Impact of Completion Lymphadenectomy on Quality of Life for Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma

Impact of Adjuvant Interferon Therapy on Survival Outcomes for Cutaneous Melanoma With Parotid Involvement

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relative 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) outcomes for adjuvant interferon therapy in the treatment of head and neck cutaneous melanoma (HNCM) with parotid gland involvement.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution to analyze patients undergoing parotidectomy for cutaneous head and neck melanoma involving the parotid gland from 2000 to 2014. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank p-values and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 82 patients who underwent surgical resection of stage III HNCM with parotid involvement. The mean follow-up was 67.8 months (SD 65) after diagnosis. Twenty-one patients received adjuvant interferon therapy, 12 patients received adjuvant radiation therapy, and 49 patients received no adjuvant therapy. Crude 5-year OS rates were 95.0% for interferon therapy, 33.3% for adjuvant RT, and 40.4% for no adjuvant therapy. Crude 5-year RFS rates were 75.2%, 19.5%, and 40.8% respectively. In the fully adjusted model, adjuvant interferon therapy was associated with improved 5-year OS compared to adjuvant RT (HR 0.10, 95% CI 0.011-0.837; p = 0.034). There was no significant association between adjuvant interferon therapy and 5-year RFS in the fully adjusted model.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant interferon therapy for surgically resected stage III cutaneous melanoma with parotid gland involvement may be associated with improved survival outcomes. These findings support the growing evidence for the use of immunotherapy in melanoma, and potentially a unique role for when melanoma involves the lymphatic-rich parotid gland.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2024.

Elective neck dissection versus elective neck irradiation in cT3/4N0 maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Maxillary sinus squamous cell carcinoma (MS-SCC) is an infrequent malignancy, and determining the optimal neck management for patients with cT3/4N0 MS-SCC remains a topic of ongoing debate. The purpose of this study was to compare the prognoses and quality of life outcomes of patients who underwent either elective neck dissection (END) or elective neck irradiation (ENI) for cT3/4N0 MS-SCC.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients with surgically treated cT3/4N0 MS-SCC, and the impact of different neck management strategies on regional control and disease-specific survival was compared using propensity score matching. The effect of surgical intervention on quality of life was evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

Of the 120 patients included, 36 underwent END. After propensity score matching, our analysis indicated that END did not lead to superior outcomes than ENI, as demonstrated by comparable rates of regional control (p = 0.990) and disease-specific survival (p = 0.999). However, in the 70 returned questionnaires, patients who underwent END reported higher scores in the domains of appearance, chewing, and speech than did patients who underwent ENI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that while END and ENI contribute to similar prognoses, END yields superior functional outcomes.

Omission of Completion Lymph Node Dissection in Sentinel Node Biopsy Positive Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma Patients

BACKGROUND

Recent studies evaluating patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB+) show no melanoma-specific survival difference between patients undergoing lymph node basin surveillance and completion lymph node dissection (CLND). This has been broadly applied, despite underrepresentation of head and neck (HN) cutaneous melanoma patients. We evaluated whether this was upheld in the HN melanoma cohort.

METHODS

Patients with HN melanoma with a SLNB+ were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2012 to 2019. Overall survival (OS) of patients who underwent SLNB only versus SLNB + CLND were compared. Subgroup analyses were performed based on pathologic N (pN) and receipt of immunotherapy. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

RESULTS

Analysis of 634 patients with multivariable Cox regression showed no difference in OS in SLNB only versus SLNB + CLND cohorts (hazard ratio [HR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-1.81; p = 0.610). Charlson-Deyo score (CDS) 1 versus 0 (HR 1.70; 95% CI 1.10-2.63; p = 0.016), pN2+ versus pN1 (HR 1.74; 95% CI 1.23-2.45; p = 0.002), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) versus no (HR 2.07; 95% CI 1.34-3.19; p = 0.001) were associated with worse prognosis. Subgroup analysis by pN showed no OS benefit for CLND in either pN1 (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.51-2.10; p = 0.922) or pN2+ (HR 1.31; 95% CI 0.67-2.57; p = 0.427) patients or in patients who received immunotherapy (HR 1.32; 95% CI 0.54-3.22; p = 0.549).

CONCLUSIONS

This study of SLNB + HN melanoma patients showed no OS difference in SLNB only versus SLNB + CLND. Further studies need to be performed to better define the role of CLND.