1
|
De Simone B, Chouillard E, Podda M, Pararas N, de Carvalho Duarte G, Fugazzola P, Birindelli A, Coccolini F, Polistena A, Sibilla MG, Kruger V, Fraga GP, Montori G, Russo E, Pintar T, Ansaloni L, Avenia N, Di Saverio S, Leppäniemi A, Lauretta A, Sartelli M, Puzziello A, Carcoforo P, Agnoletti V, Bissoni L, Isik A, Kluger Y, Moore EE, Romeo OM, Abu-Zidan FM, Beka SG, Weber DG, Tan ECTH, Paolillo C, Cui Y, Kim F, Picetti E, Di Carlo I, Toro A, Sganga G, Sganga F, Testini M, Di Meo G, Kirkpatrick AW, Marzi I, déAngelis N, Kelly MD, Wani I, Sakakushev B, Bala M, Bonavina L, Galante JM, Shelat VG, Cobianchi L, Mas FD, Pikoulis M, Damaskos D, Coimbra R, Dhesi J, Hoffman MR, Stahel PF, Maier RV, Litvin A, Latifi R, Biffl WL, Catena F. The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients. World J Emerg Surg 2024; 19:18. [PMID: 38816766 PMCID: PMC11140935 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00537-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The trauma mortality rate is higher in the elderly compared with younger patients. Ageing is associated with physiological changes in multiple systems and correlated with frailty. Frailty is a risk factor for mortality in elderly trauma patients. We aim to provide evidence-based guidelines for the management of geriatric trauma patients to improve it and reduce futile procedures. METHODS Six working groups of expert acute care and trauma surgeons reviewed extensively the literature according to the topic and the PICO question assigned. Statements and recommendations were assessed according to the GRADE methodology and approved by a consensus of experts in the field at the 10th international congress of the WSES in 2023. RESULTS The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage, including drug history, frailty assessment, nutritional status, and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Acute trauma pain in the elderly has to be managed in a multimodal analgesic approach, to avoid side effects of opioid use. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended in penetrating (abdominal, thoracic) trauma, in severely burned and in open fractures elderly patients to decrease septic complications. Antibiotics are not recommended in blunt trauma in the absence of signs of sepsis and septic shock. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH should be administrated as soon as possible in high and moderate-risk elderly trauma patients according to the renal function, weight of the patient and bleeding risk. A palliative care team should be involved as soon as possible to discuss the end of life in a multidisciplinary approach considering the patient's directives, family feelings and representatives' desires, and all decisions should be shared. CONCLUSIONS The management of elderly trauma patients requires knowledge of ageing physiology, a focused triage based on assessing frailty and early activation of trauma protocol to improve outcomes. Geriatric Intensive Care Units are needed to care for elderly and frail trauma patients in a multidisciplinary approach to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Hospital of Villeneuve St Georges, Villeneuve St Georges, France.
- Department of General Minimally Invasive Surgery, Infermi Hospital, AUSL Romagna, Rimini, Italy.
- General Surgery Department, American Hospital of Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Elie Chouillard
- General Surgery Department, American Hospital of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Unit of Emergency Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Nikolaos Pararas
- 3rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | | | - Paola Fugazzola
- Unit of General Surgery I, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital of Pavia, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Polistena
- Department of Surgery, Policlinico Umberto I Roma, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Sibilla
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Vitor Kruger
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Gustavo P Fraga
- Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil
| | - Giulia Montori
- Unit of General and Emergency Surgery, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Via C. Forlanini 71, 31029, Vittorio Veneto, TV, Italy
| | - Emanuele Russo
- Department of Anesthesia, Level I, Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Tadeja Pintar
- UMC Ljubljana and Medical Faculty Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- New Zealand Blood Service, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Nicola Avenia
- Endocrine Surgical Unit - University of Perugia, Terni, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- General Surgery Unit, Madonna del Soccorso Hospital, AST Ascoli Piceno, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Division of Emergency Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrea Lauretta
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico Di Aviano IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Massimo Sartelli
- Department of General Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Alessandro Puzziello
- Dipartimento di Medicina, Chirurgia e Odontoiatria, Campus Universitario di Baronissi (SA) - Università di Salerno, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, Unit of General Surgery, University Hospital of Ferrara and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of Anesthesia, Level I, Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Bissoni
- Department of Anesthesia, Level I, Trauma Center, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Arda Isik
- Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ernest E Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Oreste Marco Romeo
- Bronson Methodist Hospital/Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | - Dieter G Weber
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital and The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Edward C T H Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ciro Paolillo
- Emergency Department, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Verona, Italy
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Fernando Kim
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, 80246, USA
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Adriana Toro
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Federica Sganga
- Department of Geriatrics, Ospedale Sant'Anna, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Giovanna Di Meo
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Ingo Marzi
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nicola déAngelis
- Unit of Colorectal and Digestive Surgery, DIGEST Department, Beaujon University Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Cité, Clichy, France
| | | | - Imtiaz Wani
- Department of Surgery, Government Gousia Hospital, DHS, Srinagar, India
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Miklosh Bala
- Hadassah Medical Center and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Joseph M Galante
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Vishal G Shelat
- Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Novena, Singapore
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- Unit of General Surgery I, IRCCS San Matteo Hospital of Pavia, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Collegium Medicum, University of Social Sciences, Łodz, Poland
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy
- Collegium Medicum, University of Social Sciences, Łodz, Poland
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- Department of Surgical Science, Unit of Emergency Surgery, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | | | - Raul Coimbra
- Riverside University Health System Medical Center, Riverside, CA, USA
| | - Jugdeep Dhesi
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Melissa Red Hoffman
- Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Surgical Palliative Care Society, Asheville, NC, USA
| | - Philip F Stahel
- Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Ronald V Maier
- Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Diseases No. 3, Gomel State Medical University, University Clinic, Gomel, Belarus
| | - Rifat Latifi
- University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
- Abrazo Health West Campus, Goodyear, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Walter L Biffl
- Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, AUSL Romagna, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taqi KM, Lee CW, Zhang JW, Hawley P, Cheifetz R. Practicing Surgeons' Perception of Barriers to Palliative Care Delivery in British Columbia. Cureus 2024; 16:e58061. [PMID: 38738150 PMCID: PMC11088467 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Utilization of palliative care remains low among surgical patients. We aim to characterize general surgeons' perceptions of barriers to access palliative care in British Columbia (BC). METHODS Semi-structured interviews were carried out with a total of 11 surgeons in BC. Interviews were transcribed for thematic analysis via interpretive description. Dominant themes were identified and agreed upon between the authors. RESULTS Several barriers were identified, which include system and institution, communication and surgical workflow barriers. At the system and institutional level, there were difficulties accessing patient information and continuity of care. Themes in the communication included patient misconceptions about palliative care and communication challenges with consulting services. Surgical workflow barriers influenced the overall perceived role of surgeons when caring for patients with palliative care needs. CONCLUSION Understanding surgeons' perspectives on barriers to palliative care is an important step in changing management. This can aid in the development of strategies that ease access to palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kadhim M Taqi
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
| | - Christina W Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
| | - Jenny W Zhang
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
| | - Philippa Hawley
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
| | - Rona Cheifetz
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, CAN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pitzer S, Kutschar P, Paal P, Mülleder P, Lorenzl S, Wosko P, Osterbrink J, Bükki J. Barriers for Adult Patients to Access Palliative Care in Hospitals: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024; 67:e16-e33. [PMID: 37717708 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Access to palliative care services is variable, and many inpatients do not receive palliative care. An overview of potential barriers could facilitate the development of strategies to overcome factors that impede access for patients with palliative care needs. AIM To review the current evidence on barriers that impair, delay, or prohibit access to palliative care for adult hospital inpatients. DESIGN A mixed methods systematic review was conducted using an integrated convergent approach and thematic synthesis (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021279477). DATA SOURCES The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from 10/2003 to 12/2020. Studies with evidence of barriers for inpatients to access existing palliative care services were eligible and reviewed. RESULTS After an initial screening of 3,359 records and 555 full-texts, 79 studies were included. Thematic synthesis yielded 149 access-related phenomena in 6 main categories: 1) Sociodemographic characteristics, 2) Health-related characteristics, 3) Individual beliefs and attitudes, 4) Interindividual cooperation and support, 5) Availability and allocation of resources, and 6) Emotional and prognostic challenges. While evidence was inconclusive for most socio-demographic factors, the following barriers emerged: having a noncancer condition or a low symptom burden, the focus on cure in hospitals, nonacceptance of terminal prognosis, negative perceptions of palliative care, misleading communication and conflicting care preferences, lack of resources, poor coordination, insufficient expertise, and clinicians' emotional discomfort and difficult prognostication. CONCLUSION Hospital inpatients face multiple barriers to accessing palliative care. Strategies to address these barriers need to take into account their multidimensionality and long-standing persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Pitzer
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice (S.P., P.K., P.M., J.O., J.B.), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Patrick Kutschar
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice (S.P., P.K., P.M., J.O., J.B.), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Piret Paal
- Institute of Palliative Care (P.P., S.L.), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Patrick Mülleder
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice (S.P., P.K., P.M., J.O., J.B.), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Stefan Lorenzl
- Institute of Palliative Care (P.P., S.L.), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Paulina Wosko
- Gesundheit Österreich GmbH (GÖG, Austrian Public Health Institute) (P.W.), Vienna, Austria
| | - Jürgen Osterbrink
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice (S.P., P.K., P.M., J.O., J.B.), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Johannes Bükki
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice (S.P., P.K., P.M., J.O., J.B.), Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Helios-Kliniken Schwerin (J.B.), Center for Palliative Medicine, Schwerin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duncan AJ, Holkup LM, Sang HI, Sahr SM. Benefits of Early Utilization of Palliative Care Consultation in Trauma Patients. Crit Care Explor 2023; 5:e0963. [PMID: 37649850 PMCID: PMC10465097 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000963] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of palliative care consultation if performed within 72 hours of admission on length of stay (LOS), mortality, and invasive procedures. DESIGN Retrospective observational study. SETTING Single-center level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS Trauma patients, admitted to ICU with palliative care consultation. INTERVENTION None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The ICU LOS was decreased in the early palliative care (EPC) group compared with the late palliative care (LPC) group, by 6 days versus 12 days, respectively. Similarly, the hospital LOS was also shorter in the EPC group by 8 days versus 17 days in the LPC group. In addition, the EPC group had lower rates of tracheostomy (4% vs 14%) and percutaneous gastrostomy tubes (4% vs 15%) compared with the LPC group. There was no difference in mortality or discharge disposition between patients in the EPC versus LPC groups. It is noteworthy that the patients who received EPC were slightly older, but there were no other significant differences in demographics. CONCLUSIONS EPC is associated with fewer procedures and a shorter amount of time spent in the hospital, with no immediate effect on mortality. These outcomes are consistent with studies that show patients' preferences toward the end of life, which typically involve less time in the hospital and fewer invasive procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Duncan
- Department of Surgery, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND
- Sanford Medical Center Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Fargo, ND
| | - Lucas M Holkup
- Department of Surgery, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND
- Sanford Medical Center Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Fargo, ND
| | - Hilla I Sang
- Sanford Medical Center Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Fargo, ND
| | - Sheryl M Sahr
- Department of Surgery, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND
- Sanford Medical Center Department of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Fargo, ND
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roch C, Kielkopf JA, Stefenelli U, Kübler H, van Oorschot B, Seitz AK. Preliminary results regarding automated identification of patients with a limited six-month survival prognosis using nursing assessment in uro-oncology patients. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:255.e1-255.e6. [PMID: 36739195 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Contrary to current recommendations, palliative co-management of tumor patients often occurs late in daily clinical practice. Palliative care specialist (PCS) co-management should be considered at the latest after a 6-month prognosis has been presumed. Therefore, identifying patients with a limited prognosis is a reasonable measure. METHODS Patients were identified using a screening tool for limited prognosis, which combined their tumor stage and data from the nursing anamnesis. In this retrospective study, a monocentric cohort of patients with urological malignancies-UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) stages III and IV - were enrolled from March to December 2019, with a 6-month follow-up period ending in May 2020. RESULTS Most patients were male and suffered from prostate cancer. Patients with uro-oncological tumors dying within 6 months correlated significantly with the presence of repeated hospitalizations within three months, pain on admission, malnutrition, impaired breathing and reduced mobility (P < 0.001). The test was fair in quality (AUC 0.727) at a cut-point of five; a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 25% were obtained. The PPV was 0.64 and NPV was 0.82. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION We specifically identified the predictors of limited prognosis in urological cancer patients across several entities using an automated scoring system based on tumor stage and data from the nursing anamnesis. Therefore, we recognized hospitalization as an important transition point and determined nurses to be valuable partners in identifying unmet palliative care needs without additional technical, personnel or financial effort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Roch
- Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
| | | | - Ulrich Stefenelli
- Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Hubert Kübler
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Birgitt van Oorschot
- Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anna Katharina Seitz
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Newsome K, Sauder M, Spardy J, Kodadek L, Ang D, Michetti CP, Bilski T, Elkbuli A. Palliative Care in the Trauma and Surgical Critical Care Settings: A Narrative Review. Am Surg 2022:31348221101597. [PMID: 35574733 DOI: 10.1177/00031348221101597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to conduct a narrative review of available literature to understand the use of palliative care in the trauma and surgical critical care setting. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases were searched for studies investigating the use of palliative care in the trauma and surgical critical care setting. The search included all studies published through January 9th, 2022. The risk of bias of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist tools. Outcomes were summarized in tables and synthesized qualitatively. RESULTS A total of 22 studies were included in this review. Key elements of successful palliative care include communication, shared decision-making, family involvement, pain control, establishing a patient's prognosis, and end-of-life management. Approaches to implementation based upon these key elements include best-case/worst-case scenarios, consultation trigger systems, and integrated institutional palliative care programs. Palliative care may reduce hospital length of stay, improve symptom management, and increase patient satisfaction, but the impact on mortality is unclear. CONCLUSION The core elements of palliative care have been identified and palliative care has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma and surgical critical care. However, the approaches for implementation still require development. The underutilization of palliative care for trauma patients reveals the need for refining criteria for use of palliative care and improvement in the education of surgical critical care teams to provide primary palliative care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Newsome
- Florida International University, 158263Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matthew Sauder
- NSU NOVA Southeastern University, 2814Dr Kiran, C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Jeffrey Spardy
- Florida International University, 158263Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Lisa Kodadek
- Department of Surgery, 12228Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Darwin Ang
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, 23703Ocala Regional Medical Center, Ocala, FL, USA
| | | | - Tracy Bilski
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, 25105Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.,Department of Surgical Education, 25105Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Adel Elkbuli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, 25105Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA.,Department of Surgical Education, 25105Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tanaka Y, Kato A, Ito K, Igarashi Y, Kinoshita S, Kizawa Y, Miyashita M. Attitudes of Physicians toward Palliative Care in Intensive Care Units: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey in Japan. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:440-448. [PMID: 34656654 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Palliative care is an essential component of comprehensive care for patients with critical illnesses. In Japan, little is known about palliative care in intensive care units (ICUs), and palliative care approaches are not widespread. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to better understand the attitudes of physicians toward palliative care and the utilization and needs of specialized palliative care consultations in ICUs in Japan. METHODS A nationwide, self-administered questionnaire was distributed ICU physician directors in all hospitals with ICUs. RESULTS Questionnaires were distributed to 873 ICU physician directors; valid responses were received from 436 ICU physician director (50% response rate). Among the respondents, 94% (n = 411) felt that primary palliative care should be strengthened in ICUs; 89% (n = 386) wanted ICU physicians to collaborate with specialists, such as palliative care teams (PCTs); and 71% (n = 311) indicated the need for specialized palliative care consultations; however, only 38% (n = 166) actually consulted, and only 6% (n = 28) consulted more than 10 patients in the past year. Physicians most commonly consulted PCT for patients with serious end-of-life illness (24%) (n = 107), intractable pain (21%) (n = 92), and providing psychological support to family members (43%, n = 187). The potential barriers in providing primary and specialized palliative care included being unable to understand the patients' intentions (54%, n = 235), lack of knowledge and skills in palliative care (53%, n = 230), and inability to consult with PCTs in a timely manner (46%, n = 201). CONCLUSIONS These data suggest a need for primary palliative care education in ICUs and improved access to specialized palliative care consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuta Tanaka
- Department of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences (Y.T., M.M.), Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan.
| | - Akane Kato
- Department of Adult and Geriatric Nursing, Health Sciences (A.K.), Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Kaori Ito
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Acute Care Surgery (K.I.), Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabasi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuko Igarashi
- Department of Palliative Medicine (Y.I., Y.K.), Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Satomi Kinoshita
- College of Nursing, Kanto Gakuin University (S.K.), Yokohama Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kizawa
- Department of Palliative Medicine (Y.I., Y.K.), Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Mitsunori Miyashita
- Department of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences (Y.T., M.M.), Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ivey GD, Johnston FM. Barriers to Equitable Palliative Care Utilization Among Patients with Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 31:9-20. [PMID: 34776067 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Over the past half century, palliative care has grown to become a pillar of clinical oncology. Its practice revolves around relieving suffering and optimizing quality of life, not just dealing with end-of-life decisions. Despite evidence that palliative care has the potential to reduce health care utilization and improve advance care planning without affecting mortality, palliative care remains inequitably accessible and underutilized. Furthermore, it is still too often introduced late in the care of patients receiving surgical intervention. This article summarizes the numerous and complex barriers to equitable palliative care utilization among patients with cancer. Potential strategies for dismantling these barriers are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel D Ivey
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, Blalock 611, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University, 600 North Wolfe Street, Blalock 606, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haines L, Wang W, Harhay M, Martin N, Halpern S, Courtright K. Opportunities to Improve Palliative Care Delivery in Trauma Critical Illness. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2021; 39:633-640. [PMID: 34467775 DOI: 10.1177/10499091211042303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recommendations to integrate palliative care (PC) into care for critically ill trauma patients, little is known about current PC practices in trauma care to inform opportunities for improvement. OBJECTIVE Describe patterns of PC delivery among a large, critically ill trauma cohort. SETTING/SUBJECTS Retrospective cohort study of adult (≥18 years) trauma patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) at an urban, level one trauma center in the United States from March 1, 2017 to March 1, 2019. METHODS We linked the electronic medical record with the institutional trauma registry. PC process measures included a PC consult order, advance care planning (ACP) note, and hospice use. Unadjusted results are reported for the total population, decedents, and subgroups at risk for poor outcomes (age ≥55 years, Black race ≥1 pre-existing comorbidity, and severe injury) after trauma. RESULTS Among 1309 eligible admissions, 902 (68.9%) were male, 640 (48.9%) were Black, and 654 (50.0%) were ≥55 years old. Eighty-one (6.2%) patients received a PC consult order, 66 (5.0%) had an ACP note, and 13 (1.1%) were discharged to hospice. Among decedents (N = 91; 7%), 28 (30.8%) received a PC consult order and 36 (39.6%) had an ACP note. For high-risk subgroups, PC consult orders and ACP note rates ranged from 4.5-12.8% and 4.5-11.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION PC delivery was rare among this cohort, including those at high risk for poor outcomes. Urgent efforts are needed to identify barriers to and develop targeted interventions for high quality PC delivery in trauma ICU care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay Haines
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.,Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Wei Wang
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Michael Harhay
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Niels Martin
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Scott Halpern
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.,Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Katherine Courtright
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA.,Palliative and Advanced Illness Research Center, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kelley KM, Proksch D, White S, Collins J, Martyak M, Britt LD, Burgess J. Preferences and Predictions Regarding Palliative Care in the Trauma Intensive Care Unit. Am Surg 2021:31348211033534. [PMID: 34269089 DOI: 10.1177/00031348211033534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the older intensive care unit (ICU) trauma population, it is common to have to make decisions about end-of-life. We sought to demonstrate uncertainty of patients and providers in this area. METHODS Our study is a prospective observational study of trauma patients 50 years and older admitted to the ICU. Patients or surrogates completed a survey including questions regarding end-of-life. Team members were surveyed with their expectation for patient outcome and appropriateness of palliative or comfort care. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Chi-square analysis and Fisher's exact test were performed. RESULTS 100 patients had data available for analysis. Surveys were completed by the patient for 39 while a surrogate completed the survey for 61 patients. There was a significant increase in uncertainty if a surrogate answered or if there had been no prior discussions about end-of-life. Nurse, resident, and attending predictions about hospital survival were similar with all groups predicting survival in 82%. 6-month survivors were only predicted to be alive 75% of the time. Ideas about comfort care were similar but there was more variation regarding a palliative care consult with nurses saying yes in 27% of surveys while physicians only said yes in 18%. CONCLUSIONS The significantly higher rates of uncertainty for both surrogates or in cases where no prior discussion had been had highlight the importance of having more conversations about end-of-life and documentation of advance directives prior to traumatic events. The difference in team member ideas about palliative care demonstrates a need for improved team communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daisy Proksch
- 6040Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - Sasha White
- 24152Sentara Norfolk General Hospital, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - Jay Collins
- 6040Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | | | - L D Britt
- 6040Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wycech J, Fokin AA, Katz JK, Viitaniemi S, Menzione N, Puente I. Comparison of Geriatric Versus Non-geriatric Trauma Patients With Palliative Care Consultations. J Surg Res 2021; 264:149-157. [PMID: 33831601 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2020] [Revised: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care in trauma patients is still evolving. The goal was to compare characteristics, outcomes, triggers and timing for palliative care consultations (PCC) in geriatric (≥65 y.o.) and non-geriatric trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective study included 432 patients from two level 1 trauma centers who received PCC between December 2012 and January 2019. Non-geriatric (n = 61) and geriatric (n = 371) groups were compared for: mechanism of injury (MOI), Injury Severity Score (ISS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) orders, futile interventions (FI), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV), ICU admissions, ICU and hospital lengths of stay (ICULOS; HLOS), timing to PCC, and mortality. Further propensity matching (PM) analysis compared 59 non-geriatric to 59 Geriatric patients matched by ISS, GCS, and DNR. RESULTS Geriatric patients were older (85.2 versus 49.7), with falls as predominant MOI. Non-geriatric patients comprised 14.1% of all patients with PCC and were more severely injured than Geriatrics: with statistically higher ISS (24.1 versus 18.5), lower RTS (5.4 versus 7.0), GCS (7.1 versus 11.5), with predominant MOI being traffic accidents, all P < 0.01. Non-Geriatrics had more ICU admissions (96.7% versus 88.1%), longer ICULOS (10.2 versus 4.7 days), DMV (11.1 versus 4.1 days), less DNR (57.4% versus 73.9%), higher in-hospital mortality (12.5% versus 2.6%), but double the time admission-PCC (11.3 versus 4.3 days) compared to Geriatrics, all P < 0.04. In PM comparison, despite same injury severity, Non-geriatrics had triple the time to PCC, five times the HLOS of geriatrics, and more FI (25.4% versus 3.4%), all P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS PCC remains underutilized in non-geriatric trauma patients. Despite higher injury severity, non-geriatrics received more aggressive treatment, and had three times longer time to PCC, resulting in higher rate of FI than in Geriatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Wycech
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida; Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
| | - Alexander A Fokin
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida; Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, Florida.
| | - Jeffrey K Katz
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida; Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, Florida
| | - Sari Viitaniemi
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida
| | - Nicholas Menzione
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida
| | - Ivan Puente
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida; Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, Florida; Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Department of Surgery, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Epstein CD, Ventura-DiPersia C. Instrument Development: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Confidence in Palliative Care Concepts Held by Trauma and Neuroscience Intensive Care Nurses. J Nurs Meas 2021; 29:140-152. [PMID: 33593986 DOI: 10.1891/jnm-d-19-00069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Unique pressures impact trauma intensive care unit (TICU) nurses in their provision of care for severely injured patients. When it becomes clinically obvious that these patients may not survive, TICU nurses must continue life-saving measures while at the same time consider a palliative care consultation. In order to facilitate this referral, TICU nurses need to have the appropriate knowledge, attitude, and confidence in doing so. The purpose of this study is to refine an instrument that aims to support this process. METHODS A convenience sample of 42 respondents completed the Knowledge, Attitudinal, and Experiential Survey on Advance Directive (KAESAD). RESULTS Domains with the highest Cronbach's alpha value were "professional attitudes" (α = .995) and "clinical experiences" (α = .999). CONCLUSIONS Reliability assessments suggest that most domains of the instrument have strong internal consistency, and with a larger sample size, future studies may elucidate how nurse educators can use this instrument to target areas for continuing education.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hugar LA, Wulff-Burchfield EM, Winzelberg GS, Jacobs BL, Davies BJ. Incorporating palliative care principles to improve patient care and quality of life in urologic oncology. Nat Rev Urol 2021; 18:623-635. [PMID: 34312530 PMCID: PMC8312356 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00491-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Palliative care - specialized healthcare focused on improving quality of life for patients with serious illnesses - can help urologists to care for patients with unmet symptom, coping and communication needs. Society guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend incorporating palliative care into standard oncological care, based on multiple randomized trials demonstrating that it significantly improves physical well-being, patient satisfaction and goal concordant care. Misconceptions regarding the objective and ideal timing of palliative care are common; a key concept is that palliative care and treatments seeking to cure or prolong life are not mutually exclusive. Urologists are well positioned to champion the integration of palliative care into surgical urologic oncology and should be aware of palliative care guidelines, indications for palliative care use and how the field of urologic oncology can adopt best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee A. Hugar
- grid.468198.a0000 0000 9891 5233Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL USA
| | - Elizabeth M. Wulff-Burchfield
- grid.412016.00000 0001 2177 6375Medical Oncology Division and Palliative Care Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS USA
| | - Gary S. Winzelberg
- grid.10698.360000000122483208UNC Palliative Care Program, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Bruce L. Jacobs
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| | - Benjamin J. Davies
- grid.21925.3d0000 0004 1936 9000Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee JD, Jennerich AL, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Curtis JR, Khandelwal N. Type of Intensive Care Unit Matters: Variations in Palliative Care for Critically Ill Patients with Chronic, Life-Limiting Illness. J Palliat Med 2020; 24:857-864. [PMID: 33156728 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It is not clear whether use of specialty palliative care consults and "comfort measures only" (CMO) order sets differ by type of intensive care unit (ICU). A better understanding of palliative care provided to these patients may help address heterogeneity of care across ICU types. Objectives: Examine utilization of specialty palliative care consultation and CMO order sets across several different ICU types in a multihospital academic health care system. Design: Retrospective cohort study using Washington State death certificates and data from the electronic health record. Setting/Subjects: Adults with a chronic medical illness who died in an ICU at one of two hospitals from July 2013 through December 2018. Five ICU types were identified by patient population and attending physician specialty. Measurements: Documentation of a specialty palliative care consult during a patient's terminal ICU stay and a CMO order set at time of death. Results: For 2706 eligible decedents, ICU type was significantly associated with odds of palliative care consultation (p < 0.001) as well as presence of CMO order set at time of death (p < 0.001). Compared with medical ICUs, odds of palliative care consultation were highest in the cardiothoracic ICU and trauma ICU. Odds of CMO order set in place at time of death were highest in the neurology/neurosurgical ICU. Conclusion: Utilization of specialty palliative care consultations and CMO order sets varies across types of ICUs. Examining this variability within institutions may provide an opportunity to improve end-of-life care for patients with chronic, life-limiting illnesses who die in the ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Lee
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ann L Jennerich
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ruth A Engelberg
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lois Downey
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - J Randall Curtis
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nita Khandelwal
- Cambia Palliative Care Center of Excellence, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Esquibel BM, Waller CJ, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJ, Harter TD, Cogbill TH. The role of palliative care in acute trauma: When is it appropriate? Am J Surg 2020; 220:1456-1461. [PMID: 33051066 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We hypothesized that trauma providers are reticent to consider palliative measures in acute trauma care. METHODS An electronic survey based on four patient scenarios with identical vital signs and serious blunt injuries, but differing ages and frailty scores was sent to WTA and EAST members. RESULTS 509 (24%) providers completed the survey. Providers supported early transition to comfort care in 85% old-frail, 53% old-fit, 77% young-frail, and 30% young-fit patients. Providers were more likely to transition frail vs. fit patients with (OR = 4.8 [3.8-6.3], p < 0.001) or without (OR = 16.7 [12.5-25.0], p < 0.001) an advanced directive (AD) and more likely to transition old vs. young patients with (OR = 2.0 [1.6-2.6], p < 0.001) or without (OR = 4.2 [2.8-5.0], p < 0.001) an AD. CONCLUSIONS In specific clinical situations, there was wide acceptance among trauma providers for the early institution of palliative measures. Provider decision-making was primarily based on patient frailty and age. ADs were helpful for fit or young patients. Provider demographics did not impact decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendon M Esquibel
- General Surgery Residency, Department of Medical Education, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA
| | - Christine J Waller
- Department of General Surgery, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA.
| | - Andrew J Borgert
- Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA
| | - Kara J Kallies
- Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA
| | - Thomas D Harter
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA
| | - Thomas H Cogbill
- Department of General Surgery, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wycech J, Fokin AA, Katz JK, Tymchak A, Teitzman RL, Koff S, Puente I. Reduction in Potentially Inappropriate Interventions in Trauma Patients following a Palliative Care Consultation. J Palliat Med 2020; 24:705-711. [PMID: 32975481 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Palliative care is expanding as part of treatment, but remains underutilized in trauma settings. Palliative care consultations (PCC) have shown to reduce nonbeneficial, potentially inappropriate interventions (PII), as decision for their use should always be made in the context of both the patient's prognosis and the patient's goals of care. Objective: To characterize trauma patients who received PCC and to analyze the effect of PCC and do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders on PII in severely injured patients. Setting/Subjects: Retrospective cohort study of 864 patients admitted to two level 1 trauma centers: 432 patients who received PCC (PCC group) were compared with 432 propensity score match-controlled (MC group) patients who did not receive PCC. Measurements: PCC in a consultative palliative care model, PII (including tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) rate and timing, DNR orders. Results: PCC rate in trauma patients was 4.3%, with a 5.3-day average time to PCC. PII were done in 9.0% of PCC and 6.0% of MC patients (p = 0.09). In the PCC group, 74.1% of PII were done before PCC, and 25.9% after. PCC compared with MC patients had significantly higher mechanical ventilation (60.4% vs. 18.1%, p < 0.001) and assisted feeding requirements (14.1% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.001). We observed a statistically significant reduction in PII after PCC (p = 0.002). Significantly less PCC than MC patients had PII following DNR (26.3% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.035). Conclusions: PCC reduced PII in severely injured trauma patients by factor of two. Since the majority of PII in PCC patients occurred before PCC, a more timely administration of PCC is recommended. To streamline goals of care, PCC should supplement or precede a DNR discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Wycech
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida, USA.,Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - Alexander A Fokin
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida, USA.,Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - Jeffrey K Katz
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida, USA.,Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, Florida, USA
| | - Alexander Tymchak
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida, USA.,Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | | | - Susan Koff
- TrustBridge Health, West Palm Beach, Florida, USA
| | - Ivan Puente
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, Florida, USA.,Department of Surgery, Florida Atlantic University, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Boca Raton, Florida, USA.,Department of Surgery, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Development of a Value-based Algorithm for Inpatient Triage of Elderly Hip Fracture Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28:e566-e572. [PMID: 31567901 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-18-00400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study was to combine a validated middle-age and geriatric trauma risk assessment tool (STTGMA) with a novel cost-prediction tool to create an objective triage tool for elderly hip fractures that would guide value-based care initiatives. METHODS From October 2014 to January 2018, all patients aged ≥55 years who were admitted with a primary diagnosis of hip fracture to a single level 1 trauma center were enrolled. Upon evaluation in the emergency department, demographics, injury severity, and functional status were recorded to calculate the trauma triage score (STTGMARisk). A model to predict high-cost hip fracture patients was created using similar variables (STTGMACost). RESULTS Three hundred sixty-one consecutive operative hip fracture patients were enrolled. Inpatient mortalities were skewed toward STTGMARisk3 with 21.4% of patients in this high-risk group ultimately expiring during their hospitalization. High-cost patients were correctly skewed to the STTGMACost2 and STTGMACost3 groups with 88.9% of all high-cost operatively treated hip fracture correctly triaged to these cohorts. Statistically significant variations were found in cost within each STTGMARisk group. CONCLUSIONS A simple risk score calculated upon admission (STTGMARisk and STTGMACost) was able to be used as a triage tool not only to differentiate increased mortality risk but also to predict high-cost patients based on resource utilization in hip fracture patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic, level II.
Collapse
|
18
|
The Use of a Palliative Care Screening Tool to Improve Referrals to Palliative Care Services in Community-Based Hospitals: A Quality Improvement Initiative. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2020; 22:327-334. [PMID: 32568941 DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Despite efforts to improve access to palliative care services, a significant number of patients still have unmet needs throughout their continuum of care. As such, this project was conducted to increase recognition of patients who could benefit from palliative care, increase referrals, and connect regional sites. This study utilized Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles through a quality improvement approach to develop and test the Palliative Care Screening Tool and aimed to screen 100% of patients within 24 hours who were admitted to selected units by February 2017. The intervention was implemented in 3 different units, each within community hospitals. Patients 18 years or older were screened if they were admitted to one of the selected units for the project, regardless of their diagnosis, age, or comorbidities. The percentage of newly admitted patients who were screened and the total number of palliative care consults were assessed as outcome measures. The tool was met with varying compliance among the 3 sites. However, there was an overall increase in consults across all hospital sites, and an increase in the proportion of noncancer patients was demonstrated. Although the aim was not reached, the tool helped to create a shift in the demographic of patients identified as palliative.
Collapse
|
19
|
Fokin AA, Wycech J, Katz JK, Tymchak A, Teitzman RL, Koff S, Puente I. Palliative Care Consultations in Trauma Patients and Role of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Propensity-Matched Study. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020; 37:1068-1075. [PMID: 32319314 DOI: 10.1177/1049909120919672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To delineate characteristics of trauma patients associated with a palliative care consultation (PCC) and to analyze the role of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders and related outcomes. METHODS Retrospective study included 864 patients from 2 level one trauma centers admitted between 2012 and 2019. Level 1 trauma centers are designated for admission of the most severe injured patients. Palliative care consultation group of 432 patients who received PCC and were compared to matched control (MC) group of 432 patients without PCC. Propensity matching covariates included Injury Severity Score, mechanism of injury, gender, and hospital length of stay (HLOS). Analysis included patient demographics, injury parameters, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, ICU length of stay (ICULOS), duration of mechanical ventilation, timing of PCC and DNR, and mortality. Palliative care consultation patients were further analyzed based on DNR status: prehospital DNR, in-hospital DNR, and no DNR (NODNR). RESULTS Palliative care consultation compared to MC patients were older, predominantly Caucasian, with more frequent traumatic brain injury (TBI), ICU admissions, and mechanical ventilation. The average time to PCC was 5.3 days. Do-not-resuscitate orders were significantly more common in PCC compared to MC group (71.5% vs 11.1%, P < .001). Overall mortality was 90.7% in PCC and 6.0% in MC (P < .001). In patients with DNR, mortality was 94.2% in PCC and 18.8% in MC. In-hospital DNR-PCC compared to NODNR-PCC patients had shorter ICULOS (5.0 vs 7.3 days, P = .04), HLOS (6.2 vs 13.2 days, P = .006), and time to discharge (1.0 vs 6.3 days, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS Advanced age, DNR order, and TBI were associated with a PCC in trauma patients and resulted in significantly higher mortality in PCC than in MC patients. Combination of DNR and PCC was associated with shorter ICULOS, HLOS, and time from PCC to discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander A Fokin
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, 24637Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, FL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, 306688Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Joanna Wycech
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, 24637Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, FL, USA.,Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Jeffrey K Katz
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, 24637Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, FL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, 306688Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
| | - Alexander Tymchak
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, 24637Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, FL, USA
| | | | - Susan Koff
- 535241TrustBridge Health, West Palm Beach, FL, USA
| | - Ivan Puente
- Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, 24637Delray Medical Center, Delray Beach, FL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, 306688Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.,Division of Trauma and Critical Care Services, Broward Health Medical Center, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.,Department of Surgery, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, 306688Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Scally CP, Robinson K, Blumenthaler AN, Bruera E, Badgwell BD. Identifying Core Principles of Palliative Care Consultation in Surgical Patients and Potential Knowledge Gaps for Surgeons. J Am Coll Surg 2020; 231:179-185. [PMID: 32311465 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2020] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative medicine is an important component of care for patients with advanced cancer. Previous studies demonstrated that surgeons tend to underuse palliative care in comparison with medical services. In addition, little is known about the specific use of palliative care services among surgical oncology practices. Therefore, we designed and performed this study to evaluate the use of palliative care in medical and surgical oncology patients. STUDY DESIGN A single-institution retrospective review of consecutive palliative care consultations within a large National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in 2016 to 2017 was conducted. RESULTS We analyzed 120 patients (60 surgical and 60 medical). Patient demographics in the 2 groups were similar. The surgical oncology patients were more likely to undergo consultation for advanced care planning (32% vs 13%; p = 0.02). Medical oncology patients were more likely to undergo consultation for pain management (97% vs 62%; p < 0.001). Symptom assessment scores for medical patients more frequently demonstrated dyspnea and malignancy-related pain than in surgical patients. Also, palliative care recommendations and interventions for surgical patients more frequently included end-of-life discussions and transfer to the inpatient palliative care unit. For medical oncology patients, recommendations more often included changes in pain and bowel regimen medication. In addition, despite more frequent consults for advanced care planning in the surgical patients, code status was changed to DNR more frequently in the medical patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS Surgical patients were less likely to undergo palliative care consultation for assistance with symptom management and more likely to undergo consultation for assistance with end-of-life discussions than were medical oncology patients. Advanced care planning and end-of-life discussions should be an area of focus in palliative care education for surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher P Scally
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kristen Robinson
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alisa N Blumenthaler
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eduardo Bruera
- Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brian D Badgwell
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Choi JH, Luo-Owen X, Brooks SE, Turay D, O'Bosky KR, Mukherjee K. Sedation and paralytic use in open abdomen patients-results from the EAST SLEEP Survey. Surgery 2019; 166:1111-1116. [PMID: 31500906 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with an open abdomen after trauma or emergency surgery may benefit from reduced sedation and chemical paralysis. We studied the effect of attending surgeon experience on sedation depth and paralytic use, as well as enteral nutrition and time between laparotomies. METHODS We performed an institutional review board-approved survey (Sedation Level after Emergent ExLap without Primary Fascial Closure) of the senior and active Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma membership using Qualtrics (Qualtrics, Inc, Provo, UT). We obtained 393/1,655 responses (23.7%). Spearman's rho was used for ordinal data, and multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for trauma center level and presence of trainees in the relationship between surgeon experience and use of deep sedation. RESULTS Surgeon experience was associated with deep sedation (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score ≤-3, P = .001) and chemical paralysis (P = .001). Surgeon experience was associated with less concern about delirium and more concern for evisceration as the reason for sedation depth (P = .001) and for paralysis (P = .001). Using multivariate logistic regression, surgeon experience was associated with deep sedation (odds ratio 3.6 [95% confidence interval 1.3, 10.4], P = .017 for ≥20 years; odds ratio 3.5 [95% confidence interval 1.1, 10.4], P = .025 for 15-20 years). Trauma center level was also significant (odds ratio 7.2 for Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score ≤-3 [95% confidence interval 1.7, 31.0], P = .008 for level III/IV versus level I/II). Increased surgeon experience was associated with delay of commencement of enteral feeds until return of bowel function (P = .013). Few respondents indicated willingness to extubate or mobilize open abdomen patients. Experienced surgeons were likely to wait for a defined time rather than for normalization of resuscitation markers to perform the first takeback laparotomy (P = .047) and waited longer between subsequent laparotomies (P = .004). CONCLUSION There were significant variations in practice among respondents based on the length of time since their last residency or fellowship, including variations that deviate from current best practice for management of patients with an open abdomen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Hwan Choi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Xian Luo-Owen
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA
| | - Steven E Brooks
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX
| | - David Turay
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA
| | | | - Kaushik Mukherjee
- Division of Acute Care Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Marterre B, Clayville K. Navigating the Murky Waters of Hope, Fear, and Spiritual Suffering: An Expert Co-Captain's Guide. Surg Clin North Am 2019; 99:991-1018. [PMID: 31446923 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
How can surgeons deliver compassionate, holistic care to patients who are beyond cure? Interacting emotionally and understanding hope, fear, and spiritual suffering is key. Responsibly reframing hope to underlying meanings, and away from specific outcomes, is critical. Facilitating moves from cure to comfort to a peaceful dying process requires some retooling of the surgical toolbox. Surgeons possess a unique set of skills, including imagination and an undying sense of hope. Surgeons who have the courage to delve into their emotions and sustain realistic hope for their patients, all the way to the end, will reap deep personal and professional rewards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Buddy Marterre
- Surgical Palliative Care, Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest Baptist Health, 5th Floor, Watlington Hall, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | - Kristel Clayville
- Zygon Center for Religion and Science, MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, 1100 East 55th Street, Chicago, IL 60615, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nguyen MT, Feeney T, Kim C, Drake FT, Mitchell SE, Bednarczyk M, Sanchez SE. Differential Utilization of Palliative Care Consultation Between Medical and Surgical Services. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2019; 37:250-257. [PMID: 31387366 DOI: 10.1177/1049909119867904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a paucity of data regarding the utilization of palliative care consultation (PCC) in surgical specialties. We conducted a retrospective review of 2321 adult patients (age ≥18) who died within 6 months of admission to Boston Medical Center from 2012 to 2017. Patients were included for analysis if their length of stay was more than 48 hours and if, based on their diagnoses as determined by literature review and expert consensus, they would have benefited from PCC. Bayesian regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 99% credible intervals (CrI) of receiving PCC adjusted for age, sex, race, insurance status, median income, and comorbidity status. Among the 739 patients who fit the inclusion criteria, only 30% (n = 222) received PCC even though 664 (90%) and 75 (10%) of these patients were identified as warranting PCC on medical and surgical services, respectively. Of the 222 patients who received PCC, 214 (96%) were cared for by medical services and 8 (4%) were cared for by surgical services. Patients cared for primarily by surgical were significantly less likely to receive PCC than primary patients of medical service providers (OR, 0.19, 99% CrI, 0.056-0.48). At our institution, many surgical patients appropriate for PCC are unable to benefit from this service due to low consultation numbers. Further investigation is warranted to examine if this phenomenon is observed at other institutions, elucidate the reasons for this disparity, and develop interventions to increase the appropriate use of PCC throughout all medical specialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy Feeney
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chanmin Kim
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - F Thurston Drake
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Suzanne E Mitchell
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Sabrina E Sanchez
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Gandesbery B, Dobbie K, Joyce E, Hoeksema L, Perez Protto S, Gorodeski EZ. Surgical Versus Medical Team Assignment and Secondary Palliative Care Services for Patients Dying in a Cardiac Hospital. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2018; 36:316-320. [DOI: 10.1177/1049909118819462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Secondary palliative care (SPC) provides several benefits for patients with cardiovascular disease, but historically, it has been underutilized in this population. Prior research suggests a low rate of SPC consultation by surgical teams in general, but little is known about how surgical teams utilize SPC in the setting of severe cardiovascular disease. Aim: To determine if surgical team assignment affects the probability of SPC for inpatients dying of cardiovascular disease. Design: Retrospective, cohort study. Methods: We identified all inpatients at a large cardiac hospital who had anticipated death under the care of a cardiology, cardiac surgery, or vascular surgery team in 2016. Our primary outcome was referral to SPC, including palliative medicine consultation or inpatient hospice care. Informed by univariate analysis, we created a multivariable logistic regression model, the significance of which was assessed with the Wald test. Results: Two hundred thirty-seven patients were included in our analysis: 93 (39%) received SPC and 144 (61%) were “missed opportunities.” Secondary palliative care was less frequent in patients assigned to a surgical, versus medical, team (11% vs 47%, P < .001). On multivariate analysis, surgical versus medical team assignment was the strongest risk-adjusted predictor of SPC (odds ratio [OR]: 0.10, P < .001). Other predictors of SPC included do not resuscitate status on admission (OR: 14, P < .001), length of stay (OR = 1.05/day, P < .001), and having Medicare (OR = 3.9, P = .002). Conclusions: Primary inpatient care by a surgical team had a strong inverse relationship with SPC. This suggests a possible cultural barrier within surgical disciplines to SPC.
Collapse
|
25
|
Ganz FD, Sapir B. Nurses' perceptions of intensive care unit palliative care at end of life. Nurs Crit Care 2018; 24:141-148. [PMID: 30426607 DOI: 10.1111/nicc.12395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Significant barriers can block the provision of palliative care at the end of life in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, the relationship between perceptions of ICU quality palliative care and barriers to palliative care at the end of life is not well documented. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To describe ICU nurses' perceptions of quality palliative end-of-life care, barrier intensity and frequency to palliative care and their association with one another. DESIGN This was a descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional design. METHODS A convenience sample of 126 ICU nurses from two hospitals in Israel was recruited for the study. Participants completed three pencil-and-paper questionnaires (a personal characteristics questionnaire, the Quality of Palliative Care in the ICU and a revised Survey of Oncology Nurses' Perceptions of End-of-Life Care). Respondents were recruited during staff meetings or while on duty in the ICU. Ethical approval was obtained for the study from participating hospitals. RESULTS The item mean score of the quality of palliative end-of-life care was 7·5/10 (SD = 1·23). The item mean barrier intensity and frequency scores were 3·05/5 (SD = 0·76) and 3·30/5 (SD = 0·61), respectively. A correlation of r = 0·46, p < 0·001 was found between barrier frequency and intensity and r = -0·19, p = 0·04 between barrier frequency and quality palliative end-of-life care. CONCLUSIONS ICU nurses perceived the quality of palliative care at the end of life as moderate despite reports of moderate barrier levels. The frequency of barriers was weakly associated with quality palliative end-of-life care. However, barrier intensity did not correlate with quality palliative end-of-life care at a statistically significant level. Further research that investigates other factors associated with quality ICU palliative care is recommended. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Barriers to palliative care are still common in the ICU. Increased training and education are recommended to decrease barriers and improve the quality of ICU palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Freda DeKeyser Ganz
- Research and Development, Hadassah Hebrew University School of Nursing, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Batel Sapir
- Hadassah Hebrew University School of Nursing and Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Using a Validated Middle-Age and Geriatric Risk Tool to Identify Early (<48 Hours) Hospital Mortality and Associated Cost of Care. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32:349-353. [PMID: 29738400 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000001187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) To demonstrate that a validated trauma triage score for middle-aged and geriatric patients could identify those at high risk of mortality within the first 2 days of hospitalization and (2) determine the cost of care for this cohort of patients. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Single level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS Patients 55 years of age and older who were evaluated in the emergency department setting by orthopaedics or who met the American College of Surgeons Tier 1-3 criteria. INTERVENTION Calculation of validated trauma triage score, Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle-aged patients, using patient's demographic, injury severity, and functional status; main outcome measurements: length of stay, inpatient mortality, time between presentation and time of death, and direct variable costs of hospitalization. RESULTS A total of 1470 consecutive patients (mean age of 72.2 ± 11.9 years) were enrolled in this study, 17 of whom died within 48 hours of presentation to the emergency department. These patients had a significantly higher trauma triage score than the rest of the cohort with a score of 50.9% ± 37.2% versus 3.3% ± 9.5%, P < 0.001 indicating that they had a mean risk of inpatient mortality of over 50%. Mean total cost per day was much higher in the cohort of patients who died within 48 hours of admission compared with all other trauma patients [$49,367 ± $79,057 vs. $3966 ± $2897 (P = 0.031)]. CONCLUSIONS To achieve value-based care in this high-risk cohort, targeted cost savings while improving patient outcomes and/or expediting goals-of-care and end-of-life goals is necessary and the STTGMA score allows for stratification of these patients in both mortality risk and cost profile.
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The benefits of palliative care for critically ill patients are well recognized, yet acceptance into surgical culture is lagging. With the increasing proportion of geriatric trauma patients, integration of palliative medicine within daily intensive care services to facilitate goal-concordant care is imperative. RECENT FINDINGS Misconceptions of palliative medicine as it applies to trauma patients linger among trauma surgeons and many continue to practice without routine consultation of a palliative care service. Aggressive end-of-life care does not correlate with an improved family perception of medical care received near death. Additionally, elderly patients near the end of life often prefer palliative treatments over life-extending therapy, and their treatment preferences are often not achieved. A new geriatric-specific prognosis calculator estimates the risk of mortality after trauma, which is useful in starting goals of care discussions with older patients and their families. SUMMARY Shifting our quality focus from 30-day mortality rates to measurements of symptom control and achievement of patient treatment preferences will prioritize patient beneficence and autonomy. Ownership of surgical palliative care as a service provided by acute care surgeons will ensure that our patients with incurable injury and illness will receive optimal patient-centered care.
Collapse
|
28
|
Suwanabol PA, Kanters AE, Reichstein AC, Wancata LM, Dossett LA, Rivet EB, Silveira MJ, Morris AM. Characterizing the Role of U.S. Surgeons in the Provision of Palliative Care: A Systematic Review and Mixed-Methods Meta-Synthesis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 55:1196-1215.e5. [PMID: 29221845 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.11.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Revised: 11/27/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The provision of palliative care varies appropriately by clinical factors such as patient age and severity of disease and also varies by provider practice and specialty. Surgical patients are persistently less likely to receive palliative care than their medical counterparts for reasons that are not clear. OBJECTIVES We sought to characterize surgeon-specific determinants of palliative care in seriously ill and dying patients. METHODS We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on surgery and palliative care within PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Scopus, and Ovid Medline databases from January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2016 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Quantitative and qualitative studies with primary data evaluating surgeons' attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors or experiences in care for seriously ill and dying patients were selected for full review by at least two study team members based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data were extracted based on a predetermined instrument and compared across studies using thematic analysis in a meta-synthesis of qualitative and quantitative findings. RESULTS A total of 2589 abstracts were identified and screened, and 35 articles (26 quantitative and nine qualitative) fulfilled criteria for full review. Among these, 17 articles explored practice and attitudes of surgeons regarding palliative and end-of-life care, 11 articles assessed training in palliative care, five characterized surgical decision making, one described behaviors of surgeons caring for seriously ill and dying patients, and one explicitly identified barriers to use of palliative care. Four major themes across studies affected receipt of palliative care for surgical patients: 1) surgeons' experience and knowledge, 2) surgeons' attitudes, 3) surgeons' preferences and decision making for treatment, and 4) perceived barriers. CONCLUSIONS Among the articles reviewed, surgeons overall demonstrated insight into the benefits of palliative care but reported limited knowledge and comfort as well as a multitude of challenges to introducing palliative care to their patients. These findings indicate a need for wider implementation of strategies that allow optimal integration of palliative care with surgical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arielle E Kanters
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ari C Reichstein
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lauren M Wancata
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lesly A Dossett
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Emily B Rivet
- Department of Surgery and Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Maria J Silveira
- Department of Surgery, Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Arden M Morris
- S-SPIRE Center and Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lilley EJ, Scott JW, Weissman JS, Krasnova A, Salim A, Haider AH, Cooper Z. End-of-Life Care in Older Patients After Serious or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Low-Mortality Hospitals Compared With All Other Hospitals. JAMA Surg 2018; 153:44-50. [PMID: 28975244 PMCID: PMC5833626 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 05/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Importance More than 80% of older patients die or are seriously impaired within 1 year after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Given their poor survival, information about end-of-life care is a relevant marker of high-value trauma care for these patients. In-hospital mortality is commonly used to measure quality of trauma care; however, it is not known what type of end-of-life care hospitals with the best survival outcomes provide to those who die. Objective To determine whether end-of-life care for older patients with TBI is correlated with in-hospital mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants A retrospective cohort study using 2005-2011 national Medicare claims from acute care hospitals was conducted. Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years or older who were admitted with serious or severe TBI were included. Transferred patients, those treated at low-volume hospitals, and those who died on the date of admission were excluded. Low-mortality hospitals were those in the lowest quartile for in-hospital mortality using standardized mortality rates adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, comorbidity, and injury severity. Patients at low-mortality hospitals were compared with patients at all other hospitals. The study was conducted from January 2005 to December 2011. Data analysis was conducted between August 2016 and February 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures End-of-life care outcomes for patients who died in hospital or 30 days or less after discharge included gastrostomy and tracheostomy placement during the TBI admission and enrollment in hospice. Results Of 363 hospitals included in the analysis, 91 (25.1%) were designated as low-mortality. The cohort included 34 691 patients (median age, 79 years; interquartile range, 72-84 years; 40.8% women). Of these patients, 55.8% of those at low-mortality hospitals and 62.5% at all other hospitals died in the hospital or 30 days or less after discharge (P < .01). Among patients who died in the hospital (n = 16 994), end-of-life care was similar at low-mortality hospitals and all other hospitals. For patients who survived the TBI admission and died 30 days or less after discharge (n = 4027), those at low-mortality hospitals underwent fewer gastrostomy (15.9% vs 24.0%; adjusted OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.52-0.72) or tracheostomy (18.2% vs 24.9%; adjusted OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.83) procedures and received more hospice care (66.3% vs 52.5%; adjusted OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.50-1.96). Conclusions and Relevance For older patients with serious or severe TBI, hospitals with the lowest in-hospital mortality perform fewer high-intensity treatments at the end of life and enroll more patients in hospice without increasing cumulative mortality 30 days or less after discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth J. Lilley
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - John W. Scott
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Anna Krasnova
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ali Salim
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Adil H. Haider
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Deputy Editor, JAMA Surgery
| | - Zara Cooper
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Krautheim V, Schmitz A, Benze G, Standl T, Schiessl C, Waldeyer W, Hapfelmeier A, Kochs EF, Schneider G, Wagner KJ, Schulz CM. Self-confidence and knowledge of German ICU physicians in palliative care - a multicentre prospective study. BMC Palliat Care 2017; 16:57. [PMID: 29166887 PMCID: PMC5700543 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-017-0244-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about ICU physicians’ self-confidence and knowledge related to palliative care. Our objective was to investigate self-confidence and knowledge of German ICU physicians related to palliative care, and to assess the impact of work experience, gender, specialty and additional certifications in pain or palliative medicine. Methods In a multicentre prospective observational study ICU physicians of ten hospitals were asked to rate their self-confidence and to complete a multiple choice questionnaire for the assessment of knowledge. Beyond descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for group comparisons, linear regression analysis was used to assess the impact of independent variable on self-confidence and knowledge. Spearman‘s rank test was calculated. Results 55% of answers in the knowledge test were correct and more than half of the participants rated themselves as “rather confident” or “confident”. Linear regression analysis revealed that an additional certificate in either pain or palliative medicine significantly increased both knowledge and self-confidence, but only 15 out of 137 participants had at least one of those certificates. Relation between self-confidence and the results of the knowledge test was weak (r = 0.270 in female) and very weak (r = −0.007 in male). Conclusions Although the questionnaire needs improvement according to the item analysis, it appears that, with respect to palliative care, ICU Physicians’ self-confidence is not related to their knowledge. An additional certificate in either pain or palliative medicine was positively correlated to both self-confidence and knowledge. However, only a minority of the participants were qualified through such a certificate. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-017-0244-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronika Krautheim
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Schmitz
- Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Palliativmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Gesine Benze
- Klinik für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Standl
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Operative Intensiv- und Palliativmedizin, Städtisches Klinikum Solingen, Solingen, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang Waldeyer
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Hapfelmeier
- Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Eberhard F Kochs
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Gerhard Schneider
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Klaus J Wagner
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian M Schulz
- Klinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rivet EB, Ferrada P, Albrecht T, Cassel JB, Broering B, Noreika D, Del Fabbro E. Characteristics of palliative care consultation at an academic level one trauma center. Am J Surg 2017; 214:657-660. [PMID: 28689992 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Revised: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current status of palliative care consultation for trauma patients has not been well characterized. We hypothesized that palliative care consultation currently is requested for patients too late to have any clinical significance. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed for traumatically injured patients' ≥18 years of age who received palliative care consultation at an academic medical center during a one-year period. RESULTS The palliative care team evaluated 82 patients with a median age of 60 years. Pain and end of life were the most common reasons for consultation; interventions performed included delirium management and discussions about nutritional support. For decedents, median interval from palliative care consultation to death was 1 day. Twenty seven patients died (11 in the palliative care unit, 16 in an ICU). Nine patients were discharged to hospice. CONCLUSIONS Most consultations were performed for pain and end of life management in the last 24 h of life, demonstrating the opportunity to engage the palliative care service earlier in the course of hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily B Rivet
- Departments of Surgery and Internal Medicine, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Paula Ferrada
- Department of Surgery, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Tara Albrecht
- VCU School of Nursing and Massey Cancer Center, School of Nursing, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - J Brian Cassel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Beth Broering
- VCU Medical Center Trauma Program, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Danielle Noreika
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Egidio Del Fabbro
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Buckley de Meritens A, Margolis B, Blinderman C, Prigerson HG, Maciejewski PK, Shen MJ, Hou JY, Burke WM, Wright JD, Tergas AI. Practice Patterns, Attitudes, and Barriers to Palliative Care Consultation by Gynecologic Oncologists. J Oncol Pract 2017; 13:e703-e711. [PMID: 28783424 DOI: 10.1200/jop.2017.021048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We sought to describe practice patterns, attitudes, and barriers to the integration of palliative care services by gynecologic oncologists. METHODS Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology were electronically surveyed regarding their practice of incorporating palliative care services and to identify barriers for consultation. Descriptive statistics were used, and two-sample z-tests of proportions were performed to compare responses to related questions. RESULTS Of the 145 respondents, 71% were attending physicians and 58% worked at an academic medical center. The vast majority (92%) had palliative care services available for consultation at their hospital; 48% thought that palliative care services were appropriately used, 51% thought they were underused, and 1% thought they were overused. Thirty percent of respondents thought that palliative care services should be incorporated at first recurrence, whereas 42% thought palliative care should be incorporated when prognosis for life expectancy is ≤ 6 months. Most participants (75%) responded that palliative care consultation is reasonable for symptom control at any stage of disease. Respondents were most likely to consult palliative care services for pain control (53%) and other symptoms (63%). Eighty-three percent of respondents thought that communicating prognosis is the primary team's responsibility, whereas the responsibilities for pain and symptom control, resuscitation status, and goals of care discussions were split between the primary team only and both teams. The main barrier for consulting palliative care services was the concern that patients and families would feel abandoned by the primary oncologist (73%). Ninety-seven percent of respondents answered that palliative care services are useful to improve patient care. CONCLUSION The majority of gynecologic oncologists perceived palliative care as a useful collaboration that is underused. Fear of perceived abandonment by the patient and family members was identified as a significant barrier to palliative care consult.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Buckley de Meritens
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Benjamin Margolis
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Craig Blinderman
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Holly G Prigerson
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Paul K Maciejewski
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Megan J Shen
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - June Y Hou
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - William M Burke
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Jason D Wright
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Ana I Tergas
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons; New York Presbyterian Hospital-Columbia University Irving Medical Center; Weill Cornell Medicine; and Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ciriello AG, Dizon ZB, October TW. Speaking a Different Language: A Qualitative Analysis Comparing Language of Palliative Care and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Physicians. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2017; 35:384-389. [PMID: 28322074 DOI: 10.1177/1049909117700101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family conferences in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) often include palliative care (PC) providers. We do not know how ICU communication differs when the PC team is present. AIM To compare language used by PC team and ICU physicians during family conferences. DESIGN A retrospective cohort review of ICU family conferences with and without the PC team. SETTING Forty-four bed pediatric ICU in a tertiary medical center. PARTICIPANTS Nine ICU physicians and 4 PC providers who participated in 18 audio-recorded family conferences. RESULTS Of the 9 transcripts without the PC team, we identified 526 ICU physician statements, generating 10 thematic categories. The most common themes were giving medical information and discussing medical options. Themes unique to ICU physicians included statements of hopelessness, insensitivity, and "health-care provider challenges." Among the 9 transcripts with the PC team, there were 280 statements, generating 10 thematic categories. Most commonly, the PC team offered statements of support, giving medical information, and quality of life. Both teams promoted family engagement by soliciting questions; however, the PC team was more likely to use open-ended questions, offer support, and discuss quality of life. CONCLUSION Pediatric ICU physicians spend more time giving medical information, whereas the PC team more commonly offers emotional support. The addition of the PC team to ICU family conferences may provide a balanced approach to communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne G Ciriello
- 1 Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Health Systems, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Zoelle B Dizon
- 1 Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Health Systems, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tessie W October
- 1 Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Health Systems, Washington, DC, USA.,2 Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Liu OY, Malmstrom T, Burhanna P, Rodin MB. The Evolution of an Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation Service in an Urban Teaching Hospital. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2016; 34:47-52. [DOI: 10.1177/1049909115610077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Research on inpatient palliative medicine reports quality-of-life outcomes and selected “hard” outcomes including pain scores, survival, and readmissions. Objective: This case study reports the evolution of an inpatient palliative consultation (IPC) team to show how IPC induces culture change in a hospital that previously had no palliative care. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: A Catholic university-affiliated, inner-city hospital. Population: A total of 1700 consecutive adult inpatients from May 2009 to October 2013. Measures: Consultation records enumerated demographics, code status, powers of attorney, referring physician, reason for consultation, and discharge destination. Deidentified data were uploaded to a spreadsheet. Simple descriptive statistics were calculated. Results: Requests originated from internal medicine (24%), geriatrics (21%), neurology (including stroke and neurosurgery, 14.3%), medical intensive care unit (MICU, 12.2%), and hematology–oncology (10.3%). The MICU consults increased 17.6% over time. The numbers of consults nearly doubled after trainees began rounding with the service. Hospice discharges increased by 9.2%. Palliative management of in-hospital expirations increased 2- to 3-fold. The most common consultation requests were for pain and nonpain symptoms, establishing goals of care for patients experiencing clinical decline and convening family meetings in cases of divided judgment. Conclusion: We describe the evolution of palliative care in a safety-net hospital. Medicine services which are largely resident run adopted early. Specialty services that are attending driven adopted later. We believe house staff and nurses were the initial change agents. The number of consultations increased when house staff and students began rotating on the service suggesting unmet demand due to the limited supply of providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- On Ying Liu
- St Louis University Medical School, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Theodore Malmstrom
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, St Louis University Medical School, St Louis, MO, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, St Louis University Medical School, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Patricia Burhanna
- Palliative nurse practitioner, St. Louis University Hospital, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Miriam B. Rodin
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, St Louis University Medical School, St Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
The Perceptions of Non–Palliative Care Hospitalist Physicians Referring Patients to a Hospital Palliative Care Program. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2016. [DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
36
|
Bakitas M, Dionne-Odom JN, Kamal A, Maguire JM. Priorities for Evaluating Palliative Care Outcomes in Intensive Care Units. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2015; 27:395-411. [PMID: 26333759 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnc.2015.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Defining the quality of intensive care unit (ICU) care when patients are dying is challenging. Palliative care has been recommended to improve outcomes of dying ICU patients; however, traditional ICU quality indicators do not always align with palliative care. Evidence suggests that some aspects of ICU care improve when palliative care is integrated; however, consensus is lacking concerning the outcomes that should be measured. Overcoming challenges to measuring palliative care will require consensus development and rigorous research on the best way to evaluate ICU palliative care services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Bakitas
- School of Nursing, Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, NB 2M019C, 1701 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
| | - J Nicholas Dionne-Odom
- School of Nursing, Division of Geriatrics, Gerontology, and Palliative Care, University of Alabama at Birmingham, NB 2M019C, 1701 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Arif Kamal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke Palliative Care, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, 2400 Pratt Street, #8043, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Jennifer M Maguire
- Division of Pulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Bioinformatics Building, Suite 4124, Campus Box 7020, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|