Parent-Reported Outcome Questionnaire for Swallowing Dysfunction in Healthy Infants and Toddlers: Construction and Content Validation

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Swallowing Dysfunction in Patients With Laryngomalacia Treated Medically and Surgically

Objective

To identify the prevalence, pattern, and nature of swallowing dysfunction (SwD) in a consecutive cohort of patients with laryngomalacia (LM), and to determine factors associated with a higher burden of SwD.

Study Design

This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients diagnosed with LM by 2 pediatric otolaryngologists between 2013 and 2022 and a minimum of 3-month follow-up.

Setting

Tertiary care pediatric otolaryngology referral center.

Methods

Consecutive cohort of patients less than 3 years old with LM diagnosed on flexible laryngoscopy were reviewed. Patients with incomplete follow-up, lack of swallowing assessment, and genetic conditions or syndromes were excluded. All patients underwent at minimum a systematic clinical swallowing evaluation by a speech-language pathologist specialized in pediatric dysphagia. Patients with concerning clinical exams underwent instrumental swallow evaluation (Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study [VFSS] or Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing [FEES]). The prevalence of abnormalities of clinical swallowing evaluation, instrumental swallow evaluation data, and details of management were collected.

Results

Two hundred and twelve patients met criteria and were included in the final analysis. One hundred and fifteen patients (54%) had an instrumental assessment (VFSS or FEES). Of the instrumental assessments performed, 96 (69%) were abnormal. Of the total patient cohort, 55 (26%) had laryngeal penetration and/or aspiration. One hundred and seventeen (55%) had clinical or instrumental indications for intervention, with 18 (8%) requiring tube feeding. Patients with severe LM and those treated surgically had a statistically significant higher rate of penetration and aspiration.

Conclusion

Patients with LM have a high burden of dysphagia requiring medical intervention. The authors advocate for routine and systematic assessment of all patients with LM for swallowing dysfunction.

Iatrogenic pediatric unilateral vocal cord paralysis after cardiac surgery: a review

Unilateral vocal cord paralysis (UVCP) is a growing area of research in pediatrics as it spans across many specialties including otolaryngology, cardiology, general surgery, respirology, and speech language pathology. Iatrogenic injury is the most common cause of UVCP, however there is a wide range of data reporting the prevalence, symptom burden, and best treatment practice for this condition. The literature included systematic reviews and meta-analyses, retrospective studies and limited prospective studies. Overall, the literature lacked consistency in the diagnosis, treatment, and long-term outcomes of patients with UVCP. Many articles conflated bilateral vocal cord paralysis (BVCP) with UVCP and had limited data on the natural history of the condition. There was no consensus on objective and subjective measurements to evaluate the condition or best indications for requiring surgical intervention. Thyroplasty, injection medialization (IM) and recurrent laryngeal nerve reinnervation (RLNR) were the reported surgical interventions used to treat UVCP, however there was limited data on short and long-term surgical outcomes in children. More research is needed to determine the true prevalence, natural history, indications for surgical intervention and long-term outcomes for pediatric patients with this condition.

Current opinion in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: the role of the otolaryngologist in the management of pediatric dysphagia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dysphagia affects at least 1% of the pediatric population. This prevalence further increases in patients who are born prematurely or who have underlying neuromuscular or cardiopulmonary disorders. A multidisciplinary team approach, including an Otolaryngologist, can help promote an expedited diagnosis and therapeutic regimen, ensuring that the patient receives adequate nutrition needed for growth and development.

RECENT FINDINGS

The development and growth of multidisciplinary aerodigestive clinics have improved outcomes in pediatric patients with dysphagia. If a structural concern is noted on examination, there remain a multitude of medical and surgical options to help improve patient outcomes and swallow. These treatment options are usually multimodality and specific interventions may be employed to target a specific and notable abnormality.

SUMMARY

Pediatric dysphagia is a complex concern. For the otolaryngologist, etiologies with surgical targets may include ankyloglossia, tonsillar hypertrophy, laryngomalacia, laryngo-esophageal cleft, vocal fold movement impairment, and cricopharyngeal achalasia. The development and formalization of a multidisciplinary approach has streamlined and broadened treatment options for these patients. An otolaryngologist is integral as part of the treatment team of these patients.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures That Describe the Feeding Skills Domain for Pediatric Feeding Disorder: A Clinimetric Review

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) is defined as "impaired oral intake that is not age-appropriate, and is associated with medical, nutritional, feeding skill, and/or psychosocial dysfunction." Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are tools that complement clinical assessment, but many have limited clinimetric data. This review aimed to assess PROMs that reported on the feeding skills domain for PFD in children.

METHODS

A search strategy across 4 databases was conducted (July 2022). PROMs were included in the review if they described elements of the feeding skills domain of PFD, had criterion/norm-referenced data and/or a standardized assessment procedure, description, or scoring system available, and were applicable to children ≥6 months. PROMs were mapped to the PFD diagnostic domains and aspects of the International Classification of Function (ICF) model. Quality assessment was completed using the COnsensus-based Standards to the selection of health Measurement Instruments methodology.

RESULTS

Overall, 14 PROMs across 22 papers met inclusion criteria. There was variable methodological quality across the tools, with those more recently developed often receiving better scores, particularly where a more rigorous process for tool development and content validity was reported. Most tools captured ICF aspects of impairment (n = 11, eg, biting/chewing) or activity (n = 13, eg, eating a meal), rather than social participation (n = 3, eg, going to a restaurant).

CONCLUSIONS

Using PROMs with strong content validity, and including some measure of social participation, is recommended as part of an assessment battery for PFD. Consideration of the caregiver/child perspective is an essential component of family-centered care.