1
|
Standiford TC, Farlow JL, Brenner MJ, Conte ML, Terrell JE. Clinical Decision Support Systems in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: A State of the Art Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 166:35-47. [PMID: 33874795 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211004529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To offer practical, evidence-informed knowledge on clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) and their utility in improving care and reducing costs in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. This primer on CDSSs introduces clinicians to both the capabilities and the limitations of this technology, reviews the literature on current state, and seeks to spur further progress in this area. DATA SOURCES PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. REVIEW METHODS Scoping review of CDSS literature applicable to otolaryngology clinical practice. Investigators identified articles that incorporated knowledge-based computerized CDSSs to aid clinicians in decision making and workflow. Data extraction included level of evidence, Osheroff classification of CDSS intervention type, otolaryngology subspecialty or domain, and impact on provider performance or patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Of 3191 studies retrieved, 11 articles met formal inclusion criteria. CDSS interventions included guideline or protocols support (n = 8), forms and templates (n = 5), data presentation aids (n = 2), and reactive alerts, reference information, or order sets (all n = 1); 4 studies had multiple interventions. CDSS studies demonstrated effectiveness across diverse domains, including antibiotic stewardship, cancer survivorship, guideline adherence, data capture, cost reduction, and workflow. Implementing CDSSs often involved collaboration with health information technologists. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE While the published literature on CDSSs in otolaryngology is finite, CDSS interventions are proliferating in clinical practice, with roles in preventing medical errors, streamlining workflows, and improving adherence to best practices for head and neck disorders. Clinicians may collaborate with information technologists and health systems scientists to develop, implement, and investigate the impact of CDSSs in otolaryngology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janice L Farlow
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael J Brenner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Marisa L Conte
- Department of Research and Informatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Terrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jacquemard T, Doherty CP, Fitzsimons MB. The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:9. [PMID: 33541335 PMCID: PMC7859903 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00574-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This manuscript presents a framework to guide the identification and assessment of ethical opportunities and challenges associated with electronic patient records (EPR). The framework is intended to support designers, software engineers, health service managers, and end-users to realise a responsible, robust and reliable EPR-enabled healthcare system that delivers safe, quality assured, value conscious care. METHODS Development of the EPR applied ethics framework was preceded by a scoping review which mapped the literature related to the ethics of EPR technology. The underlying assumption behind the framework presented in this manuscript is that ethical values can inform all stages of the EPR-lifecycle from design, through development, implementation, and practical application. RESULTS The framework is divided into two parts: context and core functions. The first part 'context' entails clarifying: the purpose(s) within which the EPR exists or will exist; the interested parties and their relationships; and the regulatory, codes of professional conduct and organisational policy frame of reference. Understanding the context is required before addressing the second part of the framework which focuses on EPR 'core functions' of data collection, data access, and digitally-enabled healthcare. CONCLUSIONS The primary objective of the EPR Applied Ethics Framework is to help identify and create value and benefits rather than to merely prevent risks. It should therefore be used to steer an EPR project to success rather than be seen as a set of inhibitory rules. The framework is adaptable to a wide range of EPR categories and can cater for new and evolving EPR-enabled healthcare priorities. It is therefore an iterative tool that should be revisited as new EPR-related state-of-affairs, capabilities or activities emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Jacquemard
- FutureNeuro, the SFI Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, RCSI, 123 Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Colin P. Doherty
- FutureNeuro, the SFI Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, RCSI, 123 Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
- St. James’s Hospital, James’s Street, Dublin 8, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, College Green, Ireland
| | - Mary B. Fitzsimons
- FutureNeuro, the SFI Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, RCSI, 123 Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jacquemard T, Doherty CP, Fitzsimons MB. Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review. BMC Med Ethics 2020; 21:76. [PMID: 32831076 PMCID: PMC7446190 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00514-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Electronic patient record (EPR) technology is a key enabler for improvements to healthcare service and management. To ensure these improvements and the means to achieve them are socially and ethically desirable, careful consideration of the ethical implications of EPRs is indicated. The purpose of this scoping review was to map the literature related to the ethics of EPR technology. The literature review was conducted to catalogue the prevalent ethical terms, to describe the associated ethical challenges and opportunities, and to identify the actors involved. By doing so, it aimed to support the future development of ethics guidance in the EPR domain. Methods To identify journal articles debating the ethics of EPRs, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed academic databases were queried and yielded 123 eligible articles. The following inclusion criteria were applied: articles need to be in the English language; present normative arguments and not solely empirical research; include an abstract for software analysis; and discuss EPR technology. Results The medical specialty, type of information captured and stored in EPRs, their use and functionality varied widely across the included articles. Ethical terms extracted were categorised into clusters ‘privacy’, ‘autonomy’, ‘risk/benefit’, ‘human relationships’, and ‘responsibility’. The literature shows that EPR-related ethical concerns can have both positive and negative implications, and that a wide variety of actors with rights and/or responsibilities regarding the safe and ethical adoption of the technology are involved. Conclusions While there is considerable consensus in the literature regarding EPR-related ethical principles, some of the associated challenges and opportunities remain underdiscussed. For example, much of the debate is presented in a manner more in keeping with a traditional model of healthcare and fails to take account of the multidimensional ensemble of factors at play in the EPR era and the consequent need to redefine/modify ethical norms to align with a digitally-enabled health service. Similarly, the academic discussion focuses predominantly on bioethical values. However, approaches from digital ethics may also be helpful to identify and deliberate about current and emerging EPR-related ethical concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Jacquemard
- FutureNeuro, the SFI Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, 123 Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
| | - Colin P Doherty
- FutureNeuro, the SFI Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, 123 Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.,Department of Neurology, St. James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin 8, Ireland.,Trinity College Dublin, College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Mary B Fitzsimons
- FutureNeuro, the SFI Research Centre for Chronic and Rare Neurological Diseases, 123 Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Price WN, Kaminski ME, Minssen T, Spector-Bagdady K. Shadow health records meet new data privacy laws. Science 2019; 363:448-450. [PMID: 30705168 DOI: 10.1126/science.aav5133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- W Nicholson Price
- University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. .,Centre for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Margot E Kaminski
- University of Colorado Law School, Boulder, CO, USA.,Silicon Flatirons Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Timo Minssen
- Centre for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law, Copenhagen, Denmark.,University of Copenhagen Faculty of Law, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kayte Spector-Bagdady
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.,Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Big data has become the ubiquitous watch word of medical innovation. The rapid development of machine-learning techniques and artificial intelligence in particular has promised to revolutionize medical practice from the allocation of resources to the diagnosis of complex diseases. But with big data comes big risks and challenges, among them significant questions about patient privacy. Here, we outline the legal and ethical challenges big data brings to patient privacy. We discuss, among other topics, how best to conceive of health privacy; the importance of equity, consent, and patient governance in data collection; discrimination in data uses; and how to handle data breaches. We close by sketching possible ways forward for the regulatory system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Nicholson Price
- University of Michigan Law School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Project on Personalized Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, & Law, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Center for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - I Glenn Cohen
- Project on Personalized Medicine, Artificial Intelligence, & Law, Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Center for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Spector-Bagdady K, Jagsi R. Big data, ethics, and regulations: Implications for consent in the learning health system. Med Phys 2018; 45:e845-e847. [PMID: 30144096 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kayte Spector-Bagdady
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Bldg. 14, G016, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Health System, L4001 Women's Hospital, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-0276, USA
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Bldg. 14, G016, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2800, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital B2C490, 1500 East Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5010, USA
| |
Collapse
|