Partial Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in Swine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock

BACKGROUND

Complete resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (C-REBOA) increases proximal mean arterial pressure (MAP) at the cost of distal organ ischemia, limiting the duration of intervention. We hypothesized that partial aortic occlusion (P-REBOA) would maintain a more physiologic proximal MAP and reduce distal tissue ischemia. We investigated the hemodynamic and physiologic effects of P-REBOA vs C-REBOA.

STUDY DESIGN

Fifteen swine were anesthetized, instrumented, splenectomized, and subjected to rapid 25% blood volume loss. They were randomized to C-REBOA, P-REBOA, or no intervention (controls). Partial REBOA was created by partially inflating an aortic balloon catheter to generate a 50% blood pressure gradient across the balloon. Hemodynamics were recorded and serum makers of ischemia and inflammation were measured. After 90 minutes of treatment, balloons were deflated to evaluate the immediate effects of reperfusion. End organs were histologically examined.

RESULTS

Complete REBOA produced supraphysiologic increases in proximal MAP after hemorrhage compared with more modest augmentation in the P-REBOA group (p < 0.01), with both groups significantly greater than controls (p < 0.01). Less rebound hypotension after balloon deflation was seen in the P-REBOA compared with C-REBOA groups. Complete REBOA resulted in higher serum lactate than both P-REBOA and controls (p < 0.01). Histology revealed early necrosis and disruption of duodenal mucosa in all C-REBOA animals, but none in P-REBOA animals.

CONCLUSIONS

In a porcine hemorrhagic shock model, P-REBOA resulted in more physiologically tolerable hemodynamic and ischemic changes compared with C-REBOA. Additional work is needed to determine whether the benefits associated with P-REBOA can both extend the duration of intervention and increase survival.

Which type of conditioning method protects the spinal cord from the ischemia–reperfusion injury in 24 hours?

Objective

This study was designed to test the effects of different types of preconditioning and postconditioning methods on spinal cord protection following aortic clamping.

Methods

The animals (rabbits) were divided into sham-operated, ischemic preconditioning, remote ischemic preconditioning, simultaneous aortic and ischemic remote preconditioning, and ischemic postconditioning groups. After neurological evaluations, ultrastructural analysis and immunohistochemical staining for caspase-3 were evaluated after 24 h following ischemia.

Results

The neurological outcomes of the remote ischemic preconditioning (4.2 ± 0.4) and ischemic postconditioning (4.6 ± 0.8) groups were significantly improved when compared with the ischemia group (2.2 ± 04). The immunohistochemical analysis revealed that the lowest percentage of apoptosis was in-group ischemic preconditioning at 12.5 ± 30.6%. In the comparison of intracellular edema in an ultrastructural analysis, the ischemic preconditioning and ischemic postconditioning groups had significantly lower values than the ischemia group.

Conclusion

The conditioning methods attenuate ischemia–reperfusion injury for spinal cord injury. Ischemic and remote preconditioning and also postconditioning methods are simple to perform and inexpensive.

Successful staged operation for acute type A aortic dissection with paraplegia

A 75-year-old man presented with both paraplegia and acute occlusion of the abdominal aorta at onset. Extraanatomical bypass was performed following spinal drainage. After 3 days, the ascending aorta replaced under cardiopulmonary bypass using the extraanatomical bypass graft for arterial cannulation. The abdominal aorta was replaced after 6 months. A staged operation is one of the options for acute aortic dissection with paraplegia and acute occlusion of the abdominal aorta.