The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for head and neck reconstruction: surgical technique and refinements

Cervico-acromial flap for large defects in face and neck reconstruction: 34-year experience

BACKGROUND

Extensive cervicofacial defects often lead to functional and aesthetic impairments. The pre-expanded cervico-acromial flap technique is reliable and cost-effective for addressing such defects.

OBJECTIVE

To introduce our 34 years' experience on pre-expanded cervico-acromial flap technique, emphasizing key surgical techniques.

METHOD

The supraclavicular artery and its main branches were evaluated with Doppler ultrasound preoperatively. Pre-expansion was performed in most cases to optimize flap dimensions, with the tissue expander placed at the subfascial level to preserve adequate blood supply. Once fully expanded, the cervico-acromial flap was raised and rotated to cover the cervicofacial defects. The pedicle was divided three weeks postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients (5-57 years) were finally included in this retrospective study. They all accepted the above-mentioned technique by the same senior surgeon from October 1990 to October 2024. The expanded flap sizes ranged from 15 × 7 cm to 35 × 15 cm. The follow-up lasted from 6 months to 9 years. All flaps survived without necrosis or infection. Patients expressed high satisfaction with functional and cosmetic outcomes in both donor and recipient areas.

CONCLUSIONS

The pre-expanded cervico-acromial flap is safe and effective for repairing the extensive cervicofacial defects. Thorough understanding of this flap's blood supply and careful design based on the vascular anatomy help to improve the flap's survival rate.

A modified supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects

OBJECTIVE

To overcome the limitation of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF), we describe a modified SCAIF which incorporates a portion of the upper trapezius and the superficial branch of the transverse cervical artery (TCA) for the reconstruction of oral and maxillofacial defects.

STUDY DESIGN

The modified SCAIF was used on 20 patients at our hospital between April 2013 and August 2022. All patients underwent resection of the primary lesion site and immediate reconstruction with the modified SCAIF. Demographic data and flap details were recorded. Complications were assessed for at least a 6-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

This study included 20 patients. The mean flap harvest time was 50 minutes. The mean flap length was 6.0 cm, and the mean flap width was 5.0 cm. All flaps of 20 cases survived with good appearance, and no shoulder morbidity was found during a follow-up period of at least 6 months.

CONCLUSION

The modified SCAIF is a versatile and reliable local flap option for moderate to large reconstruction in this special region after resection of the primary lesions. We found this simple flap design has overcome the limitations of the traditional one with a reliable blood supply and adequate tissue for larger defects.

Submental island flap versus supraclavicular island flap in oral tongue cancer reconstruction: Perioperative and functional outcomes

BACKGROUND

The primary treatment for oral tongue cancer in both early and advanced stages involves surgical resection, which often affects tongue function. When microvascular free flaps are unsuitable for tongue reconstruction following cancer ablation, locoregional pedicled flaps become viable alternatives, for example, submental and supraclavicular island flaps. This study compares perioperative and functional outcomes between submental and supraclavicular flaps in tongue cancer reconstruction.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed the outcomes of 46 patients who underwent tongue resection and reconstruction with a submental or supraclavicular island flap between January 2015 and December 2022. We evaluated patient demographics, flap outcomes, postoperative complications, and speech and swallowing outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 24 submental and 22 supraclavicular island flap reconstructions. While demographic data were similar between the two groups, the submental island flap group had significantly shorter operative times than the supraclavicular group (291 and 347 min, respectively, p = 0.018), reduced hospital stays (14.8 and 18.6 days, respectively, p = 0.016), fewer major recipient site complications necessitating interventions under general anesthesia (1 and 6 patients, respectively, p = 0.043), and less recipient wound dehiscence (1 and 8 patients, respectively, p = 0.009). Speech and swallowing outcomes were comparable in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The submental island flap appears to be a more favorable option for tongue reconstruction than the supraclavicular island flap, offering advantages in operative time, length of hospital stays, and lower rates of major complications and wound dehiscence.

Versatility of the supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck reconstruction

Objective

To present our experience using the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for head and neck reconstruction.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review to identify patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with SCAIF at our institution. The following data were collected: age, sex, surgical indications, flap harvest time, flap dimensions, length of hospital stay, complications, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Thirty-three patients underwent SCAIF reconstruction, of whom four underwent pectoralis major myocutaneous flap reconstruction simultaneously. Twenty flaps were used to repair pharyngeal or esophageal defects following resection for tonsillar, hypopharyngeal, laryngeal, and cervical esophageal cancers. Five flaps were used for tracheal reconstruction following resection for tracheal or thyroid gland cancer. Seven flaps were used for reconstruction of cervical skin defects or fistulas related to a previous treatment. One flap for tracheal stenosis following tracheotomy. The mean age of the patients was 60.69 ± 11.47 years. The mean flap harvest time was 32.00 ± 4.44 min. The mean flap size was 10.16 ± 3.91 × 5.78 ± 0.68 cm. The mean length of hospital stay is 24.84 ± 13.78 days. Three patients had partial necrosis of the distal portion of the flap, which resolved with anti-infection therapy and local wound care. One patient developed a fistula that was resolved with wound care and further surgical intervention. Complete flap loss or major complications were not observed. No donor site complication or compromised shoulder function was observed.

Conclusion

The SCAIF can be successfully used to reconstruct head and neck defects with good outcomes and limited morbidity.

Level of Evidence

4.

Effect of Preoperative Neck Radiotherapy on the Reconstruction of Head and Neck Defects With the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap

Purpose: The supraclavicular artery island (SAI) flap is commonly used in the reconstruction of head and neck defects. However, the safety of SAI flaps for neck irradiated patient needs to be verified. To investigate the safety of using the SAI flap for patients who have undergone neck radiotherapy, as well as the risk factors for flap complications. Materials and Methods: Sixty-one patients (16 irradiated and 45 nonirradiated) with SAI flap-reconstructed head and neck defects were included, and relevant data were collected retrospectively. The gender, age, body mass index, presence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative albumin level, and flap size between irradiated and nonirradiated patients had no significant difference. Results: No significant difference was observed in the incidence of complications (total, mild, or severe) between the radiotherapy and nonradiotherapy groups. In univariate analysis, preoperative radiotherapy was not associated with postoperative complications of the SAI flap procedure (P = 1.00), while a low preoperative albumin level was a significant risk factor for postoperative complications (P < .05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that preoperative radiotherapy does not increase the risk of SAI flap postoperative complications compared with surgical reconstruction alone.

Outcomes of internal mammary artery perforator flap in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review

This study aims to evaluate the functional and prognostic outcomes associated with the internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) flap in various head and neck defect repairs, given the current lack of clarity on its effectiveness. We performed a systematic review of various databases: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect using keywords such as "Internal mammary artery perforator flap" and "IMAP." Screening and data extractions were performed by two individual reviewers. Articles were considered eligible if they included sufficient information on IMAP flap features, their applications in the head and neck, and outcomes. From 264 articles analyzed, 24 studies were included for qualitative analysis. Out of which, 125 patients who received internal mammary artery perforator flaps were included. Most of the patients, 103 (88%), received pedicled IMAP flaps, and 22 (12%) received IMAP free flaps. The second internal mammary artery (IMA) was favored as the single perforator (81.5%), with the combination of the first and second IMA being the primary choice for dual perforators (92.5%). IMAP flaps were predominantly single perforator flaps (65%), with 35% being dual perforator flaps. Among various applications, IMAP flaps are commonly employed in the reconstruction of neck defects (25.5%), pharyngocutaneous fistula repair (20.8%), and burn scar contracture restoration (8%). Only seven (5.6%) patients had flap complications, including venous congestion (1.6%), partial necrosis (1.6%), complete necrosis (1.6%), and incision dehiscence (0.8%). Donor sites were predominantly closed by the primary closure (92%). 3.2% of donor sites had minor complications. The average follow-up was 12.6 (IQR: 6-18) months. This systematic review highlights the effectiveness and safety of IMAP flaps in head and neck reconstruction, with positive outcomes and minimal complications.

Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap for Treatment of Cervical Wound Defects and Persistent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks: A Technical Note and Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue defects and persistent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks can create complications after cervical spinal surgery. The supraclavicular artery island (SAI) flap is useful in closing tissue defects, particularly in these complex surgeries and multiple reinterventions. However, technical reports in this context are scarce. We describe application of the SAI flap technique to control persistent CSF leak in the first documented instance (to our knowledge) of a low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) in the cervical epidural space. Additionally, we conducted a comprehensive review of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar from their earliest records through December 17, 2023 using combined terms, "supraclavicular artery island flap AND spine" and "supraclavicular AND flap AND spine".

TECHNICAL NOTE

A 56-year-old woman with arm pain and weakness presented with a cervical epidural mass extending from C4-C6 and associated spinal cord compression. She underwent a 3-level corpectomy and tumor resection. Primary dural closure was impossible due to the dural invasion, and reintervention with an SAI flap and definitive lumboperitoneal shunting were required to control and seal the CSF leak.

SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW

Seven case reports describing SAI flap for spinal surgery complications were identified. The indications in those cases were correcting esophageal and hypopharyngeal perforations after cervical fusion and discectomy and persistent soft tissue coverage after cervical instrumentation.

CONCLUSIONS

The SAI flap technique provided wound defect coverage in this case and is suitable for addressing issues such as persistent CSF leaks or soft tissue coverage after cervical spine surgery.

Subunit Reconstruction With Local and Regional Flaps of a Total Cervicofacial Defect From Necrotizing Fasciitis

A 60-year-old woman with a ∼450 cm 2 right cervicofacial defect following successful treatment of necrotizing fasciitis was consulted for reconstruction. She had complete orbital, malar, buccal, labial, submental, and anterolateral neck skin and soft tissue defects and near complete defects of the forehead and nasal sidewall. She underwent reconstruction with a large 24 cm×11 cm supraclavicular, deltopectoral, forehead rotational, and labial advancement flaps with skin grafting of the orbit. Follow-up at 2 months demonstrated complete take of all flaps. The patient was satisfied with her appearance and considered her outcome favorable. She exhibited comparably premorbid speech and oral competence. Large defects of the head and neck require thorough surgical planning and consideration of a subunit reconstruction technique. While free tissue transfer provides a large area of healthy tissue from a suitable donor site, subunit reconstruction with local and regional flaps can provide a superior outcome in the correct patient.

Reconstruction of Adult Tubular Esophageal Duplication with Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap: A Rare Case Presentation

Adult esophageal duplication (ED) is a rare congenital anomaly that is rarely encountered in clinical practice. There have been only a few reported cases of adult tubular esophageal duplication. A patient presented with symptoms of odynophagia and dysphagia. Upon examination, gastroscopy and X-ray contrast imaging revealed the formation of a fistula in the upper esophagus that connected to a sinus tract running along the esophagus. After managing the initial infection, an open surgery was performed. The esophageal tubular duplication was removed and the defect was reconstructed using a supraclavicular artery island (SAI) flap. The post-operative recovery was uneventful and the patient's odynophagia and dysphagia were relieved. In conclusion, ED can be effectively diagnosed through esophagogram and gastroscopy. Surgical excision is currently the preferred treatment option, and the use of the SAI flap technique shows great promise in reconstructing the esophageal defect after surgery.

Experience of using a supraclavicular flap in reconstruction of oral cavity defects

Introduction. In case of cancer of the oral mucosa at the first stage, the standard treatment approach is radical surgical intervention, with the formation of extensive defects leading to aesthetic and functional disorders. Taking into account the characteristics of defects, choosing a flap is a difficult task. Currently, there is a wide selection of regional and microvascular free flaps. However, not all flaps meet the requirements. The supraclavicular fasciocutaneous flap, being a regional flap, has a number of advantages: easy to harvest, reliable due to the constancy of the vascular pedicle, primary closure of the donor site, scarcity of hair, the possibility of closing various defects of the oral cavity.

 Aim. To evaluate the possibility of using a supraclavicular flap in patients with oral cancer to restore the defects after surgical treatment.

Materials and methods. The study included 10 patients with malignant tumors of the oral cavity who underwent surgical intervention with defect replacement using supraclavicular flap at the N. N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology between February of 2015 and May of 2021. In 4 cases, buccal mucosa was affected; in 3 cases, the retromolar area; in 1 case, oral floor mucosa; in 1 case, mandibular alveolar ridge; in 1 case, mobile tongue. Flap sizes were 5–10 × 5–8 cm. Three (3) patients had history of radiotherapy, and 1 of them had a radical dose.

Results. In 4 patients without previous radiotherapy, partial flap necrosis was observed. In 1 patient, sutural diastasis in the oral cavity after partial flap necrosis was diagnosed. There were no cases of total flap necrosis and fistula formation. Suture dehiscence in the donor bed was observed in 1 patient only.

Conclusion. Use of supraclavicular flap is an option for oral cavity defect replacement after surgical intervention in patients with malignant tumors of the oral cavity producing satisfactory esthetic and functional results. The advantages of this flap are simple flap dissection, reliability of vascular pedicle, flexibility, possibility of replacing large defects, scant hair coverage.

Regional pedicled flap salvage options for large head and neck defects: The old, the new, and the forgotten

Objectives

The objective of this article is to review options for regional pedicled reconstruction for large head and neck defects in a salvage setting.

Methods

Relevant regional pedicled flaps were identified and reviewed. Expert opinion and supporting literature were used to summarize and describe the available options.

Results

Specific regional pedicled flap options are presented including the pectoralis major flap, deltopectoral flap, supraclavicular flap, submental flap, latissimus flap, and trapezius flap.

Conclusions

Regional pedicled flaps are useful options in a salvage setting even for large defects and should be in the armamentarium of any reconstructive head and neck surgeon. Each flap option carries specific characteristics and considerations.

Is Supraclavicular Artery Island flap (SAI) a viable alternative to Free Tissue Transfer (FTT) in head and neck reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of Supraclavicular Artery Island (SAI) Flap versus Free Tissue Transfer for head and neck reconstruction.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Library database according to the PRISMA guidelines. Only comparative studies between the two techniques were included. Random-effects model meta-analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Eight studies, reporting a total of 402 patients and same number of flaps, 165 of which underwent reconstruction using supraclavicular artery island flap and 237 reconstructed with free tissue transfer were identified. No statistically significant differences were observed regarding major complications, total flap necrosis, partial flap necrosis, post operative fistula formation, donor site dehiscence, recipient site dehiscence and total flap area.

CONCLUSION

Supraclavicular artery island flap and free tissue transfer seem to be comparable when used in head and neck reconstruction.

Surgical Use of Supraclavicular Artery Flap for Head and Neck Cancer Defects Repair: Personal Experience

Introduction  For a long time, major surgical defects after oncological surgery have always been challenging cases for surgeons in terms of wound healing and covering technique. Objectives  To demonstrate the feasibility of supraclavicular artery flap (SCAF) in the reconstruction of surgical defects in those "fragile" patients undergoing oncological surgery who could not possibly have endured the timeframes involved in using microvascular free flaps. Methods  Between January 2018 and January 2019, at the Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Bergamo Est Hospital (Bergamo, Italy), we reported the cases of 11 patients in whom the SCAF was used for surgical reconstruction after oncological surgery in our Otolaryngology Department. The median age of the 11 patients was 68.7 years old. Results  The SCAF has proved, in almost all 11 cases in which it was used, to be very reliable and, above all, easy and quick to make in those "fragile" patients without the need for further intervention. There was only one case in which the resection involved the auricle entirely and a small area of perimeatal bone exposure occurred, which, anyway, healed by secondary intention. Conclusion  The SCAF is an extremely versatile flap for head and neck surgery to be considered especially for fragile and vulnerable patients who cannot undergo prolonged surgical time. Moreover, this technique has also shown high feasibility in small hospitals where there is not a plastic surgery department and the surgeon may face the difficulty of practicing surgical reconstruction after enlarged resection.

A Comprehensive Review on the Supraclavicular Flap for Head and Neck Reconstruction

ABSTRACT

The supraclavicular artery flap (SCF) is a highly vascularized fasciocutaneous flap overlying the shoulder. The flap was first described in 1979 by Lamberty but did not gain popularity until much later due to lack of a reliable technique. The main advantages of using the SCF include avoiding microsurgical techniques, requiring only a single-stage operation, shorter operative time compared with alternative options, and a wider patient population including those with comorbidities who may be excluded from more extensive operations including free flaps surgeries. The SCF has been successfully performed on individuals with advanced age, poor nutrition, cachexia, obesity, diabetes, tobacco use, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease, peripheral vascular disease, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, asthma, and steroid use. The largest disadvantages of the SCF include the possibility of distal tip necrosis, size limitation without pre-expansion, and a moderately visible donor site scar. The following review and meta-analysis of the SCF details its use historically as both an island and a pedicle flap, and its application in head and neck reconstruction.

Revisiting the Cervicodeltopectoral Flap for Reconstruction of Cutaneous Head and Neck Defects: Technique Description and Clinical Presentation Correlates

STUDY DESIGN

Technique Description with clinical presentation Correlates.

PURPOSE

Revisit and discuss the advantages of the cervicodeltopectoral flap (CDP) as an alternative to microvascular reconstruction for head and neck cutaneous defects.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed on 2 patients with prior large cutaneous facial defects after tumor resection followed by cervicodeltopectoral flap reconstruction. These cases were performed at a single institution. The tumor resections, flap reconstructions, and postoperative management were led by the listed senior author (SPK).

RESULTS

A 78-year-old (Clinical presentation 1) and 62-year-old (Clinical presentation 2) were evaluated for large nonmelanoma skin cancers of the face. Due to significant comorbidities, neither patient was an ideal candidate for microsurgical reconstruction. In both cases, lesion resection and CDP flap reconstruction was performed. The reconstruction allowed for successful coverage without significant donor site morbidity for each patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors propose the addition of the CDP flap to the armamentarium of the head and neck reconstructive surgeon as a safe and reliable alternative to microvascular reconstruction.

Use of Supraclavicular Flap by End to Side Technique in Pharyngeal SCC: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Objectives

In recent years, conservation laryngeal surgeries, including partial pharyngectomy, have been introduced as an alternative procedure for selected cases of hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HSCC). Reconstruction of these defects presents a considerable challenge for the surgeon after partial pharyngectomy due to its circumferential nature. In this case report, we represent the innovative "End to side" technique to reconstruct hypopharyngeal defect using the rolled supraclavicular flap after laryngeal-preserving partial pharyngectomy.

Methods and Results

A 70-year-old female presented with a history of progressive dysphagia and odynophagia. The evaluations revealed a T3N0M0 SCC of pyriform sinus. The mass was successfully resected through partial pharyngectomy, and the hypopharyngeal defect reconstruction was achieved using the rolled supraclavicular flap via the "End to side" technique. The patient was discharged after decannulation on day 10. The 3-week barium swallow was performed with no evidence of anastomotic leakage, and the oral feeding was started after NG tube removal. At week 5, complete movement of the true vocal cord on the one side and good phonation and deglutition was observed. There was no evidence of recurrence after 1 year.

Conclusions

Laryngeal-preserving partial pharyngectomy and hypopharyngeal reconstruction with the rolled supraclavicular flap via the "End to side" technique could lead to good oncological and functional outcomes in selected cases of pyriform sinus.

A 3D visualization layered anatomy for acromial arterial rete and flap design

BACKGROUND

The acromial arterial rete (AAR) is the junction between the skin blood supply of the cervical side and that of the upper arm, and it is the only site crossed by the trans-regional blood supply of the cervico-humeral flap (CHF). The aim of this study was to explore the structures of AAR to optimizing flap design.

METHODS

A body arteriography and spiral CT scan were performed on 33 whole adult corpses. The 3D reconstruction was used to perform continuous digital layered anatomy of the shoulder and upper chest; the acromion and acromioclavicular joint were used as the center to observe the source, route and distribution characteristics of a perforating branch and their anastomosis.

RESULTS

The perforating branches were separated from an acromial branch of the transverse cervical artery (97%), posterior humeral circumflex artery (95%), a deltoid branch of the thoracoacromial artery (95%), and the acromial branch of the thoracoacromial artery (93%). The diameter of the acromial branch of the transverse cervical artery at its initial location was 1.18 ± 0.37 mm; the trunk length was 12.53 ± 3.83 cm, and it was anastomosed with other blood vessels in three forms.

CONCLUSION

Deep fascia should be included in the flap design. Three kinds of pedicled transfer flaps can be designed with the acromial branch of transverse carotid artery as the vascular pedicle. Free flaps can be designed with the acromial branch of thoracoacromial artery as the vascular pedicle.

Use of the supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of maxillofacial defects: a case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Free flaps are widely used in maxillofacial reconstruction; however, this approach was not feasible in the current case. It was not possible because the free flap method requires microvascular anastomosis expertise, which is difficult, time-consuming and costly.

CASE PRESENTATION

An 86-year-old woman suffered squamous cell carcinoma on the right side of her face, which resulted in a large soft-tissue defect. Here, we present a case of facial reconstruction from the inferior margin of the jaw to the top of the head. The size of the defect was 18.5 cm × 7.5 cm, which is rare for a patient of this age in the maxillofacial area. We used the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIFP) which measured 19.3 cm × 8.3 cm to repair the defect. After the operation, the flap survived without complications. Then, the patient was followed for 10 months and was satisfied with the aesthetic and functional results at the donor and recipient sites following the tumour resection. The tumour did not recur, and facial nerve function was preserved.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide a new choice for the reconstruction of large defects of the head and face, and expand the potential applications of the SCAIFP.

Supraclavicular Flap Reconstruction in Head and Neck Oncologic Surgery

Free flaps have been considered as the gold standard for reconstruction of head and neck region after ablative oncologic surgery. However, the reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium should also involve pedicled flaps for certain situations such as patients having comorbid diseases necessiating shorter duration of surgical procedure. The supraclavicular flap is a pedicled thin fasciacutaneous flap used to reconstruct the defects in head and neck area. The flap has advantages of wide rotation of arc, easy matching with skin color of recipient area and relatively shorter flap harvesting time. Its bloods supply depends on supraclavicular artery which is a branch of transverse cervical artery. Between August 2016 and September 2019, the pedicled supraclavicular flap was used to reconstruct 17 head and neck cancers patients after ablative oncologic surgery. In 15 patients this flap was primary choice and in 2 patients it was used as a salvage reconstructive tool. Two of 17 flaps had very distal partial necrosis. There was no total loss of any flap. Flap harvesting time was always less than 1 hour. Mean duration for drainage tube removal at the donor side was 5 days. Functional outcomes were perfect. In our suggestion pedicled supraclavicular flap is a very good alternative option to free flap reconstruction especially for skin and oral cavity defects.

Use of cervicothoracic rotation flap and osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap for a complex multilayered cheek defect reconstruction

We report the combination of osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap and extensive cervicothoracic flap to reconstruct a large through-and-through cheek and mandibular defect. In patients with difficult clinical settings, this approach reduces operative time and complications without compromising the functional and cosmetic outcomes.

Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap: Critical Appraisal and Comparison to Alternate Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The supraclavicular artery island (SAI) flap may be a good option for selected head and neck reconstruction due to its reliability, ease of harvest, and favorable color match. The objective of this study was to examine the rates of complications for the SAI flap in head and neck oncologic reconstruction, with examination of risk factors and comparisons to alternative flaps often considered the gold-standard soft-tissue flaps for head and neck reconstruction: the pectoralis myocutaneous (PMC), radial forearm free flap (RFFF), and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Consecutive SAI flaps were compared to PMC, RFFF, and ALT flaps (non-SAI flap group), all performed by the senior author from 2010 to 2018. The non-SAI flaps were included if an SAI flap could have been performed as an alternate flap. The groups were compared based on demographics, flap dimensions, site of reconstruction, operating time, total hospital stay, total hospital costs, and complications.

RESULTS

One hundred seven SAI flaps and 194 non-SAI flaps were identified. SAI flaps were used less commonly than non-SAI flaps for mucosal defects (P < .001). The SAI flap dimensions were narrower but longer than non-SAI flaps (P < .001). SAI flaps had higher rates of total complications, partial flap necrosis, flap dehiscence at the recipient site, fistula, donor site dehiscence, and minor complications compared to non-SAI flaps (all P < .05). SAI flaps had higher rates of total complications, recipient site dehiscence, fistula, and minor complications in both the oral cavity and all mucosal sites compared to non-SAI flaps (all P < .05). SAI flaps for mucosal reconstruction were associated with higher rates of total complications (54% vs. 34%, P = .04), flap dehiscence at the recipient site (32% vs. 14%, P = .03), and major complications (21% vs. 5%, P = .02), compared to cutaneous reconstruction. Complications were equivalent between SAI flaps and non-SAI flaps for cutaneous reconstruction (all P > .05). Multivariate analysis showed that SAI flaps were associated with any postoperative complication (odds ratio [OR]: 3.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.85-6.54), partial flap necrosis (OR: 5.69, 95% CI: 1.83-17.7), flap dehiscence (OR: 5.36, 95% CI: 2.29-12.5), donor site complications (OR: 11.6, 95% CI: 3.27-41.0), and minor complications (OR: 5.17, 95% CI: 2.42-11.0). Within the SAI flap group, SAI flap length >24 cm was associated with postoperative complications on multivariate analysis (OR: 5.09, 95% CI: 1.02-25.5, P = .048).

CONCLUSIONS

The SAI flap is best suited for cutaneous reconstruction of the face, neck, and parotid/temporal bone regions due to the favorable color match; the thin, pliable nature of the skin; ease of harvest; and equivalent complication rates compared to alternate soft-tissue flaps. However, the SAI flap is associated with more complications for oral cavity and mucosal site reconstruction when compared to RFFF and ALT flaps and should be used in selected cases that do not require complex folding. For all sites, flaps longer than 24 cm should be used with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2020.

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) in head and neck reconstruction: an Italian multi-institutional experience

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a thin and pliable pedicled flap that is easy and quick to harvest. Thanks to its particular features and high reliability, it is best indicated for the elderly or most fragile patients. SCAIF is very versatile, as it can be used for reconstruction of oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, facial and cervical skin and tracheostomal defects. We began using this flap in four Italian tertiary referral centres, with several indications, both as first treatment and as salvage surgery. The aim of the study was to demonstrate the easy reproducibility of the flap among four different centres. A series of 28 patients underwent head and neck reconstructions with SCAIF with no recorded complications during flap harvesting. After the very first cases, harvesting time was approximately 45 minutes; 24 patients had successful flap integration at the recipient site, while the remaining 4 suffered from partial flap necrosis, two of whom needed revision surgery. Other minor complications were reported at the recipient site, always at the most distal and most delicate portion of the flap. Donor site was always closed primarily, with only three cases of partial suture dehiscence. We only selected the most fragile patients for SCAIF reconstruction, such as the elderly or those with one or more comorbidities; for this reason, we reported some serious systemic complications and one intraoperative death. SCAIF is an easy reproducible flap, with multiple possible indications. Its use as an alternative to free flaps in the head and neck region is nowadays under discussion. Its use should be encouraged among head and neck surgeons thanks to its various advantages.

Head and neck reconstruction: The supraclavicular flap: technical note

INTRODUCTION

Defects reconstruction after oncologic resection is challenging and complex in head and neck tumors. The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the use of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) in head and neck reconstruction, in particular, when traditional free flaps is not recommended.

METHODS

We reviewed our two years' experience of the use of SCAIF on a total of 15 cases. In 10 cases, it was used as an alternative to free flaps after head and neck tumors resection. In 5 cases, SCAIF was used for revision surgery after a free flap failure. The indications for flap use have been defects due to resection of stage II-IV cancer in the head and neck region. The operative site, time, complications and functional outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

We identified 15 patients with a total of 16 SCAIF. One patient had received bilateral SCAIF. Out of the patients, 10 were men and 5 were women. Head and neck oncologic patients underwent tumor resection followed by immediate reconstruction using SCAIF. Among those 15 patients, 10 received previous radiotherapy in the head and neck region. All the patients had undergone multiple surgical procedures. Mean flap dimensions were 6.0cm (range, 5-7cm) wide and 22.0cm (range, 14-26cm) long. The proximal part of the flap was de-epithelialized to match the defect, resulting in a mean skin paddle length of 8.0cm (range, 5-12cm). After an average follow-up duration of 13 months (range 3-20 months), the flap survival rate was 90%. Two patients had had a partial loss of the flap. All the flaps were harvested in less than one hour. The donor sites were closed primarily and did not require any additional surgery. No donor site wound dehiscence had been reported. No infection or cellulitis were observed. None of the patients reported any functional donor site morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

The supraclavicular flap provides a safe option for head and neck reconstruction of oncologic defects when traditional free flap is not recommended. It is also an excellent alternative to radial forearm free flap (RFFF) in head and neck soft tissue reconstruction, especially in vessel-depleted neck.

Supraclavicular flap practice patterns and outcomes: A survey of 221 AHNS surgeons

OBJECTIVES

To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon supraclavicular flap (SCF) practice patterns and to identify variables associated with SCF complications.

METHODS

The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between November 11, 2016, and December 31, 2016. The primary outcome was frequency of SCF complications. Independent variables included demographics, training, practice patterns, and SCF techniques.

RESULTS

Adequate survey responses were obtained from 221 AHNS surgeons. Among these, 54.3% (n = 120) performed supraclavicular flaps (SCFs). Most surgeons used the SCF for cutaneous (n = 85; 78.7%) or parotid-temporal bone (n = 59; 54.6%) defects. Nearly one-third (n = 31; 29.8%) of surgeons experienced more than a "few" SCF complications. Surgeons experienced fewer pectoralis major flap (P < 0.001) and radial forearm free flap (P < 0.001) complications compared to SCF complications. Univariate analysis demonstrated no association between surgeons with "few" SCF complications and Doppler use in SCF design (P = 0.90), harvest location (P = 0.51), and pedicle skeletonization (P = 0.25). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that surgeons performing more than 30 SCFs compared to less than or equal to 30 SCFs had a greater odds of having "few" SCF complications (odds ratio 7.1, 95% confidence interval [1.1-43.9], P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

A majority of surgeons performing SCFs use the flap to reconstruct cutaneous and parotid-temporal bone defects. The significance of relatively higher SCF complications compared to other routine flaps should be explored further. Surgeon experience with the SCF appears to be significantly associated with SCF success, whereas training characteristics, practice patterns, and technical variations may not be associated with SCF outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 129:2012-2019, 2019.

Systematic Review of Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap vs Free Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review is to compare the surgical outcomes of supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) and free tissue transfer (FTT) in head and neck reconstruction.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Independent screening and data extraction were performed by 2 authors. Only studies that directly compared SCAIF and FTT were included. Data were pooled with random-effects meta-analysis to determine the standardized mean differences (SMDs), risk differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistics. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies tool was used to evaluate extent of bias in studies.

RESULTS

The initial query yielded 661 results, of which 4 comparative studies remained for final analysis. The pooled sample sizes for the SCAIF and FTT cohorts were 100 and 84, respectively. SCAIF was associated with reduction of operative time by a large effect size (SMD, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-2.52). The harvested flap areas and perioperative complications, including rates of total flap loss, partial flap necrosis, and recipient/donor site dehiscences, were comparable between the 2 procedures with low to high heterogeneity among studies.

CONCLUSION

SCAIF requires less operative time and has comparable short-term perioperative results to FTT. The findings of this study support the viability of SCAIF as an alternative to FTT and provide evidence for its inclusion in the reconstructive armamentarium of major head and neck ablation and trauma.

Otolaryngology resident experience with supraclavicular, submental and other regional flaps in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Despite the resurgence in regional flap use, otolaryngology resident regional flap experience has been incompletely studied. We sought to characterize United States (US) otolaryngology resident exposure to, and perceptions of, supraclavicular flaps (SCFs), submental flaps (SMFs), and other regional flaps.

METHODS

An online survey was disseminated every two weeks to 106 US otolaryngology residency program directors for distribution to residents within their programs between August and October 2016. 121 surveys were returned of which 106 were sufficiently completed and eligible for data analysis.

RESULTS

Among residents with adequate responses, 52 were postgraduate year (PGY) 1-3 (junior) residents and 54 were PGY 4-7 (senior) residents. Senior residents participated in more pectoralis major flaps (mean: 8.1, 95%-CI: 6.5-9.8) compared to SCFs (mean: 1.5, 95%-CI: 1.0-2.0, p < 0.001) and SMFs (mean: 0.7; 95%-CI: 0.4-1.0, p < 0.001). Among senior residents exposed to SCFs, SMFs and pectoralis flaps, more individuals judged pectoralis major flaps as successful or very successful (96.2%, 95%-CI: 91.1-100%), compared to SCFs (64.3%, 95%-CI: 46.5-82.0%; p < 0.001) and SMFs (63.2%, 95%-CI: 41.5-84.8%; p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Senior otolaryngology residents were exposed to fewer SCFs and SMFs compared to pectoralis major flaps. Resident perception that SCFs and SMFs were not as successful as pectoralis major flaps should be investigated further.

Shoulder Morbidity in Patients after Head and Neck Reconstruction with the Pedicled Supraclavicular Island Flap

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background:

The pedicled supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for reconstruction of the head and neck has been shown to be a pliable alternative to established pedicled flaps, such as the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Because there are limited published data regarding shoulder morbidity after SCAIF procedure, we aimed to investigate it with 2 established questionnaires for the upper extremity [Constant-Murley score and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure (DASH) score].

Methods:

The authors designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study of patients who received a defect reconstruction by SCAIF. Analyzed parameters were demographics, comorbidities, donor-site morbidity and shoulder morbidity in terms of range of motion, pain, strength, and daily activities evaluated and compared between the donor site and contralateral arm.

Results:

Of the 61 consecutively performed head and neck reconstructions with SCAIF, 20 met inclusion criteria (curative intended treatment, head and neck squamous cell cancer, follow-up time more than 4 months). Mean follow-up was 17.3 months (±10.4 months) ranging from 4–35 months. Donor-site complication rate was low with 5% major (surgical revision) and 30% minor complications (conservative management). Overall Constant-Murley-Score (P = 0.334), pain (P = 0.150), overall range of motion (P = 0.861), and strength of the extremity (P = 0.638) of the shoulder receiving a SCAIF showed no significant differences to the contralateral extremity. Mean of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome Measure score was 32.5 (±28.6).

Conclusion:

The results of the present study suggest very low shoulder morbidity in patients after SCAIF procedure with no significant functional impairment of the donor shoulder compared with the contralateral side.

[Research progress of pedicled flaps for defect repair and reconstruction after head and neck tumor resection]

Objective

To summarize the current status of pedicled flaps for defect repair and reconstruction after head and neck tumor resection, and to present its application prospects.

Methods

Related literature was reviewed, and the role evolution of pedicled flaps in the reconstruction of head and neck defects were discussed. The advance, anatomical basis, indications, advantages, disadvantages, and modification of several frequently used pedicled flaps were summarized.

Results

The evolution of pedicled flaps application showed a resurgence trend in recent years. Some new pedicled flaps, e.g., submental artery island flap, supraclavicular artery island flap, submandibular gland flap, and facial artery musculomucosal flap, can acquire equivalent or even superior outcome to free flaps in certain cases. Technological modification of some traditional pedicled flaps, e.g., nasolabial flap, pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap, temporalis myofascial flap, and temporoparietal fascial flap, can further broaden their indications. These traditional flaps still occupy an irreplaceable role, especially in patients with poor condition and institution with immature microsurgical techniques.

Conclusion

The pedicled flaps still plays an important role in head and neck reconstruction after tumor resection. In certain cases, they demonstrate some advantages over free flaps, e.g., more convenient harvest, more rapid recovery, less expenditure, and better functional and aesthetic effect.

Update on the supraclavicular flap

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this study is to describe the supraclavicular flap and its utility in head and neck reconstruction in the context of recent studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current literature regarding the supraclavicular flap has described its expanded uses in a variety of head and neck reconstructive settings. Its reliability and limited morbidity have been well demonstrated, and it has been cited as a reasonable alternative to other reconstructive options including, in some situations, free tissue transfer.

SUMMARY

The supraclavicular flap has shown dependability in reconstruction of defects in the head and neck, and it warrants consideration among reconstructive surgeons, especially for circumstances in which free tissue or other pedicled flaps are less than ideal.

Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF): a rising opportunity for head and neck reconstruction

Over the last 20 years, free flaps have represented the gold standard for moderate to large head and neck reconstruction. However, regional flaps continue to evolve and still play an important role in a reconstructive surgeon's armamentarium, especially for the more delicate patients who would certainly benefit from simpler surgical procedures. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a pedicled flap that has recently gained great popularity for reconstruction of most head and neck sites, because of its unusual versatility and wide arc of rotation. SCAIF is a fasciocutaneous flap that is very reliable and both easy and quick to harvest. It is pedicled on the supraclavicular artery, which is a branch of the transverse cervical artery. Between October 2012 and July 2015, at Ospedale San Raffaele (Milan, Italy) and Policlinico San Matteo (Pavia, Italy), we used the SCAIF procedure on 14 patients with cervical and facial skin, oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal defects after oncologic surgery or as revision surgery after free-flap failure. The presence of the supraclavicular artery was demonstrated preoperatively by computed tomography angiography. Harvesting time never exceeded 50 min. Functional outcomes were excellent, and the donor site was always closed. We reported only one case of tip desquamation, which was treated conservatively, and two cases of partial flap necrosis, which required revision surgery. In our opinion, SCAIF should be considered to be a valid alternative to free-flap reconstruction, especially for facial and cervical skin, floor-of-mouth, and hypopharyngeal defects; oropharyngeal defects may be harder to reconstruct.

Pedicled adipofascial infraclavicular flap: Elevation technique and its use for maintaining neck contour and vessel coverage after radical and modified radical neck dissection

BACKGROUND

The pedicled adipofascial infraclavicular flap (ICF) is based on the anterior perforator of the supraclavicular artery and supplies the fasciocutaneous tissue of the upper chest. This flap may be used to address neck contour defects and vessel coverage after radical and modified radical neck dissections (MRNDs).

METHODS

We described the pedicled adipofascial ICF elevation technique and its use immediately after neck dissections in order to maintain soft tissue volume and vessel coverage. A video of the operation is provided.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated satisfactory neck contours with adequate volume replacement, great vessel coverage, and little donor-site morbidity.

CONCLUSION

The pedicled adipofascial ICF is a technically straightforward operation with broad possible applications in head and neck surgery. It may be useful to provide vascularized soft-tissue coverage and maintain neck contour after neck dissections. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: First-1582, 2016.

Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap and Fasciocutaneous Free Flap

Objective

Outcomes of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) have not been extensively studied in comparison with free tissue transfer (FTT) flaps for head and neck reconstruction. We hypothesize that the pedicled SCAIF has decreased operating room time, length of stay, time to wound healing of recipient site, complications, and hospital charges as compared with FTT.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Tertiary care teaching hospital.

Subjects and Methods

Medical records were reviewed for patients who underwent SCAIF (n = 45) or FTT (n = 28) reconstruction between 2011 and 2013.

Results

Total operating room time was significantly lower for the SCAIF group vs the FTT group (6.7 vs 8.1 hours, P = .002). Procedural time was 5.7 hours for the SCAIF group, as compared with 7.2 hours for FTT group ( P = .0015). Mean area for SCAIF donor site was 63.89 cm2 vs 81.8 cm2 for the radial forearm free flap group ( P = .015). There was no significant difference in mean length of stay between SCAIF (8.8 days) and FTT (11 days, P = .12). Mean length of time to wound healing of the recipient site was similar in the SCAIF group vs the FTT group (17.3 vs 22.1 days, P = .071). Ratio of total hospital charges for SCAIF were 32% lower than that of FTT ( P = .0001).

Conclusion

This is among the first studies to compare SCAIF with FTT in a large cohort analysis. We find decreased operating room times for SCAIF vs FTT, with similar length of stay and wound healing. Other outcomes between SCAIF and FTT were also comparable.

Reconstruction of cervical scar contracture using axial thoracic flap based on the thoracic branch of the supraclavicular artery

PURPOSE

Cervical scar contracture causes both physical and psychological distress for burn patients. Many pedicle flaps or skin grafting have been suggested for reconstruction of cervical scar contracture with variable results in the literature. The authors present the axial thoracic flap based on the thoracic branch of the supraclavicular artery (TBSA) for reconstruction of cervical scar contracture.

METHODS

Postburn scar contractures in anterior neck region of 66 patients had been reconstructed with the axial pattern thoracic flaps based on the TBSA, including 1 expanded and 10 nonexpanded pedicle flaps, and 9 expanded and 46 nonexpanded island pedicle flaps, during 1988 through 2012. After removing and releasing the cervical scar contracture, the flap was designed in the thoracic region. The axial artery of the flap is the TBSA bifurcating from the intersection point of sternocleidomastoid muscle and omohyoid muscle with several concomitant veins as the axial veins. The flap can be designed in a large area within the borders of the anterior border of the trapezius muscle superiorly, the middle part of the deltoid muscle laterally, the midsternal line medially, and the level 3 to 4 cm below nipples inferiorly. After incisions were made along the medial, inferior, and lateral border, dissection was performed toward the pedicle. Donor site was closed directly in expanded cases and with skin grafting in nonexpanded cases.

RESULTS

Cervical scar contractures were repaired with good functional and cosmetic results in 64 cases among this cohort. Flap tip necrosis in other 2 cases, caused by postoperative hematoma, was repaired by skin grafting. The color and texture of all flaps were fitted with those of the surrounding skin. The donor sites all healed primarily. The flap sensation in the thoracic region regained in the early stage postoperatively and that in cervical area recovered completely after 6 months according to the report of the patients.

CONCLUSION

With reliable blood supply based on the dissection of cadavers, axial flap based on the TBSA is a good option for reconstructing severe cervical scar contracture.

Safety of the supraclavicular artery island flap in the setting of neck dissection and radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SAIF) has recently been repopularized as a versatile and reliable option for reconstruction of oncological head and neck defects. Prior ipsilateral neck dissection or irradiation is considered a relative contraindication to its use. The aim of this study was to describe the safety and utility of the SAIF for head and neck reconstruction in the setting of neck dissection and radiation.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of consecutive SAIF reconstructions at two institutions between May 2011 and 2014. In addition to demographic data, comorbidities, indications, surgical characteristics, data about radiation treatment, and neck dissection were specifically recorded. Donor and recipient site complications were noted. Fisher exact test was performed to analyze if neck dissection or radiation were associated with complications.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients underwent SAIF reconstruction for an array of head and neck defects. Donor site infection was noted in one patient. Recipient site complications included, wound dehiscence (n = 2), orocutaneous fistula (n = 1), carotid blowout (n = 1), and total flap loss (n = 1). There was no association between prior neck dissection or radiation treatment and flap loss (p = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

The SAIF is safe for use in patients who have had an ipsilateral neck dissection involving level IV or V lymph nodes and/or radiation treatment to the neck. It can be used alone or in combination with other flaps for closure of a variety of head and neck defects.

Shoulder function following reconstruction with the supraclavicular artery island flap

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) is a pedicled fasciocutaneous flap used for head and neck reconstruction. In recent years, its use has significantly increased as a result of several advantageous characteristics, including pliability, an excellent color and texture match, ability to reconstruct a variety of skin and aerodigestive tract defects, and short harvest times. Clinical experience suggests that donor site complications are relatively infrequent and typically self-limiting, and there have been no documented cases of prolonged or permanent shoulder dysfunction. However, formal studies have not been performed to assess this outcome. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of SCAIF flap harvest on postoperative shoulder strength and flexibility.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort pilot study.

METHODS

Data was gathered prospectively during routine follow-up and surveillance. The Penn Shoulder Score and Constant Shoulder Scale were used to measure subjective and objective outcomes. Physical therapists performed testing for strength and flexibility.

RESULTS

Ten patients were evaluated from January to July, 2013. Subjective self-reporting of shoulder function and satisfaction was good to excellent in most patients. The majority of patients demonstrated limitations in range of motion for one or more shoulder movements. Muscle strength was preserved postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Harvest of the SCAIF appears to have limited postoperative morbidity. Postoperative shoulder strength and function appears to be very good; however, some limitation of range of motion was observed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4