Conventional haemofiltration during routine coronary bypass surgery

Continuous Ultrafiltration Enhances Recovery After Adult Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with systemic inflammation. Ultrafiltration used throughout the cardiopulmonary bypass time, continuously, is hypothesized to be an immunomodulatory therapy.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials investigating continuous forms of ultrafiltration during adult cardiac surgery (CRD42020219309) was conducted and is reported following PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Scopus were searched on November 3, 2021. The primary endpoint was operative mortality, and secondary outcomes included intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), ventilation time, acute kidney injury or renal failure, and pneumonia. Each study was assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk-of Bias-Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB2) instrument. Outcomes were analyzed with inverse variance random-effects models and assessed for GRADE quality of evidence.

Results

Twelve randomized trials consisting of 989 adult patients undergoing coronary, valvular, or concomitant cardiac procedures were included. Compared to controls, patients receiving continuous ultrafiltration had no statistical difference in operative mortality; risk ratio of 0.32 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-1.03; P = 0.06). Reductions occurred in ICU LOS, by 7.01 hours (95% CI: 1.86-12.15; P = 0.008); ventilation time, by 2.11 hours (95% CI: 0.71-3.51; P = 0.003); and incidence of pneumonia, with a risk ratio of 0.33 (95% CI: 0.15-0.75; P = 0.008). There wasno difference in renal injury. The GRADE quality of evidence for these outcomes ranged from very low to low.

Conclusions

Continuous forms of ultrafiltration enhance recovery after adult cardiac surgery by reducing ICU LOS, ventilation time, and incidence of pneumonia. A multicentre randomized trial could confirm and generalize these findings.

Ultrafiltration and cardiopulmonary bypass associated acute kidney injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary bypass is known to raise the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Previous studies have identified numerous risk factors of cardiopulmonary bypass including the possible impact of perioperative ultrafiltration. However, the association between ultrafiltration (UF) and AKI remains conflicting. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to further examine the relationship between UF and AKI.

HYPOTHESIS

Ultrafiltration during cardiac surgery increases the risk of developping Acute kidney Injury.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and SCOPUS through July 2021. The RevMan (version 5.4) software was used to calculate the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences along with their associated confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

We identified 12 studies with a total of 8005 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of AKI between the group who underwent UF and the control group who did not (RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.64-1). Subgroup analysis on patients with previous renal insufficiency also yielded nonsignificant difference (RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.53 -1.33, p = .47). Subgroup analysis based on volume of ultrafiltrate removed (> or <2900 ml) was not significant and did not increase the AKI risk as predicted (RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.63 -1.07, p  = .15). We also did subgroup analysis according to the type of UF and again no significant difference in AKI incidence between UF groups and controls was observed in either the conventional ultrafiltration (CUF), modified ultrafiltration (MUF), zero-balanced ultrafiltration (ZBUF), or combined MUF and CUF subgroups.

CONCLUSION

UF in cardiac surgery is not associated with increased AKI incidence and may be safely used even in baseline chronic injury patients.

Higher total ultrafiltration volume during cardiopulmonary bypass-assisted infant cardiac surgery is associated with acute kidney injury and fluid overload

BACKGROUND

Ultrafiltration (UF) is used for fluid removal during and after infant cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery to reduce fluid overload. Excessive UF may have the opposite of its intended effect, resulting in acute kidney injury (AKI), oliganuria, and fluid retention.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective review of infants treated with conventional and/or modified UF during CPB surgery. UF volume was indexed to weight. AKI was defined using serum creatinine "Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO)" criteria. Fluid balance was defined according to: [Formula: see text]. Peak fluid overload was determined on postoperative day 3. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for multiple covariates was used to explore associations with UF, AKI, and fluid overload.

RESULTS

Five hundred thirty subjects < 1 year of age underwent CPB-assisted congenital heart surgery with UF. Sixty-four (12%) developed postoperative AKI. On multivariable regression, higher indexed total UF volume was associated with increased AKI risk (OR 1.11, 95% CI=1.04-1.19, p = 0.003). UF volume > 119.9 mL/kg did not reduce peak fluid overload. Subjects with AKI took longer to reach a negative fluid balance (2 vs. 3 days, p = 0.04). Those with more complex surgery were at highest AKI risk (STAT 3 [25-75 percentile: 3-4] in AKI group versus STAT 3 [25-75 percentile: 2-4] in non-AKI group, p = 0.05). AKI was reduced in subjects undergoing more complex surgery and treated with UF volume < 119.9 mL/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

Judicious use of UF in more complex congenital cardiac surgery reduces the risk of AKI.

Intraoperative Hemofiltration in Adults: Prevention of Hypercirculatory Syndrome?

Hypercirculatory syndrome (HCS) after cardiac surgery may be a sequela of extracorporeal circulation due to hemodilution and release of inflammatory mediators. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of intraoperative hemofiltration (HF) on the incidence of HCS. A prospective cohort study of 80 patients scheduled for elective coronary bypass was performed. The patients were randomized to two groups: in the conventional (CONV) group 40 patients were treated conventionally and in the HF group 40 patients underwent intraoperative HF. There was no perioperative mortality. The incidence of HCS was comparable in both groups (32% in CONV group versus 40% in HF group; n.s.). Mean cardiac output was higher and systemic vascular resistance lower in CONV group patients than in HF group patients, however these differences did not reach statistical significance. According to this data intraoperative HF does not prevent postoperative HCS induced by cardiopulmonary bypass. Further studies are required to identify the etiology of HCS, and to prevent it occurring after open-heart surgery.

Conventional hemofiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass increases the serum lactate level in adult cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of hemofiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass on lactate level in adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

An observational study.

SETTING

Prince Sultan cardiac center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included 283 patients classified into two groups: Hemofiltration group (n=138), hemofiltration was done during CPB. Control group (n = 145), patients without hemofiltration.

INTERVENTIONS

Hemofiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Monitors included hematocrit, lactate levels, mixed venous oxygen saturation, amount of fluid removal during hemofiltration and urine output. The lactate elevated in group H than group C (P < 0.05), and the PH showed metabolic acidosis in group H (P < 0.05). The mixed venous oxygen saturation decreased in group H than group C (P < 0.05). The number of transfused packed red blood cells was lower in group H than group C (P < 0.05). The hematocrit was higher in group H than group C (P < 0.05). The urine output was lower in group H than group C (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemofiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass leads to hemoconcentration, elevated lactate level and increased inotropic support. There are some recommendations for hemofiltration: First; Hemofiltration should be limited for patients with impaired renal function, positive fluid balance, reduced response to diuretics or prolonged bypass time more than 2 hours. Second; Minimal amount of fluids should be administered to maintain adequate cardiac output and reduction of priming volumes is preferable to maintain controlled hemodilution. Third; it should be done before weaning of or after cardiopulmonary bypass and not during the whole time of cardiopulmonary bypass.

Impact of Ultrafiltration on Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: The Michigan Experience

BACKGROUND

This study examines the relationship between the use and volume of conventional ultrafiltration (CUF) and the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) after isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

METHODS

A total of 6,407 consecutive patients underwent isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery between 2010 and 2013 at 21 medical centers participating in the PERFusion Measures and Outcomes (PERForm) registry. We assessed the effect of CUF use on AKI and other postoperative sequelae using a generalized linear mixed-effect model with a logit link. We also modeled the effect of increasing volume of CUF per weight on AKI, and tested for any modification by a patient's preoperative kidney function.

RESULTS

Patients having CUF were more likely to have diabetes, vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, history of a myocardial infarction, or an intraaortic balloon pump (p < 0.05). They had lower preoperative and nadir hematocrits, creatinine clearance, and ejection fraction (p < 0.05). Patients exposed to CUF had higher adjusted risk of AKI (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; p = 0.002), although similar rates of death, stroke, and reoperation for bleeding (p > 0.05). The risk of AKI was modified by a patient's preoperative kidney function (p < 0.0004). Among patients with a creatinine clearance of less than 99.6 mL/min (95% confidence interval, 67.6 to 137.5), increasing volume of CUF was associated with a higher risk of AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients exposed to CUF had a higher adjusted risk of AKI. Clinical teams should consider lower volumes of CUF among patients with low creatinine clearance to minimize the risk of AKI.

A Single-Center Randomized Trial of Intraoperative Zero-Balanced Ultrafiltration During Cardiopulmonary Bypass for Patients With Impaired Kidney Function Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The authors investigated whether zero-balance ultrafiltration (Z-BUF) during bypass significantly improves clinical and cost outcomes or biomarkers of kidney injury for patients with preoperative kidney impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]<60 mL/minute) undergoing cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A single-center randomized controlled trial recruited, patients between 2010 and 2013, with a 12-months follow-up.

SETTING

Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred ninety-nine patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were assigned randomly to receive zero-balance ultrafiltration (Z-BUF) or not, with stratification for degree of kidney dysfunction and diabetes.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The authors assessed clinical efficacy and kidney function biomarkers. Cumulative probability of discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier plots and was found not to be significantly different between the two trial arms (p = 0.61). After adjusting for EuroSCORE, diabetes, eGFR, cardioplegia types and type of surgery in a Cox proportional hazard model, hazard ratios (HR) for ICU length of stay between the Z-BUF and no-Z-BUF groups was not significantly different: HR (95% CI): 0.89 (0.66, 1.20; p = 0.44). In contrast, significant reductions in postoperative chest infections and the composite of clinical endpoints (death, strokes, and myocardial infarctions) in the Z-BUF group were observed. In addition, Z-BUF significantly abrogated the rise in the kidney damage markers urinary NGAL/creatinine ratio, urea, creatinine and eGFR during CPB and adverse events risks.

CONCLUSIONS

Z-BUF during bypass surgery is associated with significant reductions in morbidity and biomarkers of CPB-induced acute kidney injury soon after CPB, which are indicative of clearance of inflammatory/immune mediators from the circulation.

Management of intraoperative fluid balance and blood conservation techniques in adult cardiac surgery

Blood transfusions are associated with adverse physiologic effects and increased cost, and therefore reduction of blood product use during surgery is a desirable goal for all patients. Cardiac surgery is a major consumer of donor blood products, especially when cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is used, because hematocrit drops precipitously during CPB due to blood loss and blood cell dilution. Advanced age, low preoperative red blood cell volume (preoperative anemia or small body size), preoperative antiplatelet or antithrombotic drugs, complex or re-operative procedures or emergency operations, and patient comorbidities were identified as important transfusion risk indicators in a report recently published by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. This report also identified several pre- and intraoperative interventions that may help reduce blood transfusions, including off-pump procedures, preoperative autologous blood donation, normovolemic hemodilution, and routine cell saver use.A multimodal approach to blood conservation, with high-risk patients receiving all available interventions, may help preserve vital organ perfusion and reduce blood product utilization. In addition, because positive intravenous fluid balance is a significant factor affecting hemodilution during cardiac surgery, especially when CPB is used, strategies aimed at limiting intraoperative fluid balance positiveness may also lead to reduced blood product utilization.This review discusses currently available techniques that can be used intraoperatively in an attempt to avoid or minimize fluid balance positiveness, to preserve the patient's own red blood cells, and to decrease blood product utilization during cardiac surgery.

2011 update to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists blood conservation clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines reflect published literature. Because of the ever changing literature base, it is necessary to update and revise guideline recommendations from time to time. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons recommends review and possible update of previously published guidelines at least every three years. This summary is an update of the blood conservation guideline published in 2007.

METHODS

The search methods used in the current version differ compared to the previously published guideline. Literature searches were conducted using standardized MeSH terms from the National Library of Medicine PUBMED database list of search terms. The following terms comprised the standard baseline search terms for all topics and were connected with the logical 'OR' connector--Extracorporeal circulation (MeSH number E04.292), cardiovascular surgical procedures (MeSH number E04.100), and vascular diseases (MeSH number C14.907). Use of these broad search terms allowed specific topics to be added to the search with the logical 'AND' connector.

RESULTS

In this 2011 guideline update, areas of major revision include: 1) management of dual anti-platelet therapy before operation, 2) use of drugs that augment red blood cell volume or limit blood loss, 3) use of blood derivatives including fresh frozen plasma, Factor XIII, leukoreduced red blood cells, platelet plasmapheresis, recombinant Factor VII, antithrombin III, and Factor IX concentrates, 4) changes in management of blood salvage, 5) use of minimally invasive procedures to limit perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion, 6) recommendations for blood conservation related to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and cardiopulmonary perfusion, 7) use of topical hemostatic agents, and 8) new insights into the value of team interventions in blood management.

CONCLUSIONS

Much has changed since the previously published 2007 STS blood management guidelines and this document contains new and revised recommendations.

Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline

BACKGROUND

A minority of patients having cardiac procedures (15% to 20%) consume more than 80% of the blood products transfused at operation. Blood must be viewed as a scarce resource that carries risks and benefits. A careful review of available evidence can provide guidelines to allocate this valuable resource and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed all available published evidence related to blood conservation during cardiac operations, including randomized controlled trials, published observational information, and case reports. Conventional methods identified the level of evidence available for each of the blood conservation interventions. After considering the level of evidence, recommendations were made regarding each intervention using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology classification scheme.

RESULTS

Review of published reports identified a high-risk profile associated with increased postoperative blood transfusion. Six variables stand out as important indicators of risk: (1) advanced age, (2) low preoperative red blood cell volume (preoperative anemia or small body size), (3) preoperative antiplatelet or antithrombotic drugs, (4) reoperative or complex procedures, (5) emergency operations, and (6) noncardiac patient comorbidities. Careful review revealed preoperative and perioperative interventions that are likely to reduce bleeding and postoperative blood transfusion. Preoperative interventions that are likely to reduce blood transfusion include identification of high-risk patients who should receive all available preoperative and perioperative blood conservation interventions and limitation of antithrombotic drugs. Perioperative blood conservation interventions include use of antifibrinolytic drugs, selective use of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery, routine use of a cell-saving device, and implementation of appropriate transfusion indications. An important intervention is application of a multimodality blood conservation program that is institution based, accepted by all health care providers, and that involves well thought out transfusion algorithms to guide transfusion decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available evidence, institution-specific protocols should screen for high-risk patients, as blood conservation interventions are likely to be most productive for this high-risk subset. Available evidence-based blood conservation techniques include (1) drugs that increase preoperative blood volume (eg, erythropoietin) or decrease postoperative bleeding (eg, antifibrinolytics), (2) devices that conserve blood (eg, intraoperative blood salvage and blood sparing interventions), (3) interventions that protect the patient's own blood from the stress of operation (eg, autologous predonation and normovolemic hemodilution), (4) consensus, institution-specific blood transfusion algorithms supplemented with point-of-care testing, and most importantly, (5) a multimodality approach to blood conservation combining all of the above.

Ultrafiltration reduces blood transfusions following cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although used routinely in pediatric patients, ultrafiltration techniques that reverse hemodilution are infrequently used in adults. Data from small, unblinded clinical trials suggest that the use of ultrafiltration can reduce inflammatory mediators, improve cardiac function, and reduce hemodilution. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized trials to evaluate the effects of ultrafiltration on blood transfusions and blood loss following adult cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched and randomized controlled trials evaluating modified and/or conventional ultrafiltration, meeting pre-determined selection criteria, were obtained. Quality evaluation and data extraction were performed by two independent observers blinded to study source. Random effects models were used to determine pooled effect estimates and sources of heterogeneity were explored using meta-regression.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty two studies were screened and 10 randomized trials evaluating 1004 patients (control, n = 495; ultrafiltration, n = 509) were identified of which only two were double-blinded. The use of ultrafiltration was associated with a reduction in postoperative blood transfusions (weighted mean difference [95% CI] of -0.73 units [-1.16, -0.31]; p = 0.001). This reduction was greater in studies evaluating modified ultrafiltration. Use of ultrafiltration was also associated with reduced postoperative bleeding (-70 ml, [-118, -21]; p = 0.005), which was driven primarily by trials evaluating modified rather than conventional ultrafiltration.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of ultrafiltration is associated with a significant reduction in postoperative blood transfusions as well as reduced bleeding in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. The efficacy and cost-effectiveness of ultrafiltration as a blood conservations strategy should be evaluated in a large, randomized, double-blinded study.

Modulation of systemic inflammatory response after cardiac surgery

Cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass initiate a systemic inflammatory response largely determined by blood contact with foreign surfaces and the activation of complement. It is generally accepted that cardiopulmonary bypass initiates a whole-body inflammatory reaction. The magnitude of this inflammatory reaction varies, but the persistence of any degree of inflammation may be considered potentially harmful to the cardiac patient. The development of strategies to control the inflammatory response following cardiac surgery is currently the focus of considerable research efforts. Diverse techniques including maintenance of hemodynamic stability, minimization of exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass circuitry, and pharmacologic and immunomodulatory agents have been examined in clinical studies. This article briefly reviews the current concepts of the systemic inflammatory response following cardiac surgery, and the various therapeutic strategies being used to modulate this response.

A minimal priming technique that allows for a higher circulating hemoglobin on cardiopulmonary bypass

Reduction in circuit prime during cardiopulmonary bypass has benefits for the patient with a low body surface area, anemia, patient refusal to receive blood products, and aids the practitioner's goal to minimize exposure to blood products. Described here is a simple, low-cost technique that has been shown to decrease priming volume in any bypass circuit and allow a significant increase in 'on bypass hemoglobin'.