Patient and therapist perspectives on physical therapy outcome measures and engagement after stroke: A case study

BACKGROUND

Outcome measures are highly recommended in stroke physical therapy, however, most of the existing research has been performed from the provider perspective. Understanding the patient perspective of outcome measures in conjunction with the therapist perspective may help to better support patient engagement and autonomy.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to explore patient and therapist perspectives on physical therapy outcome measures post-stroke.

METHODS

This qualitative case study of a Canadian rehabilitation facility is based on patient-oriented research principles, with three patient partners embedded in the research team. Data collection included chart reviews, observations of physical therapy sessions, patient interviews, and therapist interviews. Field notes of observations and interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Ten patients and seven therapists participated. Analysis revealed the following two themes: 1) tracking progress; and 2) partnership. Tracking progress included the expectations patients had for improvement, the importance of objectively measuring change and the functional improvement observed day by day. Partnership described the relationship between therapist and patient including communication, encouragement and affirmation, the therapist as expert and the gradual shift in autonomy from therapist to patient.

CONCLUSION

Patients valued the objective results of outcome measures and were encouraged by measurable changes. Maximizing the use of physical therapy outcome measures may improve patient engagement and support relational autonomy.

Standard Psychometric Criteria for Measurements in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

ABSTRACT

Measurements of person's variable, such as behavior, perceptions, or attitudes, are essential to physical and rehabilitation medicine in both clinical practice and research. These measurements are commonly based on cumulative questionnaires and follow special statistical rules, belonging to the domain of psychometrics. Selecting the most appropriate measurement is critical. This article provides an overview of the standard psychometric criteria to consider in measurement selection. The article focuses on the criteria related to the contemporary psychometric approach as it considers the construct, the target population, and the purpose for which measurements are used. Common strategies related to psychometric testing are discussed and applied to critically appraise, as a representative example, one of the most commonly used pain measurements: Brief Pain Inventory. The measurement construct, conceptual framework, target population, purpose, and psychometric properties are highlighted. Observed limitations for its implementation in different settings also are discussed.

Preliminary investigation of the reliability and validity of the BIRT Independent Living Scale

PURPOSE

Neurorehabilitation aims to increase independence and participation in ordinary life. It is argued that the fundamental indices of this are independent living and engagement in occupational or productive activity. The Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Independent Living Scale was designed to capture change in levels of participation and independence following neurorehabilitation. With greater use of outcome measures in health care, it becomes necessary to develop tools which are simple to use and that capture the holistic impact of rehabilitation. This study examines the inter-rater reliability and validity of the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Independent Living Scale, which comprises two single item, multiple-choice sub-scales.

METHOD

Inter-rater reliability was assessed by comparing the ratings on the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Independent Living Scale, by five pairs of graduate psychologists, of 37 individuals who had undergone neurorehabilitation. Retrospective data collected by other members of the clinical team for the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4, Supervision Rating Scale and Care And Needs Scale were correlated with the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Independent Living Scale to establish concurrent validity.

RESULTS

Weighted kappa coefficients revealed moderate (occupation) to strong (accommodation) inter-rater reliability for the two sub-scales. All correlations between the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Independent Living Scale and the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4, Supervision Rating Scale and the Care And Needs Scale were high, demonstrating good concurrent validity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights some of the psychometric properties of the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Independent Living Scale and demonstrates its utility in assessing independent living ability and level of social participation after neurorehabilitation. Implications for rehabilitation The BIRT Independent Living Scale is a validated method for ranking accommodation and occupation status as an indicator of independent living ability and occupational activity. The two freely available single-item scales emerging from this study provide a brief method for measuring independent living ability and participation following rehabilitation in research and clinical practice. The BIRT Independent Living Scale's simplicity means it does not require specific training to administer, facilitating its use by a wide range of multidisciplinary staff members and researchers.

Clinical interpretation of the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index (SCI-FI)

OBJECTIVE

To provide validation of functional ability levels for the Spinal Cord Injury - Functional Index (SCI-FI).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation hospital and community settings.

PARTICIPANTS

A sample of 855 individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury enrolled in 6 rehabilitation centers participating in the National Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Network.

INTERVENTIONS

Not Applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index (SCI-FI).

RESULTS

Cluster analyses identified three distinct groups that represent low, mid-range and high SCI-FI functional ability levels. Comparison of clusters on personal and other injury characteristics suggested some significant differences between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results strongly support the use of SCI-FI functional ability levels to document the perceived functional abilities of persons with SCI. Results of the cluster analysis suggest that the SCI-FI functional ability levels capture function by injury characteristics. Clinical implications regarding tracking functional activity trajectories during follow-up visits are discussed.

Service users’ views of the assessment process in stroke rehabilitation

Objective:

To investigate the service users’ (stroke survivors and care-givers) experiences and views of the rehabilitation assessment process.

Design:

Qualitative data analysis from three focus groups using a content analysis to identify the major themes.

Setting:

Participants were recruited from stroke support groups and community rehabilitation services in a large UK city.

Subjects:

Seventeen community-dwelling stroke survivors who had completed their rehabilitation within the previous year and six care-givers.

Results:

Five themes emerged: understanding the purpose of the assessment; repetition of assessments; feedback about assessments and progress; format of feedback and barriers to feedback. While all participants reported undergoing assessment, some felt their purpose was not always explained and resented unexplained repetitions of tests. Some participants reported a positive experience, but most wanted more information about their progress and predictions of recovery. They wanted regular, consistent, objective information presented in layman’s terms; verbally and in writing. Some carers reported difficulty accessing information particularly as a result of confidentiality policies. While some participants accepted these short-comings, others considered them due to staff’s disinterest or ineptitude, which undermined their trust in the team.

Conclusions:

Stroke service users require clear information about the purpose of assessments and regular, consistent, objective feedback about their progress using layman’s language both verbally and in writing.

Everyday uses of standardized test information in a geriatric setting: a qualitative study exploring occupational therapist and physiotherapist test administrators' justifications

BACKGROUND

Health professionals are required to collect data from standardized tests when assessing older patients' functional ability. Such data provide quantifiable documentation on health outcomes. Little is known, however, about how physiotherapists and occupational therapists who administer standardized tests use test information in their daily clinical work. This article aims to investigate how test administrators in a geriatric setting justify the everyday use of standardized test information.

METHODS

Qualitative study of physiotherapists and occupational therapists on two geriatric hospital wards in Norway that routinely tested their patients with standardized tests. Data draw on seven months of fieldwork, semi-structured interviews with eight physiotherapists and six occupational therapists (12 female, two male), as well as observations of 26 test situations. Data were analyzed using Systematic Text Condensation.

RESULTS

We identified two test information components in everyday use among physiotherapist and occupational therapist test administrators. While the primary component drew on the test administrators' subjective observations during testing, the secondary component encompassed the communication of objective test results and test performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study illustrate the overlap between objective and subjective data in everyday practice. In clinical practice, by way of the clinicians' gaze on how the patient functions, the subjective and objective components of test information are merged, allowing individual characteristics to be noticed and made relevant as test performance justifications and as rationales in the overall communication of patient needs.

The influence of objective measurement tools on communication and clinical decision making in neurological rehabilitation

RATIONALE

Routine collection of outcome measures is advocated to improve quality of care. However, there has been scant investigation of how measurement tools are used in clinical practice and what impact they may have. This paper compares two neuro-rehabilitation teams, one which routinely used standardized measurement tools and the other which did not. We explore differences in communication and clinical decision making within multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings to illuminate the influence measurement tools could have on clinical practice.

METHOD

Non-participant observation of MDT meetings in two neurological rehabilitation units in England. Semi-structured interviews were also carried out with at least one member of each profession in each team. Grounded theory techniques were used to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Differences in team members' communication within MDT meetings underscored differences in the process of clinical decision making within the teams. Using measurement tools provided a shared understanding to facilitate communication by focusing discussion on the patient's abilities rather than individual professionals' contributions. This led to differences in the way team members identified the nature and cause of patients' problems, monitored their progress and planned for discharge. They provided a 'neutral ground' to reach a shared perspective between professionals, thereby avoiding conflict. Externally, use of the tools enabled objective discussion with patients and their families about their progress and was a vehicle to facilitate giving bad news.

CONCLUSION

Using standardized measurement tools can promote a patient-focused approach to care, thus facilitating treatment planning and clinical decision making.