One-stage cochlear implantation in patients with chronic otitis media using canal wall up mastoidectomy

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implantation (CI) with subtotal petrosectomy was recommended to avoid the complications for patients with chronic otitis media (COM).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of CI in patients with COM using a one-stage operation with canal wall up mastoidectomy (CWUM).

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with COM who underwent CI with CWUM as a one-stage between 2009 and 2017 were participated. They divided into those with inactive COM and active COM. The anatomical success rate, postoperative complication, and hearing outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients had inactive COM and seven with active COM. Three of the 31 patients (9.7%) had otorrhea from the ear undergone surgery. Two of these three patients had myringitis after CI and their symptoms improved after conservative management. Although infection of the tympanic membrane in the third patient was controlled after conservative management, a perforation was left. Postoperative otorrhea occurred in two patients (8.3%) in the inactive COM group and one patient (14.3%) in the active COM group.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that infection control and successful implantation can be achieved through a one-stage CI operation with CWUM in selected patients with COM.HIGHLIGHTSAlthough COM was once considered a contraindication to CI, CI in patients with COM has been made feasible by STP before CI or simultaneously with CI.Simultaneous CI with CWUM was performed for 31 patients with COM.Three patients (9.7%) had minor complications after the surgery and only one patient experienced device explantation which was due to device failure.

Cochlear Implantation in Chronic Otitis Media With Cholesteatoma and Open Cavities: Long-term Surgical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term surgical outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in chronic otitis media (COM) with cholesteatoma and open cavities using subtotal petrosectomy (STP). To review device explantation (DE) patients and reimplantation considerations.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Otology and skull base center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Charts of 35 patients (36 ears) with COM with cholesteatoma, including open cavities, who underwent CI were reviewed for surgical outcomes and DE. Patient demographics, pathologies, previous surgeries, staging of implantation, salient intraoperative findings at the time of implantation and follow-up were evaluated. Details of patients with DE were evaluated for cause, operative findings, and reimplantation considerations.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 65.94 years. Nineteen open cavities, 11 primary cholesteatomas, 3 petrous bone cholesteatomas, and 3 atelectatic middle ears represented the pathologies with 31 patients of CI with concurrent STP and 5 patients where implantation was staged. The mean follow-up was 7.16 years ranging from 2 to 13 years. Four patients (11%) had DE due to extrusion and cavity infection with three reimplanted in same or contralateral ear. All explantations occurred within 24 months of primary implantation. No residual or recurrent cholesteatoma was observed in any of the patients during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

CI is feasible in COM with cholesteatoma and open cavities with the use of STP and single-stage implantation can be performed in the absence of purulence. Despite low risk of residual cholesteatoma post meticulous disease removal, risk of DE remains, particularly in open cavity patients, and is higher than standard implantation. Reimplantation is often possible with careful considerations.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Surgical Complications following Cochlear Implantation in Canal Wall Down Mastoid Cavities

Objective

We sought to assess the complication rates following cochlear implantation in canal wall down mastoid cavities in adults and children.

Data Sources

A systematic review of English articles from PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Additional studies were identified by reviewing the reference lists of the originally identified studies.

Review Methods

Studies were included that reported on surgical outcomes following cochlear implantation in canal wall down mastoid cavities. Two authors, using predefined data fields, independently reviewed all articles while tabulating study quality indicators. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted on select cohorts to determine weighted complication rates.

Results

Forty-two articles were included that accounted for 424 patients and described surgical outcomes following cochlear implantation in canal wall down mastoid cavities. In a comparison of the postoperative complication rates, overclosing the external auditory meatus had significantly fewer global complications than did maintaining a canal wall down mastoid cavity ( P = .027). In a comparison of the complication rates (1) between staging the cochlear implantation and performing external auditory meatus overclosure simultaneously with cochlear implantation and (2) between pediatric and adult cochlear implantation recipients with external auditory meatus overclosure, there were no significant differences ( P = .085 and P = .92, respectively).

Conclusion

Overclosing the external auditory meatus at the same time of cochlear implantation leads to significantly fewer complications when compared with maintaining a canal wall down mastoid cavity with soft tissue coverage of the electrode array.