Surgical resection of pulmonary inflammatory pseudotumors: long-term outcome

Inflammatory pseudotumor and myofibroblastic inflammatory tumor. Diagnostic criteria and prognostic differences

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) are two very rare entities that were formerly included in the same category; however, today they are considered two different diseases due to the neoplastic origin of the IMT. Our objective is to share our experience in the management of these two types of tumors that we must take into account in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary masses or nodules.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with a pathological diagnosis of IPT and IMT who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively studied. We recorded the pre and postoperative information of each one, as well as the survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients, 8 were men and 5 women. The mean age of presentation was 53,5 years. An atypical segmentectomy was performed in 6 patients; a lobectomy was necessary in 6 and a pneumonectomy in 1 case. In all cases a complete resection was achieved. Diagnosis was possible thanks to histology, immunohistochemical (IHQ) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques determining the expression of IgG4 and the rearrangement of ALK, respectively. After a median follow up of 49 months, we didn't find any loco-regional or distant recurrence in the patients studied.

CONCLUSION

IPT and IMT are rare tumors with a very good prognostic. The diagnosis of both entities is based mainly on specific anatomopathological techniques. Surgery has, in most cases, both a diagnostic and therapeutic role.

Common Presentation of Uncommon Disease: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the lung, case report

Background

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) of the lung is a rare lung tumor, accounting for 0.7% of all lung tumors. They are usually benign, but can invade surrounding structures, undergo malignant transformation, recur, or even metastasize.

Case report

We report a 44-year-old adult diabetic male from Saudi Arabia who had been suffering from cough with severe sputum and left shoulder pain for 2 weeks. Chest radiography (X-ray and computed tomography (CT)) revealed the presence of a mass lesion in the left lower upper lobe with central cavitation. The diagnosis of inflammatory myofibroblast lung tumor was confirmed by histological and immunohistochemical examination of the CT guided lung biopsy. The patient was successfully treated with surgical resection of the tumor by left limited thoracotomy with safety margin, and IMT was also documented.

Conclusion

A high degree of suspicion of a solitary pulmonary mass is required for diagnosis and management of an inflammatory myofibroblastic lung tumor. The clinical and radiologic presentation of an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor is nonspecific and the diagnosis is rarely made before surgical biopsy. Histologic and immunohistochemical examination is usually required to confirm the diagnosis and prevent recurrence.

Operated pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors: Our experience with 17 cases

Background

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological features of pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor cases operated in our clinic.

Methods

A total of 17 inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor patients (5 males, 12 females; median age: 46 years) who were operated in our clinic between February 2000 and July 2019 were included. Data including sex, age, symptoms, accompanying diseases, tumor localization, tumor diameter, endobronchial extension, maximum standard uptake value of the tumors, surgery type, recurrence, and survival data were analyzed.

Results

Two patients were diagnosed preoperatively and two patients were diagnosed during surgery using frozen-section method before resection. Three (17.7%) patients underwent pneumonectomy, five (29.4%) patients lobectomy, three (17.7%) patients segmentectomy, five (29.4%) patients wedge resection, and one (5.8%) patient bronchial sleeve resection. All patients had complete resection with negative margins. None of them had lymph node metastasis. Median follow-up was 122 (range, 8 to 245 months) months. None of the patients received adjuvant therapy, there was no tumor recurrence or tumor-related death.

Conclusion

It is difficult to make a preoperative diagnosis of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor patients. Systematic lymph node dissection is not required in diagnosed patients. Complete resection is the most important prognostic factor, and it is critical to achieve this with the smallest resection possible.

Inflammatory pseudotumor and myofibroblastic inflammatory tumor. Diagnostic criteria and prognostic differences

INTRODUCTION

Inflammatory pseudotumor (IPT) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) are two very rare entities that were formerly included in the same category; however, today they are considered two different diseases due to the neoplastic origin of the IMT. Our objective is to share our experience in the management of these two types of tumors that we must take into account in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary masses or nodules.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with a pathological diagnosis of IPT and IMT who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2019 were retrospectively studied. We recorded the pre and postoperative information of each one, as well as the survival analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients, 8 were men and 5 women. The mean age of presentation was 53,5 years. An atypical segmentectomy was performed in 6 patients; a lobectomy was necessary in 6 and a pneumonectomy in 1 case. In all cases a complete resection was achieved. Diagnosis was possible thanks to histology, immunohistochemical (IHQ) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques determining the expression of IgG4 and the rearrangement of ALK, respectively. After a median follow up of 49 months, we didńt find any loco-regional or distant recurrence in the patients studied.

CONCLUSION

IPT and IMT are rare tumors with a very good prognostic. The diagnosis of both entities is based mainly on specific anatomopathological techniques. Surgery has, in most cases, both a diagnostic and therapeutic role.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the lung: A rare entity

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare mesenchymal tumor usually seen within the first and second decade. They are extremely rare in adults, constituting less than 1% of adult lung tumors. It's usually benign, but it had a tendency for local recurrence. We report a case of asymptomatic inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of lung in a 46-year-old non-smoker woman.