Assessing non-response bias in pediatric palliative care research

What motivates informal carers to be actively involved in research, and what obstacles to involvement do they perceive?

BACKGROUND

Due to demographic changes and a strained public sector operating in many countries globally, informal care is increasing. Currently, at least 1.3 million adults in Sweden regularly provide help, support and/or care to a family member/significant other. With no sign of an imminent decrease in their caring activities, it is important that informal carers are considered as a key stakeholder group within research that affects them, e.g., the co-design of carer and/or dyadic support interventions. The objective of this descriptive, quantitative study was to investigate informal carers' perceived motivations and obstacles to become involved in research.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey design was adopted, using first-wave data from a panel study. The data, collected in Sweden between September 2019 and March 2020, included survey responses from 147 informal carers who were either aged 60+ years themselves or were caring for someone who was aged 60+ years.

RESULTS

Our main results showed that informal carers are, in general, interested in research. Slightly fewer were interested in becoming actively involved themselves, but older age was the only characteristic significantly associated with less interest of being actively involved. Two latent motivational dimensions emerged from the factor analysis: 'family motivation' and 'the greater good motivation'. These, according to our results, almost equally valued dimensions, described the differing reasons for informal carers to become involved in research. The most common perceived obstacle was lack of time and it was reported by more women than men.

CONCLUSION

Our study contributes with new knowledge of informal carers' perceived motivations and obstacles regarding carer involvement in research. Paying attention to the differing motivational dimensions held by informal carers could help researchers create conditions for more inclusive and systematic participation of informal carers within research. Thereby, increasing the opportunities for research that is deemed to be of higher societal impact. IRRID (International Registered Report Identifier): RR2-10.2196/17759.

Developing a family-reported measure of experiences with home-based pediatric palliative and hospice care: a multi-method, multi-stakeholder approach

Background

Many children with serious illnesses are receiving palliative and end-of-life care from pediatric palliative and hospice care teams at home (PPHC@Home). Despite the growth in PPHC@Home, no standardized measures exist to evaluate whether PPHC@Home provided in the U.S. meets the needs and priorities of children and their families.

Methods

We developed and conducted a preliminary evaluation of a family-reported measure of PPHC@Home experiences using a multi-method, multi-stakeholder approach. Our instrument development process consisted of four phases. Item identification and development (Phase 1) involved a comprehensive literature search of existing instruments, guidelines, standards of practice, and PPHC@Home outcome studies, as well as guidance from a PPHC stakeholder panel. Phase 2 involved the initial item prioiritization and reduction using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with PPHC professionals and parent advocates. Phase 3 involved a second DCE with bereaved parents and parents currently receiving care for their child to further prioritize and winnow the items to a set of the most highly-valued items. Finally, we conducted cognitive interviews with parents to provide information about the content validity and clarity of the newly-developed instrument (Phase 4).

Results

Items were compiled predominantly from three existing instruments. Phase 2 participants included 34 PPHC providers, researchers, and parent advocates; Phase 3 participants included 47 parents; and Phase 4 participants included 11 parents. At the completion of Phase 4, the Experiences of Palliative and Hospice Care for Children and Caregivers at Home (EXPERIENCE@Home) Measure contains 22 of the most highly-valued items for evaluating PPHC@Home. These items include “The care team treats my child’s physical symptoms so that my child has as good a quality of life as possible”, “I have regular access to on-call services from our care team”, and “The nurses have the knowledge, skills, and experience to support my child’s palliative or hospice care at home.”

Conclusions

The EXPERIENCE@Home Measure is the first known to specifically measure family-reported experiences with PPHC@Home in the U.S. Future work will include formal psychometric evaluation with a larger sample of parents, as well as evaluation of the clinical utility of the instrument with PPHC@Home teams.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-020-00703-0.

What Do Parents Value Regarding Pediatric Palliative and Hospice Care in the Home Setting?

CONTEXT

Children with life-shortening serious illnesses and medically-complex care needs are often cared for by their families at home. Little, however, is known about what aspects of pediatric palliative and hospice care in the home setting (PPHC@Home) families value the most.

OBJECTIVES

To explore how parents rate and prioritize domains of PPHC@Home as the first phase of a larger study that developed a parent-reported measure of experiences with PPHC@Home.

METHODS

Twenty domains of high-value PPHC@Home, derived from the National Consensus Project's Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care, the literature, and a stakeholder panel, were evaluated. Using a discrete choice experiment, parents provided their ratings of the most and least valued PPHC@Home domains. We also explored potential differences in how subgroups of parents rated the domains.

RESULTS

Forty-seven parents participated. Overall, highest-rated domains included Physical aspects of care: Symptom management, Psychological/emotional aspects of care for the child, and Care coordination. Lowest-rated domains included Spiritual and religious aspects of care and Cultural aspects of care. In exploratory analyses, parents who had other children rated the Psychological/emotional aspects of care for the sibling(s) domain significantly higher than parents who did not have other children (P = 0.02). Furthermore, bereaved parents rated the Caregiversupportat the end of life domain significantly higher than parents who were currently caring for their child (P = 0.04). No other significant differences in domain ratings were observed.

CONCLUSION

Knowing what parents value most about PPHC@Home provides the foundation for further exploration and conversation about priority areas for resource allocation and care improvement efforts.

Measuring quality in pediatrics: Florida's early experiences with the CHIPRA core measure set

Enacted in 2009, the Children's Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (CHIPRA) aims, among other things, to increase state's accountability for providing quality health care to all children in the United States. Although it is important for states to report on the measures, learning from their successes and failures is critical in producing the measures so that states will be prepared for future regulations. Florida covered roughly 2.59 million children in 2010. Administrative, medical record, registry, and survey data were used to report on 20 of the 24 CHIPRA core measures. Technical specifications from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were used. Approximately 10 months were needed to identify, collect, safeguard, and process the required data. Florida was able to build on its past experiences with performance measurement reporting and surveying. Conducting medical record reviews at the state level and producing measures that required registry data proved to be challenging. Although Florida was successful in its first year of reporting the CHIPRA core measures, certain populations were not included in some of the measures. The next phase of Florida's CHIPRA project will focus on developing and implementing a dissemination plan and creating opportunities to improve the measures. Florida has made significant progress in the early phases of reporting the CHIPRA measures. As Florida gains more experience in reporting the measures, and results from other states are released, it will be easier to put the statewide measure results into context. Once meaningful comparisons can be made, Florida will be able to better plan for the future of child health and health outcomes.

Inviting parents to take part in paediatric palliative care research: a mixed-methods examination of selection bias

BACKGROUND

Recruitment to paediatric palliative care research is challenging, with high rates of non-invitation of eligible families by clinicians. The impact on sample characteristics is unknown.

AIM

To investigate, using mixed methods, non-invitation of eligible families and ensuing selection bias in an interview study about parents' experiences of advance care planning (ACP).

DESIGN

We examined differences between eligible families invited and not invited to participate by clinicians using (1) field notes of discussions with clinicians during the invitation phase and (2) anonymised information from the service's clinical database.

SETTING

Families were eligible for the ACP study if their child was receiving care from a UK-based tertiary palliative care service (Group A; N = 519) or had died 6-10 months previously having received care from the service (Group B; N = 73).

RESULTS

Rates of non-invitation to the ACP study were high. A total of 28 (5.4%) Group A families and 21 (28.8%) Group B families (p < 0.0005) were invited. Family-clinician relationship appeared to be a key factor associated qualitatively with invitation in both groups. In Group A, out-of-hours contact with family was statistically associated with invitation (adjusted odds ratio 5.46 (95% confidence interval 2.13-14.00); p < 0.0005). Qualitative findings also indicated that clinicians' perceptions of families' wellbeing, circumstances, characteristics, engagement with clinicians and anticipated reaction to invitation influenced invitation.

CONCLUSION

We found evidence of selective invitation practices that could bias research findings. Non-invitation and selection bias should be considered, assessed and reported in palliative care studies.

Measuring the quality of dying and death in the pediatric intensive care setting: the clinician PICU-QODD

CONTEXT

In the pediatric intensive care setting, an accurate measure of the dying and death experience holds promise for illuminating how critical care nurses, physicians, and allied psychosocial staff can better manage end-of-life care for the benefit of children and their families, as well as the caregivers.

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to assess the reliability and validity of a clinician measure of the quality of dying and death (Pediatric Intensive Care Unit-Quality of Dying and Death 20 [PICU-QODD-20]) in the pediatric intensive care setting.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, five types of clinicians (primary nurse, bedside nurse, attending physician, and the psychosocial clinician and critical care fellow most involved in the case) were asked to complete a survey for each of the 94 children who died over a 12 month period in the pediatric intensive care units of two children's hospitals in the northeast U.S. Analyses were conducted within type of clinician.

RESULTS

In total, 300 surveys were completed by 159 clinicians. Standard item analyses and substantive review led to the selection of 20 items for inclusion in the PICU-QODD-20. Cronbach alpha for the PICU-QODD-20 ranged from 0.891 for bedside nurses to 0.959 for attending physicians. For each type of clinician, the PICU-QODD-20 was significantly correlated with the quality of end-of-life care and with meeting the family's needs. In addition, when patient/family or team barriers were encountered, the PICU-QODD-20 score tended to be significantly lower than for cases in which the barrier was not encountered.

CONCLUSION

The PICU-QODD-20 shows promise as a valid and reliable measure of the quality of dying and death in pediatric intensive care.

Reporting of pediatric palliative care: a systematic review and quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals

CONTEXT

Pediatric palliative care clinical practice depends upon an evidence-based decision-making process which in turn is based upon current research evidence.

AIMS

This study aimed to perform a quantitative analysis of research publications in palliative care journals for reporting characteristics of articles on pediatric palliative care.

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

This was a systematic review of palliative care journals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve palliative care journals were searched for articles with "paediatric" or "children" in titles of the articles published from 2006 to 2010. The reporting rates of all journals were compared. The selected articles were categorized into practice, education, research, and administration, and subsequently grouped into original and review articles. The original articles were subgrouped into qualitative and quantitative studies, and the review articles were grouped into narrative and systematic reviews. Each subgroup of original articles' category was further classified according to study designs.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Descriptive analysis using frequencies and percentiles was done using SPSS for Windows, version 11.5.

RESULTS

The overall reporting rate among all journals was 2.66% (97/3634), and Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing (JHPN) had the highest reporting rate of 12.5% (1/8), followed by Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life and Palliative Care (JSWELPC) with a rate of 7.5% (5/66), and Journal of Palliative Care (JPC) with a rate of 5.33% (11/206).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall reporting rate for pediatric palliative care articles in palliative care journals was very low and there were no randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews found. The study findings indicate a lack of adequate evidence base for pediatric palliative care.

Health status and health-related quality of life in a pediatric palliative care program

BACKGROUND

Children with life-threatening illnesses have unique physical and psychosocial needs that pediatric palliative care programs can address. Integrated programs strive to address these needs from the point of diagnosis through death, if needed, at the same time that curative care is provided. To better understand the variation in these needs, we assessed the health status and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of children enrolled in an integrated pediatric palliative care program.

METHODS

A telephone survey was conducted with 98 parents whose children were enrolled in an integrated pediatric palliative care program in Florida. The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system was used to assess health status and HRQOL.

RESULTS

HUI2 attribute levels show that children have the greatest impairment with moderate-to-severe burdens related to self-care, mobility, and sensation, and the least impairment with emotion. HUI3 attribute levels show that children have the greatest impairment with moderate-to-severe burdens related to ambulation and cognition and the least impairment with hearing and emotional functioning. Mean overall HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores are 0.37 and 0.15, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Children with life-threatening illnesses in our sample had a high level of morbidity compared with those found in other HUI studies of children with acute or chronic health conditions. Not only do our results highlight severely impaired HRQOL, they also demonstrate the wide variety of health states and needs for children in integrated palliative care programs. This information can help develop strategies to encourage more providers to participate in integrated pediatric palliative care programs.

Information seeking behaviors of parents whose children have life-threatening illnesses

OBJECTIVES

For children with life-threatening illnesses we sought to (1) understand the associations between parental characteristics and preferred health information sources, and (2) assess the e-health literacy of Internet-users.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional, telephone survey of 129 parents whose children are in a pediatric palliative care program in Florida.

RESULTS

Four out of five parents report that they use the Internet, and 64% of Internet-users use it daily. Parents who never use the Internet, versus parents who do use the Internet, are predominately Hispanic (50%) and have less than a high school education (64%) (P ≤ 0.023). Internet-users have high levels of e-health literacy; however, they are not confident or are unsure about the quality of information on the Internet. Not having graduated from high school was associated with a decrease in e-health literacy and using the Internet as the primary information source (vs. doctor as primary source) was associated with an increase in e-health literacy.

CONCLUSION

Parents of children with life-threatening illnesses have access to and use the Internet as a source of information about their children's health. More information is needed to explore how electronic-based interventions could be used to impact information seeking of parents whose children are in pediatric palliative care programs.