Renal outcome following on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in non-dialysis-dependent patients with stage 2 and stage 3 chronic kidney disease

Purpose

To assess the short-term outcomes in non-dialysis-dependent patients with stage 2 and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD), undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). To examine whether there was a difference in mortality between stage 2 and stage 3 CKD patients and whether mortality in diabetics was different compared to non-diabetics. Outcomes would be judged on the basis of possible cardiovascular, pulmonary, infective, neurological and renal complications, duration of stay at the intensive therapy unit (ITU), and overall duration of stay at the hospital. A comparative study of outcomes between stage 2 and stage 3 CKD would be undertaken. Also, given the impact of diabetes mellitus in this patient population, a comparative study of outcomes would be made between diabetics and non-diabetics.

Methods

Three hundred fifteen consecutive patients undergoing OPCAB were included in this observational prospective study. Of them, 201 (64%) had stage 3 CKD and 114 (36%) had stage 2 CKD. Nearly half of the study group (49.52%) were diabetics. Data was collected from patients' files, patient observation charts at the ITU, and patient interviews. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (Q1, Q3) as appropriate and qualitative variables presented with the frequency and corresponding percentage. Comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients was performed by the Student's t test or chi-square test as appropriate. And when assumptions of parametric test failed, then an appropriate non-parametric test was performed. Repeated measures ANOVA (analysis of variance) was used to see the trend of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values. Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS version 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The eGFR was measured pre-operatively, on the day following OPCAB and at the time of discharge and the mean eGFR, remained more or less the same throughout (mean of 55.86 ml/min/1.73 m² pre-operatively, 58.39 ml/min/1.73 m² on the day following OPCAB and 58.39 ml/min/1.73 m² at discharge). One patient with stage 2 CKD (0.9%) required hemodialysis post-operatively while 3 patients (1.5%) required the same in the stage 3 CKD group, which was not statistically significant. Nineteen patients (6.03%) required re-intubation for hypoxia in the post-operative period. Post-operative myocardial infarction developed in 12 patients (3.81%). Twenty patients (6.35%) patients needed an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion in the peri-operative period owing to hemodynamic compromise. Fifteen patients (4.76%) were re-explored for bleeding following surgery and fifteen patients (4.76%) had a deep sternal wound infection in the post-operative period. New-onset atrial fibrillation was found to be present in 42 stage 3 CKD patients (11%) while it occurred in 21 stage 2 CKD patients (9.6%) (p value = 0.014), which was statistically significant. The mean duration of ITU stay was 84 ± 6.22 h in the stage 2 CKD group and 92.9 ± 8.18 h in the stage 3 CKD group (p value = 0.01), which was statistically significant. Mean duration of ITU stay was 94 ± 10.12 h in the diabetic group while it was 86.7 ± 11.08 h in the non-diabetic group (p value = 0.008) which was statistically significant. Duration of post-operative hospital stay was a mean of 8 ±0.08 days in the diabetic group whereas it was 7 ± 0.04 days in the non-diabetic group (p value = 0.012), which was statistically significant. Surgical mortality was 6 out of 315 patients (1.9%).

Conclusion

OPCAB is a safe and effective revascularization strategy in patients with stage 2 and stage 3 CKD. Short-term outcomes of OPCAB have been good in the patient population in this study, in terms of both surgical morbidity and mortality. Surgical mortality was 1.9%. New-onset atrial fibrillation was found in eleven patients (9.6%) in the stage 2 CKD group and 42 patients (21%) in the stage 3 CKD group (p value =0.014) which was statistically significant. The results of this study reflect the reno-protective nature of OPCAB. The duration of ITU stay and the post-operative duration of stay at the hospital were found to be significantly more in diabetics than in non-diabetics.

The impact of off-pump surgery in end-organ function: practical end-points

Most surgeons perform coronary bypass surgery with the aid of cardiopulmonary bypass, which inflicts a massive systemic inflammatory response to the body leading to adverse clinical outcome. In an attempt to make CABG less invasive, interest have been diverted to the off pump technique.

The current review attempts to bring an insight onto the last ten years knowledge on the off-pump impact in end organ function, with an aim to draw some clear conclusions in order to allow practitioners to reflect on the subject.

Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting for ischaemic heart disease

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is performed both without and with cardiopulmonary bypass, referred to as off-pump and on-pump CABG respectively. However, the preferable technique is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of off-pump versus on-pump CABG in patients with ischaemic heart disease.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2011), MEDLINE (OVID, 1950 to February 2011), EMBASE (OVID, 1980 to February 2011), Science Citation Index Expanded on ISI Web of Science (1970 to February 2011) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost, 1981 to February 2011) on 2 February 2011. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials of off-pump versus on-pump CABG irrespective of language, publication status and blinding were selected for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For statistical analysis of dichotomous data risk ratio (RR) and for continuous data mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used for analysis to assess the risk of random error due to sparse data and to multiple updating of accumulating data.

MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-six trials (10,716 participants) were included. Ten trials (4,950 participants) were considered to be low risk of bias. Pooled analysis of all trials showed that off-pump CABG increased all-cause mortality compared with on-pump CABG (189/5,180 (3.7%) versus 160/5144 (3.1%); RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.53; P =.04). In the trials at low risk of bias the effect was more pronounced (154/2,485 (6.2%) versus 113/2,465 (4.6%), RR 1.35,95% CI 1.07 to 1.70; P =.01). TSA showed that the risk of random error on the result was unlikely. Off-pump CABG resulted in fewer distal anastomoses (MD -0.28; 95% CI -0.40 to -0.16, P <.00001). No significant differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, renal insufficiency, or coronary re-intervention were observed. Off-pump CABG reduced post-operative atrial fibrillation compared with on-pump CABG, however, in trials at low risk of bias, the estimated effect was not significantly different.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review did not demonstrate any significant benefit of off-pump compared with on-pump CABG regarding mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction. In contrast, we observed better long-term survival in the group of patients undergoing on-pump CABG with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest. Based on the current evidence, on-pump CABG should continue to be the standard surgical treatment. However, off-pump CABG may be acceptable when there are contraindications for cannulation of the aorta and cardiopulmonary bypass. Further randomised clinical trials should address the optimal treatment in such patients.