Factors associated with recanalization and reintervention following below knee polidocanol endovenous microfoam ablation for great saphenous and small saphenous veins

BACKGROUND

Polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM) has been used to treat lower extremity venous reflux for almost one decade with specific advantages for below knee (BK) truncal veins where thermal ablation poses a risk of injury to adjacent nerves. The current literature of the BK segment often examines short-term outcomes with modest sample sizes. We aim to identify factors associated with recanalization and reintervention in this subset of patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database of patients from a single institution who underwent 1% PEM ablation for BK great saphenous vein (GSV) and small saphenous vein (SSV) reflux. Patients underwent duplex ultrasound (DU) within 7 days after injection, every 3 to 6 months for 1 year, and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. Patients with symptomatic recanalization underwent reintervention. The 26 patients lost to follow-up without DU after ablation were excluded. The factors associated with recanalization and reintervention were examined by multivariate and nonparametric analyses.

RESULTS

Between March 2018 and July 2023, 411 patients (166 male, 245 female) with 573 treated limbs (284 right, 289 left) met the study criteria. Of the 573 included limbs, 457 (79.8%) had undergone prior above knee saphenous ablations. A total of 554 BK GSV and 42 SSV ablations were performed. The most recent DU was performed at a mean of 231 ± 329 days. The overall recanalization rate was 10.6% (55 GSVs and 8 SSVs) at a mean follow-up of 104 ± 180 days. Comparing the closed and recanalized veins, we found no significant difference in age (P = .90), treated laterality (P = .14), patient body mass index (P = .59), preprocedural CEAP (clinical-etiology-anatomy-pathophysiology) score (P = .79), recanalization rate in GSVs vs SSVs (P = .06), or administered PEM volume (P = .24). The recanalized veins had significantly larger preprocedural diameters than the veins that remained closed (recanalized, 4.9 mm; closed, 4.3 mm; P = .001). Men had higher incidence of recanalization than women (men, 14.2%; women, 8%; P = .015). Anticoagulation use was associated with recanalization (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.6; P = .03). Early recanalization at the first DU accounted for 31 failures (49.2%) and had a significantly lower administered PEM volume compared with later recanalization (early, 4 mL; late, 5 mL; P = .025). There were no significant differences between the 33 recanalized patients requiring reintervention (52.4%) and the 30 who did not. Twenty-four reinterventions were performed with PEM, 100% of which remained closed at a median of 160 days (interquartile range, 257 days).

CONCLUSIONS

PEM is successful for the treatment of BK GSV and SSV reflux with a closure rate of 89% at a mean of 231 days and shows promise as salvage therapy. Most cases of recanalization were noted in the early postprocedure period and were associated with a lower PEM volume. A larger vein diameter, male sex, and anticoagulation use are associated with higher rates of recanalization.

Migraine aura-like episodes following sclerotherapy for varicose veins of the lower extremities-A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review provides a summary and evaluation of cases of migraine aura-like episodes elicited by sclerotherapy of veins of the lower extremities and discusses possible underlying mechanisms.

BACKGROUND

Sclerotherapy is a commonly used treatment for varicose veins. Symptoms resembling migraine aura have been reported during and following sclerotherapy of the lower extremities, suggesting that sclerotherapy may elicit migraine aura.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for articles reporting neurological complications that were transient and fully reversible following sclerotherapy treatment for varicose veins in the lower limbs. There were no restrictions regarding article language or publication date. Only original studies and case reports were included. Two authors independently reviewed included articles in detail. Data were extracted from each article, including details on symptoms, previous migraine history, sclerotherapy method, and the presence of a right-to-left cardiac shunt in patients. We evaluated whether episodes fulfilled modified International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for 1.2 Migraine with aura or 1.5.2 Probable migraine with aura.

RESULTS

The search yielded 777 articles, 28 of which were included. Twenty-six articles reported 119 episodes of transient neurological symptoms in 34,500 sclerotherapy sessions. Two additional articles reported six episodes of transient neurological symptoms with no specification of the number of sessions. Of the 125 episodes, 119 involved transient visual disturbances, and eight met the modified criteria for Probable migraine with aura. In most episodes (98%), clinical information was insufficient to determine if the criteria were fulfilled.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms that are clinically indistinguishable from migraine with aura attacks may occur following sclerotherapy, although this likely is rare. Microembolization through a right-to-left shunt triggering cortical spreading depolarization is a possible mechanism. Our findings are limited by infrequent specific assessments for neurological complications and a low level of detail in the description of symptoms in the available literature. Future prospective studies are needed to determine this phenomenon's incidence and underlying mechanisms.

Treatment of superficial venous insufficiency in a large patient cohort with retrograde administration of ultrasound-guided polidocanol endovenous microfoam versus endovenous laser ablation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes among symptomatic patients with superficial chronic venous insufficiency treated with retrograde ultrasound-guided polidocanol endovenous microfoam 1% (PEM) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA).

METHODS

Retrospective chart review from a single vein center between October 2013 and June 2019. Procedures were performed on 1070 patients with CEAP class 2-6 and symptomatic superficial venous reflux of the great saphenous vein (GSV) or anterior accessory saphenous vein (AASV).

RESULTS

PEM was used for 550 procedures and followed for 43 +/- 13 months and EVLA was used for 520 procedures and followed for 57 +/- 18 months. Following complete treatment, elimination of reflux was documented in 93.5% (514/550) and 92.8% (482/520) of the PEM and EVLA procedures, respectively. During the follow-up period, 18% of patients treated with EVLA returned for additional treatment to address residual symptoms in the affected leg. In C6 patients treated with PEM, 69% (11/16) of ulcers healed in less than one month, compared to 5% (1/21) of patients treated with EVLA. In C4 patients with lesions, resolution of spontaneous bleeding was 100% in both groups. There were no neurological or cardiac adverse events (NCAEs) in the PEM group. Minor complications included asymptomatic DVT (0.5%), 1 common femoral vein thrombus extension, and superficial venous thrombosis (4%) in the Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam PEM group and asymptomatic DVT (0.8%) and 2 EHITs in the endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) group.

CONCLUSIONS

PEM is comparable in safety and efficacy to EVLA for the treatment of saphenous reflux and associated symptoms. PEM was an effective intervention for most patients with C6 disease. Closure rates in both groups were maintained 36 months post treatment.

A new automated system for the preparation of sclerosant foam: A study of the physical characteristics produced and the device settings required

OBJECTIVES

To determine the quality of sclerosant foam produced with an automated preparation system with multiple combinations of sclerosing agents, gases, and device settings.

METHODS

Single-use mixing capsules filled with air or O₂/CO₂ and polidocanol (0.25, 1, or 3%) or sodium tetradecyl sulfate (0.2 or 1%) were coupled to a customized magnetic stirrer. Stirring speed and time were adjusted between 1500 and 4000 r/min and 30 and 60 s, respectively, and characteristics of the foam produced were measured: half-life, bubble diameter, and gas-to-liquid ratio.

RESULTS

With optimized device settings, the following foam characteristics were obtained: half-life range, 1.4 ± 0.9 to 5.2 ± 0.6 min; bubble diameter, 84 ± 14 to 119 ± 6 µm; and gas-to-liquid ratio, 5:1-7:1. Sodium tetradecyl sulfate foam was quicker to form than polidocanol but faster to degrade. Foams with low sclerosant concentrations and O₂/CO₂ required higher speed and longer time.

CONCLUSIONS

Suitable foam characteristics could be obtained with all combinations of sclerosing agent, concentration, and gas.

Recent developments on foaming mechanical and electronic techniques for the management of varicose veins

Introduction: Varicose veins are a common disease, causing significant impairment of quality of life to afflicted individuals. Conventional surgery has represented the traditional treatment for years, with significant post-operative complications. By the end of the 20^th century, novel approaches had been developed to induce biochemical sclerosis into the treated vein in order to exclude it from blood circulation.Areas covered: Foaming techniques for treatment of varicose veins, both clinically-approved methods and those under experimental studies. A brief description of cavitation, which is the basis of microbubbles formation, and an overview of foam properties have been also provided, including a discussion on clinical efficacy and safety profile.Expert commentary: Foam sclerotherapy has rapidly gained popularity since it represents the most minimally invasive and cost-effective procedure in the short term. Several different methods of foam preparation have been described in literature. In general, the foam generation method may affect characteristics such as stability and bubble size distribution, which in turn affect the therapeutic action of foam itself. Therefore, the selection of a suitable foaming technique is of importance for treatment success. Future developments on foaming techniques are expected to make sclerotherapy, already an effective treatment, even safer and more versatile therapeutic procedure.