4D Computed Tomography for Dynamic Upper Airway Evaluation in Robin Sequence

Analysis of Upper Airway Flow Dynamics in Robin Sequence Infants Using 4-D Computed Tomography and Computational Fluid Dynamics

Robin Sequence (RS) is a potentially fatal craniofacial condition characterized by undersized jaw, posteriorly displaced tongue, and resultant upper airway obstruction (UAO). Accurate assessment of UAO severity is crucial for management and diagnosis of RS, yet current evaluation modalities have significant limitations and no quantitative measures of airway resistance exist. In this study, we combine 4-dimensional computed tomography and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to assess, for the first time, UAO severity using fluid dynamic metrics in RS patients. Dramatic intrapopulation differences are found, with the ratio between most and least severe patients in breathing resistance, energy loss, and peak velocity equal to 40:1, 20:1, and 6:1, respectively. Analysis of local airflow dynamics characterized patients as presenting with primary obstructions either at the location of the tongue base, or at the larynx, with tongue base obstructions resulting in a more energetic stenotic jet and greater breathing resistance. Finally, CFD-derived flow metrics are found to correlate with the level of clinical respiratory support. Our results highlight the large intrapopulation variability, both in quantitative metrics of UAO severity (resistance, energy loss, velocity) and in the location and intensity of stenotic jets for RS patients. These results suggest that computed airflow metrics may significantly improve our understanding of UAO and its management in RS.

Accuracy and Reliability of 4D-CT and Flexible Laryngoscopy in Upper Airway Evaluation in Robin Sequence

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of 4-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) in assessing upper airway obstruction (UAO) in patients with Robin sequence (RS) and compare the accuracy and reliability of 4D-CT and flexible fiber-optic laryngoscopy (FFL).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective survey of retrospective clinical data.

SETTING

Single, tertiary care pediatric hospital.

METHODS

At initial and 30-day time points, a multidisciplinary group of 11 clinicians who treat RS rated UAO severity in 32 sets of 4D-CT visualizations and FFL videos (dynamic modalities) and static CT images. Raters assessed UAO at the velopharynx and oropharynx (1 = none to 5 = complete) and noted confidence levels of each rating. Intraclass correlation and Krippendorff alpha were used to assess intra- and interrater reliability, respectively. Accuracy was assessed by comparing clinician ratings with quantitative percentage constriction (QPC) ratings, calculated based on 4D-CT airway cross-sectional area. Results were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum and signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

There was similar intrarater agreement (moderate to substantial) with 4D-CT and FFL, and both demonstrated fair interrater agreement. Both modalities underestimated UAO severity, although 4D-CT ratings were significantly more accurate, as determined by QPC similarity, than FFL (-1.06 and -1.46 vs QPC ratings, P = .004). Overall confidence levels were similar for 4D-CT and FFL, but other specialists were significantly less confident in FFL ratings than were otolaryngologists (2.25 and 3.92, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Although 4D-CT may be more accurate in assessing the degree of UAO in patients with RS, 4D-CT and FFL assessments demonstrate similar reliability. Additionally, 4D-CT may be interpreted with greater confidence by nonotolaryngologists who care for these patients.