Microbubbles

Gas embolism is a known complication of various invasive procedures, and its management is well established. The consequence of gas microemboli, microbubbles, is underrecognized and usually overlooked in daily practice. We present the current data regarding the pathophysiology of microemboli and their clinical consequences. Microbubbles originate mainly in extracorporeal lines and devices, such as cardiopulmonary bypass and dialysis machines, but may be endogenous in cases of decompression sickness or mechanical heart valves. Circulating in the blood stream, microbubbles lodge in the capillary bed of various organs, mainly the lungs. The microbubble obstructs blood flow in the capillary, thus causing tissue ischemia, followed by inflammatory response and complement activation. Aggregation of platelets and clot formation occurs as well, leading to further obstruction of microcirculation and tissue damage. In this review, we present evidence of the biological and clinical detrimental effects of microbubbles as demonstrated by studies in animal models and humans, and discuss management of the microbubble problem with regard to detection, prevention, and treatment.

Ex vivo testing of the Quart arterial line filter

Arterial line filters are now routinely used in cardiac surgery in order to decrease the microemboli load to the patient. The Quart filter (Jostra, Hirrlingen, Germany) with a new planar construction design, an easy de-airing system and an integrated bypass, was tested for air filtration capacity and resistance to blood path in a standardized setting with surviving animals. Three calves (mean body weight: 71+/-3.4 kg) were connected to a standard cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit by jugular venous and carotid arterial cannulation with a mean flow rate of 3.5 l/min. The arterial line filter was challenged with upstream injections of boluses of air of 5, 10 and 15 ml, respectively. A Doppler ultrasound was positioned downstream on the arterial line to measure bubble count and size. The pressure drop through the filter was monitored at flow rates of between 1 and 6 l/min. At the end of the procedure the animals were weaned from the CPB and, thereafter, from the ventilator. After 7 days, the animals were sacrificed electively. This study shows that important quantities of air can be injected into the arterial line upstream of the filter with small volumes of small sized bubbles recorded downstream. With the 5 ml air bolus injection, mean values of 0.3+/-0.6 bubbles of 30 and 40 microm were detected, whereas with the 20 ml bolus, 32.6+/-8.7 bubbles of 10 microm, 3.7+/-1.1 bubbles of 30 microm, 3.3+/-0.6 bubbles of 40 microm and 0.7+/-1.1 bubbles of 50 microm were recorded. The blood path resistance at different blood flow rates was well within the acceptable range with a pressure drop of 20+/-0 and 26.6+/-5.7 mmHg at flow rates of 4 and 5 l/min, respectively. With its planar concept, the Quart filter offers good air filtering capacity both in terms of bubble count and size after injection of large boluses of air, without any increase of resistance to the blood path. Moreover, it offers a venting function and an integrated bypass system.

Laboratory evaluation of the Pall LG6 leukocyte depleting arterial line filter

The Pall LG6 arterial line filter has been designed to remove free circulating leukocytes from the arterial line of the extracorporeal circuit employed in openheart surgery. The filter was evaluated and compared to a control filter (Pall Stat-Prime) in terms of its general blood handling characteristics, particularly with regard to the associated level of leukocyte removal. The gross air handling characteristics of the filters were also assessed together with pressure drop. It was found that the filters differed little in terms of all factors studied other than the level of leukocyte depletion. The LG6 filter was associated with substantial levels of leukocyte depletion, particularly the depletion of neutrophils. Over the 90 minute perfusion period the LG6 filter was found to be associated with a neutrophil depletion rate of around 70% while preferentially sparing lymphocytes. This compared to a 10-20% depletion rate in the control filter. This was achieved without apparently compromising the performance of the filter in terms of the other factors studied.