Use of bivalirudin as a primary anticoagulant in a child during Berlin Heart EXCOR ventricular assist device support

Bivalirudin May Reduce the Need for Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Pediatric Cardiac Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

We retrospectively compared anticoagulation with heparin and bivalirudin for 32 consecutive children under 18 years old during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in our pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU). Between September 2015 and January 2018, 14 patients received heparin, 13 venoarterial (VA), and 1 venovenous (VV). From February 2018 to September 2019, 18 received bivalirudin (all VA). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) percentage of time with therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time and activated clotting time was bivalirudin 54 (14%) and heparin 57 (11%), p = 0.4647, and percentage of time supratherapeutic was bivalirudin 18 (10%) and heparin 27 (12%), p = 0.0238. Phlebotomy-associated blood loss per hour of ECMO was double in the heparin compared with bivalirudin group 1.08 ml/h (0.20 ml/h), compared with 0.51 ml/h (0.07 ml/h), p = 0.0003, as well as interventions to control bleeding. Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions significantly correlated with higher blood loss in the heparin group (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.49, p = 0.0047). Overall amount of blood product utilization was not different between the groups. Survival to ECMO decannulation was 89% for bivalirudin and 57% for heparin, p = 0.0396, although 6 month survival was not significantly different (67% versus 57%, p = 0.5809). Heparin may increase the need for PRBC transfusions and strategies to attenuate bleeding when compared with bivalirudin for children receiving ECMO in PCICU.

A Review of Bivalirudin for Pediatric and Adult Mechanical Circulatory Support

As the use of mechanical circulatory support has increased in volume and complexity, anticoagulation remains an intricate component of a patient’s pharmacotherapy plan. Traditionally, heparin has been the primary anticoagulant utilized because of its ease of titration and  familiarity of use. More recently, bivalirudin, a direct thrombin inhibitor, has attracted attention as a potential alternative to traditional therapy. While labeled for use in percutaneous coronary interventions, it is utilized off-label for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and mechanical circulatory support. A literature search identified ten studies in which bivalirudin was used in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and five studies in which it was used in ventricular assist devices. The purpose of this review was to summarize the currently available literature for bivalirudin use for mechanical circulatory support in both adult and pediatric patients.

Time in Therapeutic Range for Bivalirudin Among Pediatric Ventricular Assist Device Recipients

Given the adverse event rates involving bleeding and thrombosis among children on ventricular assist devices (VADs), anticoagulant management has become a focal point for quality improvement and innovation. There may be advantages to using direct thrombin inhibitors, such as bivalirudin, though this has not been fully explored. As the percent time in therapeutic range (%TTR) for anticoagulants is classically associated with improved clinical outcomes, we evaluated the %TTR for bivalirudin among pediatric VAD recipients. Using a modification of the Rosendaal method, %TTR was calculated using activated partial thromboplastin time measurements for 11 VAD recipients in the early postoperative period (postoperative days 0-14) and for the duration of VAD support. In the initial 2 weeks after VAD implant, mean %TTR was 68.7 (±13.0). During the entire support course, the mean %TTR improved to 79.6 (±11.0). There was an era effect with improving %TTR in the latter half of the study period. We report very good %TTR for bivalirudin both in the first 2 weeks post implant and this improved over the duration of support. Because %TTR reflects the degree of safety and efficacy in chronic anticoagulation, this relatively high %TTR among a diverse, often critically ill cohort suggests that bivalirudin may be a promising agent. Although this study was underpowered to comprehensively evaluate adverse events on bivalirudin, this represents an important next step for larger scale study.

The role of ventricular assist device in children

The first and successful implantation of a ventricular assist device in 1990 has allowed an 8-year-old child with an end-stage heart failure to undergo a heart transplantation. This milestone paved the way to consider support with ventricular assist in the armamentarium of heart failure management in infants, children and adolescents. Several systems have evolved and faded owing to unacceptable complications. Indications and contraindications to implantation have been established. Anticoagulation management is still on its way to impeccability. Despite the challenges, issues and concerns revolving around ventricular assist devices, the system definitely supports pediatric patients with end-stage heart failure until heart transplantation and could allow recovery of the myocardium.

Pediatric ventricular assist devices: what are the key considerations and requirements?

Introduction: The development of ventricular assist devices (VADs) have enabled myocardial recovery and improved patient survival until heart transplantation. However, device options remain limited for children and lag in development.Areas covered: This review focuses on the evolution of pediatric VADs in becoming to be an accepted treatment option in advanced heart failure, discusses the classification of VADs available for children, i.e. types of pumps and duration of support, and defines implantation indications and explantation criteria, describes attendant complications and long-term outcome of VAD support. Furthermore, we emphasize the key considerations and requirements in the application of these devices in infants, children and adolescents.Expert opinion: Increasing use of VADs has facilitated a leading edge in management of advanced heart failure either as a bridge to transplantation or as a bridge to myocardial recovery. In newborns and small children, the EXCOR Pediatric VAD remains the only reliable option. In some patients ventricular unloading may lead to complete myocardial recovery. There is a strong need for pumps that are fully implantable, suitable for single ventricle physiology, such as the right ventricle.