Functional performance and safety of bone-anchored prostheses in persons with a transfemoral or transtibial amputation: a prospective one-year follow-up cohort study

Cumulative loading increases and loading asymmetries persist during walking for people with a transfemoral bone-anchored limb

BACKGROUND

A bone-anchored limb (BAL) is an alternative to a traditional socket-type prosthesis for people with transfemoral amputation. Early laboratory-based evidence suggests improvement in joint and limb loading mechanics during walking with a BAL compared to socket prosthesis use. However, changes in cumulative joint and limb loading measures, which may be predictive of degenerative joint disease progression, remain unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do cumulative total limb and hip joint loading during walking change using a BAL for people with unilateral transfemoral amputation, compared to prior socket prosthesis use?

METHODS

A case-series cohort of eight participants with prior unilateral transfemoral amputation who underwent BAL hardware implantation surgery were retrospectively analyzed (4 M/4 F; BMI: 27.7 ± 3.1 kg/m2; age: 50.4 ± 10.2 years). Daily step count and whole-body motion capture data were collected before (using socket prosthesis) and one-year after BAL hardware implantation. Cumulative total limb and hip joint loading and between-limb loading symmetry metrics were calculated during overground walking at both time points and compared using Cohen's d effect sizes.

RESULTS

One year after BAL hardware implantation, participants demonstrated bilateral increases in cumulative total limb loading (amputated: d = -0.65; intact: d = -0.72) and frontal-plane hip moment (amputated: d = -1.29; intact: d = -1.68). Total limb loading and hip joint loading in all planes remained asymmetric over time, with relative overloading of the intact limb in all variables of interest at the one-year point.

SIGNIFICANCE

Despite increases in cumulative total limb and hip joint loading, between-limb loading asymmetries persist. Habitual loading asymmetry has been implicated in contributing to negative long-term joint health and onset or progression of degenerative joint diseases. Improved understanding of methods to address habitual loading asymmetries is needed to optimize rehabilitation and long-term joint health as people with transfemoral amputation increase physical activity when using a BAL.

Transtibial osseointegration following unilateral traumatic amputation: An observational study of patients with at least two years follow-up

IMPORTANCE

Most patients use a traditional socket prosthesis (TSP) to ambulate independently following transtibial amputation. However, these patients generally require prosthesis repairs more than twice annually and an entirely new prosthesis every two years. Furthermore, transtibial amputation patients have four times the skin ulceration rate of transfemoral patients, prompting more frequent prosthesis refitting and diminished use. Trans-Tibial osseointegration (TTOI) is a promising technique to address the limitations of TSP, but remains understudied with only four cohorts totaling 41 total procedures reported previously. Continued concerns regarding the risk of infection and questions as to functional capacity postoperatively have slowed adoption of TTOI worldwide.

OBJECTIVE

This study reports the changes in mobility, quality of life (QOL), and the safety profile of the largest described cohort of patients with unilateral TTOI following traumatic amputation.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study. The cohort consisted of patients with data outcomes collected before and after osseointegration intervention.

SETTING

A large, tertiary referral, major metropolitan center.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-one skeletally mature adults who had failed socket prosthesis rehabilitation, with at least two years of post-osseointegration follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Mobility was evaluated by K-level, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). QOL was assessed by survey: daily prosthesis wear hours, prosthesis problem experience, general contentment with prosthesis, and Short Form 36 (SF36). Adverse events included any relevant unplanned surgery such as for infection, fracture, implant loosening, or implant failure.

RESULTS

All patients demonstrated statistically significant improvement post osseointegration surgery with respect to K-level, TUG, 6MWT, prosthesis wear hours, prosthesis problem experience, general prosthesis contentment score, and SF36 Physical Component Score (p < 0.01 for all). Three patients had four unplanned surgeries: two soft tissue refashionings, and one soft tissue debridement followed eventually by implant removal. No deaths, postoperative systemic complications, more proximal amputations, or periprosthetic fractures occurred.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

TTOI is likely to confer mobility and QOL improvements to patients dissatisfied with TSP rehabilitation following unilateral traumatic transtibial amputation. Adverse events are relatively infrequent and not further disabling. Judicious use of TTOI seems reasonable for properly selected patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 (Therapeutic investigation, Observational study with dramatic effect).

The nonsalvageable tibia: amputation and prosthetics

Mangled extremities are a challenging problem for the orthopaedic surgeon. The decision for salvage versus amputation is multifactorial. Several work groups have attempted to create scoring systems to guide treatment, but each case must be regarded individually. As surgical technique and prosthetics continue to improve, amputations should be seen as a viable reconstructive option, rather than failure. This article reviews scoring systems for the mangled extremity, outcomes on salvage versus amputation, amputation surgical technique, and prosthetic options.

The biomechanical influence of transtibial Bone-Anchored limbs during walking

Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) using socket prostheses demonstrate asymmetric joint biomechanics during walking, which increases the risk of secondary comorbidities (e.g., low back pain (LBP), osteoarthritis (OA)). Bone-anchored limbs are an alternative to socket prostheses, yet it remains unknown how they influence multi-joint loading. Our objective was to determine the influence of bone-anchored limb use on multi-joint biomechanics during walking. Motion capture data (kinematics, ground reaction forces) were collected during overground walking from ten participants with unilateral TTA prior to (using socket prostheses) and 12-months after bone-anchored limb implantation. Within this year, each participant completed a rehabilitation protocol that guided progression of loading based on patient pain response and optimized biomechanics. Musculoskeletal models were developed at each testing timepoint (baseline or 12-months after implantation) and used to calculate joint kinematics, internal joint moments, and joint reaction forces (JRFs). Analyses were performed during three stance periods on each limb. The between-limb normalized symmetry index (NSI) was calculated for joint moments and JRF impulses. Discrete (range of motion (ROM), impulse NSI) dependent variables were compared before and after implantation using paired t-tests with Bonferroni-Holm corrections while continuous (ensemble averages of kinematics, moments, JRFs) were compared using statistical parametric mapping (p < 0.05). When using a bone-anchored limb, frontal plane pelvic (residual: pre = 9.6 ± 3.3°, post = 6.3 ± 2.5°, p = 0.004; intact: pre = 10.2 ± 3.9°, post = 7.9 ± 2.6°, p = 0.006) and lumbar (residual: pre = 15.9 ± 7.0°, post = 10.6 ± 2.5°, p = 0.024, intact: pre = 17.1 ± 7.0°, post = 11.4 ± 2.8°, p = 0.014) ROM was reduced compared to socket prosthesis use. The intact limb hip extension moment impulse increased (pre = -11.0 ± 3.6 Nm*s/kg, post = -16.5 ± 4.4 Nm*s/kg, p = 0.005) and sagittal plane hip moment impulse symmetry improved (flexion: pre = 23.1 ± 16.0 %, post = -3.9 ± 19.5 %, p = 0.004, extension: pre = 29.2 ± 20.3 %, post = 8.7 ± 22.9 %, p = 0.049). Residual limb knee extension moment impulse decreased compared to baseline (pre = 15.7 ± 10.8 Nm*s/kg, post = 7.8 ± 3.9 Nm*s/kg, p = 0.030). These results indicate that bone-anchored limb implantation alters multi-joint biomechanics, which may impact LBP or OA risk factors in the TTA population longitudinally.

Bone-anchored prostheses for transfemoral amputation: a systematic review of outcomes, complications, patient experiences, and cost-effectiveness

Introduction

Bone-anchored prostheses (BAP) are an advanced reconstructive surgical approach for individuals who had transfemoral amputation and are unable to use the conventional socket-suspension systems for their prostheses. Access to this technology has been limited in part due to the lag between the start of a new procedure and the availability of evidence that is required before making decisions about widespread provision. This systematic review presents as a single resource up-to-date information on aspects most relevant to decision makers, i.e., clinical efficacy, safety parameters, patient experiences, and health economic outcomes of this technology.

Methods

A systematic search of the literature was conducted by an information specialist in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, the Core Collection of Web of Science, CADTH's Grey Matters, and Google Scholar up until May 31, 2023. Peer-reviewed original research articles on the outcomes of clinical effectiveness (health-related quality of life, mobility, and prosthesis usage), complications and adverse events, patient experiences, and health economic outcomes were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence and ROBINS-I, as appropriate.

Results

Fifty studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 12 were excluded. Thirty-eight studies were finally included in this review, of which 21 reported on clinical outcomes and complications, 9 case series and 1 cohort study focused specifically on complications and adverse events, and 2 and 5 qualitative studies reported on patient experience and health economic assessments, respectively. The most common study design is a single-arm trial (pre-/post-intervention design) with varying lengths of follow-up.

Discussion

The clinical efficacy of this technology is evident in selected populations. Overall, patients reported increased health-related quality of life, mobility, and prosthesis usage post-intervention. The most common complication is a superficial or soft-tissue infection, and more serious complications are rare. Patient-reported experiences have generally been positive. Evidence indicates that bone-anchored implants for prosthesis fixation are cost-effective for those individuals who face significant challenges in using socket-suspension systems, although they may offer no additional advantage to those who are functioning well with their socket-suspended prostheses.

Daily steps and stepping cadence increase one-year following prosthesis osseointegration in people with lower-limb amputation

PURPOSE

People with lower-limb loss participate in less physical activity than able-bodied individuals, which increases the mortality risk and incidence of metabolic syndromes. This study evaluated the effect of lower-limb prosthesis osseointegration on physical activity, including daily steps and stepping cadence.

METHODS

Free-living walking activity was assessed from 14 patients scheduled to undergo prosthesis osseointegration at two time points (within 2 weeks prior to osseointegration surgery and 12-months following). Daily step count, stepping time, number of walking bouts, average step cadence per bout, maximum step cadence per bout, and time spent in bands of step cadence were compared before and after osseointegration.

RESULTS

Twelve months after prosthesis osseointegration, participants increased daily steps, daily stepping time, average step cadence, and maximum cadence per walking bout compared to pre-osseointegration.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants engaged in more daily steps, higher stepping cadence, and longer bouts at higher cadence one year following osseointegration compared to when using a socket prosthesis. As a novel intervention that is becoming more common, it is important to understand walking activity outcomes as these are critical for long-term health.

Bone-anchored prostheses for lower limb amputation in a French cohort with 1-15 years of follow-up: implant survival rates, mechanical complications, and reported outcomes

PURPOSE

To evaluate the implant survival rate, mechanical complications, and reported patient outcomes of bone-anchored prostheses for patients with lower limb amputation in France after 1-15 years of follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent surgery at a single center in France between 2007 and 2021. The primary outcomes were the implant survival rate and functional scores assessed by the Questionnaire for Transfemoral Amputees (Q-TFA). Secondary outcomes were adverse events that occurred during follow-up.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 20 bone-anchored prostheses in 17 patients. The main level of amputation was transfemoral (82%, n = 14). The main reason for amputation was trauma (n = 15). The mean age at amputation was 32 (range 15-54) years, and the mean age at the first stage of osseointegration was 41 (range 21-58) years. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed respective survival rates of 90%, 70%, and 60% at 2, 10, and 15 years. All Q-TFA scores were significantly improved at last the follow-up. Eleven patients (65%) experienced mechanical complications. In total, 37 infectious events occurred in 13 patients (76%), mainly comprising stage 1 infections (68%, n = 25). Only two cases of septic loosening occurred (12%), leading to implant removal.

CONCLUSION

This is the first French cohort of bone-anchored prostheses and among the series with the longest follow-up periods. The findings indicate that bone-anchored prostheses are safe and reliable for amputee patients who have difficulties with classic prostheses.

Transcutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis Systems (TOPS) for Rehabilitation After Lower Limb Loss: Surgical Pearls

Background

The biology of osseointegration of any intramedullary implant depends on the design, the press-fit anchoring, and the loading history of the endoprosthesis. In particular, the material and surface of the endoprosthetic stem are designed to stimulate on- and in-growth of bone as the prerequisite for stable and long-lasting integration1-8. Relative movement between a metal stem and the bone wall may stimulate the formation of a connective-tissue interface, thereby increasing the risk of peri-implant infections and implant loss9-12. The maximum achievable press-fit (i.e., the force closure between the implant and bone wall) depends on the diameter and length of the residual bone and thus on the amputation level. Beyond this, the skin-penetrating connector creates specific medical and biological challenges, especially the risk of ascending intramedullary infections. On the one hand, bacterial colonization of the skin-penetrating area (i.e., the stoma) with a gram-positive taxon is obligatory and almost impossible to avoid9,10. On the other hand, a direct structural and functional connection between the osseous tissue and the implant, without intervening connective tissue, has been shown to be a key for infection-free osseointegration11,12.

Description

We present a 2-step implantation process for the standard Endo-Fix Stem (ESKA Orthopaedic Handels) into the residual femur and describe the osseointegration of the prosthesis13. In addition, we demonstrate the single-step implantation of a custom-made short femoral implant and a custom-made humeral BADAL X implant (OTN Implants) in a patient who experienced a high-voltage injury with the loss of both arms and the left thigh. Apart from the standard preparation procedures (e.g., marking the lines for skin incisions, preparation of the distal part of the residual bone), special attention must be paid when performing the operative steps that are crucial for successful osseointegration and utilization of the prosthesis. These include shortening of the residual bone to the desired length, preparation of the intramedullary cavity for hosting of the prosthetic stem, precise trimming of the soft tissue, and wound closure. Finally, we discuss the similarities and differences between the Endo-Fix Stem and the BADAL X implant in terms of their properties, intramedullary positioning, and the mechanisms leading to successful osseointegration.

Alternatives

Socket prostheses for transfemoral or transtibial amputees have been the gold standard for decades. However, such patients face many challenges to recover autonomous mobility, and an estimated 30% of all amputees report unsatisfactory rehabilitation and 10% cannot use a socket prosthesis at all.

Rationale

Transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems especially benefit patients who are unable to tolerate socket suspension systems, such as those with short residual limbs and/or bilateral limb loss. The use of a firmly integrated endoprosthetic stem allows patients and surgeons to avoid many of the limitations associated with conventional socket prostheses, such as the need to continually fit and refit the socket to match an ever-changing stump6,14-19. Discussion between patients who are considering an osseointegrated prosthesis and those who have already received one ("peer patients") has proven to be a powerful tool to prevent unrealistic expectations. Patients with a transhumeral amputation especially benefit from the stable connection between the residual limb and exoprosthesis. Motion of the affected and even the contralateral shoulder is no longer impaired, as straps and belts are dispensable. Furthermore, transmission of myoelectric signals from surrounding muscles to the prosthesis is fundamentally improved. However, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus or peripheral arterial disease require careful counseling, even if these conditions were not responsible for the loss of the limb. Transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems for replacement of an upper or lower limb might not be an option in patients who are unable, for any reason, to take adequate care of the stoma.

Expected Outcomes

Despite subtle differences between the systems utilized for the intramedullary anchoring of the prosthetic stem, all data indicate that mobility and quality of life significantly increase while the frequency of stoma infections is remarkably low as long as the patient is able to follow simple postoperative care protocols2-5,9,10,13-19.

Important Tips

The impaction pressure of the implant depends on the diameter of the implant and the quality of the residual bone (i.e., the time interval between the amputation and the implantation of the prosthetic stem). The extent of reaming of the inner cortex of the residual bone must be adapted to these conditions. The standard Endo-Fix Stem and BADAL X implant are both slightly curved to adapt to the physiological shape of the femur. Thus, the surgeon must be sure to insert the implant in the right position and at the correct rotational alignment. When preparing a short femoral stump, carefully identify the exact transection level in order to obtain enough bone stock to anchor the implant in the correct intramedullary position for an additional locking screw into the femoral neck and head. Depending on the residual length of the humerus and the press-fit stability of the implant, the utilization of locking screws is optional, as a notch at the distal end of the implant guarantees primary rotational stability.

Acronyms and Abbreviations

TOPS = transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthesis systemsEEP = endo-exo prosthesisMRSA = methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureusa.p. = anteroposteriorK-wire = Kirschner wireCT = computed tomographyDCA = double conus adapterOFP = osseointegrated femur prosthesis.

Walking ability of individuals fitted with transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses: A comparative study of gait parameters

OBJECTIVE

This study presents the walking abilities of participants fitted with transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses using a total of 14 gait parameters.

DESIGN

Two-centre retrospective cross-sectional comparative study.

SETTING

Research facilities equipped with tridimensional motion capture systems.

PARTICIPANTS

Two control arms included eight able-bodied participants arm (54 ± 9 years, 1.75 ± 0.07 m, 76 ± 7 kg) and nine participants fitted with transfemoral socket-suspended prostheses arm (59 ± 9 years, 1.73 ± 0.07 m, 80 ± 16 kg). The intervention arm included nine participants fitted with transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses arm (51 ± 13 years, 1.78 ± 0.09 m, 87.3 ± 16.1 kg).

INTERVENTION

Fitting of transfemoral bone-anchored prostheses.

MAIN MEASURES

Comparisons were performed for two spatio-temporal, three spatial and nine temporal gait parameters.

RESULTS

The cadence and speed of walking were 107 ± 6 steps/min and 1.23 ± 0.19 m/s for the able-bodied participants arm, 88 ± 7 steps/min and 0.87 ± 0.17 m/s for the socket-suspended prosthesis arm, and 96 ± 6 steps/min and 1.03 ± 0.17 m/s for bone-anchored prosthesis arm, respectively. Able-bodied participants and bone-anchored prosthesis arms were comparable in age, height, and body mass index as well as cadence and speed of walking, but the able-bodied participant arm showed a swing phase 31% shorter. Bone-anchored and socket-suspended prostheses arms were comparable for age, height, mass, and body mass index as well as cadence and speed of walking, but the bone-anchored prosthesis arm showed a step width and duration of double support in seconds 65% and 41% shorter, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Bone-anchored and socket-suspended prostheses restored equally well the gait parameters at a self-selected speed. This benchmark data provides new insights into the walking ability of individuals using transfemoral bionics bone-anchored prostheses.

Have Surgery and Implant Modifications Been Associated With Reduction in Soft Tissue Complications in Transfemoral Bone-anchored Prostheses?

BACKGROUND

The most frequently occurring adverse events in individuals with a transfemoral amputation treated with a bone-anchored prosthesis are soft tissue infections and stoma-related complications. These soft tissue complications are believed to be influenced by surgical technique and implant design, but little is known about the effect of changes to treatment on these events.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the result of surgical technique and implant modifications on the incidence of soft tissue infections and stoma-related complications in transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis users, depending on whether they had a conventional stoma and a cobalt-chrome-molybdenum (CoCrMo) osseointegration implant (treatment period 2009 to 2013) or a shallower stoma and titanium osseointegration implant (2015 to 2018)? (2) What is the incidence of serious complications, such as bone or implant infection, aseptic loosening, intramedullary stem breakage, and periprosthetic fracture?

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2013, we performed osseointegration implant surgery using a conventional surgical technique and a CoCrMo implant in 42 individuals who had a lower extremity amputation experiencing socket-related problems that resulted in limited prosthesis use. We considered all individuals treated with two-stage surgery with a standard press-fit transfemoral osseointegration implant as potentially eligible for inclusion. Based on this, 100% (42) were eligible, and 5% (two of 42) were excluded because they did not provide informed consent, leaving 95% (40 of 42) for analysis. Between 2015 and 2018, we treated 79 individuals with similar indications with osseointegration implant surgery, now also treating individuals with dysvascular amputations. We used an adapted surgical technique resulting in a shallower stoma combined with a titanium implant. Using the same eligibility criteria as for the first group, 51% (40 of 79) were eligible; 49% (39 of 79) were excluded because they were treated with transtibial amputation, a patient-specific implant, or single-stage surgery and 1% (one of 79) were lost before the 2-year follow-up interval, leaving 49% (39 of 79) for analysis. The period of 2013 to 2015 was a transitional period and was excluded from analysis in this study to keep groups reasonably comparable and to compare a historical approach with the present approach. Hence, we presented a comparative study of two study groups (defined by surgical technique and implant design) with standardized 2-year follow-up. The risk factors for adverse events were similar between groups, although individuals treated with the shallow stoma surgical technique and titanium implant potentially possessed an increased risk because of the inclusion of individuals with dysvascular amputation and the discontinuation of prolonged postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Outcomes studied were soft tissue infections and stoma-related complications (hypergranulation or keloid formation as well as stoma redundant tissue) and bone or implant infection, aseptic loosening, implant stem breakage, periprosthetic fracture, and death.

RESULTS

Patients treated with the shallow stoma surgical technique and titanium implant experienced fewer soft tissue infections (13 versus 76 events, absolute risk 0.17 [95% CI 0.09 to 0.30] versus 0.93 [95% CI 0.60 to 1.45]; p < 0.01), which were treated with less invasive measures, and fewer stoma redundant tissue events (0 versus five events, absolute risk 0 versus 0.06 [95% CI 0.03 to 0.14]) than patients treated with the conventional stoma surgical technique and CoCrMo implant. This was contrasted by an increased incidence of surgical site infections occurring between surgical stages 1 and 2, when no stoma was yet created, after the implementation of treatment changes (conventional surgery and CoCrMo implant versus shallow stoma surgery and titanium implant: one versus 11 events, absolute risk 0.01 [95% CI 0.00 to 0.08] versus 0.14 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.25]; p = 0.02). Patients treated with the shallow stoma surgical technique and titanium implant did not experience serious complications, although bone infections occurred (six events in 8% [three of 40] of patients) in the conventional surgery and CoCrMo implant group, all of which were successfully treated with implant retention.

CONCLUSION

Adaptations to surgical technique and newer implant designs, as well as learning curve and experience, have resulted in a reduced incidence and severity of soft tissue infections and stoma redundant tissue, contrasted by an increase in surgical site infections before stoma creation. Serious complications such as deep implant infection were infrequent in this 2-year follow-up period. We believe the benefits of these treatment modifications outweigh the disadvantages and currently advise surgeons to create a shallower stoma with a stable soft tissue envelope, combined with a titanium implant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Comparison of conventional socket attachment and bone-anchored prosthesis for persons living with transfemoral amputation - mobility and quality of life

BACKGROUND

For patients with transfemoral amputation experiencing issues with their sockets, bone-anchored prosthesis systems are an alternative and sometimes the only way to be mobile and independent. The present cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the gait performance and quality of life of a group of patients treated with bone-anchored systems compared to those of participants treated with a conventional socket-suspended prosthesis.

METHODS

A total of 17 participants with a socket-suspended and 20 with a bone-anchored prosthesis were included. Gait patterns were examined for symmetry, and performance was assessed using the six-minute walk test and the timed "Up & Go" test. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to detect signs of osteoarthritis in both hips. Mobility in everyday life and quality of life were assessed using questionnaires.

FINDINGS

There were no differences between the groups regarding the quality of life, daily mobility, and gait performance. The step width was significantly higher for the patients using socket-suspended prosthesis. The socket-suspended group showed a significant asymmetry regarding the step length. In the socket-suspended group, the prosthetic leg showed significantly higher cartilage abrasion than the contralateral leg did.

INTERPRETATION

Large differences in the measured outcomes in both groups illustrate the very different capabilities of the individual participants, which is apparently not primarily determined by the type of treatment. For patients who are satisfied with the socket treatment and perform well, bone-anchored prosthesis systems may not necessarily improve their functional capabilities and perceived quality of life.

Oxygen consumption and gait dynamics in transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis users compared to socket-prosthesis users: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

A transfemoral bone-anchored prosthesis (BAP) is an alternative for the conventional socket-suspended prosthesis (SSP) in persons suffering from socket-related problems. In these persons, it has been demonstrated to reduce oxygen consumption during walking, which could be related to centre of mass (CoM) and trunk dynamics. However, it remains uncertain whether the same comparative findings are found in SSP-users without any socket-related problems.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do oxygen consumption, CoM and trunk dynamics during walking differ between satisfied transfemoral SSP- and BAP-users and able-bodied individuals (AB); and are CoM and trunk dynamics and pistoning potential determinants of oxygen consumption?

METHODS

Oxygen consumption was measured while participants walked on a treadmill at preferred speed, 30 % slower, and 30 % faster. At preferred speed, we also evaluated CoM deviation, root-mean-square values (RMS) of mediolateral (ML) CoM and trunk excursions, and pistoning. In the prosthetic users, we evaluated whether oxygen consumption, CoM and trunk dynamics, and pistoning were associated.

RESULTS

We included BAP-users (n = 10), SSP-users (n = 10), and AB (n = 10). SSP-users demonstrated higher oxygen consumption, CoM and trunk RMS ML in comparison to AB during walking. BAP-users showed intermediate results between SSP-users and AB, yet not significantly different from either group. Greater CoM and trunk excursions were associated with higher oxygen consumption; in the SSP-users a greater degree of pistoning, in turn, was found to associate with larger trunk RMS ML.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our results indicate that satisfied SSP-users have increased oxygen consumption compared to AB subjects and use compensatory movements during walking. An assessment of CoM and trunk dynamics, and pistoning during walking may be considered for evaluating whether an individual SSP-user could possibly benefit from a BAP, in addition to the currently used functional tests for evaluating eligibility. This might lead to a larger group of persons with a transfemoral SSP benefiting from this technology.

Changes in lower extremity joint moments one-year following osseointegration in individuals with Transfemoral lower-limb amputation: A case series

BACKGROUND

Dissatisfaction with socket prostheses has led to the development of bone-anchored prostheses through osseointegration for people with transfemoral amputation, eliminating the need for a prosthetic socket. Gait deviations of transfemoral prosthesis users may be linked to increased risk of osteoarthritis, and it remains unknown if gait biomechanics change following osseointegration. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the longitudinal changes in joint kinetics one year post-osseointegration in patients with transfemoral amputation during walking.

METHODS

Knee, hip, and trunk internal moments were evaluated in the prosthetic and intact limbs during walking at a self-selected speed in four participants pre- and one-year post-osseointegration. Longitudinal changes were quantified using the percent change (%∆) in peak joint moments between the two time points and Cohen's d (d) effect size was used to determine the magnitude of effect on joint moments during walking one year following osseointegration.

FINDINGS

Participants demonstrated increased peak knee extension moment (224 ± 308%∆, d = -1.31) in the prosthetic limb, while demonstrating reduced peak knee extension moment (-43 ± 34%∆, d = 1.82) in the intact limb post-osseointegration. Participants demonstrated bilateral reduction of peak hip extension moment (prosthetic: -22 ± 37%∆, d = 0.86; intact: -29 ± 10%∆, d = 1.27) and bilateral increase of peak hip abduction moment (prosthetic: 45 ± 40%∆, d = 1.20; intact: 23 ± 44%∆, d = 0.74) post-osseointegration. Participants demonstrated reduced peak trunk moments on both the prosthetic (extension: -31 ± 16%∆, d = 1.51; lateral flexion: -21 ± 20%∆, d = 0.63) and intact side (extension: -7 ± 22%∆, d = 0.38; lateral flexion: -22 ± 18%∆, d = 1.12) post-osseointegration.

INTERPRETATION

This case series suggests improved gait symmetry in individuals with transfemoral amputation one year following osseointegration, justifying future investigation.

Osseoperception in transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) after transfemoral amputation: a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Endo-exo prosthetics (EEP), which belongs to the transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS), provides an alternative bone-anchored rehabilitation method for transfemoral amputees. It led to the question of whether transmitted forces from prosthetic feet are perceptible by osseoperception resulting in proprioceptive feedback of ground conditions.

OBJECTIVES

The following hypotheses emerged for our trial with the null hypothesis: EEP fitting after transfemoral amputation does not influence osseoperception. Alternative hypothesis 1: EEP patients achieve better osseoperception results than transfemoral amputees fitted with socket prosthesis. Alternative hypothesis 2: EEP carriers achieve comparable results with regards to their osseoperception as non-amputees.

METHODS

N = 25 patients with EEP (mean age = 50,6 ± 9,4, male/female = 15/10) N = 25 patients with socket prostheses (mean age = 52,6 ± 13,1, male/female = 19/6) and N = 25 healthy volunteers were included in the experimental case-control study. In three blinded test modules (V1, V2, V3), the participants had to identify different degrees of shore hardness (c) of different materials (rubber balls (shore = 5-25c), foam cushions (shore = 5-30c), foam mats (shore = 5-30c) with their prosthetic foot (or a personally defined foot in healthy volunteers) without footwear and had to rank them into the correct order according to their tactile sensation and the degree of hardness. A maximum of 10 points could be scored per run.

RESULTS

This experimental observational study included N = 75 participants. The mean age for the entire cohort was 42.8 ± 16.6 years and the BMI was 26.0 ± 4.8. Our results show a significant level of differences in tactile osseoperception between all groups (p < 0.001). A correlation between the mean values of V1-3 and the PMQ2.0 as well as the mean values of K-Level and the prosthesis wearing time per day showed for PMQ (r = 0.387, p = 0.006) and K-level (r = 0.448, p = 0.001) which is a moderate effect according to Cohen.

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest that the EEP treatment can lead to an improvement in tactile sensory perception via the bone-anchored implant, which can lead to an increase in quality of life and improved gait safety.

Osseointegrated prostheses improve balance and balance confidence in individuals with unilateral transfemoral limb loss

BACKGROUND

More than half of patients with lower-limb amputation who use socket prostheses experience at least one fall annually. These falls are primarily attributed to reduced proprioception which negatively affects balance. A promising alternative to socket prostheses are osseointegrated prostheses that involve direct fixation of the prosthetic limb to the residual limb through a bone-anchored implant, yet its effect on balance remains unknown.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do osseointegrated prostheses change static and dynamic balance, as well as patient reported measures of balance confidence, compared to a socket prosthesis?

METHODS

A sample of 10 patients with unilateral transfemoral amputation scheduled to undergo prosthesis osseointegration were enrolled (6 F/4 M, BMI: 26.7 ± 2.9 kg/m2, Age: 46.1 ± 6.3 years). Motion capture data during quiet standing (eyes opened and eyes closed) and overground walking at a self-selected speed, and the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, were collected before (with socket prosthesis) and 12-months following osseointegration. Postural sway via the center of pressure (COP), variability of spatiotemporal parameters, and ABC scores were compared using a repeated measures design before and after osseointegration.

RESULTS

Following prosthesis osseointegration, COP path length and 95 % confidence ellipse area were reduced during quiet standing (d = 0.75, P = 0.09; d = 0.52, P = 0.29, respectively) and the variability of step width and length were reduced during overground walking (d = 0.50, P = 0.06; d = 0.72, P = 0.06, respectively). Furthermore, patients reported significantly improved ABC scores with an osseointegrated prosthesis compared to a socket prosthesis (d = -1.36, P = 0.01).

SIGNIFICANCE

Improvements in postural sway, reductions in gait variability, and greater balance confidence indicate that osseointegrated prostheses improve balance for people with unilateral transfemoral amputation.

Osseointegrated prostheses for the rehabilitation of patients with transfemoral amputations: A prospective ten-year cohort study of patient-reported outcomes and complications

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

What Are the Risk Factors for Mechanical Failure and Loosening of a Transfemoral Osseointegrated Implant System in Patients with a Lower-limb Amputation?

BACKGROUND

Septic loosening and stem breakage due to metal fatigue is a rare but well-known cause of orthopaedic implant failure. This may also affect the components of the osseointegrated implant system for individuals with transfemoral amputation who subsequently undergo revision. Identifying risk factors is important to minimize the frequency of revision surgery after implant breakage.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What proportion of patients who received an osseointegrated implant after transfemoral amputation underwent revision surgery, and what were the causes of those revisions? (2) What factors were associated with revision surgery when stratified by the location of the mechanical failure and (septic) loosening (intramedullary stem versus dual cone adapter)?

METHODS

Between May 2009 and July 2015, we treated 72 patients with an osseointegrated implant. Inclusion criteria were a minimum follow-up of 5-years and a standard press-fit cobalt-chromium-molybdenum (CoCrMb) transfemoral osseointegrated implant. Based on that, 83% (60 of 72) of patients were eligible; a further 3% (2 of 60) were excluded because of no received informed consent (n = 1) and loss to follow-up (n = 1). Eventually, we included 81% (58 of 72) of patients for analysis in this retrospective, comparative study. We compared patient characteristics (gender, age, and BMI), implant details (diameter of the intramedullary stem, length of the dual cone, and implant survival time), and event characteristics (infectious complications and distal bone resorption). The data were retrieved from our electronic patient file and from our cloud-based database and analyzed by individuals not involved in patient care. Failures were categorized as: (1) mechanical failures, defined as breakage of the intramedullary stem or dual-cone adapter, or (2) (septic) loosening of the osseointegrated implant.

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent (20 of 58) of patients had revision surgery. In 12% (7 of 58) of patients, the reason for revision was due to intramedullary stem failures (six breakages, one septic loosening), and in 22% (13 of 58) of patients it was due to dual-cone adaptor failure (10 weak-point breakages and four distal taper breakages; one patient broke both the weak-point and the dual-cone adapter). Smaller median stem diameter (failure: 15 mm [interquartile range 1.3], nonfailure: 17 mm [IQR 2.0], difference of medians 2 mm; p < 0.01) and higher median number of infectious events (failure: 6 [IQR 11], nonfailure: 1 [IQR 3.0], difference of medians -5; p < 0.01) were associated with revision intramedullary stem surgery. No risk factors could be identified for broken dual-cone adapters.

CONCLUSION

Possible risk factors for system failure of this osteointegration implant include small stem diameter and high number of infectious events. We did not find factors associated with dual-cone adapter weak-point failure and distal taper failure, most likely because of the small sample size. When treating a person with a lower-limb amputation with a CoCrMb osseointegrated implant, we recommend avoiding a small stem diameter. Further research with longer follow-up is needed to study the success of revised patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Prosthesis satisfaction and quality of life in US service members with combat-related major lower-limb amputation

BACKGROUND

Military amputee patient care programs offer extensive services, including advanced prosthetic devices, to restore function and improve quality of life (QOL) among veterans and service members with combat-related limb loss, but research on satisfaction with these devices is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess prosthesis satisfaction and QOL in US service members and veterans with combat-related major lower-limb amputation.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Eighty-six participants with combat-related major lower-limb amputation completed the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) Satisfaction with Device scale and Quality of Well-Being Scale, Self-Administered, for the Wounded Warrior Recovery Project.

RESULTS

Most participants (62%-88%) responded Agree or Strongly Agree to OPUS Satisfaction with Device items on the fit, weight, comfort, ease of donning, appearance, and durability of their prosthesis. By contrast, the majority of participants (55%-79%) responded Disagree or Strongly Disagree to items on clothes being free of wear and tear, skin free of abrasions and irritations, and the affordability of their prosthesis. In linear regression analysis, total OPUS Satisfaction with Device score was positively associated with Quality of Well-Being Scale, Self-Administered score (β = 0.0058; P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate the majority of participants were satisfied with the overall functionality of their prosthesis, but dissatisfied with the effect of their prosthesis on clothing and skin, as well as expenses related to their prosthesis. Additionally, prosthesis satisfaction was positively associated with QOL.

Management, outcome, and novel classification system of periprosthetic fractures in patients with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS)-a retrospective cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION

Transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) are anchored prosthetic systems for major limb loss. Sometimes TOPS patients suffer from periprosthetic fractures. The aim of this study was to analyze the management and outcomes of periprosthetic fractures in patients with TOPS and to introduce a novel classification system for this entity.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Since 2010, 140 patients were treated with TOPS after transfemoral amputation in two centers in Germany. Fifteen patients sustained periprosthetic fractures, with five intra- and ten postoperative fractures. The outcome was analyzed by Prosthesis Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ), K-level and prosthesis wear time per day. A subgroup analysis for the body mass index (BMI) was performed.

RESULTS

All postoperative fractures were treated with implant-retaining osteosynthesis. Fourteen fractures healed without complications after a mean of 3 months. One postoperative fracture developed a clinically asymptomatic firm non-union. No Endo-Fixstem had to be removed. For the fracture and control group, a significant increase of the PMQ (p < 0.001) and K-level (p < 0.001) was observed after TOPS treatment compared to the preoperative baseline. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis showed a significant increase of the PMQ and K-level for both normal weight (p = 0.002) and overweight patients (p < 0.001). Of interest, overweight patients even showed a significantly higher increase in scores compared to normal weight patients, regardless of periprosthetic fracture.

CONCLUSION

Periprosthetic fractures do not necessarily worsen outcomes of TOPS treatment. Proper classification and standardized appropriate treatment strategies according to fracture morphology are paramount for reliably good outcomes. We recommend to not remove or exchange the implant (Endo-Fixstem) even if it is assembly. Higher BMI did not have an impact onto rehabilitation success after TOPS to major limb loss of the lower extremity.

Comparison of functional outcome and patient satisfaction between patients with socket prosthesis and patients treated with transcutaneous osseointegrated prosthetic systems (TOPS) after transfemoral amputation

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate and evaluate differences in functional outcome and satisfaction of patients treated with a TOPS and patients using socket prosthesis after transfemoral amputation.

METHODS

This retrospective comprehensive analysis included patients from a single hospital, and was conducted between February 2017 and December 2018. Overall n = 139 patients with prosthesis were included and divided into two comparable groups (socket- and TOPS group). Incomplete data sets were excluded. This led to n = 36 participants for the socket- and n = 33 for the TOPS group. Functional outcome and satisfaction were evaluated by Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). The used PROMs were: Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA), EQ5D-5L, Satisfaction with Prosthesis Questionnaire (SAT-PRO), Prosthesis Mobility Questionnaire (PMQ 2.0) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

RESULTS

Significant results in favor of TOPS patients were identified for the EQ-5D 5L (p = 0.004), Q-TFA (p = 0.000), SAT-PRO (p = 0.000) and PMQ 2.0 (p = 0.000). For FIM, no statistical significance was found (p = 0.318).

CONCLUSION

In this study, transfemoral amputees treated with an osseointegrated prosthetic attachment (TOPS) showed significantly higher scores for mobility and satisfaction. This demonstrates the high potential of TOPS in the prosthetic treatment of patients with transfemoral amputation with regard to their functional abilities in daily life.

Patient-reported benefits of bone-anchored transfemoral prostheses as assessed by MedTech20: A general outcome measure for medical products

BACKGROUND

The medical community demands evidence for the benefits of medical devices such as bone-anchored prostheses (BAPs). MedTech20  is a novel instrument aiming to address general benefits of medical devices.

OBJECTIVE

To describe general patient-reported benefits of BAPs measured with MedTech20.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional descriptive survey.

METHODS

Patients treated in Sweden who had used a BAP for >1 year were mailed the MedTech20  Questionnaire. Responses to each attribute were described, and the MedTech20   Index (0-1), in which a higher figure represents larger benefits from the product, was calculated. Index values were compared based on demographic variables (sex, unilateral or bilateral transfemoral amputation (TFA), and those having experienced any complication of implant parts or the prosthetic connection device).

RESULTS

The response rate was 72%. The 62 participants (41 men and 21 women; mean age 57 years) had 11 ± 6.9 mean years of BAP experience. Single attributes stated as highly relevant and with high benefit for BAPs included perceived reliability, perceived safety, sense of control of the disability, facilitation of movement outside home, no discomfort at use, and ease of use. Attributes with less relevance included aid to remember tasks, reduction of barriers to a good sleep, and reduced sense of compromised integrity. The MedTech20  Index was 0.655 ± 0.188 and was not statistically significantly different based on any of the demographic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

By using a general measure on attributes of medical devices, this study provides new insights strengthening the evidence regarding the benefits that BAPs provide for patients with TFA who had difficulties with socket-suspended prostheses.

Transtibial Osseointegration for Patients with Peripheral Vascular Disease: A Case Series of 6 Patients with Minimum 3-Year Follow-up

The management of peripheral vascular disease (PVD) can require amputation. Osseointegration surgery is an emerging rehabilitation strategy for amputees. In this study, we report on 6 patients who had PVD requiring transtibial amputation (PVD-TTA) and either simultaneous or subsequent osseointegration (PVD-TTOI).

Methods

Six patients (aged 36 to 84 years) with transtibial amputation and preexisting PVD underwent osseointegration between 2014 and 2016 and were followed for 3 to 5 years. Pre- and postoperative clinical and functional outcomes (pain, prosthesis wear time, mobility, walking ability, and quality of life) and adverse events (infection, fracture, implant failure, revision surgery, additional amputation, and death) were prospectively recorded.

Results

All patients' mobility improved following osseointegration. Three patients initially had required the use of a wheelchair, precluding baseline walking tests; the other 3 were classified as K level 1 or 2, with mean baseline Timed Up and Go (TUG) test = 14.0 ± 2.2 s and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) = 262 ± 75 m. At the time of the latest follow-up, all patients were K level 2 or 3; mean TUG = 12.7 ± 7.2 s and 6MWT = 353 ± 148 m. Four patients wore their prosthesis ≥16 hours daily. Three patients had superficial soft-tissue infections. One other patient experienced recurrent infections 2.8 years after osseointegration requiring debridements and transfemoral amputation; the patient died 2 days following surgery from myocardial infarction caused by coronary atherosclerosis.

Conclusions

All 6 patients who underwent PVD-TTOI in this case series survived through 2 years. Patients who initially had used a wheelchair achieved and maintained independent, unaided ambulation until PVD-related impairments in the contralateral leg occurred in 1 patient. Patients previously using a traditional socket prosthesis reported improvement in mobility and quality of life. One patient's death underscores the importance of careful patient selection. However, marked improvement in the other 5 patients suggests cautious optimism that PVD-TTA is not an absolute osseointegration contraindication. Conscientious further investigation seems appropriate.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Translating Technique into Outcomes in Amputation Surgeries

The department of surgery at Washington University is putting increased emphasis on outcomes for amputees. This multidisciplinary effort begins with choosing the correct surgery and incorporating the latest technical advances in amputation surgery.

Advanced techniques in amputation surgery and prosthetic technology in the lower extremity

Bone-anchored implants give patients with unmanageable stump problems hope for drastic improvements in function and quality of life and are therefore increasingly considered a viable solution for lower-limb amputees and their orthopaedic surgeons, despite high infection rates.Regarding diversity and increasing numbers of implants worldwide, efforts are to be supported to arrange an international bone-anchored implant register to transparently overview pros and cons.Due to few, but high-quality, articles about the beneficial effects of targeted muscle innervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI), these surgical techniques ought to be directly transferred into clinical protocols, observations and routines.Bionics of the lower extremity is an emerging cutting-edge technology. The main goal lies in the reduction of recognition and classification errors in changes of ambulant modes. Agonist-antagonist myoneuronal interfaces may be a most promising start in controlling of actively powered ankle joints.As advanced amputation surgical techniques are becoming part of clinical routine, the development of financing strategies besides medical strategies ought to be boosted, leading to cutting-edge technology at an affordable price.Microprocessor-controlled components are broadly available, and amputees do see benefits. Devices from different manufacturers differ in gait kinematics with huge inter-individual varieties between amputees that cannot be explained by age. Active microprocessor-controlled knees/ankles (A-MPK/As) might succeed in uneven ground-walking. Patients ought to be supported to receive appropriate prosthetic components to reach their everyday goals in a desirable way.Increased funding of research in the field of prosthetic technology could enhance more high-quality research in order to generate a high level of evidence and to identify individuals who can profit most from microprocessor-controlled prosthetic components. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:724-741. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190070.

Osseointegrated reconstruction and rehabilitation of transtibial amputees: the Osseointegration Group of Australia surgical technique and protocol for a prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Lower extremity amputation uniformly impairs a person's vocational, social and recreational capacity. Rehabilitation in traditional socket prostheses (TSP) is associated with a spectrum of complications involving the socket-residuum interface which lead to reduced prosthetic use and quality of life. Osseointegration has recently emerged as a novel concept to overcome these complications by eliminating this interface and anchoring the prosthesis directly to bone. Though the complications of TSPs affect both transfemoral and transtibial amputees, Osseointegration has been predominantly performed in transfemoral ones assuming a greater benefit/risk ratio. However, as the safety of the procedure has been established, we intend to extend the concept to transtibial amputees and document the outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is protocol for a prospective cohort study, with patient enrolment started in 2014 and expected to be completed by 2022. The inclusion criteria are age over 18 years, unilateral, bilateral and mixed transtibial amputation and experiencing socket-related problems. All patients receive osseointegrated implants, the type of which depend on the length of the residuum and quality of bone, which are press-fitted into the residual bone. Objective functional outcomes comprising 6-Minute Walk Test, Timed Up-and-Go test and K-level, subjective patient-reported-quality-of-life outcomes (Short Form Health Survey 36, daily prosthetic wear hours, prosthetic wear satisfaction) and adverse events are recorded preoperatively and at postoperative follow-up intervals of 3, 6, 12 months and yearly, and compared with the preoperative values using appropriate statistical tests. Multivariable multilevel logistic regression will be performed with a focus to identify factors associated with outcomes and adverse events, specifically infection, periprosthetic fracture, implant fracture and aseptic loosening.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics approval for the study has been received from the University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia (014153S). The outcomes of this study will be disseminated by publications in peer-reviewed academic journals and scientific presentations at relevant orthopaedic conferences.

Transkutane osseointegrierte Prothesensysteme (TOPS) zur Versorgung Oberschenkelamputierter

Ziel Der Studie Durchgeführt wurde eine retrospektive Analyse der klinischen Ergebnisse und Komplikationsraten aller oberschenkelamputierten Patienten eines Zentrums, die mit dem neuesten Implantatdesign der sogenannten Endo-Exo-Femur-Prothese (EEFP, dritte Generation) versorgt wurden. Ziel ist es, spezifische Informationen zu Langzeitkomplikationen dieser Amputationsversorgungsform zu gewinnen.

Methodik Im Januar 2019 wurden Daten aller Oberschenkelamputierten, die von 2010 bis 2016 an einer Akutklinik aus Schleswig-Holstein mit TOPS versorgt wurden, retrospektiv analysiert. Dies geschah unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der postoperativen Komplikationen. Hierfür wurden alle Untersuchungsbefunde der klinischen Routine-Nachsorge-Untersuchungen herangezogen. Die Komplikationen wurden unterteilt in Stomaprobleme, orthopädie-technische Probleme, Frakturen und Explantationen. Alle EEFPs besaßen das gleiche Implantatdesign (dritte Generation). Dieses Implantat findet derzeit als einziges TOPS in Deutschland klinische Anwendung. Eine deskriptive Statistik des Patientenkollektivs, sowie Verhältnisangaben über aufgetretene Komplikationen wurden berechnet.

Ergebnisse Insgesamt wurden in diesem Zeitraum 68 Implantationen durchgeführt. Durchschnittliche Beobachtungszeit war 6,32 Jahre (±2,16 Jahre). Das mittlere Alter der Patienten betrug 51,84 Jahre±12,12 Jahre. Ursache der Amputation waren überwiegend Traumata (82,35%). Stoma-assoziierte Probleme zeigten mit 7% die höchste Inzidenz innerhalb aller beobachteten, patientenassoziierten Komplikationen und stellten die größten Herausforderungen während des Rehabilitationsprozesses dar. Betrachtet man nur die chirurgischen Komplikationen, so hatten 81% überhaupt keine Komplikationen. Insgesamt wiesen 15% orthopädie-technische Probleme auf, 6% eine peri-prothetische Fraktur, 7% Probleme am Stoma und 3% mussten aufgrund einer Infektion explantiert werden.

Schlussfolgerung Die erhobene Datenanalyse zeigt, dass TOPS (hier die EEFP der dritten Generation) eine erfolgreiche alternative Behandlungsmethode zur Schaftprothesenversorgung für Patienten mit Oberschenkelknochenverlust darstellen können. Die Indikation sollte erst nach dem Versagen einer Schaftversorgung erfolgen und Kontraindikationen müssen umfassend ausgeschlossen werden. Die größten Herausforderungen im Rehabilitationsprozess stellen die Vermeidung von Stomakomplikationen, Infektionen und orthopädie-technischen Problemen dar. Die Rehabilitation von Amputierten, die mit TOPS behandelt werden, erfordert daher ein interdisziplinäres, spezialisiertes Rehabilitations-Team und eine lebenslange rehabilitative Versorgung.

Safety and Performance of Bone-Anchored Prostheses in Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation: A 5-Year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

For almost 30 years, bone-anchored prostheses have offered an alternative solution to prosthetic sockets by attaching the artificial limb directly to the femoral residuum by means of an osseointegration implant. Osseointegration implant surgery was introduced in our center in 2009. The aim of the present study is to report on safety, prosthesis-wearing time, and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) for patients with femoral bone-anchored prostheses during a 5-year follow-up period.

METHODS

All patients who underwent implantation of a press-fit osseointegration implant between May 2009 and November 2013 were eligible for the present study. Implantation was performed in 2 stages. Adverse events included infectious complications (grade 1 to 4), aseptic loosening, breakage, stoma-redundant tissue, and stoma hypergranulation. Prosthesis-wearing time and HRQoL were measured with the Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral Amputation (Q-TFA) prosthetic use score and global score, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine of 42 eligible patients were included. Thirty patients (77%) presented with some kind of infection (156 events in total), with 148 (95%) events being classified as grade 1 or 2 and 8 events (5%) being classified as grade 3; the latter 8 events occurred in 4 patients. There were no instances of septic loosening. The intramedullary stem of the osseointegration implant broke in 2 patients. In total, soft-tissue refashioning had to be done 30 times in 14 patients. The Q-TFA median prosthetic use and global scores improved significantly from 71 to 100 and from 33 to 75, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the adverse events, patient prosthetic use and HRQoL improved significantly. Grade-1 and 2 infections were frequent but could mostly be treated with nonoperative measures. Most infections seemed to occur in the first 2 years and did not lead to deep infections. Two broken intramedullary stems were revised successfully. Current developments focus on reduction of infectious complications and prevention of osseointegration implant breakage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Safety, prosthesis wearing time and health-related quality of life of lower extremity bone-anchored prostheses using a press-fit titanium osseointegration implant: A prospective one-year follow-up cohort study

BACKGROUND

We described safety and functional one-year follow-up outcomes of individuals with lower limb amputation treated with bone-anchored prostheses using titanium press-fit osseointegration implants.

METHODS

All consecutive individuals treated between March 2015 and June 2018 with curved osseointegration femur implant (OFI-C) indicated for a long femoral remnant, gamma osseointegration femur implant (OFI-Y) indicated for a short femoral remnant, or osseointegration tibia implant (OTI) were eligible for this study. All adverse events were evaluated, infections were graded as follows: grade 1 and 2: low- and high-grade soft tissue infection, respectively, grade 3: deep bone infection, grade 4: septic implant failure. Functional outcome measures included prosthesis wearing time (PUS), health-related quality of life (GS), and the overall situation as an amputee (GS Q3); evaluated with the Questionnaire of persons with trans-femoral amputation (Q-TFA) before surgery and at one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Ninety of 91 individuals were included (mean age: 54±14 yrs, 26 females); treated with 53, 16 and 21 OFI-C, OFI-Y and OTI, respectively. Soft tissue infections (grade 1: 11 events, grade 2: 10 events) were treated successfully with antibiotics except in two (OFI-C and OFI-Y), who required additional surgery due to recurrent stoma irritation and peri-stoma abscess drainage. One individual with dysvascular amputation (OTI) developed septic implant loosening and occlusion of the femoral artery resulting in a transfemoral amputation. No aseptic loosening's occurred. One individual (OFI-Y) required stoma surgical refashioning due to soft tissue redundancy. At baseline mean ±SD and median (25th to 75th PCTL) Q-TFA PUS and GS were 52±39, 52(7-90) and 40±19, 42(25-50) and improved significantly to 88±18, 90 (90-100) and 71±15, 75 (67-83) at one-year follow-up. The GS Q3 improved over time.

CONCLUSION

Titanium osseointegration implants can be safely used within a one-year follow-up period. The performance improved compared to the use of a socket-suspended prosthesis.