Incidence, severity and characteristics of medical device-related pressure injuries in adult intensive care patients: A single-centre, cross-sectional study

AIM

This study aimed to determine the incidence, severity and characteristics of medical device-related pressure injuries in intensive care units.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study. Data were collected from 187 patients admitted to the Anaesthesia and Reanimation intensive care unit of a university hospital between January and May 2023. The skin of the patients enrolled in the study was assessed for the presence of medical device-related pressure injuries, and all medical devices used were recorded. Data were collected using the Patient Identification Form, the Medical Device-Related Pressure Injury Follow-up Form, and the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk.

RESULTS

It was found that 30.6% of the patients developed medical device-related pressure injuries; of these, 73.7% had stage I pressure injuries. We found that 36.8% of the patients were diagnosed with medical device-related pressure injuries within 8-11 days. The results showed that endotracheal tube (61.4%), non-invasive ventilation/oxygen mask (52.6%), Foley catheter (49.1%), and nasogastric tube (36.8%) devices were the most common causes of the development of medical device-related pressure injuries. Patients' demographic characteristics were found to have a significant effect on the development of medical device-related pressure injuries (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The study found that the incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries was relatively high and that a relationship was observed between the patients' demographic characteristics and medical device-related pressure injuries. It is crucial that ICU nurses, who are more likely to encounter medical device-related pressure injuries, consider these factors when caring for their patients and take appropriate preventive measures to reduce the incidence of these injuries.

Effects of leg compression and calf muscle contraction by active ankle motion on venous hemodynamics in sitting individuals

Objectives

To clarify the effects of compression and active ankle motion on venous hemodynamics in healthy sitting individuals.

Methods

In the sitting position, 14 participants performed plantar flexion and dorsiflexion of the ankle for 3 s each without compression. Changes in the calf volume were recorded using air plethysmography. Subsequently, the process was repeated with the application of tubular elastic bandage (TEB), followed by anti-thrombotic stocking (ATS).

Results

The median interface pressure at the calf was 16 mmHg with TEB and 21 mmHg with ATS. Without compression ( N), the median venous volume was 76 mL. This was reduced to 58 mL with TEB and 56 mL with ATS ( p < .01 vs. N for both). On the other hand, ejection volume by plantar flexion in N (27 mL) was not significantly changed with TEB (31 mL) or ATS (31 mL). Also, ejection volume by dorsiflexion in N (53 mL, p < .001 vs. plantar flexion) was not significantly changed with TEB (53 mL, p < .01 vs. plantar flexion) or ATS (41 mL, p < .05 vs. plantar flexion).

Conclusions

The venous volume, which is defined as the change in enclosed calf volume from elevation to dependency, in the sitting position reduced similarly with TEB and ATS; however, the ejection volumes did not change significantly. Dorsiflexion exerted a larger ejection volume than plantar flexion in the sitting position.

First-generation therapy for varicose veins: medication, compression, sclerotherapy, and stripping

Background: Improving the understanding varicose veins (VV) is increasing due to life extension and concerns regarding quality of life. Recently, endovascular treatment has become more common, even in mild cases. Excessive procedures are often performed before conservative and non-surgical treatments. We aimed to explain the efficacy of medication, compression, sclerotherapy, and stripping of treatments and to consider the appropriate indications for many treatment methods, including endovascular procedures.Current Concepts: Venoactive drugs can be used as first-line agents for symptoms, such as edema, at all stages of varicose vein. These are effective adjuvant agents and can help achieve compression before and after procedures. Compression therapy is effective for skin change and ulcers and is excellent for the improvement of symptoms. Sclerotherapy has been widely used as an adjuvant treatment, but recently, its indications have been expanded for non-invasive causes. Traditional high ligation and stripping is still the recommended treatment option for recurrent or complicated varicose veins.Discussion and Conclusion: The patients’ symptoms should be evaluated more critically than assessing only the venous reflux using ultrasound. Additionally, objective evaluation of various causes of lower extremity discomfort should be considered. Treatment according to appropriate indications, such as medication, compression, sclerotherapy, stripping, and endovascular therapy, can improve the patients’ quality of life and prevent complications.

Risk factors of medical device-related pressure injury in intensive care units

OBJECTIVES

Intensive care unit (ICU) patients are at high risk of medical device related pressure injury (MDRPI). This study aims to ascertain the MDRPI prevalence in ICU patients and analyse the risk factors of MDRPI.

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of MDRPI not only increases hospitalisation time with pain and economic burden, but also causes medical disputes. A better understanding of this condition will increase knowledge and facilitate the ability to recognise and prevent MDRPI for clinical nursing staff. However, there are few multicentre studies of MDRPI prevalence in ICU patients in China.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study design was employed.

METHODS

Data from 694 patients in 66 adult ICU at 30 hospitals in China were included between October 2018 and March 2019. The stage of each MDRPI was determined according to the definitions of National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. The study methods were followed by the STORBE guidelines.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence rate of MDRPI was 13.1% (91/694), with 98 anatomic locations in total. The most common stages of MDRPI were stage 1 (54.1%, 53/98), stage 2 (15.3%, 15/98) and mucosal membrane pressure injury (15.3%, 15/98). MDRPI mainly occurred in the finger (32.7%, 32/98), followed by nose (18.4%, 18/98). The prevalence rate of MDRPI caused by CPAP or BiPAP masks (25%) was highest. Lower Braden scores and having skin oedema were risk factors for MDRPI in adult ICU patients.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of MDRPI in this study was still high. Nurses should take these related factors into consideration when taking care of ICU patients, and appropriate prevention measures should be adopted to decrease the prevalence of MDRPI.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The study can help to improve the PI prevention efforts in ICU patients specific to medical device related PI.

Interface Pressures Derived from a Tubular Elastic Bandage

Objective: We sought to clarify the interface pressure (IP) when using a tubular elastic bandage (TEB) and examine the possibility for TEBs to provide IPs comparable to those provided by anti-thrombotic stockings.

Materials and Methods: In 40 healthy patients, IPs were measured at the level of calf at its maximum diameter (C) and transition of the medial gastrocnemius muscle into the Achilles tendon (B1) while a single or double layer of TEBs (17.5 cm in circumference) were applied with the patient in a supine position.

Results: Including both the C and B1 levels, circumferences and IPs showed a good correlation (single layer; r=0.72, double layer; r=0.75). The IP obtained with a single layer of TEB at the C level (median, 17 mmHg [range, 12–23 mmHg]) was higher than that at the B1 level (14 mmHg [11–18 mmHg], p<0.001). When double-layer TEB was used, the IP at B1 level increased to 18 (14–23) mmHg (p<0.001 vs. single layer).

Conclusion: Considering the characteristics of TEBs and using a single or double layer appropriately, creating a pressure profile mimicking that of an anti-thrombotic stocking seemed to be feasible when using a TEB.