To explore the relationship between the use of midazolam and cessation of oral intake in the terminal phase of hospice inpatients: A retrospective case note review: Does midazolam affect oral intake in the dying?

Sedatives and Sedation at the End of Life in Nursing Homes: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

There is scarce information about sedation in nursing homes at the end of life. We aimed to assess (1) the use of sedatives generally and "sedatives with continuous effect," based on objective operational criteria, within the last week of life in nursing homes and (2) factors associated with this treatment.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study, using the nursing homes' medical records.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Residents who died in 4 German nursing homes from January 2015 to December 2017 and whose medical records were available (n = 512).

METHODS

Sedatives analyzed were those recommended by guidelines for "palliative sedation": benzodiazepines, levomepromazine, haloperidol (≥5 mg/d), and propofol. The definition of "sedatives with continuous effect" and doses judged as at least moderately sedating were consented by palliative care clinicians and pharmacists, based on the literature. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed (R version 3.6.1).

RESULTS

Overall, 110/512 (21%) deceased residents received a sedative at least once during the last week of life, 46/512 (9%) "sedatives with continuous effect." Oral lorazepam was used most frequently. Eleven of 512 (2%) residents received doses judged as at least moderately sedating. The term sedation was not used. Most frequent indications were agitation (58/110; 53%) and anxiety (35/110; 32%); no indication was noted for 36/110 (33%) residents. The resident's involvement in the decision for sedatives was documented in 3/110 (3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed significant associations between use of sedatives and age (OR = 0.94, P < .001) as well as institution (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our data indicate a lower prevalence of sedation compared to international data and considerable differences regarding prevalence between institutions. These differences, potential setting-specific challenges, and need for support measures for consistent best practice of sedation in nursing homes should be further explored.

Evaluation of the effect of pre-operative oral midazolam on post-operative oral fluid intake after tonsillectomy

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to determine if pre-operative oral midazolam administration decreased postoperative oral fluid intake after tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review identified 104 patients who were undergoing tonsillectomy with and without adenoidectomy who were not given midazolam preoperatively and 182 who were given midazolam preoperatively. Indications for tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy included obstructive sleep apnea, recurrent acute streptococcal pharyngotonsillitis, and, in selected cases, periodic fever with aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis and adenopathy. All patients were evaluated in the pre-operative area by the attending anesthesiologist, who then determined whether or not he/she felt the patient would benefit from premedication with oral midazolam prior to surgery. Patients whom the attending anesthesiologist judged would benefit from midazolam were then given a 0.12-1.06 mg/kg dose (mean 0.35 mg/kg, STD 0.12), at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Various methods were used to perform tonsillectomy, such as coblation and electrocautery, at the discretion of the otolaryngologist. Results were not stratified by surgical technique. Oral fluid intake was calculated by establishing the time of return to the floor from surgery and determining the documented oral fluid intake for the next 12 h. Oral fluid intake per kg per hour was then calculated. The amount of midazolam given was documented.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in oral fluid intake by group when adjusting for age and weight, F(1, 282) = 0.383, p = 0.537. Also, there was no significant difference in ml/kg/hr by group when adjusting for age and weight, F(1, 282) = 2.813, p = 0.095.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in oral fluid intake between the no midazolam and midazolam groups, indicating that clinicians can continue to use their judgement in administering midazolam to select anxious patients prior to tonsillectomy with or without adenoidectomy. Future work could include multi-center retrospective reviews or a randomized placebo-controlled trial to examine more carefully the effects of midazolam on postoperative oral fluid intake.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Palliative Sedation for the Terminally Ill Patient

Palliative sedation (PS) is performed in the terminally ill patient to manage one or more refractory symptoms. Proportional PS, which means that drugs can be titrated to the minimum effective dose, is the form most widely used. From a quarter to a third of all terminally ill patients undergo PS, with a quarter of these requiring continuous deep sedation. The prevalence of PS varies according to the care setting and case mix. The most frequent refractory physical symptoms are delirium and dyspnea, but PS is also considered for existential suffering or psychological distress, which is an extremely difficult and delicate issue to deal with. Active consensus from the patient and advanced care planning is recommended for PS. The decision-making process concerning the continuation or withdrawal of other treatments is not the same as that used for PS. The practice differs totally from euthanasia in its intentions, procedures, and results. The most widely used drugs are midazolam and haloperidol for refractory delirium, but chlorpromazine and other neuroleptics are also effective. In conclusion, some patients experience refractory symptoms during the last hours or days of life and PS is a medical intervention aimed at managing this unbearable suffering. It does not have a detrimental effect on survival.