Feasibility of group telerehabilitation for individuals with chronic acquired brain injury: integrating clinical care and research

BACKGROUND

Acquired brain injury (ABI) is a leading cause of lifelong disability, but access to treatment in the chronic stages has significant barriers. Group-based, remotely delivered neurorehabilitation reduces costs, travel barriers, and infection risk; however, its feasibility for patients with ABI is not well-established.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the feasibility of remotely group-based cognitive and mood therapies for persons with chronic ABI.

METHODS

Three hundred and eighty-eight adults with chronic ABI participated in group tele-neurorehabilitation modules comprising Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Goal Management Training®, Relaxation and Mindfulness Skills Training, and/or a novel Concussion Education & Symptom Management program. Assessments comprised quantitative metrics, surveys, as well as qualitative semi-structured interviews in a subset of participants.

RESULTS

High retention, adherence, and satisfaction were observed. Facilitators of treatment included accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and convenience. Adoption of technology was high, but other people's technological interruptions were a barrier. Self-reported benefits specific to group-based format included improved mood, stress management, coping, interpersonal relationships, cognitive functioning, and present-mindedness.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study examined chronic ABI patients' perceptions of telerehabilitation. Patients found remotely delivered, group-based mood, and cognitive interventions feasible with easy technology adoption. Group format was considered a benefit. Recommendations are provided to inform design of remotely delivered ABI programs.

Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive Paradigm

With the arrival of the cognitive paradigm during the latter half of the last century, the theoretical and scientific bases of neurorehabilitation have been linked to the knowledge developed in cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience. Although the knowledge generated by these disciplines has made relevant contributions to neurological therapy, their theoretical premises may create limitations in therapeutic processes. The present manuscript has two main objectives: first, to explicitly set forth the theoretical bases of cognitive neurorehabilitation and critically analyze the repercussions that these premises have produced in clinical practice; and second, to propose the enactive paradigm to reinterpret perspectives on people with brain damage and their therapy (assessment and treatment). This analysis will show that (1) neurorehabilitation as a therapy underutilizes body-originated resources that aid in recovery from neurological sequelae (embrained therapy); (2) the therapeutic process is based exclusively on subpersonal explanation models (subpersonal therapy); and (3), neurorehabilitation does not take subjectivity of each person in their own recovery processes into account (anti-subjective therapy). Subsequently, and in order to attenuate or resolve the conception of embrained, subpersonal and anti-subjective therapy, I argue in support of incorporating the enactive paradigm in rehabilitation of neurological damage. It is proposed here under a new term, "experiential neurorehabilitation." This proposal approaches neurological disease and its sequelae as alterations in dynamic interaction between the body structure and the environment in which the meaning of the experience is also altered. Therefore, when a person is not able to walk, remember the past, communicate a thought, or maintain efficient self-care, their impairments are not only a product of an alteration in a specific cerebral area or within information processing; rather, the sequelae of their condition stem from alterations in the whole living system and its dynamics with the environment. The objective of experiential neurorehabilitation is the recovery of the singular and concrete experience of the person, composed of physical and subjective life attributes.

Behaviour problems after brain injury: incidence and need for treatment

The aim of this study was to identify the incidence and nature of behaviour problems following severe head injury. All severe head injuries in a known population were identified from a three-year period. Sixteen patients were assessed for behavioural problems shortly after injury, while still in hospital. The relatives' judgements of behavioural change observed at home, for a total of 33 patients from three consecutive years, was collected to compare the extent of behavioural problems during the years following injury.

More behavioural problems were reported at home, by families, than by nursing and therapy staff in hospital. Relatives identified behaviour change in about 80% of the patients and significant practical problems were reported at home in about half of all severely head-injured people. Symptoms appeared to be persistent and tended to worsen over a three-year period following the injury. In particular, aggressive behaviour increased. Behaviour change did not correlate with either age or the severity of the injury as measured by post-traumatic amnesia.

The results of this study draw attention to the need for treatment and support for the families of brain-injured patients showing behavioural disturbance, at home, after they have been discharged from hospital.

Use of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury

Objective: To compare the appropriateness and responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) during early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident brain injury.

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: A regional neurological rehabilitation unit.

Patients: Two hundred and fifty-nine consecutive patients undergoing inpatient comprehensive neurological rehabilitation following a vascular brain injury due to single cerebral infarction (n=75), spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (n=34) and subarachnoid haemorrhage (n=43), and 107 patients who had sustained traumatic brain injury.

Measurements: Admission and discharge FIM total, physical and cognitive scores and the Barthel Index were recorded. Appropriateness and responsiveness in the study samples were determined by examining score distributions and floor and ceiling effects, and by an effect size calculation respectively. Non-parametric statistical analysis was used to calculate the significance of the change in scores.

Results: In all patient groups there was a significant improvement (Wilcoxon's rank sum, P < 0.0001) in the Barthel Index (mean change score: vascular 3.9, traumatic 3.95) and FIM (mean change score: vascular 17.3, traumatic 17.4) scores during rehabilitation, and similar effect sizes were found for the Barthel Index (effect size: vascular 0.65, traumatic 0.55) and FIM total (effect size: vascular 0.59, traumatic 0.48) and physical scores in all patient groups. In each patient group the cognitive component of the FIM had the smallest effect size (0.35-0.43).

Conclusions: All measures were appropriate for younger (less than 65 years of age) patients undergoing early inpatient rehabilitation after single incident vascular or traumatic brain injury. The Barthel Index and the total and physical FIM scores showed similar responsiveness, whilst the cognitive FIM score was least responsive. These findings suggest that none of the FIM scores have any advantage over the Barthel Index in evaluating change in these circumstances.

Professional Claims, Uncertainty and the Politics of Care: Impact on Referral and Equitable Care in Traumatic Brain Injury

Rising healthcare expenditure and more explicit rationing of healthcare resources is a central feature of healthcare systems globally. In Australia, reform efforts have targeted the high cost areas such as the public hospital system. This has increased the demands on professionals to reduce length of stay and complicated post-hospital referral of people with complex and severe injury. In the area of traumatic brain injury (TBI), pressures on existing rehabilitation resources and a changing healthcare environment, with greater emphasis on efficiency and evidence-based practice, confront professionals' efforts to provide equitable care. In this paper, some of the key issues important in understanding patterns of referral in TBI are presented. It is argued that referral decisions exemplify a negotiation of professional claims and value judgements that not only conceal the uncertainty in decision-making, but also more notably, reflect the lack of attention to equity in the broader politics of care. Case studies are used to illustrate these issues and to discuss the implications for equitable care in the contemporary healthcare environment in Australia. The paper concludes by outlining the challenges and opportunities in applying evidence-based decision-making in TBI and some future directions for attaining more equitable patterns of referral.

Referral to rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury: practitioners and the process of decision-making

The study aimed to examine the factors influencing referral to rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury (TBI) by using social problems theory as a conceptual model to focus on practitioners and the process of decision-making in two Australian hospitals. The research design involved semi-structured interviews with 18 practitioners and observations of 10 team meetings, and was part of a larger study on factors influencing referral to rehabilitation in the same settings. Analysis revealed that referral decisions were influenced primarily by practitioners' selection and their interpretation of clinical and non-clinical patient factors. Further, practitioners generally considered patient factors concurrently during an ongoing process of decision-making, with the combinations and interactions of these factors forming the basis for interpretations of problems and referral justifications. Key patient factors considered in referral decisions included functional and tracheostomy status, time since injury, age, family, place of residence and Indigenous status. However, rate and extent of progress, recovery potential, safety and burden of care, potential for independence and capacity to cope were five interpretative themes, which emerged as the justifications for referral decisions. The subsequent negotiation of referral based on patient factors was in turn shaped by the involvement of practitioners. While multi-disciplinary processes of decision-making were the norm, allied health professionals occupied a central role in referral to rehabilitation, and involvement of medical, nursing and allied health practitioners varied. Finally, the organizational pressures and resource constraints, combined with practitioners' assimilation of the broader efficiency agenda were central factors shaping referral.

A survey of services provided by community neurorehabilitation teams in South East England

OBJECTIVE

To survey the role, function and staffing of community rehabilitation teams in London and the South East NHS Region of England who work with neurologically disabled people, with emphasis on services provided for traumatic brain injury.

DESIGN

Telephone survey using a structured interview with team leaders.

SETTING

London and South East NHS Regions of England (population 15.6 million).

SUBJECTS

Community rehabilitation teams.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

A structured interview about service provision.

RESULTS

Thirty-five teams were found in 25 Health Authorities serving 14 million people. In a further five Health Authorities, another five teams did not participate. There were fewer than 1.5 community team professionals for 4,000-5,000 neurologically disabled. Teams had seen less than 3% of disabled traumatic brain injuries. Most focused on physical disability. Only two teams specialized in consequences of cognitive impairment or personality change. Stroke and multiple sclerosis were the most common referrals. Sixty per cent of teams had no clinical psychologist. The composition of teams is described, as is caseload, clinical role, outcome measures used, professional links, work practice and staffing issues.

CONCLUSIONS

Community physical disability teams seem insufficiently resourced to provide a comprehensive service for the neurologically disabled. There are not enough teams generally, and too few specialize in psychosocial problems. All teams should include a clinical psychologist, should have specialist resources for cases from ethnic minorities and formal policies for staff security. There needs to be clarity over the range of services provided and to whom, and this linked to prevalence of disability and team resourcing.

Preparedness for medical rehabilitation of casualties in disaster situations

Natural and man-made disasters produce large numbers of severely and multiply injured casualties, many of whom survive with severe impairments that require comprehensive and protracted rehabilitation (brain and spinal cord damage, peripheral nerve injuries, amputations). In a disaster situation, even adequately developed rehabilitation services are unable to provide care to the large number of casualties, without advance planning and preparation. Such planning has to consider expansion of available rehabilitation institutions and conversion of other facilities into settings for rehabilitation, and integrating all into a rehabilitation referral system consisting of levels of care. It should further consider strengthening community service for the provision of continuity of rehabilitation care and the preparation of guidelines for adequate management of various categories of disablements at various levels. The paper offers guidance to those in disaster-prone areas, or in anticipation of a disaster, who might wish to undertake the planning, as well as to those who need to organize available services or to set up new ones, once the disaster has occurred.

A practical framework for understanding compensatory behaviour in people with organic memory impairment

This paper describes a framework for understanding compensatory behaviour in people with organic memory impairment. It builds on a theoretical framework proposed by Bäckman and Dixon (1992) who distinguish four steps in the evolution of compensatory behaviour: (a) origins, (b) mechanisms, (c) forms, and (d) consequences. Although this framework is useful in understanding compensation in neurologically impaired adults, other factors need to be taken into account. Using data from a long-term follow-up study it is shown that age, severity of memory impairment, and additional cognitive deficits are important variables in predicting independence and use of compensations several years post-rehabilitation. The paper concludes with a consideration of how the framework might be used in future studies.