1
|
Schaper K, Woelber JP, Jaehne A. Can the spirit of motivational interviewing be taught online? A comparative study in general practitioners. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 125:108297. [PMID: 38728998 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Motivational Interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based approach to enhance patients' motivation and is increasingly in demand in medical practice. Online teaching methods offer advantages to train health care professionals, but only very few studies examined whether MI-specific interviewing skills (""MI-skills""), and especially MIspecific attitudes (the "MI-spirit"), can be taught online and whether learning gains differ from those in face-to-face courses. This study compared the effects of 7 h of basic training for experienced general practitioners (GP) in either an online or a traditional face-to-face format with a non-trained control group. METHODS "MI-skills" and "MI-spirit" were measured in a prospective analysis in 49 experienced GPs before and one week after training RESULTS: An ANOVA on gain-scores demonstrated significant differences between groups in both MI-specific skills (VASE-R, p = 0.006) and "MIspirit" (MIKAT, p = 0.029; HRQ, p < 0.001) from pre- to posttest. Post-hoc comparisons revealed significant improvement only in the training groups (VASE-R, p < 0.001; MIKAT, p = 0.014 for online, p = 0.003 for face-to-face; HRQ, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The results suggest similar effects of both online and face-to-face training of "MI-skills" and "MI-spirit" to GPs. PRACTICE IMPLICATION Online learning opportunities should be integrated in MIT programs for general practitioners where appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karsten Schaper
- Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs-University, Breisacher Str. 153, 79106 Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Johan Peter Woelber
- Policlinic of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology, and Pediatric Dentistry, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Andreas Jaehne
- Oberberg Specialist Clinic Rhein-Jura, Schneckenhalde 13, 79713 Bad Säckingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hoekstra F, Gainforth HL, Broeksteeg R, Corras S, Collins D, Eleftheriadou E, Gaudet S, Giroux EE, Kuipers LS, McCallum S, Ma JK, de Passillé E, Rakiecki D, Rockall S, van den Berg-Emons R, van Vilsteren A, Williamson M, Wilroy J, Martin Ginis KA. The co-development and evaluation of an e-learning course on spinal cord injury physical activity counselling: a randomized controlled trial. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:240. [PMID: 38448881 PMCID: PMC10916033 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05141-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health, fitness and lifestyle professionals can play important roles in promoting physical activity in groups at risk of developing an inactive lifestyle, such as people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Tailored counselling is a promising tool to promote and improve physical activity levels. To support professionals to effectively have a conversation about physical activity with clients with SCI, evidence-based training and resources are needed. This project aimed to (1) co-develop an e-learning course on best practices for SCI physical activity counselling and, (2) examine the effectiveness and usability of this course. METHODS Guided by the technology-enhanced learning (TEL) evaluation framework, we used a systematic, multistep approach to co-develop and evaluate an e-learning course. The development process was informed by input and feedback from a diverse group of end-users and experts (n > 160) via online surveys and (think-aloud) interviews. A randomized controlled trial was used to compare learning outcomes (post-knowledge and self-efficacy) between participants who completed the course (intervention group) and the wait-listed control group. Usability, learning experiences, and satisfaction were assessed among all participants. RESULTS Forty-one participants (21 intervention-group; 20 control-group) with various backgrounds (e.g., lifestyle counsellors, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, recreation therapists, fitness trainers) enrolled in the randomized controlled trial. After completing the course, participants in the intervention group showed significantly improved knowledge on the best practices for SCI physical activity counselling and higher self-efficacy for using these best practices in conversations with clients with SCI compared to the control group (p <.001). Participants reported above average usability scores, positive learning experiences, and high levels of satisfaction when completing the course. CONCLUSION We used a systematic, multi-step, theory-informed approach to co-develop and evaluate an evidence-based e-learning course on SCI physical activity counselling to support professionals to promote physical activity in their daily practices. The overall positive findings demonstrate that the e-learning course is feasible and ready for further implementation in various health and community settings. Implementation of the e-learning course can help professionals improve the physical activity support they provide to their clients, and subsequently increase physical activity participation in people with SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Femke Hoekstra
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Heather L Gainforth
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Stephanie Corras
- School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Delaney Collins
- School of Occupational Therapy, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Electra Eleftheriadou
- Centre for Teaching and Learning, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Sonja Gaudet
- Spinal Cord Injury British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- The Thompson Okanagan Tourism Association, Vernon, BC, Canada
| | - Emily E Giroux
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Shannon McCallum
- Therapeutic Recreation Program, St. Lawrence College, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jasmin K Ma
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Erica de Passillé
- Horizon Health Network, Stan Cassidy Centre for Rehabilitation, Fredericton, NB, Canada
| | - Diane Rakiecki
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| | - Shannon Rockall
- Praxis Spinal Cord Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Access Community Therapists, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rita van den Berg-Emons
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jereme Wilroy
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kathleen A Martin Ginis
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
- International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Management, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Erschens R, Fahse B, Festl-Wietek T, Herrmann-Werner A, Keifenheim KE, Zipfel S, Fallgatter AJ, Velten-Schurian K. Training medical students in motivational interviewing using a blended learning approach: a proof-of-concept study. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1204810. [PMID: 37546454 PMCID: PMC10400288 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1204810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Difficulties in implementing behavior change in patients with chronic diseases are common in clinical practice. Motivational interviewing (MI) helps clinicians to support patients in overcoming ambivalence while maintaining self-determination. The inclusion of MI in German medical training curricula is still rare. Furthermore, the effects of systematic teaching of MI, especially via blended learning, have hardly been investigated. Methods Medical students participated in three curricular events related to MI, consisting of instructional videos and theoretical and practical components in a blended learning format. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of teaching MI in students' medical education. A controlled, non-randomized study was conducted with an intervention group and a control group. Both groups completed questionnaires on their experience and knowledge related to MI, completed a knowledge test and rated their satisfaction with the course. MI was taught in the 6th semester of medical coursework as part of a psychosomatic course, in the 8th semester during a psychiatry course and in the 9th semester during a weekly psychiatry clerkship. Results Data from the intervention group (n = 35) and control group (n = 14) were analyzed, with 65.7% of students participating in all three parts of the curriculum. Overall interest in learning MI was high, with M = 2.92 (SD = 1.00). The results indicate a greater increase in knowledge over time in the intervention group. The majority (62.86%) stated that the curriculum was relevant to their future career. Free-form text responses indicated a high level of satisfaction with practical relevance. Conclusion This study demonstrates the usefulness of an MI curriculum for medical students. The integration of MI into medical curricula is a promising curricular addition to improve doctor-patient communication. Future research should address patient perceptions of MI competencies and the persistence of acquired competencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Erschens
- University Medical Hospital Tuebingen, Internal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Bettina Fahse
- University Medical Hospital Tuebingen, Internal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany
- Tübingen Institute for Medical Education (TIME), Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Teresa Festl-Wietek
- Tübingen Institute for Medical Education (TIME), Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anne Herrmann-Werner
- University Medical Hospital Tuebingen, Internal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany
- Tübingen Institute for Medical Education (TIME), Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Katharina E. Keifenheim
- University Medical Hospital Tuebingen, Internal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Zipfel
- University Medical Hospital Tuebingen, Internal Medicine, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Tübingen, Germany
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andreas J. Fallgatter
- German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Tuebingen, Germany
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kerstin Velten-Schurian
- Tübingen Center for Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doorley JD, Fishbein NS, Greenberg J, Reichman M, Briskin EA, Bakhshaie J, Vranceanu AM. How Do Orthopaedic Providers Conceptualize Good Patient Outcomes and Their Barriers and Facilitators After Acute Injury? A Qualitative Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:1088-1100. [PMID: 36346734 PMCID: PMC10194782 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Good clinical outcomes in orthopaedics are largely dictated by the biomedical model, despite mounting evidence of the role of psychosocial factors. Understanding orthopaedic providers' conceptualizations of good clinical outcomes and what facilitates and hinders them may highlight critical barriers and opportunities for training providers on biopsychosocial models of care and integrating them into practice. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES (1) How do orthopaedic trauma healthcare providers define good clinical outcomes for their patients after an acute orthopaedic injury? (2) What do providers perceive as barriers to good outcomes? (3) What do providers perceive as facilitators of good outcomes? For each question, we explored providers' responses in a biopsychosocial framework. METHODS In this cross-sectional, qualitative study, we recruited 94 orthopaedic providers via an electronic screening survey from three Level I trauma centers in geographically diverse regions of the United States (rural southeastern, urban southwestern, and urban northeastern). This study was part of the first phase of a multisite trial testing the implementation of a behavioral intervention to prevent chronic pain after acute orthopaedic injury. Of the 94 participants who were recruited, 88 completed the screening questionnaire. Of the 88 who completed it, nine could not participate because of scheduling conflicts. Thus, the final sample included 79 participants: 48 surgeons (20 attendings, 28 residents; 6% [three of 48] were women, 94% [45 of 48] were between 25 and 55 years old, 73% [35 of 48] were White, and 2% [one of 48] were Hispanic) and 31 other orthopaedic professionals (10 nurse practitioners, registered nurses, and physician assistants; 13 medical assistants; five physical therapists and social workers; and three research fellows; 68% [21 of 31] were women, 97% [30 of 31] were between 25 and 55 years old, 71% [22 of 31] were White, and 39% [12 of 31] were Hispanic). Using a semistructured interview, our team of psychology researchers conducted focus groups, organized by provider type at each site, followed by individual exit interviews (5- to 10-minute debriefing conversations and opportunities to voice additional opinions one-on-one with a focus group facilitator). In each focus group, providers were asked to share their perceptions of what constitutes a "good outcome for your patients," what factors facilitate these outcomes, and what factors are barriers to achieving those outcomes. Focus groups were approximately 60 minutes long. A research assistant recorded field notes during the focus groups to summarize insights gained and disseminate findings to the broader research team. Using this procedure, we determined that thematic saturation was reached for all topics and no additional focus groups were necessary. Three independent coders identified the codes of good outcomes, outcome barriers, and outcome facilitators and applied this coding framework to all transcripts. Three separate data interpreters collaboratively extracted themes related to biomedical, psychological, and social factors and corresponding inductive subthemes. RESULTS Although orthopaedic providers' definitions of good outcomes naturally included biomedical factors (bone healing, functional independence, and pain alleviation), they were also marked by nuanced psychosocial factors, including the need for patients to recover from psychological trauma associated with injury and feel heard and understood-not just as outcome facilitators, but also as key outcomes themselves. Regarding perceived barriers to good outcomes, providers interwove psychological and biomedical factors (for example, "if they're a smoker, if they have depression, anxiety…") and discussed how psychological dysfunction (for example, maladaptive avoidance or fear of reinjury) can limit key behaviors during recovery (such as adherence to physical therapy regimens). Unprimed, providers also cited resiliency-related terms from psychological research, including (low) "self-efficacy," "catastrophic thinking," and (lack of) psychological "hardiness" as barriers. Regarding perceived facilitators of good outcomes, various social and socioeconomic factors emerged, including a biosocial connection between recovery, social support, and "privilege" (such as occupation or education). These perspectives emerged across sites and provider types. CONCLUSION Although the biomedical model prevails in clinical practice, providers across all sites, in various roles, defined good outcomes and their barriers and facilitators in terms of interconnected biopsychosocial factors without direct priming to do so. Thus, similar Level I trauma centers may be more ready to adopt biopsychosocial care approaches than initially expected. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Providers' perspectives in this study aligned with a growing body of research on the role of biomedical and psychosocial factors in surgical outcomes and risk of transition to chronic pain. To translate these affirming attitudes into practice, other Level I trauma centers could encourage leaders who adopt biopsychosocial approaches to share their perspectives and train other providers in biopsychosocial conceptualization and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James D. Doorley
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nathan S. Fishbein
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan Greenberg
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mira Reichman
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ellie A. Briskin
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jafar Bakhshaie
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ana-Maria Vranceanu
- Center for Health Outcomes and Interdisciplinary Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Grieve NJ, Cranston KD, Jung ME. Examining the Effectiveness of an E-Learning Training Course for Coaches of a Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Program. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE 2023:1-11. [PMID: 37362065 PMCID: PMC10191814 DOI: 10.1007/s41347-023-00316-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
Small Steps for Big Changes (SSBC) is a community-based diabetes prevention program (DPP). SSBC utilizes a motivational interviewing (MI) informed counseling style to deliver a structured diet and exercise curriculum to empower healthy behavioral modifications and prevent type 2 diabetes (T2D). An electronic learning (e-learning) platform to train SSBC coaches was developed to improve flexibility, reach, and accessibility. While e-learning has shown to be an effective mode of teaching content to health professionals, less is known in the context of DPP coaches. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the SSBC e-learning course. Twenty coaches (eleven fitness staff personnel and nine university students) were recruited through existing fitness facilities to participate in the online SSBC coach training which included completing pre- and post-training questionnaires, seven online modules of content and a mock client session. Knowledge regarding MI (Mpre = 3.30 ± 1.95, Mpost = 5.90 ± 1.29; p < 0.01), SSBC content (Mpre = 5.15 ± 2.23, Mpost = 8.60 ± 0.94; p < 0.01), and T2D (Mpre = 6.95 ± 1.57, Mpost = 8.25 ± 0.72; p < 0.01), and self-efficacy to deliver the program (Mpre = 7.93 ± 1.51, Mpost = 9.01 ± 1.00; p < 0.01) all significantly increased from pre- to post e-learning training. Participants reported positively on the user satisfaction and feedback questionnaire with a mean score of 4.58/5 (SD = 0.36). These findings suggest e-learning platforms are a promising mode to improve DPP coaches' knowledge, counseling skills, and to bolster confidence in program delivery with high levels of satisfaction. E-learning to train DPP coaches allows for effective and feasible expansion of DPP's, ultimately permitting more reach to adults living with prediabetes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41347-023-00316-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie J. Grieve
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Kaela D. Cranston
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Mary E. Jung
- School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus, Kelowna, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brown M, Páez YD, Jabri A, Weiner J, Allen A, Sydnor-Campbell T, Fritz S, Creasman M, Kasturi S, Safford MM, Navarro-Millán I. Virtual training of rheumatoid arthritis peer coaches in motivational interviewing skills and concepts of cardiovascular disease. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2023; 33:101130. [PMID: 37122490 PMCID: PMC10130077 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Peer coaching interventions are effective in helping individuals with chronic conditions understand their disease. Most peer coach training programs occur in person, which has become an obstacle during the COVID pandemic. We describe our experiences with virtual training for future peer coach interventions. Methods Individuals with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) between 40 and 75 years of age were recruited and interviewed by the research team. We conducted seven virtual training sessions focused on four main points: Listen, Discuss, Practice, and Certify. The peer coaches provided feedback throughout the program, which was used to refine the training and intervention. A post-training focus group assessed satisfaction with the training program and intervention development process. Results Four peer coaches (3 women, 1 man) were trained, including 2 Black and 2 White individuals with advanced degrees. Their ages ranged from 52 to 57, and their RA duration ranged from 5 to 15 years. An iterative process with the coaches and researchers resulted in a nine-week training program. Peer coaches reported satisfaction, confidence, and a preference for the virtual training format. Conclusion This virtual peer coach training program was feasible and acceptable for coaches with advanced degrees during the global COVID-19 pandemic. Our approach represents an opportunity to adapt training that has been traditionally done in person. By doing so, our approach facilitates the recruitment and training of a diverse group of coaches and promotes sustainability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie Brown
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Assem Jabri
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joan Weiner
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Patient Power Research Network-ArthritisPower, USA
| | - Aberdeen Allen
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Patient Power Research Network-ArthritisPower, USA
| | - Tien Sydnor-Campbell
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Patient Power Research Network-ArthritisPower, USA
| | - Shelley Fritz
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Patient Power Research Network-ArthritisPower, USA
| | - Megan Creasman
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Monika M. Safford
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Iris Navarro-Millán
- Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Hospital for Special Surgery, Division of Rheumatology, New York, NY, USA
- Corresponding author. Weill Cornell Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine Hospital for Special Surgery, Division of Rheumatology, 420 E 70th St., LH-363, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dalcin AT, Yuan CT, Jerome GJ, Goldsholl S, Minahan E, Gennusa J, Fink T, Gudzune KA, Daumit GL, Dickerson F, Thompson DA, Wang NY, Martino S. Designing Practical Motivational Interviewing Training for Mental Health Practitioners Implementing Behavioral Lifestyle Interventions: Protocol for 3 Pilot Intervention Studies. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e44830. [PMID: 36927501 PMCID: PMC10132009 DOI: 10.2196/44830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Motivational interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based, patient-centered communication method shown to be effective in helping persons with serious mental illness (SMI) to improve health behaviors. In clinical trials where study staff conducted lifestyle interventions incorporating an MI approach, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles of participants with SMI showed improvement. Given the disproportionate burden of CVD in this population, practitioners who provide somatic and mental health care to persons with SMI are ideally positioned to deliver patient-centered CVD risk reduction interventions. However, the time for MI training (traditionally 16-24 hours), follow-up feedback, and the coaching required to develop and maintain patient-centered skills are significant barriers to incorporating MI when scaling up these evidence-based practices. OBJECTIVE We describe the design and development of the following 2 scalable MI training approaches for community mental health practitioners: real-time brief workshops and follow-up asynchronous avatar training. These approaches are being used in 3 different pilot implementation research projects that address weight loss, smoking cessation, and CVD risk reduction in people with SMI who are a part of ALACRITY Center, a research-to-practice translation center funded by the National Institute of Mental Health. METHODS Clinicians and staff in community mental health clinics across Maryland were trained to deliver 3 distinct evidence-based physical health lifestyle interventions using an MI approach to persons with SMI. The real-time brief MI workshop training for ACHIEVE-D weight loss coaches was 4 hours; IMPACT smoking cessation counselors received 2-hour workshops and prescribers received 1-hour workshops; and RHYTHM CVD risk reduction program staff received 4 hours of MI. All workshop trainings occurred over videoconference. The asynchronous avatar training includes 1 common didactic instructional module for the 3 projects and 1 conversation simulation unique to each study's target behavior. Avatar training is accessible on a commercial website. We plan to assess practitioners' attitudes and beliefs about MI and evaluate the impact of the 2 MI training approaches on their MI skills 3, 6, and 12 months after training using the MI Treatment Integrity 4.2.1 coding tool and the data generated by the avatar-automated scoring system. RESULTS The ALACRITY Center was funded in August 2018. We have implemented the MI training for 126 practitioners who are currently delivering the 3 implementation projects. We expect the studies to be complete in May 2023. CONCLUSIONS This study will contribute to knowledge about the effect of brief real-time training augmented with avatar skills practice on clinician MI skills. If MI Treatment Integrity scoring shows it to be effective, brief videoconference trainings supplemented with avatar skills practice could be used to train busy community mental health practitioners to use an MI approach when implementing physical health interventions. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/44830.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene Taylor Dalcin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Christina T Yuan
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health,, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Gerald J Jerome
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,College of Health Professions, Towson University, Towson, MD, United States
| | - Stacy Goldsholl
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Eva Minahan
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Joseph Gennusa
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Tyler Fink
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kimberly A Gudzune
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Gail Lois Daumit
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Faith Dickerson
- Department of Psychology, Sheppard Pratt, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - David A Thompson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Nae-Yuh Wang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Steve Martino
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, West Haven, CT, United States.,VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Johns Hopkins Patient Engagement Program: Improving Patient Engagement, Improving Patient Outcomes. Qual Manag Health Care 2022; 31:105-106. [PMID: 35324555 DOI: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
9
|
Training Physicians in Motivational Communication to Address Influenza Vaccine Hesitation: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10020143. [PMID: 35214603 PMCID: PMC8875187 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Strategies to support health care professionals on how to address vaccine hesitancy are needed. Methods: We developed a 4-h Motivational Communication (MC) training program tailored to help physicians address hesitancy related to influenza vaccination among patients living with rheumatoid arthritis. Five MC competencies were evaluated at baseline and post-training with a standardized patient using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity [MITI] scale. Adherence to MC during clinical consultations and changes in vaccine intentions was measured as secondary outcomes. Results: Seven rheumatology physicians participated in the training. MITI scores increased in all participants, and 71% (n = 5) achieved thresholds of clinical competency (i.e., ≥3.5/5 at MITI global score and ≥3/5 on at least 3 individual competency score) post-training. Autonomy/support and empathy competencies reached competency thresholds (+2.4 ± 1.3 to +4.1 ± 0.7 and +2.1 ± 0.7 to +4.1 ± 0.7, respectively). Evocation and collaboration competencies improved but without reaching competency thresholds (+1.4 ± 0.8 to +3.1 ± 1.1; +1.4 ± 0.8 to +2.9 ± 1.1, respectively). Direction did not improve. Among 21 patient consultations post-training, 15 (71%) were MC-consistent. Of the 15 patients, 67% (10/15) intended to receive the influenza vaccine and 33% (5/15) received it. Conclusion: A brief MC training program targeting vaccine hesitancy increased MC competency among rheumatology physicians and promoted behavioral change among patients.
Collapse
|