Induction Chemotherapy plus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy vs Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Induction plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in elderly patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinomas (LANPCs) remain subjects of debate. This study evaluated the efficacy of IC+CCRT compared to CCRT alone in elderly LANPC patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 335 elderly patients diagnosed with stage III or IVa NPC who received CCRT with or without IC between 2010 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were used to estimate and compare survival rates. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression model was conducted to assess prognostic risk factors. Toxicities were compared using the χ2 test.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 69.3 months (interquartile range: 42.7-72.6). Baseline clinical characteristics were well-balanced between groups. No significant differences were observed between IC+CCRT and CCRT for any survival-related endpoints, including overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.26, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.77, p = 0.188), locoregional relapse-free survival (HR=1.03, 95 % CI: 0.56-1.91, p = 0.913), distant metastasis-free survival (HR=1.39, 95 % CI: 0.90-2.16, p = 0.139), and failure-free survival (HR = 1.25, 95 % CI: 0.85-1.83, p = 0.255). However, the incidence and severity of acute and late toxicities were significantly higher in the IC+CCRT group compared to the CCRT group.

CONCLUSION

In elderly LANPC patients, the addition of IC to CCRT did not improve survival outcomes, but was associated with significant toxicities.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in elderly patients with stage III-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A real-world study based on medical comorbidities

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes and toxicities of adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in elderly (≥65 years) patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC, stage III-IVa).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using an NPC-specific database, 245 elderly patients with stage III-IVa NPC, receiving CCRT +/- NAC, and an Adult Co-morbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE-27) score <2 were included. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) based on TNM stage and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA were applied for risk stratification. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Two risk groups were generated by the RPA model. In the high-risk group (EBV DNA < 4000 copy/ml with stage IVa & EBV DNA ≥4000 copy/ml with stage III-IVa), patients treated with NAC plus CCRT achieved improved 5-year DFS rates compared to those who received CCRT alone (56.9% vs. 29.4%; p = 0.003). But we failed to observe the survival benefit of additional NAC in the low-risk group (EBV DNA <4000 copy/ml with stage III). The most common severe acute toxic effects were leucopenia (46.8% vs. 24.4%) and neutropenia (43.7% vs. 20.2%) in the NAC plus CCRT group versus CCRT group with statistically significant differences.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of NAC to CCRT was associated with better DFS for the high-risk group of elderly LANPC patients with ACE-27 score <2. However, the survival benefit of additional NAC was not observed in low-risk patients.

Significance of chemotherapy for older patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: A propensity score matching analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the survival and prognosis of older patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) alone versus IMRT plus chemotherapy using propensity score matching (PSM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 841 older patients with NPC aged 60 years and above without metastasis receiving IMRT alone or chemoradiotherapy from 2012 to 2019. The comorbidity was assessed by adult comorbidity evaluation (ACE-27). PSM (1:3 ratio) was conducted between the two treatment groups based on four clinical factors including age, T-stage, N-stage, and ACE-27. Differences in overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

A total of 841 patients with NPC were included in the study, there were 94 patients in the IMRT alone group and 747 patients in the chemoradiotherapy (CRT) group. After a 1:3 ratio PSM, 89 patients underwent IMRT alone and 223 patients underwent CRT. The baseline analysis showed an insignificant difference after PSM (P > 0.05). In multivariate analysis, we found that ACE-27 (≥2) was associated with worse five-year OS and CSS (HR = 1.994, 95%CI: 1.276-3.116, P = 0.002; HR = 1.849, 95%CI: 1164-2.935, P = 0.009, respectively). Chemotherapy was an independent prognosticator of better five-year OS and CSS (HR = 0.333, 95%CI: 0.213-0.552, P < 0.001; HR = 0.327, 95%CI: 0.204-0.524, P < 0.001, respectively). In terms of subgroup analysis, chemotherapy was a statistically beneficial predictor for stage III-IV patients (P < 0.05), but no significant difference in stage II patients (P > 0.05). About the adverse events, the incidence of hepatotoxicity (P = 0.002), neutropenia (P < 0.001), anemia (P < 0.001), and thrombocytopenia (P < 0.001) were significantly higher in the CRT group.

DISCUSSION

Combined modality therapy was associated with improved five-year OS and CSS in older adults with stage III-IV NPC, but was not associated with improved survival over IMRT alone in patients with stage II disease. Risk factors including T3-4 disease, positive lymph nodes, ACE-27 score ≥ 2, and IMRT alone were were associated with worse OS and CSS. There was a significantly higher incidence of hepatotoxicity and blood toxicity in the CRT group.

The Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Human Papillomavirus-Positive Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in a Single-Institution Cohort

BACKGROUND

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a head and neck cancer more frequent among East Asian populations compared with Western populations. While much is known about human papillomavirus's (HPV's) role in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), little is known about its prevalence and prognostic value in NPC. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of HPV in NPC treated with definitive radiotherapy at a single institution.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of patient's medical records and HPV status treated for NPC in Rambam Health Care Campus (Rambam HCC). Immunohistochemical staining for p16 was used as a surrogate marker of HPV infection in the tumor cells. All specimens were stained and evaluated by pathologists at the referring center independently.

RESULTS

In total, 87 patients diagnosed with NPC were treated at Rambam HCC between 2005 and 2018. Seventy-four patients had accessible data on the disease's clinical parameters and p16 status. In total, 10/74 (13.5%) had p16-positive staining in tumor cells; 75% were men and over 50% were smokers. The average age of diagnosis for the whole cohort was 48 years, being lower for p16-positive patients compared with p16-negative patients at 43 and 49 years old, respectively. A total of 84% of the patients had advanced disease of stage III and IV at presentation. Only 16% were diagnosed with stage I and II. Unlike the p16-negative group, the p16-positive group did not include any stage I or II disease. In univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival rates, the age at diagnosis and the nodal spread status were the only statistically significant measures. P16 status was not found to be associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The HPV prevalence in NPC is nontrivial. p16-positive patients had significantly less nodal spread and tended to be younger. Both age and nodal status were significantly correlated with the survival, but P16 status was not prognostic. Further large-scale trials are needed to elucidate the role of HPV in NPC.

Prognostic model on overall survival in elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a recursive partitioning analysis identifying pre-treatment risk stratification

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the optimal management for elderly patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

METHODS

A total of 283 elderly patients with NPC diagnosed from 2015 to 2019 were enrolled in the study. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were preformed to identify potential prognostic factors. The recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used for risk stratification. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were applied to evaluate the survival endpoints, and log-rank test was utilized to assess differences between groups. The prognostic index (PI) was constructed to further predict patients' prognosis displayed by nomogram model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) and the calibration curves were applied to assess the effectiveness of the model.

RESULTS

Based on RPA-based risk stratification, we demonstrated that elderly NPC patients who were treated with IC followed by RT had similar OS as those with induction chemotherapy (IC) combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in the middle- (stage I-III and pre-treatment EBV > 1840 copies/ml) and high-risk groups (stage IVA). IMRT alone may be the optimal treatment option for the low-risk group (stage I-III with pre-treatment EBV ≤ 1840 copies/ml). We established an integrated PI which was indicted with stronger prognostic power than each of the factors alone for elderly NPC patients (The AUC of PI was 0.75, 0.80, and 0.82 for 1-, 3-, 5-year prediction of OS, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We present a robust model for clinical stratification which could guide individual therapy for elderly NPC patients.

A nonendemic analysis of the patterns and prognosis of de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinomas in older patients aged ≥ 65 years

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors related to overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) aged ≥ 65 years in nonendemic areas. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for elderly patients with M1 stage NPC at initial diagnosis between 2004 and 2016. This study examined 100 patients and evaluated the relationship of sex, age, race, pathological grade, T stage, N stage, sequence number, site of metastasis, number of metastatic organs, and other related factors with OS and CSS. The median survival and follow-up time were 10 and 48 months, respectively. The survival curves for race, bone metastasis, radiation, and chemotherapy significantly affected OS on the log-rank test. Advanced N stage and liver metastasis may be associated with poor survival. Race, bone metastasis, and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors of OS. Bone metastasis was associated with poor survival. The survival curves for CSS were significantly different between races, N stage, sequence number, and bone metastasis. In Cox regression multivariate analysis, only sequence number had an independent effect on prognosis. This study revealed that chemotherapy prolonged survival in elderly patients with metastatic NPC, whereas bone metastasis shortened survival.

Management of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in Elderly Patients

Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is one of the most difficult cancers in the head and neck region due to the complex geometry of the tumour and the surrounding critical organs. High-dose radical radiotherapy with or without concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy is the primary treatment modality. Around 10%–15% of NPC patients have their diagnosis at age after 70. The management of NPC in elderly patients is particularly challenging as they encompass a broad range of patient phenotypes and are often prone to treatment-related toxicities. Chronologic age alone is insufficient to decide on the management plan. Comprehensive geriatric assessment with evaluation on patients’ functional status, mental condition, estimated life expectancy, comorbidities, risks and benefits of the treatment, patients’ preference, and family support is essential. In addition, little data from randomized controlled trials are available to guide treatment decisions in elderly patients with NPC. In deciding which treatment strategy would be suitable for an individual elderly patient, we reviewed the literature and reviewed the analysis of primary studies, reviews, and guidelines on management of NPC. This review also summarises the current evidence for NPC management in elderly adults from early to late stage of disease.

Institutionally validated nomogram predicting prognosis for older patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Aim: Older adult patients with nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) have poor outcomes relative to younger patients. The authors' group established a nomogram to predict the overall survival of older adults with NPC and inform patient management. Methods: Cases with NPC (n = 782) were enrolled in this study; clinical data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2010 to 2015 served as the training cohort (n = 657), and patients from Jiangxi Cancer Hospital (n = 125) served as the external validation cohort. Results: Training and external validation cohort C-index, receiver operator characteristics curves and calibration curves showed that our nomogram has great predictive ability. Conclusions: Compared with tumor-node-metastasis staging, this nomogram can help clinicians better predict the prognosis of older adults with nonmetastatic NPC.

Combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A SEER population-based study

Currently, the impact of chemotherapy (CT) on survival outcomes in elderly patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving radiation therapy (RT) remains controversial. This retrospective study aims to investigate survival outcomes in a cohort of elderly NPC patients receiving RT alone or together with CT.Clinical data on 529 NPC patients aged 65 years and older extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry (2004-2015) was collected and retrospectively reviewed. In this cohort, 74 patients were treated with RT alone and 455 individuals received RT and CT. We used propensity score matching with a 1:3 ratio to identify correlations between patients based on 6 different variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The differences in OS and CSS between the 2 treatment groups were compared using the Log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models.The estimated 5-year OS and CSS rates for all patients were 49.5% and 59.3%, respectively. The combination of RT and CT provided longer OS than RT alone (53.7% vs 36.9%, P = .002), while no significant difference was observed in CSS (61.8% vs 51.7%, P = .074) between the 2 groups. Moreover, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the combination of CT and RT correlated favorably with OS and CSS. Subgroup analyses showed that the combination of RT and CT correlated better with both OS and CSS in patients with stage T3 or N2 or stage III.Among NPC patients aged 65 years and older, treatment with RT and CT provided longer OS than RT alone. Furthermore, the combination of RT and CT showed a better correlation with OS and CSS in NPC patients with stage T3 or N2 or stage III.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with additional chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A pooled analysis of propensity score-matching studies

OBJECTIVE

To determine the benefits of adding induction chemotherapy (IC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) based on propensity score-matching (PSM) studies.

METHODS

Eligible PSM studies were searched in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases from inception to September 1, 2020. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS).

RESULTS

A total of 14 trials consisting of 4086 participants were included. Significant benefits were observed between IC + CCRT and CCRT for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.91) and DMFS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.94) with the exception of LRFS (HR, 1.14; 95% CI: 0.90-1.43). However, CCRT + AC did not achieve significant improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

IC with CCRT yields significant survival benefits in terms of OS and DMFS, whereas CCRT with AC fails to achieve any additional benefit in all endpoints.

MRI-Based Deep-Learning Model for Distant Metastasis-Free Survival in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Distant metastasis is the primary cause of treatment failure in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).

PURPOSE

To develop a model to evaluate distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in LANPC and to explore the value of additional chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for different risk groups.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

In all, 233 patients with biopsy-confirmed nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) from two hospitals.

FIELD STRENGTH

1.5T and 3T.

SEQUENCE

Axial T₂ -weighted (T₂ -w) and contrast-enhanced T₁ -weighted (CET₁ -w) images.

ASSESSMENT

Deep learning was used to build a model based on MRI images (including axial T₂ -w and CET₁ -w images) and clinical variables. Hospital 1 patients were randomly divided into training (n = 169) and validation (n = 19) cohorts; Hospital 2 patients were assigned to a testing cohort (n = 45). LANPC patients were divided into low- and high-risk groups according to their DMFS (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare the DMFS of different risk groups and subgroup analysis was performed to compare patients treated with CCRT alone and treated with additional chemotherapy to CCRT in different risk groups, respectively.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Univariate analysis was performed to identify significant clinical variables. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to assess the model performance.

RESULTS

Our deep-learning model integrating the deep-learning signature, node (N) stage (from TNM staging), plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-DNA, and treatment regimens yielded an AUC of 0.796 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.729-0.863), 0.795 (95% CI: 0.540-1.000), and 0.808 (95% CI: 0.654-0.962) in the training, internal validation, and external testing cohorts, respectively. Low-risk patients treated with CCRT alone had longer DMFS than patients treated with additional chemotherapy to CCRT (P < 0.05).

DATA CONCLUSION

The proposed deep-learning model, based on MRI features and clinical variates, facilitated the prediction of DMFS in LANPC patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE

4.

Comparison of induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy and induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC + CCRT) is a standard treatment regimen for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC). However, the increased acute toxicity of this intensified chemotherapy may counteract its efficacy. The results of studies focusing on the omission of concurrent chemotherapy (CC) regimens are controversial. Therefore, we carried out a meta-analysis to elucidate the efficacy and toxicity of IC + CCRT versus IC plus radiotherapy alone (IC + RT) for LA-NPC.

METHODS

Studies available on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrails.gov were independently searched by two investigators from inception to March 1, 2020. Review Manager software 5.3 (RevMan 5.3) was employed to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs), risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eight studies with a total of 2605 patients were analysed. The results showed that no significant difference between IC + RT and IC + CCRT for disease-free survival (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0,85-1.39, P = 0.50), overall survival (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.78-1.09, P = 0.34), local recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.95-1.67; P = 0.10), or distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.84-1.26, P = 0.79). Notably, the incidence of treatment-related grade 3/4 acute haematological toxicity during radiation was higher in the IC + CCRT group. Subgroup analysis showed similar survival outcomes for IC + CCRT and IC + RT with and without the two-dimensional RT technique.

CONCLUSIONS

IC + RT was as effective as IC + CCRT for the management of LA-NPC. The IC + RT regimen has the possibility of replacing the IC + CCRT regimen for LA-NPC in the future due to the lower toxicity, although more high-level evidence is urgently needed for verification.

Therapeutic patterns and outcomes in older patients (aged ≥65 years) with stage II-IVB Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: an investigational study from SEER database

Purpose: Currently, the optimal treatment regimens for older nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients remained unclear. The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate therapeutic patterns and survival outcomes for a cohort of older NPC patients receiving radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy (CT). Methods: The clinical data of 529 patients with aged ≥65 years and NPC, who were identified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry (years 2004-2015), were collected and retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 74 patients treated with RT alone and 455 cases were administrated for RT plus CT. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The differences in OS and CSS were compared using Log-rank test. Results: The estimated OS and CSS rates at 5 years were 48.9% and 59.6%, respectively. Univariate analysis indicated that age, histology, T stage, and clinical stage were independent prognosticators of OS and CSS, while treatment option was only associated with OS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that age, T stage, histology, and therapeutic strategy were correlated with OS, while age, T stage and histology were independent prognostic factors of CSS. Subgroup analyses showed that the combination of RT and CT yielded better OS and CSS in patients with stage T3 or N2 or III. Conclusion: Among these NPC patients with aged ≥65 years reported in the SEER database, treatment with RT plus CT provided longer OS than those treated with radiation therapy alone. Moreover, the combination of RT and CT obtained favorable OS and CSS in NPC patient stage T3 or N2 or III.

Comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy alone vs. intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy in elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients (aged >65 years)

PURPOSE

The efficacy and tolerability of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy in the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) remain controversial among older patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The present study compared IMRT alone with IMRT in combination with chemotherapy in elderly NPC patients.

METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2014, 102 patients aged >65 years with NPC who received IMRT alone (IMRT group) or IMRT in combination with chemotherapy (IMRT/CT group) were enrolled. Patients from both treatment arms were pair-matched (1:1 ratio) based on six clinical factors. Differences in overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models, whereas the toxicity profile was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted in OS (72.1% vs. 72.5%, p = 0.799), DFS (65.9% vs. 70.1%, p = 0.733), LRRFS (76.4% vs. 71.6%, p = 0.184), and DMFS (90.8% vs. 98.0%, p = 0.610) between the IMRT and IMRT/CT groups. Multivariate analyses showed that chemotherapy was not an independent factor for OS, DFS, LRRFS, and DMFS. However, the incidences of grade 3 vomiting/nausea (p = 0.000), leukopenia/neutropenia (p = 0.000), thrombocytopenia (p = 0.041), and anemia (p = 0.040) were significantly higher in the IMRT/CT group compared with the IMRT group. No grade 4 toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSION

IMRT alone was similar to IMRT/CT in treating elderly NPC patients (age >65 years), with comparable survival outcomes and less grade 3 toxicities.

Reprint of Long-term survival and late toxicities of elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated by high-total- and fractionated-dose simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To analyse the survival and late toxicities of elderly nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with the high-total- and fractionated-dose simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy (SMART) boost technique and to identify the effect of concurrent chemotherapy for these patients.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-four elderly patients (age ≥ 60.0) with newly diagnosed non-metastatic NPC were retrospectively analysed. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software program.

RESULTS

The actual mean total and fractionated doses delivered to the gross tumour volume of the nasopharynx (GTVnx) were 74.55 Gy and 2.49 Gy, respectively. The 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort were 93.0%, 85.7%, 83.2% and 74.1%, respectively. No grade 4 acute or late radiotherapy-induced toxicities were observed. Of 247 patients with stage II-IVb disease, 89 patients received radiotherapy (RT) alone, and 158 patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and the 5-year LRRFS, DMFS, DSS and OS of the RT-alone group vs. the CCRT group were 94.0% vs. 92.2%, 83.5% vs. 86.2%, 81.8% vs. 83.1% and 74.0% vs. 72.8% (all P > 0.05), respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that CCRT was not an independent predictor for LRRFS, DMFS, DSS and OS (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

High-total- and fractionated-dose SMART boost IMRT could obtain a satisfactory long-term outcome with mild late toxicity in elderly NPC patients. The role of CCRT needs to be further studied to optimize the treatment strategy and improve the overall survival.

Practice patterns and outcomes of chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for older patients with nasopharyngeal cancer

Older patients are at increased risk of toxicities from aggressive oncologic therapy and of nononcologic death. A meta‐analysis of non‐nasopharyngeal head and neck cancers showed no statistical benefit in adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) in older patients; another meta‐analysis of RT versus chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in NPC found advantages to CRT, but vastly under‐represented patients ≥70 years old. This is the largest study to date evaluating outcomes of CRT versus RT alone in this population. The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was queried for primary nasopharyngeal cancer cases (2004–2013) in patients ≥70 years old receiving RT alone or CRT. Patients with unknown RT/chemotherapy and T1N0 or M1 disease were excluded. Logistic regression analysis ascertained factors associated with CRT delivery. Kaplan–Meier analysis evaluated overall survival (OS) between both cohorts. Cox proportional hazards modeling determined variables associated with OS. In total, 930 patients were analyzed (n = 713 (77%) CRT, n = 217 (23%) RT). Groups were relatively balanced; CRT was less frequently delivered in patients with advancing age, lower nodal burden, and females (P < 0.05 for all). Median OS in the CRT and RT groups were 35.3 versus 20.0 months, respectively (P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of OS included age, comorbidities, income and insurance status, tumor grade, and stage (P < 0.05 for all). Notably, receipt of chemotherapy independently predicted for improved OS (P = 0.036). CRT, compared to RT alone, was independently associated with improved survival in NPC patients ≥70 years old. CRT appears to be a promising approach in this population, but treatment‐related toxicity risks should continue to be weighed against potential oncologic benefits.