Clinical and hemodynamic study of tilting disc heart valve: Single-center study

Aortic valve replacement in small aortic root- Bi-leaflet mechanical valve is superior to a Mono-leaflet mechanical valve

Background

Patient prosthetic mismatch is a serious but avoidable complication of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) complicated by a small aortic annulus. This study aims to compare early and midterm outcomes following aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a mono-leaflet (ML) valve and a bi-leaflet (BL) valve in a small aortic root.

Methods and selection

From January 1st, 2017 to December 31st, 2019, 98 patients diagnosed with small aortic root underwent isolated aortic valve replacement with either TTK Chitra valve (Mono-leaflet/ ML group) or St. Jude medical valve (Bi-leaflet/ BL group) of size 17/ 19 mm. Echocardiography was analyzed from medical records and telephonic follow-up.

Results

Baseline parameters were comparable. The ML group had 42 patients and the BL group had 56 patients. Aortic cross-clamp time, the incidence of severe patient prosthetic mismatch (p = 0.002) and mean, peak pressure gradients were high in the ML group. Duration of ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, the incidence of stroke, need for intra-aortic balloon pump, permanent pacemaker, dialysis, and left ventricular mass index in echocardiography were comparable between the two groups postoperatively. There was no early mortality in both group. Survival at the end of 5 years was 57 ± 14.4% in the ML group; 91.8 ± 4% in the BL group (p = 0.005). Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed elderly age as a risk factor for mortality.

Conclusion

We conclude that aortic valve replacement without any root widening procedure, using a small-sized mechanical valve provides acceptable early outcomes. Bi-leaflet mechanical valves provide better hemodynamics and survival percentage.

Clinical outcomes of bileaflet St. Jude Medical and tilting disc TTK Chitra mechanical heart valve prosthesis: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Comparative data on the clinical outcomes of TTK Chitra mechanical heart valve prosthesis (CHVP), an indigenously developed low-cost tilting disc valve and commonly used bileaflet valve, the St. Jude medical (SJM) prosthesis are sparse.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective follow-up study of consecutive patients undergoing mitral (MVR) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) with SJM or CHVP mechanical prostheses over a 6-year period at our institution.

RESULTS

Seven hundred and thirty-five patients who underwent isolated MVR (n = 510) or AVR (n = 225) were included in the study. Patients with CHVP were younger and belonged to a lower socioeconomic class. The study cohort was followed-up for 2836 patient-years (SJM: 1865.1, CHVP: 971.0). All-cause mortality (p = 0.894), valve-related mortality (p = 0.681), prosthetic valve thrombosis (p = 0.155), embolism (p = 0.210), hemorrhage (p = 0.959) and infective endocarditis (IE, p = 0.084) were similar between both valve on follow-up. Estimated event free survival was 2302 ± 1 days in SJM as compared to 2484 ± 65 days in CHVP group (p = 0.393). Valve type was not an independent predictor of adverse events after adjusting for baseline data, time in therapeutic range and aspirin use. Subgroup analysis of patients who underwent MVR and AVR showed similar functional improvement and outcomes, except for a higher incidence of IE with SJM at the aortic position (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

The indigenously developed, low-cost CHVP has comparable midterm clinical performance as SJM in aortic or mitral positions.

Numerical and in-vitro experimental assessment of the performance of a novel designed expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene stentless bi-leaflet valve for aortic valve replacement

The expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) heart valve can serve as a viable option for prosthetic aortic valve. In this study, an ePTFE bi-leaflet valve design for aortic valve replacement (AVR) is presented, and the performance of the proposed valve was assessed numerically and experimentally. The valve was designed using CAE software. The dynamic behavior of the newly designed bi-leaflet valve under time-varying physiological pressure loading was first investigated by using commercial finite element code. Then, in-vitro tests were performed to validate the simulation and to assess the hemodynamic performance of the proposed design. A tri-leaflet ePTFE valve was tested in-vitro under the same conditions as a reference. The maximum leaflet coaptation area of the bi-leaflet valve during diastole was 216.3 mm2. When fully closed, no leakage gap was observed and the free edges of the molded valve formed S-shaped lines. The maximum Von Mises stress during a full cardiac cycle was 4.20 MPa. The dynamic performance of the bi-leaflet valve was validated by the in-vitro test under physiological aortic pressure pulse. The effective orifice area (EOA), mean pressure gradient, regurgitant volume, leakage volume and energy loss of the proposed valve were 3.14 cm2, 8.74 mmHg, 5.93 ml/beat, 1.55 ml/beat and 98.99 mJ, respectively. This study reports a novel bi-leaflet valve design for AVR. The performance of the proposed valve was numerically and experimentally assessed. Compared with the reference valve, the proposed design exhibited better structural and hemodynamic performances, which improved valve competency. Moreover, the performance of the bi-leaflet design is comparable to commercialized valves available on the market. The results of the present study provide a viable option for the future clinical applications.