of the maxillary sinus

Volume measurements of maxillary sinus may be useful to identify diseases affecting paranasal sinuses. However, literature shows a lack of consensus in studies measuring the volume. This may be attributable to different computed tomography data acquisition techniques, segmentation methods, focuses of investigation, among other reasons. Furthermore, methods for volumetrically quantifying the maxillary sinus are commonly manual or semiautomated, which require substantial user expertise and are time-consuming. The purpose of the present study was to develop an automated tool for quantifying the total and air-free volume of the maxillary sinus based on computed tomography images. The quantification tool seeks to standardize maxillary sinus volume measurements, thus allowing better comparisons and determinations of factors that influence maxillary sinus size. The automated tool utilized image processing techniques (watershed, threshold, and morphological operators). The maxillary sinus volume was quantified in 30 patients. To evaluate the accuracy of the automated tool, the results were compared with manual segmentation that was performed by an experienced radiologist using a standard procedure. The mean percent differences between the automated and manual methods were 7.19% ± 5.83% and 6.93% ± 4.29% for total and air-free maxillary sinus volume, respectively. Linear regression and Bland-Altman statistics showed good agreement and low dispersion between both methods. The present automated tool for maxillary sinus volume assessment was rapid, reliable, robust, accurate, and reproducible and may be applied in clinical practice. The tool may be used to standardize measurements of maxillary volume. Such standardization is extremely important for allowing comparisons between studies, providing a better understanding of the role of the maxillary sinus, and determining the factors that influence maxillary sinus size under normal and pathological conditions.

Pneumatization Patterns of the Petrous Apex and Lateral Sphenoid Recess

Introduction  The petrous apex poses a challenge for surgical intervention due to poor access. As intraoperative image guidance and surgical instrumentation improve, newer endoscopic approaches are increasingly favored. This study aims to provide normative data on the anatomy of the lateral sphenoid sinus recess and petrous apex. These normative data could assist in determining the efficacy of a transnasal transsphenoidal approach to lesions of the anteroinferior petrous apex. Methods  This is a retrospective study investigating normative data on all maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scans performed at a level I trauma center over a 6-month period. All appropriate images had the pneumatization pattern of the petrous apex and lateral recess of the sphenoid sinus reviewed by a single otologist and graded bilaterally. These were then analyzed in SPSS; Pearson correlation analyses and χ ² test were used. Results  A total of 481 patients were identified, yielding a total of 962 temporal bones and sphenoid sinuses for analysis. Eighty-eight percent of sides analyzed had a nonpneumatized lateral recess. The petrous apex was nonpneumatized in 54% of sides analyzed. There was a correlation noted between the degree of pneumatization of the petrous apex and pneumatization of the lateral recess of the sphenoid. Conclusion  This study is the first to provide normative data comparing pneumatization of the petrous apex and sphenoid sinus. These data may support future work evaluating the utility of an endonasal approach to the petrous apex.

The effects of choanal atresia on development of the paranasal sinuses and turbinates

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the volume of paranasal sinuses (PNS) and turbinate in patients with unilateral choanal atresia (CA).

MATERIALS AND METHOD

Computed tomography images of PNS in 11 individuals with unilateral CA were evaluated retrospectively. Mucosal thickness and volume of the maxillary, frontal and sphenoidal sinuses were determined, in addition to the volume of the middle and inferior turbinate. The unaffected nasal side of patients was used as a control group for the measurements. The results comprised the measurements of the atresic side compared to those of the healthy side.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the atresic and healthy side of the nose in patients with CA with respect to mucosal thickness and volume of the PNS (the maxillary, frontal and sphenoidal sinuses) and the middle and inferior turbinate (p > 0.050).

CONCLUSION

The complete absence of nasal unilateral airflow had no effect on the development of the PNS and the middle and inferior turbinate. Moreover, mucosal thickness in the sinuses was similar to that in the control group.

The Effect of Nasal Septal Deviation on Frontal and Maxillary Sinus Volumes and Development of Sinusitis

The purpose of this study was to determine the possible role of nasal septal deviation on volume of maxillary and frontal sinuses. Between February 2011 and October 2013, paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) findings of 732 patients (410 males, 322 females) who were admitted to Ear Nose and Throat Department of Kayseri Research and Training Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. By excluding the other coexistent sinonasal pathologies, 83 consecutive patients with nasal septal deviations were included in the study. The volume of each maxillary and frontal sinus (ipsi- and contralateral to the deviation side) was also calculated using the computer program. There was no statistically significant difference between ipsilateral and contralateral maxillary sinus volumes in group 1 and group 3 (P > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between ipsilateral and contralateral maxillary sinus volumes in group 2 (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between ipsilateral and contralateral frontal sinus volumes in group 1, group 2, and group 3 (P > 0.05). Moderate septal deviation significantly affects the volume of maxillary sinus. Mild and severe septal deviation does not significantly affect the volume of maxillary sinus. Effect of septal deviation on frontal sinus volume was not detected. The probability to encounter maxillary and frontal sinusitis ipsilateral to the all septum deviation groups was significantly increased in both right- and left-sided subjects.

Maxillary Sinus Aeration in Allergic Rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the relationship between allergic rhinitis, which is an important reason of nasal obstruction, and maxillary sinus aeration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred fifteen patients who have a complaint of nasal obstruction and scheduled to undergo skin prick test (SPT) with a suspicion of allergic rhinitis (AR) were enrolled for this study. Thirty-two patients with positive SPT result and 30 patients with a negative SPT result were determined as group 1 and 2 (control group), respectively. A 3-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography images of the 62 patients was used to assess and calculate maxillary sinus volumes (MSVs).

RESULTS

Total maxillary sinus volumes were measured as 21.87 cm(3) and 30.15 cm(3) in group 1 and group 2, respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed between the MSVs of the groups (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Total maxillary sinus volumes were found to be significantly smaller for patients with a positive SPT compared to patients with a negative SPT. Thus, we may conclude that AR has a negative impact on maxillary sinus aeration.

Anatomical correlation between existence of concha bullosa and maxillary sinus volume

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess the effects of concha bullosa variation on maxillary sinus volume and uncinate angle.

METHOD

The study group included 169 patients (338 sides) who underwent either surgical or medical treatment with the diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis. The paranasal sinus computed tomography of these patients was analyzed to measure maxillary sinus volume, uncinate angle and existence of concha bullosa. Subsequently, these variables were evaluated to find out possible relationship inbetween.

RESULTS

Mean maxillary sinus volume and uncinate angle at right and left sides were 15.21 ± 0.47 and 15.51 ± 0.48 mm(3), 30.57 ± 0.62° and 30.20 ± 0.68°, respectively. There was no difference between patients with or without concha bullosa in regard to maxillary sinus volume and uncinate angle at both sides. Maxillary sinus volume and degree of uncinate angle did not show any significant correlation at both sides; r = -0.124, p = 0.107 and r = -0.136, p = 0.078.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, concha bullosa is a common anatomical variation at nasal cavity. The existence of concha bullosa does not have any association with the volume of maxillary sinus and angle of uncinate process.

Morphometric analysis of the maxillary sinus in patients with nasal septum deviation

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between nasal septum deviation, which is common in the general population, and maxillary sinus volume. A retrospective assessment was made for 96 patients with nasal septum deviation without coexisting sinonasal morbidity and compared to 60 healthy individuals. A three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography images was used to assess a total of 312 maxillary sinus volumes. Septal deviation angles and volumes were also measured to standardize and determine the severity of the septal deviations. Septal deviations were right-sided in 36.5% of the cases (n = 35) and left-sided in 63.5% (n = 61). Deviation angles varied between 5° and 24.4°, with a mean value of 12.9 ± 5.0. The mean value for the deviation volume was 4.6 ± 1.5 cm(3) (range 1.7-9.4). The right and left maxillary sinus volumes were 11.8 ± 4.7 cm(3) and 11.5 ± 4.4 cm(3), respectively, in control group. Statistically significant discrepancy was observed between the ipsilateral and contralateral maxillary sinus volumes, in regard to the side of the septal deviation in study group. Maxillary sinus volumes were found to be significantly smaller on the ipsilateral side of septal deviation compared with the contralateral side.

The effect of nasal septal deviation on maxillary sinus volumes and development of maxillary sinusitis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the possible role of nasal septal deviation on volume of maxillary sinuses and its relationship with development of maxillary sinusitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between May 2010 and September 2012, paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) findings of 825 patients (470 males, 355 females), who admitted to Ear Nose and Throat Department of Bozok University Medical Faculty were retrospectively analyzed. By excluding the other co-existent sino nasal pathologies, 109 consecutive patients (47 males, 62 females mean age 36 ± 13.4 years; range 18-71 years) with isolated nasal septal deviations were recruited for the study. The convex side of the septal curvature was accepted as the direction of deviation. The findings were grouped according to the radiologically measured angle of nasal septal deviations. The deviation angle of the nasal septum was described as; mild (<9°), moderate (the angle between 9° and 15°), or severe (15° and up). The volume of each maxillary sinus (ipsi- and contralateral to the deviation side) was also calculated using the computer program. Sinusitis was defined as any evident thickening of the maxillary sinus mucosa.

RESULTS

There were 62 females and 47 males with a mean age of 36 ± 13.4. Nasal septal deviation angles were found to range between 5° and 27.2° (mean 13° ± 3.4°). The right sided deviations included 19 mild (<9°, Group I), 16 moderate (9°-15°, Group II), and 16 severe (15° and up, Group III) cases. The left sided deviations included 19 mild (<9°, Group I), 19 moderate (9°-15°, Group II), and 20 severe (15° and up, Group III) subjects. Maxillary sinus volumes were compared between right and left sided deviation groups. We could not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the right maxillary sinus volumes of Groups I and II in left sided deviation cases (p = 0.77). In the same side, comparison of Groups I-III and Groups II-III, the maxillary sinus volume differences were found to be significantly meaningful (p = 0.001 and p = 0.013, respectively). Identical results were yielded in the right sided septal deviation group related to the maxillary sinus volumes of Groups I and II and Groups I-III and Groups II-III compartments (p = 0.99, p = 0.004 and p = 0.003, respectively). In both right and left deviation groups, ipsi and contralateral maxillary sinus volume comparements produced statistically significant results (p = 0.002 and p = 0.04, respectively). The presence of maxillary sinusitis findings were significantly increased in both group (p = 0.00). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that maxillary sinus volumes tend to be higher at the contralateral side of the severe septum deviations. In addition, the chance of finding maxillary sinusitis findings on ipsilateral to the severe septum deviation was significantly increased.