Substance Use Disorder as Risk Factor for Intubation in Angioedema: A Nationwide Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Individuals with angioedema (AE) are at high risk for airway compromise and often require endotracheal intubation. Patient factors predisposing one to airway compromise are not well described. The objective of this study is to examine whether substance use disorder (SUD) in patients with AE is associated with need for airway intervention.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective cohort study compared AE patients with SUD versus propensity-matched control groups. Outcomes were hospitalization, intubation, and tracheotomy. Using the TriNetX National Database, this study included 28,931 patients with SUD and 117,509 patients without SUD who presented with AE.

RESULTS

Among patients with AE, those with each subtype of SUD (alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, tobacco, and opioids) were found to have higher risk of severe AE compared to propensity-matched non-SUD cohorts. Rate of hospitalization after cohort matching ranged from 20.4% for tobacco use disorder to 30.4% for cocaine use disorder, all significantly higher than the 8.0% in a population without SUD. Each SUD subtype was associated with a higher rate of intubation compared with matched non-SUD groups, with cannabis use disorder having the highest relative risk (RR) of 3.67 (95% CI: 2.69-5.02). Tobacco (RR = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.79-3.34) and alcohol (RR = 2.82, 95% CI: 1.73-4.58) use disorders were both associated with significantly higher risk of tracheotomy.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that patients with SUD, regardless of subtype, and after propensity matching for demographics and comorbidities are at higher risk for adverse outcomes when presenting with AE. This study highlights clinically relevant predictors of airway compromise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Airway Involvement and Intervention in Non-ACE-Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema

OBJECTIVES

Characterize the presentation of patients with non-angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)-induced angioedema and determine risk factors associated with patient disposition and possible need for airway intervention.

METHODS

The medical records of adult patients in the Emergency Department (ED) and diagnosed with non-ACEI-induced angioedema over 4.5 years were included. Demographics, vital signs, etiology, timeline, presenting symptoms, physical exam including flexible laryngoscopy, medical management, and disposition were examined. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS V 23.0 software calculating and comparing means, standard deviations, medians, and correlation of categorical and ordinate variables.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients with non-ACEI-induced angioedema were evaluated with flexible laryngoscopy by otolaryngology. Notably, 11 patients (6.1%) required airway intervention and were successfully intubated. Statistically significant factors (p ≤ 0.05) associated with airway intervention included the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p = 0.006 and 0.01 respectively), symptoms of dysphonia (p = 0.018), the presence of oropharyngeal, supraglottic, and hypopharyngeal edema (p ≤ 0.001 for each site), and the number of edematous anatomic subsites documented on physical exam (p < 0.001). Other patient demographics, prior history of angioedema, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, symptom onset, number of symptoms at presentation, and medication administered in the ED did not correlate with airway intervention.

CONCLUSION

Dysphonia, DBP, MAP, anatomic location of edema and edema in multiple sites are associated with airway intervention and a higher level of care in non-ACEI-induced angioedema and can be useful in risk assessment in patient management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:2282-2287, 2024.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Other Medications Associated With Angioedema

Angioedema is a localized swelling of the dermis, subcutaneous tissues, and/or submucosal tissues caused by fluid extravasation into these tissues. Angioedema is associated with certain vasoactive molecules and is typically mediated by histamine or bradykinin. It manifests clinically as facial edema, swelling of the extremities and urogenital area, and potential involvement of the larynx, leading to dyspnea and inspiratory stridor, which can become life-threatening. Histamine-mediated angioedema is associated with urticaria and pruritus and will show classic signs of allergic (type 1 hypersensitivity) reactions. Bradykinin-mediated angioedema is often familial (hereditary angioedema) and is more often associated with gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), edema of the extremities and trunk, and a lack of urticaria and pruritus. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are a class of medications commonly prescribed for hypertension, heart failure, and diabetic nephropathy. ACEIs are associated with an increased risk of angioedema, which can range from a mild reaction to severe and life-threatening. ACEI-induced angioedema is a bradykinin-mediated reaction that can occur in individuals with a genetic predisposition. Other medications, such as angiotensin receptor blockers, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and certain antibiotics, most notably those in the beta-lactam class, can also cause drug-induced angioedema. The present investigation describes current knowledge of the pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, predisposing factors, and management of drug-induced angioedema.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema

Angioedema is a well-recognized and potentially lethal complication of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) therapy. In ACEi-induced angioedema, bradykinin accumulates due to a decrease in its metabolism by ACE, the enzyme that is primarily responsible for this function. The action of bradykinin at bradykinin type 2 receptors leads to increased vascular permeability and the accumulation of fluid in the subcutaneous and submucosal space. Patients with ACEi-induced angioedema are at risk for airway compromise because of the tendency for the face, lips, tongue, and airway structures to be affected. The emergency physician should focus on airway evaluation and management when treating patients with ACEi-induced angioedema.

Clinical predictors of endotracheal intubation in patients presenting to the emergency department with angioedema

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to identify predictors of airway compromise among patients presenting to the emergency department with angioedema in order to develop and validate a risk score to augment clinician gestalt regarding need for intubation.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of emergency department patients with a diagnosis of angioedema. After data extraction they were randomly divided into a training and test set. The training set was used to identify factors associated with intubation and to develop a model and risk score to predict intubation. The model and risk score were then applied to the test set.

RESULTS

A total of 594 patients were included. Past medical history of hypertension, presence of shortness of breath, drooling, and anterior tongue or pharyngeal swelling were independent predictors included in our final model and risk score. The Area Under the Curve for the Receiver Operator Characteristic curve was 87.55% (83.42%-91.69%) for the training set and 86.1% (77.62%-94.60%) for the test set.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple scoring algorithm may aid in predicting angioedema patients at high and low risk for intubation. External validation of this score is necessary before wide-spread adoption of this decision aid.

Angioedema Caused by Drugs That Prevent the Degradation of Vasoactive Peptides: A Pharmacovigilance Database Study

Angioedema results from the decreased degradation of vasoactive peptides such as substance P and bradykinin. In this study, we sought to clarify whether dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors that suppress the degradation of substance P and bradykinin are involved in angioedema onset. We calculated information coefficients (ICs) by performing a disproportionality analysis to evaluate DPP-4/ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. No angioedema signals were detected for DPP-4 inhibitors; however, a signal was detected for ACE inhibitors (IC: 2.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.19 to 2.65). Of the patients treated with DPP-4 inhibitors, four developed drug-induced angioedema in combination with ACE inhibitors, and all were taking vildagliptin. Signals were detected for enalapril (IC: 2.39, 95% CI: 2.06 to 2.71), imidapril (IC: 2.83, 95% CI: 2.38 to 3.27), lisinopril (IC: 2.28, 95% CI: 1.55 to 3.00), temocapril (IC: 1.35, 95% CI: 0.29 to 2.40), and trandolapril (IC: 1.57, 95% CI: 0.19 to 2.95). Both inhibitors inhibited the degradation of substance P and bradykinin and were thus expected to cause angioedema. However, no signal of angioedema was detected with the DPP-4 inhibitors, in contrast to some ACE inhibitors. This study found that ACE inhibitors and DPP-4 inhibitors, which inhibit the degradation of substance P and bradykinin, tended to have different effects on the onset of angioedema in clinical practice.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Angioedema

Angioedema is a well-recognized and potentially lethal complication of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) therapy. In ACEi-induced angioedema, bradykinin accumulates due to a decrease in its metabolism by ACE, the enzyme that is primarily responsible for this function. The action of bradykinin at bradykinin type 2 receptors leads to increased vascular permeability and the accumulation of fluid in the subcutaneous and submucosal space. Patients with ACEi-induced angioedema are at risk for airway compromise because of the tendency for the face, lips, tongue, and airway structures to be affected. The emergency physician should focus on airway evaluation and management when treating patients with ACEi-induced angioedema.

Emergency Department Intubations in Patients With Angioedema: A Report from the National Emergency Airway Registry

BACKGROUND

Angioedema, a localized swelling of subcutaneous and submucosal tissues, may involve the upper airway. A subset of patients presenting for emergent evaluation of angioedema will require intubation. Little is known about airway management practices in patients with angioedema requiring intubation in the emergency department (ED).

OBJECTIVE

To describe airway management practices in patients intubated for angioedema in the ED.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the National Emergency Airway Registry. All patients with an intubation attempt for angioedema between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2018 were included. We report univariate descriptive data as proportions with cluster-adjusted 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of 19,071 patient encounters, intubation was performed for angioedema in 98 (0.5%). First-attempt success was achieved in 81%, with emergency physicians performing the procedure in 94% of encounters. The most common device used was a flexible endoscope (49%), and 42% of attempts were via a nasal route. Pharmacologic methods included sedation with paralysis (61%), topical anesthesia with or without sedation (13% and 13%, respectively), and sedation only (10%). Among 19 (19%) patients requiring additional attempts, intubation was achieved on second attempt in 10 (53%). The most common adverse events were hypotension (13%) and hypoxemia (12%). Cricothyrotomy occurred in 2 patients (2%). No deaths were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Angioedema was a rare indication for intubation in the ED setting. Emergency physicians achieved first-attempt success in 81% of encounters and used a broad range of intubation devices and methods, including flexible endoscopic techniques. Cricothyrotomy was rare, and no ED deaths were reported. © 2021 Elsevier Inc.

C1 esterase inhibitor for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema at a community teaching health system: A brief retrospective propensity-matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi)-induced angioedema is a serious emergency that can cause life-threatening symptoms and death if not treated promptly. Potential treatment options for ACEi-induced angioedema include medications with limited evidence for use in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use, clinical efficacy, and angioedema-related medication costs of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1EI) for ACEi-induced angioedema.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study comparing patients who received C1EI to those who did not receive C1EI for ACEi-induced angioedema. The primary outcome of interest was comparing the proportion of patients who required intubation secondary to ACEi-induced angioedema. Secondary endpoints of interest were also included.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 22 patients were stratified into both the non-C1EI group and C1EI group, respectively. There was no difference between the groups with respect to the proportion of intubation (13.6% in the C1EI group vs. 9.1% in the non-C1EI group, p > 0.999). Mean cost of angioedema-related medication therapy was higher in the C1EI group compared to the non-C1EI group [$8758.95 (± $2959.30) vs. $15.91 (± $7.32), p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort study, the use of C1EI for ACEi-induced angioedema did not demonstrate improved outcomes with respect to intubation and resulted in increased costs. Larger, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to further validate the results of this study and to provide more clarity on the role of C1EI therapy in ACEi-induced angioedema.

Evaluation of staging criteria for disposition and airway intervention in emergency department angioedema patients

AIM

Angioedema is a nonpitting edema that can lead to death secondary to airway obstruction. Previously, a staging system based on localization of the angioedema was proposed for risk stratification of likelihood of need for admission or airway intervention. This study aims to evaluate a staging system based on angioedema localization as a method of predicting need for admission or airway intervention.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review of angioedema cases that presented to an academic emergency department (ED) from August 1, 2006, to January 31, 2018. Data were collected on location of swelling, treatment setting, and medical and procedural interventions. Cases were categorized by modified Ishoo criteria, defined as follows: 1, lips, face, periorbital, extremities, total body/diffuse swelling; 2, soft palate, posterior pharynx; 3, tongue; 4, larynx. Predictive probability of disposition by stage was then compared.

RESULTS

A total of 320 patients were included in this study (median age, 44 years; 54.4% female). Stage 4 was more likely to require intensive care unit care without (probability 17%) and with (67%) airway intervention compared with stage 1 without (2.5%) and with (0.1%) airway intervention. Conversely, stage 1 was more likely to be treated in ED and discharged (85%) compared with stage 4 (0%). Stage 4 was also more likely to require airway intervention (67%) compared with other stages (1, 0.1%; 2, 8.6%; 3, 16%).

CONCLUSION

Higher-stage patients were more likely to require higher levels of care and airway intervention. Thus, the staging system appears to be a valid method of predicting risk among ED angioedema patients.

Management of difficult airway among patients with oropharyngeal angioedema

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary difficult airway response team (DART), a quality improvement program, in the management of patients with difficult airway associated with oropharyngeal angioedema patients.

METHODS

Individual retrospective cohort study. Retrospective review of patient charts from July 2003 to June 2008 (pre-DART) and retrospective review of prospectively collected data from July 2008 to June 2013 (post-DART). Patients with angioedema were identified using International Classification of Disease codes 995.1 and 277.6. Patients were included in the study if an otolaryngologist was consulted for airway management. Patients were excluded if they had a history of angioedema but no active issues. Patient characteristics, airway evaluation, and interventions (intubation/surgical airway) were compared between the pre-DART and post-DART cohort.

RESULTS

The DART team attended to 27 patients with advanced oropharyngeal angioedema. Response time averaged 3.36 minutes. Preintubation fiberoptic airway evaluations were performed in 81% of the post-DART cohort and 56% of the pre-DART cohort. The incidence of patients requiring intubation was higher in the post-DART cohort (18 out of 27 [67%]) than the pre-DART (14 out of 36 [39%]) cohort. One emergency cricothyroidotomy was performed in each of the post-DART and pre-DART cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Angioedema of the larynx is a predictor of intubation or cricothyroidotomy. Fiberoptic-guided intubation is primarily used for establishing airway in angioedema patients. A multidisciplinary standardized approach such as the DART program offers adequate time and resources for airway evaluation prior to intervention and allows fewer number of attempts to secure an airway.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 129:1360-1367, 2019.

Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Other Drug-associated Angioedema

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents, β-lactam antibiotics, non-β lactam antibiotics, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are the most common classes of drugs that cause angioedema. Drug-induced angioedema is known to occur via mechanisms mediated by histamine, bradykinin, or leukotriene, and an understanding of these mechanisms is crucial in guiding therapeutic decisions. Nonallergic angioedema occurs in patients with genetic variants that affect metabolism or synthesis of bradykinin, substance P, prostaglandins, or leukotrienes, or when patients are taking drugs that have synergistic mechanisms. The mainstay in treatment of nonallergic drug-induced angioedema is cessation of the offending agents.

Inhalant allergen sensitization is an independent risk factor for the development of angioedema

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The etiology and risk factors for angioedema remain poorly understood with causative triggers often going undiagnosed despite repeated reactions. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between inhalant allergen sensitization and angioedema.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who had in vitro inhalant allergy testing from 2006 to 2010 was performed. Patients with a diagnosis of angioedema who underwent inhalant allergy testing were identified. Analyses for co-morbidities, class of sensitization, seasonal timing of angioedema, and concurrent use of known hypertensive medications that can cause angioedema were performed.

RESULTS

There were 1000 patients who underwent inhalant allergy testing and qualified for the study. 37/1000 had at least one episode of angioedema and of these patients, 34 had positive inhalant sensitization testing results. Multivariate regression models showed overall sensitization status, seasonal allergen and epidermal/mite sensitization as independent risk factors (p<0.001, p=0.005, p=0.025 respectively) when controlling for ACE inhibitor use and other covariates. Tree, and epidermal/mite sensitizations were independent risk factors for angioedema in mono-sensitized subject analysis (p=0.028, p=0.029, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Both seasonal and perennial allergen sensitizations are independent risk factors for the development of angioedema. In patients with angioedema and an unknown trigger, inhalant allergen sensitization should be considered as a potential contributing factor to the development of angioedema.

Emergency Department Airway Management of Severe Angioedema: A Video Review of 45 Intubations

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Angioedema is an uncommon but important cause of airway obstruction. Emergency airway management of angioedema is difficult. We seek to describe the course and outcomes of emergency airway management for severe angioedema in our institution.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, observational study of all intubations for angioedema performed in an urban academic emergency department (ED) between November 2007 and June 2015. We performed a structured review of video recordings of each intubation. We identified the methods of airway management, the success of each method, and the outcomes and complications of the effort.

RESULTS

We identified 52 patients with angioedema who were intubated in the ED; 7 were excluded because of missing videos, leaving 45 patients in the analysis. Median time from arrival to the ED to the first intubation attempt was 33 minutes (interquartile range 17 to 79 minutes). Nasotracheal intubation was the most common first method (33/45; 73%), followed by video laryngoscopy (7/45; 16%). Two patients required attempts at more invasive airway procedures (retrograde intubation and cricothyrotomy). The intubating laryngeal mask airway was used as a rescue method 5 times after failure of multiple methods, with successful oxygenation, ventilation, and intubation through the laryngeal mask airway in all 5 patients. All patients were successfully intubated.

CONCLUSION

In this series of ED patients who were intubated because of angioedema, emergency physicians used a range of methods to successfully manage the airway. These observations provide key lessons for the emergency airway management of these critical patients.

Diagnostic approach to sudden onset of diffuse isolated oedema of the lips

In the light of a case of sudden onset of diffuse, isolated oedema of the lips, the authors describe the key points of the diagnostic approach and the main epidemiological and clinical data.