Sedation withdrawal following single stage laryngotracheal reconstruction: Does dexmedetomidine help?

OBJECTIVES

Single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction (SS-LTR) requires a period of post-operative intubation, during which time adequate sedation is needed to ensure graft healing. Commonly used agents include benzodiazepines, opioids, and more recently, dexmedetomidine, a centrally-acting α₂ adrenoreceptor. This study aims to compare withdrawal outcomes between various sedation regimens following SS-LTR.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 56 patients who underwent SS-LTR between 2008 and 2018 at a tertiary free-standing children's hospital was performed. Of 47 patients with complete records, 18 patients received dexmedetomidine for >75% of their intubation period with midazolam (DexWM), 9 received dexmedetomidine for >75% without midazolam (DexWOM), and 20 received dexmedetomidine for <75% with midazolam (noDex).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in length of PICU or hospital stay between the groups. The noDex group trended toward a higher re-intubation rate of 25%, as compared with 11% of DexWOM and 5.6% of DexWM (p = 0.21). There was no significant difference in days of oral sedation taper required or Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1) score for post-extubation days 1 and 3. By post-extubation day 5, 100% of the DexWM group had WAT-1 scores <3 as compared with 71.4% of the noDex group (p = 0.037). Notably, lower average daily doses of dexmedetomidine and midazolam were used in the DexWM group, as compared with the DexWOM and noDex groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine as a primary sedation agent with midazolam allows for adequate sedation following SS-LTR. The combination of the two drugs in the DexWM group not only reduced the dosage of each drug needed, but also significantly improved WAT-1 scores by post-extubation day 5, as compared with the alternative sedation regimens.

Gamma-hydroxybutyrate: is it a feasible alternative to midazolam in long-term mechanically ventilated children?

Aim: Benzodiazepines like midazolam are commonly used for long-term sedation of critically ill children requiring mechanical ventilation. Tolerance to midazolam may occur in these patients resulting in a ceiling effect with insufficient or missing sedative response to increases of midazolam infusion or bolus application. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a drug rotation protocol replacing continuous infusion of midazolam with gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) to counteract midazolam tolerance. Methods: This retrospective, observational study was conducted in a 14-bed pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary referral center. Thirty-three mechanically ventilated children with tolerance to midazolam who received continuous infusion of GHB were included. Success of drug rotation from midazolam to GHB was defined as adequate sedation with GHB and subsequent reduction of required doses of midazolam. Results: In our cohort, drug rotation for at least 2 days could be successfully performed in 10 out of 34 children resulting in subsequent reduction of required doses of midazolam. Drug rotation to GHB failed in 24 patients due to insufficient sedation resulting in a premature termination of the protocol. In these children, dosing of midazolam could not be reduced following drug rotation. We could not identify factors which predict success or failure of drug rotation from midazolam to GHB. Conclusions: The data from our single-center study suggest that drug rotation from midazolam to GHB may be worth trying in children with midazolam tolerance during long-term sedation, but physicians should be aware of possible treatment failure.

Outcomes Using a Postoperative Protocol in Pediatric Single-Stage Laryngotracheal Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate single-stage laryngotracheal reconstruction (ssLTR) outcomes before and after the implementation of a postoperative care protocol in pediatric patients.

METHODS

A case-control study with chart review was conducted at 2 tertiary academic centers from 2010 to 2016. Pediatric patients who underwent ssLTR with a postoperative care protocol were compared with those who did not receive care under this protocol. Data regarding perioperative management were collected and compared using χ² and Wilcoxon rank tests. Planned extubation, length of intubation in the intensive care unit, and complications were examined.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients completed ssLTR after the protocol was initiated, and 26 prior patients were used as control subjects. Planned extubation failed in 9 patients (35%) in the control group compared with 1 patient (5%) in the protocol group (P < .05). Using a structured protocol demonstrated a decrease in delayed extubation and intensive care unit stay (P < .05). Despite more postprotocol patients' requiring posterior graft placement, preprotocol patients were less likely to be extubated within 7 days (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors propose an intensive care unit protocol that uses a combination of pharmacologic agents to optimally reduce the risk for adverse events that delay time to extubation and thus decannulation. Timely extubation was more likely with the use of this postoperative care protocol using a multidisciplinary approach involving otolaryngologists, pharmacists, intensivists, and anesthesiologists.