Effectiveness of Transmastoid Plugging for Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

Comparing Approaches for Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

OBJECTIVE

Compare outcomes for subjects who underwent middle cranial fossa (MCF) or transmastoid (TM) repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Quaternary-care, academic neurotology practice.

METHODS

Subjects who underwent MCF or TM repair of SSCD between December 1999 and April 2023 were identified. Main outcome measures included demographic data, length of surgery and hospital stay, clinical presentation, and audiometric testing.

RESULTS

Ninety-three subjects (97 ears) who underwent surgery for SSCD met inclusion criteria: 58.8% (57) via MCF, 39.2% (38) via TM, and 2.0% (2) via TM + MCF. Median operative time was shorter for the TM (35) compared to the MCF (29) approach (118 vs 151 minutes, P < .001). Additionally, median hospital stays were shorter for TM (36) compared to the MCF (56) approach (15.3 vs 67.7 hours, P < .001). Overall, 92% (49/53) of MCF and 92% (33/36) of TM surgeries resulted in an improvement or resolution of one or more symptoms (P = .84). There was no significant preoperative to postoperative change in the median air conduction pure-tone average (PTA), air-bone gap, or word recognition score in both the MCF and TM groups (P > .05). Improvements of >10 dB in the pre- to postoperative absolute change in bone conduction PTA were noted in 3 subjects in the MCF group and 4 subjects in the TM group (P = .49).

CONCLUSION

The TM approach for SSCD demonstrates shorter operative times and length of hospital stay. The TM and MCF approaches have comparable audiometric and clinical outcomes.

Trans-mastoid plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence: long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of trans-mastoid plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD), focusing on complicated cases.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we included all patients who underwent trans-mastoid plugging of SSCD between 2009 and 2019. We evaluated the symptoms (autophony, sound-/pressure-induced vertigo, disequilibrium, aural fullness and pulsatile tinnitus) before and 1 year after surgery in the medical records. We systematically assessed the current symptoms 6.2 ± 3 years postoperative (range 2.2-12.3 years) using questionnaires sent by post and validated by telephone interviews. We also documented any complications and the need for further procedures. We compared pure tone and speech audiometry before and 1 year after surgery. Finally, the degree of mastoid pneumatisation and mastoid tegmen anatomy were reviewed on preoperative CT scans.

RESULTS

We included 24 ears in 23 patients. No complications were recorded, and none required a second procedure for SSCD. Following surgery, oscillopsia and Tullio phenomena resolved in all patients. Hyperacusis, autophony, and aural fullness were also settled in all patients except one. Balance impairment persisted to some degree in 35% of patients. No deterioration over the years was reported regarding the above symptoms. On average, bone conduction pure tone average pre- and 1 year postoperative were 13.7 ± 17 and 20.5 ± 18 dB, respectively (P = 0.002). Air bone gaps were reduced from 12.7 ± 8 to 5.9 ± 6 (P = 0.001). Two patients had a significant sclerotic mastoid, three had a prominent low-lying mastoid tegmen, and two had both. Anatomy had no effect on outcome.

CONCLUSION

Trans-mastoid plugging of SSCD is a reliable and effective technique which achieves long-lasting symptom control, even in cases with sclerotic mastoid or low-lying mastoid tegmen.

Impaired Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex on Video Head Impulse Test in Superior Canal Dehiscence: "Spontaneous Plugging" or Endolymphatic Flow Dissipation?

Surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal (SSC) represents an effective procedure to treat disabling symptoms in superior canal dehiscence (SCD), despite resulting in an impaired vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain for the SSC. On the other hand, SSC hypofunction on video head impulse test (vHIT) represents a common finding in patients with SCD exhibiting sound/pressure-induced vertigo, a low-frequency air-bone gap (ABG), and enhanced vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs). "Spontaneous canal plugging" has been assumed as the underlying process. Nevertheless, missing/mitigated symptoms and/or near-normal instrumental findings would be expected. An endolymphatic flow dissipation has been recently proposed as an alternative pathomechanism for SSC VOR gain reduction in SCD. We aimed to shed light on this debate by comparing instrumental findings from 46 ears of 44 patients with SCD exhibiting SSC hypofunction with post-operative data from 10 ears of 10 patients with SCD who underwent surgical plugging. While no difference in SSC VOR gain values was found between the two groups (p = 0.199), operated ears developed a posterior canal hypofunction (p = 0.002). Moreover, both ABG values (p = 0.012) and cervical/ocular VEMP amplitudes (p < 0.001) were significantly higher and VEMP thresholds were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in ears with SCD compared to operated ears. According to our data, canal VOR gain reduction in SCD should be considered as an additional sign of a third window mechanism, likely due to an endolymphatic flow dissipation.

Computed tomography approximated superior semicircular canal dehiscence size and location and their association with clinical presentation

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the relationship of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) size and location with patient symptomatology and audiometry.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed SSCD cases presented to a tertiary institution between 2011 and 2022. Dehiscence length and width measured on high-resolution temporal bone computed tomography imaging were used to calculate an approximate dehiscence area (ADA). Dehiscence location was classified employing a six-grade system. Multivariable regression analyses were performed with symptomatology and audiogram metrics as outcome variables and ADA and dehiscence location as the primary covariates of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 402 SSCD were included in the analysis. Controlling for patient age, sex, dehiscence laterality, and location, greater ADA was independently associated higher rates of autophony (aOR 1.39; 95% C.I. 1.14-1.71; P = 0.004) and hyper-amplification (aOR 1.39; 1.14-1.70; P = 0.004). Additionally, dehiscences with greater ADA exhibited significantly lower bone conduction threshold at 500 Hz (adjusted β -1.75, P = 0.006) and 1000 Hz (adjusted β -1.61, P = 0.018) and significantly wider air-bone gap at 500 Hz (adjusted β 2.22, P < 0.001) and 1000 Hz (adjusted β 1.00, P = 0.039). Dehiscence location was not independently associated with any outcome variable examined when accounting for dehiscence size.

CONCLUSION

The size of dehiscence is more independently related to clinical presentations than the anatomical location of the dehiscence in the superior semicircular canal. Greater dehiscence size is associated with symptomatology and audiometry consistent with more severe bone conduction hyperacusis.

Vestibular Migraine Confounds Management of Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of vestibular migraine (VM) in a cohort of patients with radiologic confirmation of superior canal dehiscence (SCD) and to compare management of superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS) in patients with and without comorbid VM.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a SCD database.

SETTING

University-based tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Ninety-one patients identified with SCD from 2009 to 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Coincidence of VM and SCD, and resolution of symptoms.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients with SCD met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. VM was diagnosed in 36 (39.6%) patients. Of those receiving medical therapy for VM alone, five (45.5%) reported symptom resolution, five (45.5%) reported partial improvement, one (9.1%) had no change, and none worsened. Fifteen patients (41.7%) were treated with both surgery (for SCD) and medical therapy (for VM). Seven (46.7%) reported symptom resolution, seven (46.7%) reported partial improvement, and one (6.7%) worsened. There was no statistically significant difference in symptom resolution between SCD + VM patients who were treated medically compared with those treated with medical therapy and surgery (p = 0.951). There was no significant difference in symptom resolution after surgery between SCD + VM and SCD-only cohorts (p = 0.286).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study describing the incidence of VM in a cohort of patients with SCDS. The symptoms of VM confound those of SCDS and unrecognized or undertreated VM may contribute to surgical failure in SCDS. Therefore, we recommend a high index of suspicion for VM in patients with SCDS and a trial of medical therapy in the setting of suspected VM.

Evaluation of the transmastoid plugging approach for superior semicircular canal dehiscences: a retrospective series of 30 ears

PURPOSE

The classical surgical approach for superior semicircular canal dehiscences (SSCD) is via the extradural middle cranial fossa. This pathway is used to resurface or to plug the SSC. In this paper, we present long-term data on an alternative route: the transmastoid pathway. The predictive factors for a successful surgery are equally presented in this paper.

METHODS

Thirty reports of patients operated between September 2007 to January 2020 were analysed. SSCD was confirmed by the association of concordant complaints, audiometric data, cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP) responses and computerized tomography findings. Before and after surgery, the following factors were analysed: auditory and vestibular subjective symptoms, Tullio phenomenon, pure-tone audiometry thresholds for air and bone conduction, air-bone gap, cVEMP threshold, and computerized tomography data, for instance the size of the dehiscence.

RESULTS

The follow-up is 21 months on average. The transmastoid approach significantly improves all symptoms (although there were less probing results for the vestibular symptoms). Objectively, we can observe, a closure of the audiometric air-bone gap on the low frequencies and an improvement in the cVEMP. The only correlation that was identified was between the preoperative cVEMP results and the postoperative air conduction.

CONCLUSIONS

The originality of this study is the long postoperative follow-up. It allowed us to evaluate the symptoms in the long term and to determine a predictive factor of postoperative complication, which has not yet been described until today.The transmastoid plugging technique is safe and effective. Additional long-term data with a larger cohort are needed to confirm our results and correlation studies.

Intraoperative Electrocochleography Correlates to Outcomes in Transmastoid and Middle Cranial Fossa Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Repair

OBJECTIVE

To determine the degree to which electrocochleography (ECoG) correlates with auditory and vestibular outcomes after repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) via transmastoid (TM) and middle cranial fossa (MCF) approaches.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adults with SSCD who underwent repair between 2005 and 2019.

INTERVENTION

Pre-, intra-, and postoperative ECoG.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient-reported vestibular and auditory symptoms; pre-, intra-, and postoperative ECoG measures, dizziness handicap inventory (DHI) scores.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients underwent SSCD repair (40 unilateral, six bilateral) between 2005 and 2019, including 24 MCF and 28 TM approaches. There were no differences in preoperative, intraoperative, or postrepair ECoG SP/AP values between the MCF and TM groups (p 0.12, 0.77, 0.58). Patients had subjective improvement in vestibular symptoms (or stable vestibular function in patients operated for predominantly auditory manifestations) with both approaches (MCF: 87.5%; TM: 92.3%; p 0.64). A successful outcome correlated with intraoperative SP/AP ratio normalization (p 0.0005). Similarly, DHI scores were similar in both groups preoperatively (p 0.66) and returned to their preoperative baseline postoperatively with both (p 0.52). Reported vestibular symptoms persisted or worsened more often in patients with migraine (66.6% vs. 28.9%, p 0.03), and with persistently abnormal ECoG measures, though the latter was not statistically significant in this population (38% vs. 15%, p 0.10). Patients had subjective improvement or stability in auditory symptoms using either approach (MCF: 96%; TM: 100%; p 0.62), also correlating with SP/AP ratio normalization (p 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Correction of abnormal preoperative ECoG reliably correlates to patient symptom improvement after SSCD repair. No significant differences in postoperative outcomes were noted between patients undergoing TM versus MCF repair. Circumspection regarding the likelihood of an ideal outcome after SSCD repair should be exercised when counseling patients with concomitant migraine.

DEFINE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GAP AND EDUCATIONAL NEED

It is not certain whether outcomes differ between the two dominant approaches for SSCD repair. Surgeons and patients would benefit from an intraoperative metric that reflects satisfactory plugging of SSCD.

LEARNING OBJECTIVE

To highlight the reliability and unique utility of intraoperative ECoG and demonstrate the correlation between ECoG correction and symptom improvement for SSCD repair.

DESIRED RESULT

To report subjective and objective outcomes following SSCD repair and encourage adoption of intraoperative ECoG monitoring.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

INDICATE IRB OR IACUC

IRB review considers this study exempt (HUM00169949).

OUP accepted manuscript

The superior semicircular canal dehiscence is a vestibular disease recognized condition in recent years, and surgical therapy has been modeling itself over the years to ensure the control of vestibular symptoms and auditory symptoms. In this case series, the authors have experienced an intervention aimed at closing the superior semicircular canal dehiscence through the insertion of bone paté between the meninx and the residual middle cranial fossa bone wall. Seven patients underwent this intervention, they reported an improvement in all vestibular and auditory symptoms, and hearing threshold remained stable. Despite the small sample size, the difference was significant in the control of dizziness and the reduction of pulsatile tinnitus. The technique described in this article allows the control of symptoms in superior semicircular canal dehiscence, and it is a type of surgery familiar to the otosurgeon and easily replicable as it involves a modified mastoidectomy. More data are needed.

Transmastoid Occlusion Surgery for Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Syndrome Improves Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Measures and corrects cVEMP Thresholds and Amplitudes

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pre- and postoperative clinical, audiological, vestibular, and patient-reported measures in patients undergoing transmastoid occlusion surgery for superior canal dehiscence syndrome (SCDS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre, UK.

PATIENTS

All primary transmastoid occlusion surgeries for SCDS were included (tertiary centre, single-surgeon), January 2008 to July 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Transmastoid superior canal occlusion surgery for SCDS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We collated audiological (pure tone audiogram), vestibular (cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials [cVEMPs]), and patient-reported outcome measures (Dizziness Handicap Inventory and subjective symptom grading).

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (55 ears) met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one (56%) were female. Mean age was 47 years (range 29-63) and mean follow-up of 11.2 months. Six patients had bilateral disease, four of whom underwent sequential, bilateral surgery.Autophony was the most frequent presenting symptom, improving in 92%.Significant improvements were self-reported in patients' autophony (p < 0.0001), pressure- and noise-induced dizziness (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001), aural fullness (p = 0.0159), pulsatile tinnitus (p < 0.0001), perceived hearing loss (p = 0.0058), and imbalance (p = 0.0303).Overall Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores reduced from 45.9 to 27.4 (p < 0.0001), and across all subgroups of functional (p = 0.0003), emotional (p < 0.0001), and physical handicap (p = 0.0005).A 6.4-dB HL improvement in the air-bone gap (500-1000 Hz) occurred (95% confidence intervals 3.3-9.4 dB HL, p < 0.0001). There were no dead ears. cVEMP thresholds, when recordable, normalized in all except two ears.

CONCLUSIONS

Transmastoid occlusion is effective at improving patient-reported outcomes and normalizing cVEMP thresholds, though some symptoms, notably disequilibrium, persist to a variable degree.

Surgical treatments of superior semicircular canal dehiscence: A single-centre experience in 63 cases

OBJECTIVE

Different procedures have been described to treat superior canal dehiscence. The present study aims to describe the results obtained with middle fossa approach, transmastoid approach, and round window reinforcement in a large series of patients.

METHODS AND DESIGN

In this single-center retrospective study, we report the results of the procedures performed between 2006 and 2019 using the three main surgical approaches, middle fossa approach (MFA), transmastoid approach (TMA), and round window reinforcement (RWR). The outcome on cardinal cochlear and vestibular symptoms, audiometric results, and changes in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) were analyzed. The patients were also interviewed 12 months to 13 years post-treatment to establish their overall satisfaction following surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were divided into three groups: 42 MFA; 12 RWR; 9 TMA. Postsurgical control rates exceeded 80% for the majority of symptoms in the MFA and TMA groups, and ranged from 11.1% to 83.3% for the RWR group. Over 90% of MFA or TMA patients and 60% of the RWR cohort were satisfied overall with their treatment. Hearing thresholds were intact following surgery in the MFA and TMA groups. There was one case of profound postoperative deafness in the RWR group.

CONCLUSION

MFA and TMA are both safe and effective techniques in the treatment of disabling SSCD. Since MFA is the more invasive technique, we suggest that TMA should be proposed as first-line treatment, temporal bone anatomy permitting. RWR outcomes are more variable in term of symptomatic control, and this option could be offered to patients at risk under general anesthesia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4 evidence.

Auditory Outcomes Following Transmastoid and Middle Cranial Fossa Approaches for Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence Repair

OBJECTIVE

To describe postoperative hearing outcomes following transmastoid (TM) and middle cranial fossa (MCF) approaches for semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD) repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

SETTING

Academic, tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Adults with SSCD who underwent repair between 2005 and 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

Pure tone audiometry pre- and postoperatively after SSCD repair.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in air-bone gap (ABG) at 250 and 500 Hz, pure tone average (PTA), bone conduction (BC), and air conduction (AC) thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz for patients undergoing TM and MCF approaches for SSCD repair.

RESULTS

The average change in BC PTA for patients undergoing TM (n = 26) and MCF (n = 24) SSCD repair was not significantly different between the two groups. The first and final postoperative PTAs were recorded an average of 1.7 (range 0.30-3.0) and 29.1 (range 3.5-154) months postoperatively. For patients who underwent MCF repair, the average BC PTAs increased (+) by 2.2 dB HL (p 0.43) and 0.57 dB HL (p 0.88) at the first and final audiograms respectively compared to +1.27 dB HL (p 0.53) and a decrease (-) of 0.57 dB HL (p 0.63) for the TM group. The average changes in low frequency ABG for patients undergoing MCF repair were -4.7 dB (p 0.08) and -6.9 dB (p 0.15) at first and final audiograms respectively compared to -4.9 dB (p 0.06) and -4.1 dB (p 0.36) for patients who underwent TM repair. There was a high frequency hearing loss noted at 8000 Hz for the MCF (30.0 dB ± 18.7 preop; 41.7 dB ± 21.7 postop; p 0.01) and TM (32.1 dB ± 23.2 preop; 44.3 dB ± 29.6 postop; p 0.001) groups which persisted on long term follow up.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TM and MCF approaches to SSCD repair can be performed with long-term preservation of hearing. ABGs were reduced in each treatment group but did not reach significance. A high frequency hearing loss (8000 Hz) may be expected with either approach.

Transmastoid Superior Semicircular Canal Plugging: A Prospective Analysis of Surgical Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcomes of the transmastoid superior semicircular canal plugging in patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary, university center.

PATIENTS

Patients with SSCD undergoing transmastoid superior semicircular canal plugging within a 30-month period.

INTERVENTIONS

Transmastoid superior semicircular canal occlusion.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We documented the surgical technique, pre- and postoperative (3-month review) dizziness handicap inventory scores, average hearing thresholds, low-frequency air-bone gap, six-canal video head-impulse-test responses, improvement of the auditory symptoms and complications.

RESULTS

Out of 30 patients with SSCD, 11 patients (12 ears) were enrolled with an average age 41.17 years (range 32-65 years). Oscillopsia resolved in all patients; DHI score improved from 56.7 (range 22-84) preoperatively to 25.83 (10-46) postoperatively (p = 0.001), while out of the nine patients with troublesome auditory symptoms, five patients noticed an improvement. The average pre- and postoperative hearing thresholds were 15.2 dB (range 3-32.5 dB) and 14.17 dB (range 5-30 dB) (p = 0.73), respectively. The average pre- and postoperative low-frequency air bone gap was 12.3 dB (range 5-20 dB) and 9.4 dB (range 0-20 dB), respectively (p = 0.24) (Table 1). There were no major complications; two patients developed postoperative benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

CONCLUSION

Transmastoid plugging of the superior semicircular canal can safely and significantly improve the vestibular symptoms of the patients with SCDS, as well as the auditory symptoms in a substantial number of patients in a hearing-preservation way.

Quality of life outcomes after transmastoid plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence

PURPOSE

This study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness and impact on quality of life in patients undergoing plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence using the transmastoid approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review with prospective outcomes assessment, using validated quantitative scoring systems, was performed on 10 patients (23-76 years) who underwent transmastoid plugging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence between February 2014 and February 2018 at a tertiary referral center. Pre-operative and post-operative autophony and vertigo were measured by The Autophony Index and the Dizziness Handicap Index. Overall quality of life following intervention was measured by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Subjective improvement, audiological changes, and subjective quality of life changes were also recorded.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in the total Dizziness Handicap Index was seen following transmastoid repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence (p = 0.0078). This was also evident when subgroup analysis of the Dizziness Handicap Index was performed, as physical (p = 0.0273), emotional (p = 0.0078), and functional subgroups were all significantly reduced (p = 0.0117). Autophony was also significantly reduced following intervention (p = 0.0312). Overall quality of life was seen to be improved following surgery as measured by the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (p = 0.0345).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that transmastoid plugging of a dehiscence in the superior semicircular canal is a safe and effective means of improving autophony, dizziness and overall quality of life in these patients. We believe that these results should be taken into consideration in discussions regarding surgical approach for patients who are contemplating this procedure.

Comparison of Transmastoid and Middle Fossa Approaches for Superior Canal Dehiscence Repair: A Multi-institutional Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes for patients undergoing a transmastoid approach versus a middle fossa craniotomy approach with plugging and/or resurfacing for repair of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Outcome measures include symptom resolution, hearing, operative time, hospital stay, complications, and revision rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective comparative cohort study.

SETTINGS

Three tertiary neurotology centers.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

All adult patients undergoing repair for superior canal dehiscence between 2006 and 2017 at 3 neurotology centers were included. Demographics and otologic history collected by chart review. Imaging, audiometric data, and vestibular evoked myogenic potential measurements were also collected for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 68 patients (74 ears) were included in the study. Twenty-one patients underwent middle fossa craniotomy repair (mean age, 47.9 years), and 47 underwent transmastoid repair (mean age, 48.0 years). There were no significant differences in age or sex distribution between the groups. The transmastoid group experienced a significantly shorter duration of hospitalization and lower recurrence rate as compared with the middle fossa craniotomy group (3.8% vs 33%). Both groups experienced improvement in noise-induced vertigo, autophony, pulsatile tinnitus, and nonspecific vertigo. There was no significant difference among symptom resolution between groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in audiometric outcomes between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Both the transmastoid approach and the middle fossa craniotomy approach for repair of superior canal dehiscence offer symptom resolution with minimal risk. The transmastoid approach was associated with shorter hospital stays and lower recurrence rate as compared with the middle fossa craniotomy approach.