Relationship Between Parental Intolerance of Uncertainty and Decisional Conflict in Pediatric Otolaryngologic Surgery

There is no sinus without "us": A randomized controlled study assessing the efficacy of shared decision-making in the surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis

KEY POINTS

CRS patients exhibit little decision conflict in their choice of pursuing surgery. Standard counseling alone appears to suffice once patients express an interest in surgery. Decision aids may increase patient knowledge and improve postoperative care understanding.

The Mediating Effect of Perceived Social Support and Health Literacy on the Relationship Between Decisional Dilemma and Participation in Shared Decision-Making Among Chinese Parents of Premature Infants

PURPOSE

This research was conducted to explore the mediating effect of perceived social support and health literacy on the relationship between decisional dilemmas and participation in shared decision-making among Chinese parents of premature infants.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study recruited 225 Chinese parents of premature infants in a neonatal ward of a Chinese hospital through convenience sampling. Data were collected from August 2022 to February 2023 using 5 self-administered instruments. Structural equation modeling and multiple mediation tests were applied to explore the interplay among perceived social support, health literacy, decisional dilemmas, and participation in shared decision-making. The study is reported in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

RESULTS

Decisional dilemmas were found to negatively impact participation in shared decision-making. Perceived social support and health literacy were identified as partial mediators in this relationship, collectively accounting for a mediation effect of -0.413, which represents 50.0% of the total effect.

CONCLUSION

The findings elucidate a multifaceted model of factors influencing participation in shared decision-making among Chinese parents of premature infants. Prompt recognition of these variables can enable nursing professionals to incorporate tailored management strategies within patient-centered care frameworks, thereby enhancing decisional outcomes.

Correlation Between Intolerance of Uncertainty and Post-Operative Regret in Otolaryngology Patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine if intolerance of uncertainty, depression, anxiety, worry, or stress are related to post-op regret in otolaryngology patients.

METHODS

Adult patients or parents giving consent for pediatric patients meeting criteria for otolaryngologic surgery were recruited and completed the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale (IUS-12), Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) preop and the Decisional Regret (DR) scale 1-month post-op. Pearson correlations were calculated.

RESULTS

The cohort included 109 patients, 73 (67%) males and 36 (33.3%) females. 43 (39.5%) were college graduates and 66 (60.9%) were not. Mean IUS-12 score was 22.9 (95% CI 21.0-24.8), mean PSWQ score was 46.9 (95% CI 44.5-49.3). DASS-21 mean score was 11.9 (95% CI 9.6-14.3). Mean DR score was 11.1 (95% CI 8.6-13.6). IUS-12 subscales Prospective Anxiety mean score was 14.2 (95% CI 12.8-15.5) and Inhibitory Anxiety mean score was 16.5 (95% CI 14.5-18.6). The Pearson correlation coefficient for post-op DR and total preop IUS was .188 (P = .027) and the correlation coefficient for post-op DR and preop Prospective Anxiety subscale of IUS score was .174 (P = .037). Correlations with PSWQ and DASS-21 scores and DR were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Intolerance of uncertainty is a psychological construct that is associated with post-op DR. More work is needed to determine whether screening for IU and behavior modification directed at IU for those with high levels would improve post-op decisional regret.

Exploring Decisional Conflict With Measures of Numeracy and Optimism in a Stated Preference Survey

Objectives

Low optimism and low numeracy are associated with difficulty or lack of participation in making treatment-related health care decisions. We investigated whether low optimism and low self-reported numeracy scores could help uncover evidence of decisional conflict in a discrete-choice experiment (DCE).

Methods

Preferences for a treatment to delay type 1 diabetes were elicited using a DCE among 1501 parents in the United States. Respondents chose between two hypothetical treatments or they could choose no treatment (opt out) in a series of choice questions. The survey included a measure of optimism and a measure of subjective numeracy. We used latent class analyses where membership probability was predicted by optimism and numeracy scores.

Results

Respondents with lower optimism scores had a higher probability of membership in a class with disordered preferences (P value for optimism coefficient = 0.032). Those with lower self-reported numeracy scores were more likely to be in a class with a strong preference for opting out and disordered preferences (P = 0.000) or a class with a preference for opting out and avoiding serious treatment-related risks (P = 0.015).

Conclusions

If respondents with lower optimism and numeracy scores are more likely to choose to opt out or have disordered preferences in a DCE, it may indicate that they have difficulty completing choice tasks.