Outcomes of emergency thoracotomy for trauma in a general hospital in Singapore

A critical appraisal of emergency resuscitative thoracotomy in a Western European level 1 trauma centre: a 13-year experience

Emergency Resuscitative Thoracotomy (ERT) is a lifesaving procedure in selected patients. Outcome mostly in blunt trauma is believed to be poor. The primary aim of this study was to determine the predictors of postoperative mortality following ERT. We retrospectively reviewed 34 patients ≥ 18 years who underwent ERT at San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital (Rome, Italy) between January 2009 and December 2022 with traumatic arrest for blunt or penetrating injuries. Of 34 ERT, 28 (82.4%) were for blunt trauma and 6 (17.6%) were for penetrating trauma. Injury Severity Score (p-value 0.014), positive E-FAST (p-value 0.023), Systolic Blood Pressure (p-value 0.001), lactate arterial blood (p-value 0.012), pH arterial blood (p-value 0.007), and bicarbonate arterial blood (p-value < 0.001) were significantly associated with postoperative mortality in a univariate model. After adjustment, the only independent predictor of postoperative mortality was Injury Severity Score (p-value 0.048). Our experience suggests that ERT is a technique that should be utilized for patients with critical penetrating injuries and blunt trauma in patients in extremis. Our study highlights as negative prognostic factors high values of ISS and lactate arterial blood, a positive E-FAST, and low values of Systolic Blood Pressure, pH arterial blood and bicarbonate arterial blood.

Emergency Resuscitative Thoracotomy for Civilian Thoracic Trauma in the Field and Emergency Department Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Emergency department resuscitative thoracotomy (ED-RT) or prehospital resuscitative thoracotomy (PH-RT) is performed for trauma patients with impending or full cardiovascular collapse. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyze outcomes in patients with thoracic trauma receiving PH-RT and ED-RT.

METHODS

PubMed, JAMA Network, and CINAHL electronic databases were searched to identify studies published on ED-RT or PH-RT between 2000-2020. Patients were grouped by location of procedure and type of thoracic injury (blunt versus penetrating).

RESULTS

A total of 49 studies met the criteria for qualitative analysis, and 43 for quantitative analysis. 43 studies evaluated ED-RT and 5 evaluated PH-RT. Time from arrival on scene to PH-RT >5 min was associated with increased neurological complications and time from the initial encounter to PH-RT or ED-RT >10 min was associated with increased mortality. ISS ≥ 25 and absent signs of life were also associated with increased mortality. There was higher mortality in all PH-RT (93.5%) versus all ED-RT (81.8%) (P = 0.02). Among ED-RTs, a significant difference was found in mortality rate between patients with blunt (92.8%) versus penetrating (78.7%) injuries (P < 0.001). When considering only blunt or penetrating injury types, no significant difference in RT mortality rate was found between ED-RT and PH-RT (P = 0.65 and P = 0.95, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

ED-RT and PH-RT are potentially life-saving procedures for patients with penetrating thoracic injuries in extremis and with signs of life. The efficacy of this procedure is time sensitive. Moreover, there appears to be a greater mortality risk for patients with thoracic trauma receiving RT in the PH setting compared to the ED setting. More studies are needed to determine the significance of PH-RT mortality.