1
|
Beck AK, Baker AL, Britton B, Lum A, Pohlman S, Forbes E, Moore L, Barnoth D, Perkes SJ, Oldmeadow C, Carter G. Adapted motivational interviewing for brief healthcare consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment fidelity in real-world evaluations of behaviour change counselling. Br J Health Psychol 2023; 28:972-999. [PMID: 37144242 PMCID: PMC10947272 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Behaviour change counselling (BCC) is an adaptation of motivational interviewing (MI) designed to maximize the effectiveness of time-limited health behaviour change consultations. To improve intervention quality and understanding of treatment effects, it is recommended that evaluations of health behaviour change interventions incorporate existing fidelity frameworks (e.g. The National Institutes of Health [NIH] Behaviour Change Consortium) and ensure that treatment fidelity is assessed and reported. PURPOSE This systematic review was designed to examine (a) adherence to NIH fidelity recommendations, (b) provider fidelity to BCC and (c) impact of these variables on the real-world effectiveness of BCC for adult health behaviours and outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS Searches of 10 electronic databases yielded 110 eligible publications describing 58 unique studies examining BCC delivered within real-world healthcare settings by existing providers. Mean study adherence to NIH fidelity recommendations was 63.31% (Range 26.83%-96.23%). Pooled effect size (Hedges g) for short-term and long-term outcomes was .19 (95% CI [.11, .27]) and .09 (95% CI [.04, .13]), respectively. In separate, random-effects meta-regressions, neither short-term nor long-term effect sizes were significantly modified by adherence to NIH fidelity recommendations. For the subgroup of short-term alcohol studies (n = 10), a significant inverse relationship was detected (Coefficient = -.0114, 95% CI [-.0187, -.0041], p = .0021). Inadequate and inconsistent reporting within the included studies precluded planned meta-regression between provider fidelity and BCC effect size. CONCLUSIONS Further evidence is needed to clarify whether adherence to fidelity recommendations modifies intervention effects. Efforts to promote transparent consideration, evaluation and reporting of fidelity are urgently needed. Research and clinical implications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison K. Beck
- School of Medicine and Public HealthThe University of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Amanda L. Baker
- School of Medicine and Public HealthThe University of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ben Britton
- Hunter New England HealthNew LambtonNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Alistair Lum
- School of Medicine and Public HealthThe University of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Sonja Pohlman
- School of Medicine and Public HealthThe University of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Erin Forbes
- School of Medicine and Public HealthThe University of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lyndell Moore
- School of Medicine and Public HealthThe University of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ditte Barnoth
- School of Medicine and Public HealthThe University of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Sarah J. Perkes
- School of Medicine and Public HealthThe University of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Chris Oldmeadow
- Clinical Research Design and Statistical ServiceHunter Medical Research InstituteNew Lambton HeightsNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Gregory Carter
- School of Medicine and Public HealthThe University of NewcastleCallaghanNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shi Z, Jing X. New developments during the COVID-19 pandemic: Drama therapy as an online psychological intervention tool. Front Psychol 2022; 13:930002. [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has caused many art therapists and psychotherapists to change their practice modes and workplace setup. As a creative arts therapy (CAT), drama therapy has also shifted to an online mode—a shift that has been highly consequential for practice. This paper reviews the existing practice of tele-CAT and tele-drama therapy, explores the advantages and disadvantages of online drama therapy as a psychological intervention tool, and puts forward some developmental suggestions for online drama therapy.
Collapse
|
3
|
Arnold ML, Haley W, Lin FR, Faucette S, Sherry L, Higuchi K, Witherell K, Anderson E, Reed NS, Chisolm TH, Sanchez VA. Development, assessment, and monitoring of audiologic treatment fidelity in the aging and cognitive health evaluation in elders (ACHIEVE) randomised controlled trial. Int J Audiol 2022; 61:720-730. [PMID: 34533430 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1973126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Studies investigating hearing interventions under-utilise and under-report treatment fidelity planning, implementation, and assessment. This represents a critical gap in the field that has the potential to impede advancements in the successful dissemination and implementation of interventions. Thus, our objective was to describe treatment fidelity planning and implementation for hearing intervention in the multi-site Ageing and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) randomised controlled trial. DESIGN Our treatment fidelity plan was based on a framework defined by the National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium (NIH BCC), and included strategies to enhance study design, provider training, and treatment delivery, receipt, and enactment. STUDY SAMPLE To assess the fidelity of the ACHIEVE hearing intervention, we distributed a checklist containing criteria from each NIH BCC core treatment fidelity category to nine raters. RESULTS The ACHIEVE hearing intervention fidelity plan satisfied 96% of NIH BCC criteria. Our assessment suggested a need for including clear, objective definitions of provider characteristics and non-treatment aspects of intervention delivery in future fidelity plans. CONCLUSIONS The ACHIEVE hearing intervention fidelity plan can serve as a framework for the application of NIH BCC fidelity strategies for future studies and enhance the ability of researchers to reliably implement evidence-based interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L Arnold
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Florida, Florida, FL, USA
| | - William Haley
- School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Florida, FL, USA
| | - Frank R Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sarah Faucette
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Laura Sherry
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Kerry Witherell
- Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Elizabeth Anderson
- Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Nicholas S Reed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Theresa H Chisolm
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Florida, Florida, FL, USA
| | - Victoria A Sanchez
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, University of South Florida, Florida, FL, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ryan RE, Connolly M, Bradford NK, Henderson S, Herbert A, Schonfeld L, Young J, Bothroyd JI, Henderson A. Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 7:CD013116. [PMID: 35802350 PMCID: PMC9266997 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013116.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication about end of life (EoL) and EoL care is critically important for providing quality care as people approach death. Such communication is often complex and involves many people (patients, family members, carers, health professionals). How best to communicate with people in the period approaching death is not known, but is an important question for quality of care at EoL worldwide. This review fills a gap in the evidence on interpersonal communication (between people and health professionals) in the last year of life, focusing on interventions to improve interpersonal communication and patient, family member and carer outcomes. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of interventions designed to improve verbal interpersonal communication about EoL care between health practitioners and people affected by EoL. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception to July 2018, without language or date restrictions. We contacted authors of included studies and experts and searched reference lists to identify relevant papers. We searched grey literature sources, conference proceedings, and clinical trials registries in September 2019. Database searches were re-run in June 2021 and potentially relevant studies listed as awaiting classification or ongoing. SELECTION CRITERIA This review assessed the effects of interventions, evaluated in randomised and quasi-randomised trials, intended to enhance interpersonal communication about EoL care between patients expected to die within 12 months, their family members and carers, and health practitioners involved in their care. Patients of any age from birth, in any setting or care context (e.g. acute catastrophic injury, chronic illness), and all health professionals involved in their care were eligible. All communication interventions were eligible, as long as they included interpersonal interaction(s) between patients and family members or carers and health professionals. Interventions could be simple or complex, with one or more communication aims (e.g. to inform, skill, engage, support). Effects were sought on outcomes for patients, family and carers, health professionals and health systems, including adverse (unintended) effects. To ensure this review's focus was maintained on interpersonal communication in the last 12 months of life, we excluded studies that addressed specific decisions, shared or otherwise, and the tools involved in such decision-making. We also excluded studies focused on advance care planning (ACP) reporting ACP uptake or completion as the primary outcome. Finally, we excluded studies of communication skills training for health professionals unless patient outcomes were reported as primary outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Standard Cochrane methods were used, including dual review author study selection, data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. MAIN RESULTS Eight trials were included. All assessed intervention effects compared with usual care. Certainty of the evidence was low or very low. All outcomes were downgraded for indirectness based on the review's purpose, and many were downgraded for imprecision and/or inconsistency. Certainty was not commonly downgraded for methodological limitations. A summary of the review's findings is as follows. Knowledge and understanding (four studies, low-certainty evidence; one study without usable data): interventions to improve communication (e.g. question prompt list, with or without patient and physician training) may have little or no effect on knowledge of illness and prognosis, or information needs and preferences, although studies were small and measures used varied across trials. Evaluation of the communication (six studies measuring several constructs (communication quality, patient-centredness, involvement preferences, doctor-patient relationship, satisfaction with consultation), most low-certainty evidence): across constructs there may be minimal or no effects of interventions to improve EoL communication, and there is uncertainty about effects of interventions such as a patient-specific feedback sheet on quality of communication. Discussions of EoL or EoL care (six studies measuring selected outcomes, low- or very low-certainty evidence): a family conference intervention may increase duration of EoL discussions in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting, while use of a structured serious illness conversation guide may lead to earlier discussions of EoL and EoL care (each assessed by one study). We are uncertain about effects on occurrence of discussions and question asking in consultations, and there may be little or no effect on content of communication in consultations. Adverse outcomes or unintended effects (limited evidence): there is insufficient evidence to determine whether there are adverse outcomes associated with communication interventions (e.g. question prompt list, family conference, structured discussions) for EoL and EoL care. Patient and/or carer anxiety was reported by three studies, but judged as confounded. No other unintended consequences, or worsening of desired outcomes, were reported. Patient/carer quality of life (four studies, low-certainty evidence; two without useable data): interventions to improve communication may have little or no effect on quality of life. Health practitioner outcomes (three studies, low-certainty evidence; two without usable data): interventions to improve communication may have little or no effect on health practitioner outcomes (satisfaction with communication during consultation; one study); effects on other outcomes (knowledge, preparedness to communicate) are unknown. Health systems impacts: communication interventions (e.g. structured EoL conversations) may have little or no effect on carer or clinician ratings of quality of EoL care (satisfaction with care, symptom management, comfort assessment, quality of care) (three studies, low-certainty evidence), or on patients' self-rated care and illness, or numbers of care goals met (one study, low-certainty evidence). Communication interventions (e.g. question prompt list alone or with nurse-led communication skills training) may slightly increase mean consultation length (two studies), but other health service impacts (e.g. hospital admissions) are unclear. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Findings of this review are inconclusive for practice. Future research might contribute meaningfully by seeking to fill gaps for populations not yet studied in trials; and to develop responsive outcome measures with which to better assess the effects of communication on the range of people involved in EoL communication episodes. Mixed methods and/or qualitative research may contribute usefully to better understand the complex interplay between different parties involved in communication, and to inform development of more effective interventions and appropriate outcome measures. Co-design of such interventions and outcomes, involving the full range of people affected by EoL communication and care, should be a key underpinning principle for future research in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca E Ryan
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Michael Connolly
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin and Our Lady's Hospice and Care Services, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Natalie K Bradford
- Centre for Children's Health Research, Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes at Centre for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), South Brisbane, Australia
| | - Simon Henderson
- Department of Aviation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anthony Herbert
- Paediatric Palliative Care Service, Children's Health Queensland, Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Children's Health Research, Queensland University of Technology, South Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lina Schonfeld
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Jeanine Young
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia
| | | | - Amanda Henderson
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Godecke E, Brogan E, Ciccone N, Rose ML, Armstrong E, Whitworth A, Ellery F, Holland A, Middleton S, Rai T, Hankey GJ, Cadilhac D, Bernhardt J. Treatment fidelity monitoring, reporting and findings in a complex aphasia intervention trial: a substudy of the Very Early Rehabilitation in SpEech (VERSE) trial. Trials 2022; 23:501. [PMID: 35710437 PMCID: PMC9204960 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06433-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Treatment fidelity is inconsistently reported in aphasia research, contributing to uncertainty about the effectiveness of types of aphasia therapy following stroke. We outline the processes and outcomes of treatment fidelity monitoring in a pre-specified secondary analysis of the VERSE trial. Methods VERSE was a 3-arm, single-blinded RCT with a 12-week primary endpoint comparing Usual Care (UC) to two higher intensity treatments: Usual Care-Plus (UC-Plus) and VERSE, a prescribed intervention. Primary outcome results were previously reported. This secondary analysis focused on treatment fidelity. Video-recorded treatment sessions in the higher intensity study arms were evaluated for treatment adherence and treatment differentiation. Treatment components were evaluated using a pre-determined fidelity checklist. Primary outcome: prescribed amount of therapy time (minutes); secondary outcomes: (i) adherence to therapy protocol (%) and (ii) treatment differentiation between control and high intensity groups. Results Two hundred forty-six participants were randomised to Usual Care (n=81), Usual Care-Plus (n=82), and VERSE (n=83). One hundred thirty-five (82%) participants in higher intensity intervention arms received the minimum prescribed therapy minutes. From 10,805 (UC 7787; UC-Plus 1450; VERSE 1568) service events, 431 treatment protocol deviations were noted in 114 participants. Four hundred thirty-seven videos were evaluated. The VERSE therapists achieved over 84% adherence to key protocol elements. Higher stroke and aphasia severity, older age, and being in the UC-Plus group predicted more treatment deviations. Conclusions We found high levels of treatment adherence and differentiation between the intervention arms, providing greater confidence interpreting our results. The comprehensive systems for intervention fidelity monitoring and reporting in this trial make an important contribution to aphasia research and, we argue, should set a new standard for future aphasia studies. Trial registration ACTRN 12613000776707 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06433-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Godecke
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Dve, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia. .,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation Recovery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. .,Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Emily Brogan
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Dve, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation Recovery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Natalie Ciccone
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Dve, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation Recovery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Miranda L Rose
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation Recovery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Armstrong
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, 270 Joondalup Dve, Joondalup, Western Australia, 6027, Australia
| | | | - Fiona Ellery
- Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sandy Middleton
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation Recovery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,St Vincent's Health Network Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tapan Rai
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Graeme J Hankey
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Dominique Cadilhac
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation Recovery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Julie Bernhardt
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation Recovery, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Frydman JS, Cook A, Armstrong CR, Rowe C, Kern C. The Drama Therapy Core Processes: A Delphi study Establishing a North American Perspective. ARTS IN PSYCHOTHERAPY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aip.2022.101939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
7
|
Nomikos PA, Hall M, Fuller A, Millar B, Ogollah R, Valdes A, Doherty M, Walsh DA, das Nair R, Abhishek A. Fidelity assessment of nurse-led non-pharmacological package of care for knee pain in the package development phase of a feasibility randomised controlled trial based in secondary care: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045242. [PMID: 34326044 PMCID: PMC8323379 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate fidelity of delivery of a nurse-led non-pharmacological complex intervention for knee pain. SETTING Secondary care. Single-centre study. STUDY DESIGN Mixed methods study. PARTICIPANTS Eighteen adults with chronic knee pain. INCLUSION CRITERIA Age >40 years, knee pain present for longer than 3 months, knee pain for most days of the previous month, at least moderate pain in two of the five domains of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain scale. INTERVENTIONS Nurse-led non-pharmacological intervention comprising assessment, education, exercise, use of hot/cold treatments, footwear modification, walking aids and weight-loss advice (if required). OUTCOMES Primary: fidelity of delivery of intervention, secondary: nurses' experience of delivering intervention. METHODS Each intervention session with every participant was video recorded and formed part of fidelity assessment. Fidelity checklists were completed by the research nurse after each session and by an independent researcher, after viewing the video-recordings blinded to nurse ratings. Fidelity scores (%), percentage agreement and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with the research nurse. RESULTS Fourteen participants completed all visits. 62 treatment sessions took place. Nurse self-report and assessor video rating scores for all 62 treatment sessions were included in fidelity assessment. Overall fidelity was higher on nurse self-report (97.7%) than on objective video-rating (84.2%). Percentage agreement between nurse self-report and video-rating was 73.3% (95% CI 71.3 to 75.3). Fidelity was lowest for advice on footwear and walking aids. The nurse reported difficulty advising on thermal treatments, footwear and walking aids, and did not feel confident negotiating achievable and realistic goals with participants. CONCLUSIONS A trained research nurse can deliver most components of a non-pharmacological intervention for knee pain to a high degree of fidelity. Future research should assess intervention fidelity in a routine clinical setting, and examine its clinical and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03670706.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polykarpos Angelos Nomikos
- Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michelle Hall
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Amy Fuller
- Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Bonnie Millar
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Reuben Ogollah
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Ana Valdes
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Michael Doherty
- Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David A Walsh
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Pain Centre Versus Arthritis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roshan das Nair
- Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- Division of Psychiatry & Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - A Abhishek
- Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
- NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Witte M, Orkibi H, Zarate R, Karkou V, Sajnani N, Malhotra B, Ho RTH, Kaimal G, Baker FA, Koch SC. From Therapeutic Factors to Mechanisms of Change in the Creative Arts Therapies: A Scoping Review. Front Psychol 2021; 12:678397. [PMID: 34366998 PMCID: PMC8336579 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Empirical studies in the creative arts therapies (CATs; i.e., art therapy, dance/movement therapy, drama therapy, music therapy, psychodrama, and poetry/bibliotherapy) have grown rapidly in the last 10 years, documenting their positive impact on a wide range of psychological and physiological outcomes (e.g., stress, trauma, depression, anxiety, and pain). However, it remains unclear how and why the CATs have positive effects, and which therapeutic factors account for these changes. Research that specifically focuses on the therapeutic factors and/or mechanisms of change in CATs is only beginning to emerge. To gain more insight into how and why the CATs influence outcomes, we conducted a scoping review (Nstudies = 67) to pinpoint therapeutic factors specific to each CATs discipline, joint factors of CATs, and more generic common factors across all psychotherapy approaches. This review therefore provides an overview of empirical CATs studies dealing with therapeutic factors and/or mechanisms of change, and a detailed analysis of these therapeutic factors which are grouped into domains. A framework of 19 domains of CATs therapeutic factors is proposed, of which the three domains are composed solely of factors unique to the CATs: “embodiment,” “concretization,” and “symbolism and metaphors.” The terminology used in change process research is clarified, and the implications for future research, clinical practice, and CATs education are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina de Witte
- Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Kennisontwikkeling Vaktherapieën (KenVaK) Research Centre for the Arts Therapies, Heerlen, Netherlands.,Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Stevig Specialized and Forensic Care for Patients With Intellectual Disabilities, Dichterbij, Oostrum, Netherlands
| | - Hod Orkibi
- Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, Emili Sagol Creative Arts Therapies Research Center, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Rebecca Zarate
- Division of Expressive Therapies, Lesley University, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Vicky Karkou
- Research Centre for Arts and Wellbeing, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom
| | - Nisha Sajnani
- Educational Theatre & Rehabilitation Science Ph.D. Programs, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Bani Malhotra
- Department of Creative Arts Therapies, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Rainbow Tin Hung Ho
- Department of Social Work and Social Administration, Centre on Behavioral Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Girija Kaimal
- Department of Creative Arts Therapies, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Felicity A Baker
- Music Therapy Department, Norwegian Academy of Music, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Fine Arts and Music, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Sabine C Koch
- SRH University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department for Creative Arts Therapies and Therapy Science, Alanus University of Arts and Social Sciences, Alfter, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hepgul N, Wilson R, Yi D, Evans C, Bajwah S, Crosby V, Wilcock A, Lindsay F, Byrne A, Young C, Groves K, Smith C, Burman R, Chaudhuri KR, Silber E, Higginson IJ, Gao W. Immediate versus delayed short-term integrated palliative care for advanced long-term neurological conditions: the OPTCARE Neuro RCT. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2020. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr08360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Palliative care is recommended to help meet the needs of patients with progressive non-cancer conditions, such as long-term neurological conditions. However, few trials have tested palliative care in this population.
Objectives
To determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of short-term integrated palliative care in improving symptoms, improving patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes and reducing hospital use for people severely affected by long-term neurological conditions.
Design
Pragmatic, randomised controlled, multicentre, fast-track trial, with an embedded qualitative component and surveys.
Setting
Seven UK centres (South London, Nottingham, Liverpool, Cardiff, Brighton, Ashford and Sheffield) with multiprofessional palliative care teams and neurology services.
Participants
People living with multiple sclerosis, idiopathic Parkinson’s disease, motor neurone disease, multiple system atrophy or progressive supranuclear palsy, with unresolved symptoms and/or complex psychosocial needs. The qualitative study involved patients, caregivers and health-care staff.
Interventions
Participants were randomised to receive short-term integrated palliative care, delivered by multiprofessional teams, immediately or after a 12-week wait (standard care group).
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was a combined score of eight symptoms measured by the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale for Neurological conditions 8 symptom subscale (IPOS Neuro-S8) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included patients’ other physical and psychological symptoms, quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions, five-level version), care satisfaction, caregiver burden, service use and cost, and harms. Data were analysed using multiple imputation, generalised linear mixed models, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (threshold was the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year) and cost-effectiveness planes. Qualitative data were analysed thematically.
Results
We recruited 350 patients and 229 caregivers. There were no significant between-group differences for primary or secondary outcomes. Patients receiving short-term integrated palliative care had a significant improvement, from baseline to 12 weeks, on the primary outcome IPOS Neuro-S8 (–0.78, 95% confidence interval –1.29 to –0.26) and the secondary outcome of 24 physical symptoms (–1.95, 99.55% confidence interval –3.60 to –0.30). This was not seen in the control group, in which conversely, care satisfaction significantly reduced from baseline to 12 weeks (–2.89, 99.55% confidence interval –5.19 to –0.59). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were smaller than the set threshold (EuroQol-5 Dimensions index score –£23,545; IPOS Neuro-S8 –£1519), indicating that the intervention provided cost savings plus better outcomes. Deaths, survival and hospitalisations were similar between the two groups. Qualitative data suggested that the impact of the intervention encompassed three themes: (1) adapting to losses and building resilience, (2) attending to function, deficits and maintaining stability, and (3) enabling caregivers to care.
Conclusions
Our results indicate that short-term integrated palliative care provides improvements in patient-reported physical symptoms at a lower cost and without harmful effects when compared with standard care.
Limitations
Outcome measures may not have been sensitive enough to capture the multidimensional changes from the intervention. Our surveys found that the control/standard and intervention services were heterogeneous.
Future work
Refining short-term integrated palliative care and similar approaches for long-term neurological conditions, focusing on better integration of existing services, criteria for referral and research to improve symptom management.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN18337380.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 36. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilay Hepgul
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Wilson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Vincent Crosby
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Andrew Wilcock
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Anthony Byrne
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Carolyn Young
- Department of Neurology, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | | - Clare Smith
- Department of Palliative Care, Ashford and St. Peter’s Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK
| | - Rachel Burman
- Department of Palliative Care, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
| | - K Ray Chaudhuri
- National Parkinson Foundation Centre of Excellence, King’s College Hospital and King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Eli Silber
- Department of Neurology, King’s College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Collingridge Moore D, Payne S, Van den Block L, Ling J, Froggatt K. Strategies for the implementation of palliative care education and organizational interventions in long-term care facilities: A scoping review. Palliat Med 2020; 34:558-570. [PMID: 32009516 PMCID: PMC7222696 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319893635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of older people dying in long-term care facilities is increasing; however, care at the end of life can be suboptimal. Interventions to improve palliative care delivery within these settings have been shown to be effective in improving care, but little is known about their implementation. AIM The aim of this study was to describe the nature of implementation strategies and to identify facilitators and/or barriers to implementing palliative care interventions in long-term care facilities. DESIGN Scoping review with a thematic synthesis, following the ENTREQ guidelines. DATA SOURCES Published literature was identified from electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL. Controlled, non-controlled and qualitative studies and evaluations of interventions to improve palliative care in long-term care facilities were included. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were sourced and data extracted on the study characteristics, the implementation of the intervention, and facilitators and/or barriers to implementation. RESULTS The review identified 8902 abstracts, from which 61 studies were included in the review. A matrix of implementation was developed with four implementation strategies (facilitation, education/training, internal engagement and external engagement) and three implementation stages (conditions to introduce the intervention, embedding the intervention within day-to-day practice and sustaining ongoing change). CONCLUSION Incorporating an implementation strategy into the development and delivery of an intervention is integral in embedding change in practice. The review has shown that the four implementation strategies identified varied considerably across interventions; however, similar facilitators and barriers were encountered across the studies identified. Further research is needed to understand the extent to which different implementation strategies can facilitate the uptake of palliative care interventions in long-term care facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sheila Payne
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- VUB-UGhent End of Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Julie Ling
- European Association for Palliative Care, Vilvoorde, Belgium
| | - Katherine Froggatt
- International Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Palmer JA, Parker VA, Barre LR, Mor V, Volandes AE, Belanger E, Loomer L, McCreedy E, Mitchell SL. Understanding implementation fidelity in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial in the nursing home setting:a mixed-methods examination. Trials 2019. [PMID: 31779684 DOI: 10.1186/s13063‐019‐3725‐5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Pragmatic Trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes (PROVEN) is one of the first large pragmatic randomized clinical trials (pRCTs) to be conducted in U.S. nursing homes (N = 119 intervention and N = 241 control across two health-care systems). The trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a suite of videos to improve advance care planning (ACP) for nursing home patients. This report uses mixed methods to explore the optimal and suboptimal conditions necessary for implementation fidelity within pRCTs in nursing homes. METHODS PROVEN's protocol required designated facility champions to offer an ACP video to long-stay patients every 6 months during the 18-month implementation period. Champions completed a video status report, stored within electronic medical records, each time a video was offered. Data from the report were used to derive each facility's adherence rate (i.e., cumulative video offer). Qualitative interviews held after 15 months with champions were purposively sampled from facilities within the highest and lowest adherence rates (i.e., those in the top and bottom quintiles). Two researchers analyzed interview data thematically using a deductive approach based upon six domains of the revised Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity (CFIF). Matrices were developed to compare coded narratives by domain across facility adherence status. RESULTS In total, 28 interviews involving 33 champions were analyzed. Different patterns were observed across high- versus low-adherence facilities for five CFIF domains. In low-adherence nursing homes, (1) there were limited implementation resources (Context), (2) there was often a perceived negative patient or family responsiveness to the program (Participant Responsiveness), and (3) champions were reticent in offering the videos (Recruitment). In high-adherence nursing homes, (1) there was more perceived patient and family willingness to engage in the program (Participant Responsiveness), (2) champions supplemented the video with ACP conversations (Quality of Delivery), (3) there were strategic approaches to recruitment (Recruitment), and (4) champions appreciated external facilitation (Strategies to Facilitate Implementation). CONCLUSIONS Critical lessons for implementing pRCTs in nursing homes emerged from this report: (1) flexible fidelity is important (i.e., delivering core elements of an intervention while permitting the adaptation of non-core elements), (2) reciprocal facilitation is vital (i.e., early and ongoing stakeholder engagement in research design and, reciprocally, researchers' and organizational leaders' ongoing support of the implementation), and (3) organizational and champion readiness should be formally assessed early and throughout implementation to facilitate remediation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02612688. Registered on 19 November 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Palmer
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Hebrew SeniorLife, Hinda & Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, 1200 Centre Street, Roslindale, MA, 02131, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, East Campus, Yamins 419, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Victoria A Parker
- Peter T. Paul College of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, 10 Garrison Avenue, Durham, NH, 03824, USA
| | - Lacey R Barre
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Vincent Mor
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.,Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.,Center of Innovation in Health Services Research and Development Service, Providence Veterans Administration Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Ave, Providence, RI, 02908, USA
| | - Angelo E Volandes
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Section of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Gray 7-730, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Emmanuelle Belanger
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.,Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Lacey Loomer
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Ellen McCreedy
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Susan L Mitchell
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Hebrew SeniorLife, Hinda & Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, 1200 Centre Street, Roslindale, MA, 02131, USA.,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, East Campus, Yamins 419, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Palmer JA, Parker VA, Barre LR, Mor V, Volandes AE, Belanger E, Loomer L, McCreedy E, Mitchell SL. Understanding implementation fidelity in a pragmatic randomized clinical trial in the nursing home setting:a mixed-methods examination. Trials 2019; 20:656. [PMID: 31779684 PMCID: PMC6883560 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3725-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Pragmatic Trial of Video Education in Nursing Homes (PROVEN) is one of the first large pragmatic randomized clinical trials (pRCTs) to be conducted in U.S. nursing homes (N = 119 intervention and N = 241 control across two health-care systems). The trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a suite of videos to improve advance care planning (ACP) for nursing home patients. This report uses mixed methods to explore the optimal and suboptimal conditions necessary for implementation fidelity within pRCTs in nursing homes. Methods PROVEN’s protocol required designated facility champions to offer an ACP video to long-stay patients every 6 months during the 18-month implementation period. Champions completed a video status report, stored within electronic medical records, each time a video was offered. Data from the report were used to derive each facility’s adherence rate (i.e., cumulative video offer). Qualitative interviews held after 15 months with champions were purposively sampled from facilities within the highest and lowest adherence rates (i.e., those in the top and bottom quintiles). Two researchers analyzed interview data thematically using a deductive approach based upon six domains of the revised Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity (CFIF). Matrices were developed to compare coded narratives by domain across facility adherence status. Results In total, 28 interviews involving 33 champions were analyzed. Different patterns were observed across high- versus low-adherence facilities for five CFIF domains. In low-adherence nursing homes, (1) there were limited implementation resources (Context), (2) there was often a perceived negative patient or family responsiveness to the program (Participant Responsiveness), and (3) champions were reticent in offering the videos (Recruitment). In high-adherence nursing homes, (1) there was more perceived patient and family willingness to engage in the program (Participant Responsiveness), (2) champions supplemented the video with ACP conversations (Quality of Delivery), (3) there were strategic approaches to recruitment (Recruitment), and (4) champions appreciated external facilitation (Strategies to Facilitate Implementation). Conclusions Critical lessons for implementing pRCTs in nursing homes emerged from this report: (1) flexible fidelity is important (i.e., delivering core elements of an intervention while permitting the adaptation of non-core elements), (2) reciprocal facilitation is vital (i.e., early and ongoing stakeholder engagement in research design and, reciprocally, researchers’ and organizational leaders’ ongoing support of the implementation), and (3) organizational and champion readiness should be formally assessed early and throughout implementation to facilitate remediation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02612688. Registered on 19 November 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Palmer
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. .,Hebrew SeniorLife, Hinda & Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, 1200 Centre Street, Roslindale, MA, 02131, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, East Campus, Yamins 419, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Victoria A Parker
- Peter T. Paul College of Business and Economics, University of New Hampshire, 10 Garrison Avenue, Durham, NH, 03824, USA
| | - Lacey R Barre
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Vincent Mor
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.,Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.,Center of Innovation in Health Services Research and Development Service, Providence Veterans Administration Medical Center, 830 Chalkstone Ave, Providence, RI, 02908, USA
| | - Angelo E Volandes
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Section of General Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street Gray 7-730, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Emmanuelle Belanger
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.,Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Lacey Loomer
- Department of Health Services, Policy, and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Ellen McCreedy
- Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, School of Public Health, Brown University, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI, 02903, USA
| | - Susan L Mitchell
- Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,Hebrew SeniorLife, Hinda & Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, 1200 Centre Street, Roslindale, MA, 02131, USA.,Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, East Campus, Yamins 419, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Orkibi H, Feniger-Schaal R. Integrative systematic review of psychodrama psychotherapy research: Trends and methodological implications. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0212575. [PMID: 30779787 PMCID: PMC6380607 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychodrama is an experiential psychotherapy in which guided role-play is used to gain insights and work on personal and interpersonal problems and possible solutions. Despite the wealth of literature describing clinical work, psychodrama intervention research is relatively scarce compared to other psychotherapies and psychological interventions. OBJECTIVE For this reason we implemented the integrative approach to systematic review that authorizes the combination of publications with diverse methodologies and all types of participants, interventions, comparisons, and outcomes. Our aim was to produce a comprehensive summary of psychodrama intervention research in the last decade that critically evaluates methodological issues to inform future studies. METHODS We searched four major electronic databases (PsycINFO, PubMEd, Scopus by Elsevier, and Web of Science) for peer-reviewed articles on psychodrama interventions published in English between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017. The quality of qualitative and mixed methods studies was assessed on the basis of pre-established guidelines, and the risk of bias was assessed for all quantitative randomized control studies, consistent with the PRISMA protocol. FINDINGS The database search and a hand search resulted in 31 psychodrama intervention publications. Overall, these studies examined the effects of psychodrama on more than 20 different outcomes and most studies had adult clients. The next largest group was adolescents, whereas only two studies involved children. Thus psychodrama intervention research in the last decade suggests there are promising results in all methodologies, and highlights the need to enhance methodological as well as reporting quality and to theorize and examine modality-specific mechanisms that lead to therapeutic change. Recommendations to improve methodology, transparency, and specificity in reporting future psychodrama and other psychotherapy research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hod Orkibi
- School of Creative Arts Therapies, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| | - Rinat Feniger-Schaal
- School of Creative Arts Therapies, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gao W, Huque S, Morgan M, Higginson IJ. A Population-Based Conceptual Framework for Evaluating the Role of Healthcare Services in Place of Death. Healthcare (Basel) 2018; 6:E107. [PMID: 30200247 PMCID: PMC6164352 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare6030107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2018] [Revised: 08/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a significant geographical disparity in place of death. Socio-demographic and disease-related variables only explain less than a quarter of the variation. Healthcare service factors may account for some (or much) of the remaining variation but their effects have never been systematically evaluated, partly due to the lack of a conceptual framework. This study aims to propose a population-based framework to guide the evaluation of the role of the healthcare service factors in place of death. METHODS Review and synthesis of health service models that include the impact of a service component on either place of death/end of life care outcomes or service access/utilization. RESULTS The framework conceptualizes the impact of healthcare services on the place of death as starting from the end of life care policies that in turn influence service commissioning and shape healthcare service characteristics, including service type, service capacity-facilities, service location, and workforce, through which service utilization and ultimately place of death are affected. Patient socio-demographics, disease-related variables, family and community support and social care also influence place of death, but they are not the focus of this framework and therefore are grouped as needs and other environmental factors. Information on service utilization, together with the place of death, creates loop feedback to inform policy and service commission. CONCLUSIONS The framework provides guidance for analysis aiming to understand the role of healthcare services in place of death. It aids the interpretation of results in the light of existing knowledge and potentially identifies service factors that can be addressed to improve end of life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Gao
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9PJ, UK.
| | - Sumaya Huque
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9PJ, UK.
| | - Myfanwy Morgan
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London SE1 9NH, UK.
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Bessemer Road, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9PJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ryan P, Papanek P, Csuka ME, Brown ME, Hopkins S, Lynch S, Scheer V, Schlidt A, Yan K, Simpson P, Hoffman R. Background and method of the Striving to be Strong study a RCT testing the efficacy of a m-health self-management intervention. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 71:80-87. [PMID: 29894865 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Revised: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoporosis is a prevalent and debilitating condition affecting >50% of post-menopausal women. Yet, a low percentage of women regularly engage in health promoting behaviors associated with osteoporosis prevention. Complex, multidimensional, m-Health interventions hold promise to effect engagement in health behavior change related to calcium and vitamin D intake, balance, core and leg strength, and physical activity. METHODS Striving to be Strong study (R01NR013913-01) tests the efficacy of a research and theory based, patient centered, dynamically tailored intervention delivered via smart phone apps. Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMAs) enhance immediate feedback and complement traditional measures. The desired outcomes are the maintenance of osteoporosis self-management behaviors and a decrease in the loss of bone density over time. The Individual and Family Self-management Theory provided the conceptual foundation for the study. The sample consists of 290 healthy women between the ages of 40 and 60 with an anticipated attrition of 33%. This three group repeated measures Randomized Clinical Trial spans a 12-month time period. Data collected occurs via web site, smart-phone app, self-report, observation, and measures. Proximal (engagement in osteoporosis health behaviors) and distal (serum vitamin D, DXA, and body composition) outcomes are collected for testing of the efficacy of the intervention and theory evaluation. DISCUSSION Active and rigorous quality management processes continually evaluate enrollment and retention goals, functionality of the automated intervention delivery and data collection systems, EMAs, and dispersion of incentives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Polly Ryan
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, School of Nursing, United States.
| | | | | | | | | | - Shelly Lynch
- University of Wisconsin Milwaukee, United States
| | | | | | - Ke Yan
- Medical College of Wisconsin, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Interventionist training and intervention fidelity monitoring and maintenance for CONNECT, a nurse-led primary palliative care in oncology trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2018; 10:57-61. [PMID: 29696159 PMCID: PMC5898502 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2017] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Intervention fidelity is a critical component of behavioral research that has received inadequate attention in palliative care studies. With increasing focus on the need for palliative care models that can be widely disseminated and delivered by non-specialists, rigorous yet pragmatic strategies for training interventionists and maintaining intervention fidelity are needed. Objectives (1) Describe components of a plan for interventionist training and monitoring and maintaining intervention fidelity as part of a primary palliative care trial (CONNECT) and (2) present data about perceived training effectiveness and delivery of key intervention content. Methods Post-training evaluations, visit checklists, and visit audio-recordings. Results Data were collected from June, 2016 through April, 2017. We include procedures for (1) identification, training and certification of oncology nurses as CONNECT interventionists; (2) monitoring intervention delivery; and (3) maintaining intervention quality. All nurses (N = 14) felt prepared to deliver key competencies after a 3-day in-person training. As assessed via visit checklists, interventionists delivered an average of 94% (SD 13%) of key content for first intervention visits and 85% (SD 14%) for subsequent visits. As assessed via audio-recordings, interventionists delivered an average of 85% (SD 8%) of key content for initial visits and 85% (SD 12%) for subsequent visits. Conclusion We present a 3-part strategy for training interventionists and monitoring and maintaining intervention delivery in a primary palliative care trial. Training was effective in having nurses feel prepared to deliver primary palliative care skills. As assessed via nursing checklists and visit audio-recordings, intervention fidelity was high.
Collapse
|