Aortic valve neocuspidisation using xenologous pericardium versus bioprosthetic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for aortic valve stenosis (AS) patients with small aortic root is associated with a higher rate of prosthesis-patient mismatch and suboptimal clinical outcomes. Aortic valve neocuspidisation using xenologous pericardium (xAVNeo) has shown favorable hemodynamic performance. The aim was to compare 6-year clinical outcomes of xAVNeo with SAVR.

METHODS

Between 2003-2018, 412 patients with severe AS and small aortic root received either xAVNeo (N=114) or bioprosthesis (N=298). After propensity matching, the cohort included 222 patients. The primary endpoints were early-, 6-year mortality and freedom from reoperation. Mean follow-up averaged 3.4±3.1 years and was 95% complete.

RESULTS

Early mortality was 8.1% for the SAVR group vs 9.9% for the xAVNeo group, OR 1.25 [CI95% 0.51-2.89]. The estimated survival probabilities at 6 years for the SAVR and xAVNeo cohorts were 89.9% and 88.8%, respectively, OR 1.07 [0.49-2.34]. Progressive degeneration of the neo-cusps resulted in mean gradients increase from 6.1±2.3 mmHg to 22.7±11.5 mmHg ( p<0.0001 ); cusp sclerosis was the most common indication for reoperation in the xAVNeo group with a linearised rate of 1.92% vs. 0.26% per patient-year, rate ratio = 7.41 [CI95% 0.95-333.7]. The freedom from reoperation was 84.8% at 6 years, inferior to that of the SAVR group (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Early clinical outcome and 6-year survival following xAVNeo and SAVR was comparable. However, xAVNeo using bovine pericardium was associated with a higher rate of structural valve deterioration and inferior freedom from reoperation when compared to SAVR.

Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Supra-Annular Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) in the TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry in patients undergoing supra-annular transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for de novo stenosis or failed surgical bioprostheses (transcatheter aortic valve [TAV]-in-surgical aortic valve [SAV]).

BACKGROUND

Severe PPM has been associated with adverse outcomes following TAVR, yet the clinical outcome of severe PPM after supra-annular TAVR is largely unknown.

METHODS

Supra-annular TAVR was performed in patients enrolled in the TVT Registry with de novo stenosis (n = 42,174) or TAV-in-SAV (n = 5,446). Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria were used to define severe PPM. The clinical impact of severe PPM on 1-year mortality and valve-related readmission was assessed using multivariate regression. A generalized linear mixed model was used to evaluate predictors of severe PPM.

RESULTS

Severe PPM was found in 5.3% of patients undergoing de novo TAVR and 27.0% of patients undergoing TAV-in-SAV. The presence of severe PPM was not significantly associated with 1-year mortality or valve-related readmissions in both groups. Mean aortic gradients were higher in patients with severe PPM than in those without severe PPM at 1 month (9.7 ± 5.7 mm Hg vs. 7.3 ± 4.0 mm Hg; p < 0.001) and 1 year (10.2 ± 6.4 mm Hg vs. 8.0 ± 4.3 mm Hg; p < 0.001). Pre-procedural factors, including a <20-mm aortic annulus, were positive predictors of severe PPM in patients undergoing de novo TAVR (area under the curve = 0.795) and TAV-in-SAV (area under the curve = 0.764).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe PPM after supra-annular TAVR was not associated with increased 1-year mortality or valve-related readmissions. Longer-term follow-up is needed to determine if higher residual gradients in patients with severe PPM predict long-term outcomes. (STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry [TVT Registry]; NCT01737528).