Statischer Stiffness-Index von zwei Multikomponenten-Bandagen-Kompressionssystemen: Ergebnisse einer randomisierten kontrollierten Studie an gesunden Probanden

Zweck Vergleich der Leistung von zwei Mehrkomponenten-Kompressionssystemen.

Methoden In dieser randomisierten, kontrollierten Studie wurden beide Beine von 25 gesunden Probanden nach dem Zufallsprinzip entweder mit einem Kompressionssystem der neuen Generation (UrgoK1, eine einzige Binde) oder einem etablierten System (UrgoK2, zwei Binden) als Kontrolle bandagiert. Beide Systeme wurden Tag und Nacht getragen. Arbeits- und Ruhegrenzflächendruck wurden unmittelbar nach dem Anlegen und nach 4 h, 24 h, 48 h und 72 h gemessen und der Static Stiffness Index (SSI) berechnet.

Ergebnisse Nach 4 Stunden wurden mit beiden Systemen ähnlich hohe Arbeitsdrücke und mäßige Ruhedrücke registriert. Im Zeitverlauf folgten die Druckänderungen und des SSI den gleichen Kurven. Nach 48 h wurde ein SSI ≥ 10 mmHg bei 88 % der getesteten und 76 % der Kontrollsysteme erreicht, was die Nichtunterlegenheit des Testsystems bestätigt (p = 0,016). Beide Systeme wiesen gute Halteeigenschaften auf und waren gut verträglich, aber das getestete System wurde von der Mehrheit der Probanden als deutlich angenehmer empfunden und schließlich dem Kontrollsystem vorgezogen.

Schlussfolgerung Das neue Kompressionssystem erreichte ähnliche Leistungen wie die Kontrolle, aber seine bessere Akzeptanz könnte ein Vorteil für die Patientencompliance sein. Diese vielversprechenden Ergebnisse müssen in einer klinischen Studie an Patienten mit Unterschenkelulcera und/oder Ödemen bestätigt werden.

Multicomponent compression system use in patients with chronic venous insufficiency: a real-life prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Compression therapy is the cornerstone of therapeutic management of patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a multicomponent compression system in an unselected population of patients with CVI problems under real-life conditions.

METHOD

A prospective, multicentre, observational study with a multicomponent two-bandage compression system (UrgoK2, Laboratoires Urgo, France) was conducted in 103 centres in Germany. Main outcomes included wound healing rate, wound healing progression, assessment of oedema and ankle mobility, local tolerability and acceptance of the compression therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 702 patients with venous leg ulcers (VLU) and/or with lower limb oedema due to CVI were treated with the evaluated system for a mean (±standard deviation) duration of 27±17 days. By the last visit, 30.9% of wounds had healed and 61.8% had improved. Limb oedema was resolved in 66.7% of patients and an improvement of ankle mobility was reported in 44.2% of patients. The skin condition under the compression therapy was also considered as improved in 73.9% of patients and a substantial reduction of pain was achieved, both in number of patients reporting pain and in pain intensity. Compression therapy with the evaluated system was 'very well' or 'well' tolerated and 'very well' or 'well' accepted by >95% of patients. These positive outcomes were in line with the general opinion of physicians on the evaluated compression bandages, which were judged 'very useful' or 'useful' for >96.6% of patients. Similar results were reported regardless of the treated condition, VLU and/or limb oedema.

CONCLUSION

Real-life data documented in this large observational study of non-selected patients receiving compression therapy in daily practice confirm the benefits and safety profile of the evaluated compression system. This study also confirms the high-level of performance and acceptability of the system, regardless of the characteristics of the wounds or patients at initiation of the treatment. The data support the use of this multicomponent compression system as one first-line intervention in patients with symptoms caused by CVI.

[Importance of adequate pressure in compression therapy : Basis for successful treatment]

BACKGROUND

The pressure exerted by a compression device on a part of the body corresponds to the dosage of the compression therapy. Therefore, the pressure course under compression materials should be investigated in different clinical situations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Pressure measurements were carried out under different compression materials in lying, standing and walking positions within the framework of training, self-experimentation and in patients with venous leg ulcers.

RESULTS

The results showed that the pressure varied considerably depending on the material used, the firmness of application, the local configuration (body position) and the time interval between applications. A loss of pressure occurred under each compression therapy, especially under inelastic short-stretch material, mainly due to movement and edema reduction. This pressure loss is decisive for the timing of dressing changes and a reason for the good tolerance of high-pressure levels in mobile patients.

CONCLUSION

Low pressures are particularly suitable for edema reduction. Hemodynamic effects require higher pressures (60-80 mmHg). For this purpose, inelastic materials are preferred which enable lower pressures when lying down (40-60 mmHg). As compression bandages are too loosely applied by many users, pressure indicators on bandages or adaptive bandages with templates are helpful to apply the material with the correct pressure. As a consequence of these findings it is postulated that, at least in studies comparing different compression media, pressure measurements should be carried out in the future, whereby the measuring point and body position should be documented.