Health Disparities Research in Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

Health disparities contribute significantly to disease, health outcomes, and access to care. Little is known about the state of health disparities in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS). This scoping review aims to synthesize the existing disparities research in FPRS and guide future disparities-related efforts.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science.

REVIEW METHODS

We conducted a scoping review in adherence with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. Our search included all years through March 03, 2023. All peer-reviewed primary literature of any design related to disparities in FPRS was eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Of the 12283 unique abstracts identified, 215 studies underwent full-text review, and 108 remained for final review. The most frequently examined topics were cleft lip and palate (40.7%), facial trauma (29.6%), and gender affirmation (9.3%). There was limited coverage of other areas. Consideration of race/ethnicity (68.5%), socioeconomic status (65.7%), and gender/sex (40.7%) were most common. Social capital (0%), religion, occupation, and features of relationships were least discussed (0.01% each). The majority of studies were published after 2018 (59.2%) and were of nonprospective designs (95.4%). Most studies focused on disparity detection (80.6%) and few focused on understanding (13.9%) or reducing disparities (5.6%).

CONCLUSION

This study captures the existing literature on health disparities in FPRS. Studies are concentrated in a few areas of FPRS and are primarily in the detecting phase of public health research. Our review highlights several gaps and opportunities for future disparities-related focus.

Functional and Cosmetic Considerations in Gender-Affirming Feminization Rhinoplasty

Gender-affirming facial surgery is increasing in prevalence, and rhinoplasty plays an integral role in its success. The nose displays considerable gender dimorphism, and maneuvers performed during gender-affirming rhinoplasty may differ considerably from those performed during cis-gender surgery. During feminization rhinoplasty in particular, cosmetic goals often rely on reductive techniques such as osteotomies, dorsal reduction, sidewall narrowing, tip narrowing, and alar base narrowing. These maneuvers collectively have important ramifications when considering the functional aspects of the nose. Herein, we outline the status of feminization rhinoplasty, and the interplay of cosmetic and functional considerations of the field.

Lip feminization: A review

Background

Facial feminization involves a broad array of procedures tailored to transgender women, with lip feminization emerging as a crucial element because of its significant impact on gender expression. Despite its importance, there is a dearth of studies singularly dedicated to lip feminization within this demographic.

Objectives

This review aimed to consolidate knowledge on various techniques (surgical and nonsurgical), outcomes, and patient satisfaction related to lip feminization, thereby highlighting its integral role in facial feminization and its significance in affirming transgender women's identity.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, MedLine, and Embase databases was conducted, focusing on studies published up to April 18, 2024. Inclusion criteria were centered on articles addressing the techniques and outcomes of lip feminization. A rigorous screening process was applied to identify relevant literature, which was then reviewed for data extraction on techniques, outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction.

Results

Among the initial 28 publications, 21 articles remained. These studies provided insights into surgical and nonsurgical techniques for lip feminization and reported high-satisfaction rates within a broader scope of facial feminization surgeries. Notably, specific data on lip feminization were sparse and often extrapolated either from broader facial feminization research or studies on cisgender populations.

Conclusion

This review established that lip feminization is a crucial but under researched aspect of gender-affirming care. Recognizing the high-satisfaction rates reported for facial feminization, this study advocated for detailed, procedure-specific research to optimize outcomes for transgender women seeking lip feminization.

Technical Pearls and Pitfalls of Facial Feminization Surgery: A Review of Techniques From a Single Institutional Practice

BACKGROUND

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is an emerging practice that falls under the broader umbrella of gender-affirming surgery. Various approaches exist to feminize the face, yet few published articles describe in detail the techniques of each component procedure. Considering the diversity of interventions employed, the objective of this manuscript is to highlight FFS techniques utilized by the senior author and create a corresponding media gallery.

METHODS

All patients with the diagnosis of gender dysphoria that were referred to the senior author for FFS consultation between June 2017 and August 2022 were reviewed. Data were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records according to the institutional review board (IRB)-approved study protocol. Data collected and analyzed included demographics, operative documentation, and postoperative follow-up. Multimedia material was collected intraoperatively and postoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients underwent 262 operations with a total of 1224 FFS procedures. The average follow-up time was 7.7 ± 11 months. Out of the 262 operations, 24 (9.2%) patients experienced minor complications, including 3 (1.1%) with wound dehiscence, 13 (5.0%) with hematomas, and 14 (5.3%) with postoperative infection requiring antibiotics. Of those, 3 (1.1%) required a return to the operating room for washout or removal of malar implants.

CONCLUSION

Although there is a consensus on the fundamental surgical principles to achieve adequate feminization of the facial architecture, the specific techniques to do so differ according to individual practices. As techniques diverge, so do their risk profiles and outcomes; techniques must, thus, align with patients' interventional goals. The material presented here is one of many that can support trainees and junior surgeons as they build a gender-affirming practice.

Objective Photoanalysis of Feminizing Frontal Cranioplasty Outcomes

Study Design

Retrospective analysis at a tertiary care center.

Objective

This study describes a method of analyzing postoperative results using lateral view clinical photographs to create normalized projection ratios of the glabella and radix.

Methods

We reviewed preoperative and postoperative photographs of 15 patients. All photographs were in the lateral view Frankfort horizontal plane. We calculated the distances between the (a) tragus and cornea, (b) cornea and radix, (c) cornea and glabella, and the (θ) nasofrontal angle.

Results

Fifteen sets of patient photographs were analyzed and found that there was a favorable 14% reduction at the radix and an even greater reduction (78.9%) at the glabella. The nasofrontal angle was improved to a more feminine range from 131.84° preoperatively to 145.86° postoperatively.

Conclusions

Normalized projection ratios of the glabella and radix, along with the nasofrontal angle, can be used to objectively measure outcomes of frontal feminizing cranioplasty.

Ambulatory facial feminization surgery: a comparative analysis of outcomes and complications

BACKGROUND

To date, there are no studies investigating the safety and outcomes of facial feminization surgery (FFS) as an outpatient procedure. This is the first study of its kind analyzing the outcomes of ambulatory FFS based on a comparison of complications, post-operative emergency department or urgent care (ED/UC) visits, and readmissions between patients who underwent FFS with admission versus same-day surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent FFS in a single integrated healthcare system. Patient charts were reviewed for operative details, complications, post-operative ED/UC visits, readmission, and demographic factors. Major outcomes including complications, readmissions, and ED/UC visits were compared between groups with same-day discharge and post-operative hospital admission.

RESULTS

Of 242 patients included in the study, ED/UC visits were comparable between patients discharged same-day (18.2%) and patients admitted post-operatively (21.6%, p = 0.52). Logistic regression showed no significant difference in the composite outcomes of minor complications, major complications, and readmissions (15.6% for ambulatory versus 19.3% for admission, p = 0.46). Temporary nerve palsy, infection, and hematoma were the most common post-operative complications. However, covariates of a lower face procedure and operative time were shown to have significant differences in the composite complication outcome (p = 0.04 and p = 0.045, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory FFS is a safe practice with no associated increase in adverse outcomes including complications, ED/UC visits, and readmission when compared to post-operative admission. Adoption of same-day FFS should be considered by high-volume gender health centers to potentially benefit from increased scheduling flexibility and efficiency, increased access to care, and lower healthcare costs.

Facial Feminization: Middle Third of the Face

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) as applied to the midfacial region targets modifications to the nasal and malar esthetic complexes. Although a global assessment is paramount in achieving desired functional results, most patients benefit from malar feminization in the form of bony and soft tissue augmentation, and nasal feminization in the form of reductive rhinoplasty. For patients with signs of aging, additional interventions in the form of rhytidectomy are powerful adjuncts to feminization. As with FFS techniques directed toward the upper and lower thirds, the overarching goal is to obtain complementary outcomes that enhance facial harmony and beauty.

Outcomes in Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review

Objective: Review literature on facial feminization surgery (FFS) for the transgender population and identify whether heterogeneity in reported outcomes and outcome measures exists across studies, as measured by a lack of consensus, and number of outcomes and outcome measures used. Evidence Review: A search of MEDLINE and EMBASE (database inception to January 20, 2021) was performed to retrieve FFS studies. Primary outcomes included number of reported outcomes and outcome measures; secondary outcomes included clinimetric properties of outcome measures and study characteristics. Findings: In total, 15 articles were included. Sixty-nine outcomes and 12 outcome measures were identified. Of those outcome measures, zero were found to be valid, reliable, and responsive in patients who had undergone FFS. A variety of FFS interventions were studied, with the three most common interventions being: rhinoplasty (n = 7, 46.7%), mandibuloplasty (n = 7, 46.7%), and chondrolaryngoplasty (n = 6, 40%). Conclusion and Relevance: Heterogeneity was evident in reported outcomes and outcome measures in FFS literature and there is currently no outcome measure commonly used for this patient population.

Gender-Affirming Facial Feminization Surgery at a Public, Safety-Net Hospital: A Single-Center Early Experience

BACKGROUND

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) remains inaccessible to many transgender patients. Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFG) was among the first public, safety-net hospitals to perform FFS. The purpose of this study is to examine the postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent FFS at ZSFG and describe barriers to providing FFS in a public hospital setting.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified patients who underwent FFS at ZSFG. Demographic data, comorbidity profiles, postoperative outcomes, and hospital utilization data were collected from the medical records. FACE-Q modules (scored 0-100) were used to survey patient satisfaction at least 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients underwent comprehensive FFS surgery at ZSFG. The median age was 41 years [interquartile range (IQR): 38-55], median body mass index was 26.4 (IQR: 24.1-31.3). Patients underwent a median of 9 procedures, the most common of which included frontal cranioplasty (n=13, 77%), open brow lift (n=13, 77%), rhinoplasty (n=12, 71%), and mandible contouring (n=12, 71%). There were no complications, readmissions, or reoperations within 30 days. Patients reported high satisfaction with the surgical outcome (median: 87, IQR: 87-100), excellent postoperative psychological functioning (median: 100, IQR: 88-100), and low levels of appearance-related distress (median: 3, IQR: 0-35). An estimated 243 operating room hours and 51 inpatient bed days were required to cover all FFS procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing FFS in a public, safety-net hospital was associated with zero postoperative complications, few revision procedures, and excellent patient satisfaction. Limited operating room hours and inpatient availability represented barriers to providing FFS in this setting.

Developments in facial feminization surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is being performed by facial plastic surgeons with increasing frequency. As insurance companies expand benefits to cover these procedures, more and more institutions are developing programs to treat transgender patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature on the subject so that those interested in this subject may have a framework to analyze these works.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most significant findings are that FFS does appear to be safe with low complication rates, despite long operative times due to multiple procedures performed. Much of the recent literature is reviews of each practice's techniques. This is valuable to educate those interested in beginning to perform these surgeries. Further, these reviews can eventually be compiled into a standard of care. Virtual surgical planning is currently being used by some departments, but its value is yet to be determined.

SUMMARY

FFS is performed with increasing frequency. Current literature reviews best practices with the goal of eventually establishing a standard of care.

Multiprocedural Facial Feminization Surgery: A Review of Complications in a Cohort of 31 Patients

OBJECTIVE

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is instrumental in gender affirmation for transgender patients. Multiprocedural FFS, the combination of multiple facial feminization procedures across multiple depths and planes during one surgery, crosses sterile and nonsterile planes in the oropharynx, nose, and frontal sinus. A closer look at the prevention and management of resulting complications of such reconstruction is necessary.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patient demographics, operative variables, and postoperative complications on 31 FFS patients. Patients who underwent FFS between January 2020 and June 2021 were eligible for inclusion. Associations between prevention methods, procedure type, and complications were assessed by the Fisher exact test. The main effect of patient age and number of procedures on complication rate was assessed via the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients, with a mean age of 37 years (range: 19-65 y, SD: 13.3 y), underwent 257 procedures. Patients underwent a mean of 8 procedures (SD: 2.2) lasting 3.5 to 6 hours (mean: 5.0 h, SD: 0.9 h). Overall, 68% of patients experienced no complications. Six patients experienced a postoperative infection; 4 of these patients required return for a washout. Preventative measures implemented include: preoperative dental check, intraoperative antibiotic irrigation, locking sutures, and postoperative antibiotics. After measures were implemented, there were no further procedure-related infections recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients do not suffer from major complications after multiprocedural FFS. Factors such as age, irrigation method, and dental history may be important variables affecting FFS outcomes.

Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review of Perioperative Surgical Planning and Outcomes

Background:

Facial feminization is a critical step in a transfeminine patient’s surgical transition. However, the existing literature on the various types of feminization surgeries suffers from inadequate reporting on perioperative aspects of care, such as preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate facial feminization surgery (FFS), preoperative planning, and patient reported outcomes after various types of procedures.

Methods:

An electronic database search of Ovid MEDLINE was completed according to PRISMA guidelines for articles pertaining to FFS. Study characteristics, operative information, and patient demographics were collected. Data concerning preoperative imaging, virtual simulation, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected and analyzed for patterns.

Results:

A total of 22 papers representing 1302 patients were included for analysis. The most commonly discussed operations included upper face procedures, particularly of the forehead (17 studies, 77%). When discussed, preoperative planning for FFS included standard photography in 19 (86%) studies, advanced imaging, such as cephalometry or computed tomography, in 12 (55%) studies, and virtual simulation of surgical outcomes in four (18%) studies. Patient-centered outcomes, such as postoperative satisfaction, were described in 17 (77%) studies. Standardized PROMs were heterogenous across included studies with only 11 (50%) including at least one PROM.

Conclusions:

FFS is common, safe, and highly satisfying for transfeminine patients seeking surgical intervention for identity actualization. Future research concerning transgender care must evaluate advanced surgical planning and 3D simulation combined with more standardized assessment of PROMs to ensure high-quality analysis of patient satisfaction.

Comparative Outcomes of Partial and Full Facial Feminization Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The demand for facial feminization surgery (FFS) amongst transgender women is on the rise, and requests for a single-stage full FFS (F-FFS) are becoming more frequent. The specific aim of this article is to present our institutional experience with both partial-FFS (P-FFS) and F-FFS with a specific emphasis on safety of each approach.

METHODS

We examined the electronic medical record of all patients with the diagnosis of gender dysphoria that were referred to the senior author for FFS consultation at our institution, between June 2017 and October 2020. Patients were sub-grouped into those who underwent F-FFS (upper, middle, and lower facial thirds in a single anesthetic event) and those who underwent P-FFS. Univariate analysis was used to assess for difference in postoperative complications.

RESULTS

We identified 77 patients who underwent 382 total procedures. The mean follow-up time was 7.5 months (Sd = 7.3) (interquartile range 1.75-12.0 months). Fifty-one (71.4%) patients underwent F-FFS and 21 (28.6%) patients underwent P-FFS. Compared to P-FFS, F-FFS was not associated with an increase in postoperative complication (1 out of 21 [4.8%] versus 4 out of 51 [7.8%]) ( P < 0.556). When comparing characteristics of patients with postoperative complications to patients with no postoperative complications, the average body mass index was significantly higher (30.9 versus 25.4, respectively). ( P < 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Full-FFS is a set of procedures that has gained increased popularity among male-to-female transgender patients. Our results support the understanding that F-FFS is a safe and reliable approach, which may be preferable to patients and providers alike.

Consideration of Human Immunodeficiency Status in Patients Seeking Facial Feminization Surgery

ABSTRACT

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) with its proven safety and efficacy has become a mainstay surgical approach for those desiring gender-specific perceived feminine facial aesthetics. To date, specific characteristics of patients seeking FFS have been limited, with no studies investigating the role of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) on FFS outcomes. The potential clinical implications of HIV and more specifically HIV-associated lipodystrophy, which can cause facial lipoatrophy, require further investigation. Given the importance of midface projection in feminizing the face, the authors aimed to investigate any associations HIV or Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy may have on outcomes, including clinical consequences of facial lipoatrophy. The authors performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria referred to the senior author (EDR) for FFS between 2017 and 2020. Patients were grouped based on HIV status and demographics, history, and outcomes were assessed. Seventy-seven patients were included, with 28 patients (36.4%) having a diagnosis of HIV. A total of 25 (32.5%) and 23 (29.9%) patients underwent malar fat grafting and cheek implants, respectively. No significant difference was found between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients when looking at the use of malar fat grafting, cheek implants, age, or complication rates. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the largest cohort of HIV status assessment of FFS patients to date. Future studies, particularly on the long-term outcomes, are warranted, as is continued information sharing among providers and centers performing FFS, in order to continue advancing the literature and subsequently patient care.

Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery: Experiences and Outcomes at an Academic Center

Background: Gender-affirming facial surgery (GFS) is becoming more widely available for transgender individuals, but data on surgical approaches and outcomes remain limited. Methods: Retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes among consecutive GFS cases performed at a tertiary care academic center between March 2016 and August 2020. Results: Seventy-seven patients underwent 109 surgeries, including 478 individual procedures. The median age was 42 years. Ninety-five percent of patients had public health insurance. Two-stage GFS was often used in older patients (p = 0.001), with the first stage involving bone and cartilaginous alterations, and the second stage involving soft tissue procedures. Mean hospital stay after first-stage GFS was 1.2 days, with 70% discharged on postoperative day 1. Mean follow-up was 11.3 months. Among 66 patients with at least 1 month of follow-up, all complications were minor and included surgical site infection (5%), dehiscence (3.0%), seroma (3%), and medical complications (6%). Thirty-day hospital readmission rate was 1.5%. Conclusions: There are unique surgical approaches for GFS, which demonstrate low complication and readmission rates. Understanding these approaches and outcomes may help guide preoperative patient consultations and clinical decision making.

Postoperative Pain and Opioid Use after Facial Feminization Surgery

The objective of this study is to characterize surgical pain after facial feminization surgery (FFS) and delineate postoperative opioid usage. It is a retrospective cohort study. It was performed in a multicenter integrated health care system. Electronic medical records were reviewed for patient demographic characteristics, medical history, pain medication prescriptions, and responses to a postoperative pain survey. Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used for bivariate analysis. Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical data. Seventy-four patients who underwent FFS were included. The mean (standard deviation) reported "average" postoperative pain score was 4.3 (2.3) out of 10. A total of 58% of patients reported pain lasting 5 or fewer days after surgery. The severity and duration of postoperative pain was similar between patients who underwent partial-FFS or full-FFS. A total of 68% of patients required fewer than 15 opioid tablets. There were no significant differences in the quantity of opioids prescribed or used between patients who underwent partial-FFS or full-FFS. Older age and premorbid mood disorder did not correlate with greater severity/duration of pain or number of opioids used after surgery. Most patients required fewer than 15 opioid tablets after surgery and experienced less than a week of postoperative pain. Patients undergoing full-FFS did not appear to experience significantly greater pain than those undergoing fewer procedures. Older age and premorbid mood disorder were not predictors of worse pain outcomes or greater opioid utilization.

Techniques and Trends of Facial Feminization Surgery: A Systematic Review and Representative Case Report

BACKGROUND

Facial feminization surgery is composed of a variety of craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures that are increasingly sought after by male-to-female transgender patients and by those seeking feminization of the face. Facial feminization surgery can play a prominent role in alleviating gender dysphoria. In consideration of an observed increase in gender-affirming procedures performed in recent years, a broad knowledge base in the techniques, outcomes, and challenges of facial feminization surgery should be established by surgeons offering these procedures. Our review was designed to critically appraise the current literature and inform future advancements in gender-affirming surgical practice. In addition, we detail a representative case to illustrate the senior author's approach to full facial feminization.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted for studies published through June 2020 using following the search terms: "Face" OR "facial" OR "craniofacial" AND "Feminization" OR "Feminization Surgery" OR "Gender Reassignment" OR "Gender Affirming Surgery" OR "Gender Confirmation Surgery." Data on procedures, outcomes, patient age, follow-up time, complications, and patient satisfaction were collected. The data were categorized by facial thirds and then further stratified by facial feature.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 388 articles. Thirty articles fit our inclusion criteria, and of these, 23 articles were included in the review. We extracted primary data pertaining to 3554 patients with an age range of 18 to 73 who underwent 8506 total procedures. Most of the procedures addressed the upper facial third (hairline, forehead, and brow), comprising 49.1% of total procedures performed. Further categorization by facial feature revealed that the most commonly addressed feature was the forehead (34.6% of procedures), followed by the nose (12.8%) and the chin (12.2%). In studies that used quantitative measures to gauge patient-reported outcomes, satisfaction was high.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial feminization surgery seems to be safe, whether it is conducted in a single stage or as a staged procedure. Patients report high satisfaction and better gender congruency after facial feminization procedures. Further research is needed to establish best surgical practice and gauge patient satisfaction beyond the length of average follow-up and determine the frequency with which adjunctive procedures are sought out.

Current Trends in Facial Feminization Surgery: An Assessment of Safety and Style

BACKGROUND

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) plays an instrumental role in the process of gender affirmation. These procedures are becoming increasingly appreciated for their ability to improve patient satisfaction and gender identity in a way that alleviates gender dysphoria and improves the quality of life. Despite the recent surge in popularity across the US, the current literature lacks evidence on the safety profile of combined facial feminization procedures. Our goal was to determine the safety profile of facial feminization procedures registered on a national surgical database.

METHODS

Patients with a primary diagnosis of gender dysphoria undergoing facial surgical procedures were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between the years 2013 and 2018. Demographic characteristics along with 30-day postoperative complications were recorded. Logistic regression models adjusted for confounders were used to determine the independent predictors of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A cohort of 77 patients who underwent a total of 220 procedures was identified. The number of patients undergoing surgery per year increased from three (3.9%) in 2013 to 41 (53.2%) in 2018, a 13.6-fold increase. The most commonly performed procedure was forehead contouring/frontal sinus setback, performed on 52 patients (67.5%), followed by orbital contouring (n = 37, 48%), rhinoplasty (n = 34, 44%), mandibuloplasty (n = 34, 44%), chondrolaryngoplasty (n = 27, 35.1%), genioplasty (n = 11, 14%), brow lift (n = 9, 11.7%), cheek augmentation (n = 9, 11.7%), and lip lift (n = 7, 9.1%). The number of patients who underwent 5 or more procedures in a single anesthetic event was 41 (53.2%). The complication rate was 3.9%. Univariate analysis suggested an association between older age and postoperative morbidity (P  < 0.02). However, this was not found to be an independent predictor on multivariate analysis adjusted for confounders (P < 0.083). Additionally, an increase in operative time and the number of procedures performed during a single anesthetic were not independent predictors of 30-day postoperative complications (P < 0.317 and P  < 0.19, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

FFS can be safely performed and has a low risk of postoperative morbidity. The number of patients seeking FFS surgery has risen exponentially, with the highest demand seen for the reconstruction of the upper facial third. These findings should guide expectations for patients seeking FFS, as well as for plastic surgeons looking to perform multiple procedures per anesthetic event.

Adverse events in facial plastic surgery: Data-driven insights into systems, standards, and self-assessment

PURPOSE

Complications in facial plastic surgery can lead to pain, suffering, and permanent harm. Yet, the etiology and outcomes of adverse events are understudied. This study aims to determine the etiology and outcomes of adverse events reported in aesthetic facial plastic surgery and identify quality improvement opportunities.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional survey analysis was conducted using an anonymous 22-item questionnaire distributed to members of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) and American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS). Participants were queried on demographics, practice type, and adverse events related to aesthetic facial surgeries.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-three individuals participated; nearly half of respondents (49.0%) held membership in both AAO-HNS and AAFPRS. Of these, 40.8% of respondents reported at least one adverse event within the past 12 months of practice. A total of 194 adverse events were reported, most commonly related to facelift (n = 59/194, 30.4%), rhinoplasty (n = 55/194, 28.4%), and injection procedures (n = 38/194, 19.6%), with hematoma or seroma being the most commonly described. Most adverse events were self-limited, but approximately 68% resulted in further procedures. Surgeon error or poor judgement (n = 42) and patient non-adherence (n = 18) were the most commonly ascribed reasons for adverse events; 37.1% of participants reported a change in clinical practice after the incident.

CONCLUSIONS

Adverse events were not infrequent in facial plastic surgery. Understanding these adverse events can provide impetus for tracking outcomes, standardization, and engagement with lifelong learning, self-assessment, and evaluation of practice performance.