Pilot validation of an individualised pharmacokinetic algorithm for protamine dosing after systemic heparinisation for cardiopulmonary bypass

Protamine and Heparin Interactions: A Narrative Review

ABSTRACT

Protamine, first isolated from salmon fish sperm and now produced through recombinant biotechnology, is an antidote that neutralizes the anticoagulant properties of heparin. Protamine function is based on the capacity to dissociate the heparin-antithrombin III (AT III) complex (an important link that promotes blood fluidification by inhibiting coagulation), forming the inactive heparin-protamine complex. Protamine has itself dose-dependent anticoagulant properties: It interferes with coagulation factors and platelet function; it stimulates fibrinolysis; it can lead to thrombocytopenia and reduction in thrombin-related platelet aggregation; it decreases platelet response to thrombin receptor agonist in a dose-dependent manner. In this review, we will focus on protamine and its interaction with heparin. Notably, protamine is able to antagonize not only unfractionated heparin (UFH) but also low molecular weight heparins to various degrees. Protamine-allergic and anaphylactoid systemic reactions may affect up to 1 in 10 people and should be prevented and treated early.

Optimal protamine dosing after cardiopulmonary bypass: The PRODOSE adaptive randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The dose of protamine required following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is often determined by the dose of heparin required pre-CPB, expressed as a fixed ratio. Dosing based on mathematical models of heparin clearance is postulated to improve protamine dosing precision and coagulation. We hypothesised that protamine dosing based on a 2-compartment model would improve thromboelastography (TEG) parameters and reduce the dose of protamine administered, relative to a fixed ratio.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We undertook a 2-stage, adaptive randomised controlled trial, allocating 228 participants to receive protamine dosed according to a mathematical model of heparin clearance or a fixed ratio of 1 mg of protamine for every 100 IU of heparin required to establish anticoagulation pre-CPB. A planned, blinded interim analysis was undertaken after the recruitment of 50% of the study cohort. Following this, the randomisation ratio was adapted from 1:1 to 1:1.33 to increase recruitment to the superior arm while maintaining study power. At the conclusion of trial recruitment, we had randomised 121 patients to the intervention arm and 107 patients to the control arm. The primary endpoint was kaolin TEG r-time measured 3 minutes after protamine administration at the end of CPB. Secondary endpoints included ratio of kaolin TEG r-time pre-CPB to the same metric following protamine administration, requirement for allogeneic red cell transfusion, intercostal catheter drainage at 4 hours postoperatively, and the requirement for reoperation due to bleeding. The trial was listed on a clinical trial registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03532594). Participants were recruited between April 2018 and August 2019. Those in the intervention/model group had a shorter mean kaolin r-time (6.58 [SD 2.50] vs. 8.08 [SD 3.98] minutes; p = 0.0016) post-CPB. The post-protamine thromboelastogram of the model group was closer to pre-CPB parameters (median pre-CPB to post-protamine kaolin r-time ratio 0.96 [IQR 0.78-1.14] vs. 0.75 [IQR 0.57-0.99]; p < 0.001). We found no evidence of a difference in median mediastinal/pleural drainage at 4 hours postoperatively (140 [IQR 75-245] vs. 135 [IQR 94-222] mL; p = 0.85) or requirement (as a binary outcome) for packed red blood cell transfusion at 24 hours postoperatively (19 [15.8%] vs. 14 [13.1%] p = 0.69). Those in the model group had a lower median protamine dose (180 [IQR 160-210] vs. 280 [IQR 250-300] mg; p < 0.001). Important limitations of this study include an unblinded design and lack of generalisability to certain populations deliberately excluded from the study (specifically children, patients with a total body weight >120 kg, and patients requiring therapeutic hypothermia to <28°C).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a mathematical model to guide protamine dosing in patients following CPB improved TEG r-time and reduced the dose administered relative to a fixed ratio. No differences were detected in postoperative mediastinal/pleural drainage or red blood cell transfusion requirement in our cohort of low-risk patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier NCT03532594.

Are We Able to Dose Protamine Accurately Yet? A Review of the Protamine Conundrum

Without anticoagulation, cardiopulmonary bypass would not have developed over the last nearly 60 years into one of the most influential innovations in medicine; without the ability to reverse anticoagulation, cardiac surgery might not have become the common intervention, which is now practiced globally. Despite the recent breathtaking developments in extracorporeal technology, heparin and protamine remain the pillars of anticoagulation and its reversal until this day. However, there is still much controversy in particular about protamine dosing regimens. A number of recent publications investigating various approaches to dosing protamine have rekindled this debate. This review is seeking to capture the current thinking about protamine dosing after cessation of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Analysis of the Action of Quaternized Chitosans with Different Molecular Weight on Anticoagulant Activity of Heparins In Vitro

Quaternized derivatives of chitosan with a substitution degree of 85-98% (highly substituted) synthesized from chitosans with a molecular weight of 5, 10, 20 kDa, with a degree of deacetylation of 89-98%, and the code numbers of QChit 5, QChit 10, QChit 20, respectively, completely neutralize antithrombin activity of unfractionated heparin and partially neutralize aXa activity of low-molecular-weight heparin (clexane), similar to protamine sulfate. The advantages of QChit 5 and QChit 10 over QChit 20 and protamine sulphate are the follows: the effect is achieved at lower concentrations and in greater concentration range; they do not promote platelet aggregation; in a concentration of 0.0072 mg/ml they do not destroy the erythrocyte membranes.

Calculation Algorithm Reduces Protamine Doses Without Increasing Blood Loss or the Transfusion Rate in Cardiac Surgery: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to investigate whether the HeProCalc algorithm affects heparin and protamine dosage, postoperative blood loss, and transfusion rate.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 210 cardiac surgery patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Twenty patients were excluded because of re-exploration for localized surgical bleeding (n = 9), violation of protocol (n = 2), aprotinin use (n = 3 and nadir body temperature <32°C (n = 6).

INTERVENTIONS

Study participants were randomly assigned to either traditional heparin and protamine dosage based on body weight only (control group) or dosage based on the HeProCalc algorithm (intervention group).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The initial median heparin dose was 32,500 IU (interquartile range [IQR] 30,000-35,000) in the intervention group compared with 35,000 IU (IQR 30,000-37,500) (p = 0.025) in the control group. The total heparin dose in the intervention group was 40,000 IU (IQR 32,500-47,500) compared with 42,500 IU (IQR 35,000-50,000) in the control group (p = 0.685). The total protamine dose was 210 mg (IQR 190-240) in the intervention group compared with 350 mg (IQR 300-380) (p < 0.001) in the control group. The ratio of total protamine to initial dose of heparin in the intervention group was 0.62 compared with 1.0 (p < 0.001). The amount of chest tube bleeding after 12 postoperative hours was 320 mL (IQR 250-460) in the intervention group compared with 350 mL (IQR 250-450) (p = 0.754) in the control group. Neither the transfusion rate nor postoperative blood loss differed significantly between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Use of the HeProCalc algorithm reduced protamine dosage and the protamine/heparin ratio after cardiopulmonary bypass compared with conventional dosage based on weight without significant effect on postoperative blood loss or the transfusion rate.