Mohanty AJ, DeVahl J, Kutz WJ, Rozen SM. Neurofibromatosis Type II and Facial Paralysis: Clinical Evaluation and Management.
Plast Reconstr Surg 2024;
153:415e-423e. [PMID:
37075282 DOI:
10.1097/prs.0000000000010561]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Facial paralysis secondary to neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) presents the reconstructive surgeon with unique challenges because of its pathognomonic feature of bilateral acoustic neuromas, involvement of multiple cranial nerves, use of antineoplastic agents, and management. Facial reanimation literature on managing this patient population is scant.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature review was performed. All patients with NF2-related facial paralysis who presented in the past 13 years were reviewed retrospectively for type and degree of paralysis, NF2 sequelae, number of cranial nerves involved, interventional modalities, and surgical notes.
RESULTS
Twelve patients with NF2-related facial paralysis were identified. All patients presented after resection of vestibular schwannoma. Mean duration of weakness before surgical intervention was 8 months. On presentation, one patient had bilateral facial weakness, 11 had multiple cranial nerve involvement, and seven were treated with antineoplastic agents. Two patients underwent gracilis free functional muscle transfer, five underwent masseteric-to-facial nerve transfer (of whom two were dually innervated with a crossfacial nerve graft), and one patient underwent depressor anguli oris myectomy. Trigeminal schwannomas did not affect reconstructive outcomes if trigeminal nerve motor function on clinical examination was normal. In addition, antineoplastic agents such as bevacizumab and temsirolimus did not affect outcomes if stopped in the perioperative period.
CONCLUSIONS
Effectively managing patients with NF2-related facial paralysis necessitates understanding the progressive and systemic nature of the disease, bilateral facial nerve and multiple cranial nerve involvement, and common antineoplastic treatments. Neither antineoplastic agents nor trigeminal nerve schwannomas associated with normal examination affected outcomes.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, V.
Collapse