1
|
Miranda M, Sousa J, Mansilha A. PREVAIT after modern open surgery and endothermal ablation: a systematic review. INT ANGIOL 2023; 42:436-447. [PMID: 37795801 DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.23.05082-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Presence of varices after operative treatment (PREVAIT) is a common finding after varicose vein surgery, and has been shown to significantly reduce the quality of life of those it affects. As such, long-term results after varicose vein interventions have to be taken into account when choosing a technique. This study aims to systematically review current evidence on the recurrence of varicose veins after three different techniques: conventional surgery (HLS), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A literature search was performed on the PubMed and Web of Science databases, which returned 546 studies. Fourteen studies were included. Data were extracted using predefined forms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 2795 patients were included, for a total of 3056 legs treated. 503 legs (16.5%) were treated by HLS, 1791 (58.6%) by EVLA and 762 (25.0%) by RFA. PREVAIT was reported in 34.4% for patients treated by HLS, for a mean follow-up comprised between 18 months and 5 years; 16.6% by EVLA, for a mean follow-up between 112 days and 5 years and 6.7% of those treated by RFA, for a mean follow-up between 106 days and 5 years. Regarding patterns of recurrence, the development of new varicose veins was the most commonly reported mechanism of recurrence after HLS (range: 29.8-91%) and EVLA (range: 40-81.6%), but not RFA, where recanalization of the occluded saphenous trunk accounted for up to 67.0% of the cases. Only one study reported quality of life related recurrence, and included patients treated by HLS and EVLA, but not RFA. Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score, physical functioning domains of the SF-36 score and patient satisfaction were significantly worse in patients with clinical recurrence. Re-intervention rates after recurrence were reported in 5 studies, ranging between 7.7% and 37.7% for HLS and 0-57.0% for EVLA. Only one study reported data on re-intervention for RFA patients, which was 6.67%. CONCLUSIONS Recurrence is a reliable indicator of long-term efficacy of a varicose vein treatment and appears to occur more frequently after HLS. Although there are several mechanisms of recurrence, the development of new varicose veins was the most commonly observed. There is clear heterogeneity among definitions of recurrence and follow-up periods in literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joel Sousa
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal -
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de S. João, Porto, Portugal
| | - Armando Mansilha
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de S. João, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pitoulias AG, Chatzelas D, Kalogirou TE, Politi LA, Pitoulias MG, Roussas N, Kakisis I, Giannoukas AD, Pitoulias GA. Ultrasonographic hemodynamical and epidemiological factors in advancement of clinical manifestations in primary varicose veins. INT ANGIOL 2021; 40:359-367. [PMID: 34142539 DOI: 10.23736/s0392-9590.21.04650-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary varicose veins (PVV) represent the most prominent clinical manifestation of chronic venous disease (CVD) and has a complex pathophysiological background. Objective of our study was to investigate the impact of sonographic hemodynamical and contemporary epidemiological factors on the clinical severity of PVV. METHODS We analyzed the sonographic hemodynamical and clinical parameters from 159 consecutive CVD patients and 233 lower limbs with PVV of clinical stages C2, C3 and C4. Univariate and logistic regression analysis was performed between patients of C2 (n=70 - 30.0%) and C3 - 4 stages and between subgroups C3 (n=101 - 43.3%) and C4 (n=62 - 26.6%). RESULTS Reflux of common femoral vein and saphenofemoral junction was detected in 43.3% and 65.7%. High venous reflux rates were found at the great saphenous above and below knee (90.1% - 53.2%) and in Cockett perforators (80.5%). Logistic regression revealed that factors associated with the symptomatic C3 - 4 stages were the duration of disease >10 years (p=.015, insufficiency in two or more perforators (p<.001) and history of 2 pregnancies (p=.001). Analysis C3 vs C4 showed that insufficiency in two or more perforators increased the likelihood of advanced C4 clinical stage by 2.2 times, (p=.037). Additional significant factor was the presence of at least one incompetent Cockett perforator. CONCLUSIONS Clinical severity of PVV is correlated with a plethora of complex anatomical, hemodynamical and epidemiological factors. Insufficiency in two or more perforators seems to play the most important role and this highlights the value of preoperative venous ultrasound mapping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolos G Pitoulias
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, G. Gennimatas Teaching Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece -
| | - Dimitrios Chatzelas
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, G. Gennimatas Teaching Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Thomas E Kalogirou
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, G. Gennimatas Teaching Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Loukia A Politi
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, G. Gennimatas Teaching Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Matthaios G Pitoulias
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, G. Gennimatas Teaching Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Roussas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Ioannis Kakisis
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, Attikon Teaching Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios D Giannoukas
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - Georgios A Pitoulias
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Second Department of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, G. Gennimatas Teaching Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|