1
|
Johnson MJ, Rutterford L, Sunny A, Pask S, de Wolf-Linder S, Murtagh FEM, Ramsenthaler C. Benefits of specialist palliative care by identifying active ingredients of service composition, structure, and delivery model: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004436. [PMID: 39093900 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specialist palliative care (SPC) services address the needs of people with advanced illness. Meta-analyses to date have been challenged by heterogeneity in SPC service models and outcome measures and have failed to produce an overall effect. The best service models are unknown. We aimed to estimate the summary effect of SPC across settings on quality of life and emotional wellbeing and identify the optimum service delivery model. METHODS AND FINDINGS We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. Databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ICTRP, clinicaltrials.gov) were searched (January 1, 2000; December 28, 2023), supplemented with further hand searches (i.e., conference abstracts). Two researchers independently screened identified studies. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing SPC intervention versus usual care in adults with life-limiting disease and including patient or proxy reported outcomes as primary or secondary endpoints. The meta-analysis used, to our knowledge, novel methodology to convert outcomes into minimally clinically important difference (MID) units and the number needed to treat (NNT). Bias/quality was assessed via the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Random-effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to synthesize endpoints between 2 weeks and 12 months for effect on quality of life and emotional wellbeing expressed and combined in units of MID. From 42,787 records, 39 international RCTs (n = 38 from high- and middle-income countries) were included. For quality of life (33 trials) and emotional wellbeing (22 trials), statistically and clinically significant benefit was seen from 3 months' follow-up for quality of life, standardized mean difference (SMD in MID units) effect size of 0.40 at 13 to 36 weeks, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.21, 0.59], p < 0.001, I2 = 60%). For quality of life at 13 to 36 weeks, 13% of the SPC intervention group experienced an effect of at least 1 MID unit change (relative risk (RR) = 1.13, 95% CI [1.06, 1.20], p < 0.001, I2 = 0%). For emotional wellbeing, 16% experienced an effect of at least 1 MID unit change at 13 to 36 weeks (95% CI [1.08, 1.24], p < 0.001, I2 = 0%). For quality of life, the NNT improved from 69 to 15; for emotional wellbeing from 46 to 28, from 2 weeks and 3 months, respectively. Higher effect sizes were associated with multidisciplinary and multicomponent interventions, across settings. Sensitivity analyses using robust MID estimates showed substantial (quality of life) and moderate (emotional wellbeing) benefits, and lower number-needed-to-treat, even with shorter follow-up. As the main limitation, MID effect sizes may be biased by relying on derivation in non-palliative care samples. CONCLUSIONS Using, to our knowledge, novel methods to combine different outcomes, we found clear evidence of moderate overall effect size for both quality of life and emotional wellbeing benefits from SPC, regardless of underlying condition, with multidisciplinary, multicomponent, and multi-setting models being most effective. Our data seriously challenge the current practice of referral to SPC close to death. Policy and service commissioning should drive needs-based referral at least 3 to 6 months before death as the optimal standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam J Johnson
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | | | - Anisha Sunny
- School of Psychology and Social Work, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Pask
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Susanne de Wolf-Linder
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
- School of Health Professions, Institute of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Fliss E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Ramsenthaler
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
- School of Health Professions, Institute of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ellis KR, Furgal A, Wayas F, Contreras A, Jones C, Perez S, Raji D, Smith M, Vincent C, Song L, Northouse L, Langford AT. Symptom burden and quality of life among patient and family caregiver dyads in advanced cancer. Qual Life Res 2024:10.1007/s11136-024-03743-8. [PMID: 39046614 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03743-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Symptom management among patients diagnosed with advanced cancer is a high priority in clinical care that often involves the support of a family caregiver. However, limited studies have examined parallel patient and caregiver symptom burden and associations with their own and each other's quality of life (QOL). This study seeks to identify patient and caregiver symptom clusters and investigate associations between identified clusters and demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors (cognitive appraisals and QOL). METHODS This study was a secondary analysis of self-reported baseline survey data collected from a randomized clinical trial of 484 adult advanced cancer patients and their caregivers. Latent class analysis and factor analysis were used to identify symptom clusters. Bivariate statistics tested associations between symptom clusters and demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables. RESULTS The most prevalent symptom for patients was energy loss/fatigue and for caregivers, mental distress. Low, moderate, and high symptom burden subgroups were identified at the patient, caregiver, and dyad level. Age, gender, race, income, chronic conditions, cancer type, and treatment type were associated with symptom burden subgroups. Higher symptom burden was associated with more negative appraisals of the cancer and caregiving experience, and poorer QOL (physical, social, emotional, functional, and overall QOL). Dyads whose caregivers had more chronic conditions were more likely to be in the high symptom burden subgroup. CONCLUSION Patient and caregiver symptom burden influence their own and each other's QOL. These findings reinforce the need to approach symptom management from a dyadic perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina R Ellis
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
- Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Allison Furgal
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Feyisayo Wayas
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
- Research Centre for Health Through Physical Activity, Lifestyle and Sport (HPALS), Division of Physiological Sciences, Department of Human Biology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Alexis Contreras
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Carly Jones
- Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sierra Perez
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Dolapo Raji
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Madeline Smith
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Charlotte Vincent
- School of Social Work, University of Michigan, 1080 South University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Lixin Song
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oswalt CJ, Nakatani MM, Troy J, Wolf S, Locke SC, LeBlanc TW. Timing of Palliative Care Consultation Impacts End of Life Care Outcomes in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2024:S0885-3924(24)00858-3. [PMID: 39002711 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT Early specialist palliative care (PC) involvement in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) is associated with improved quality of life, less aggressive end of life (EoL) care, and longer survival. As treatment paradigms for NSCLC have evolved, PC utilization remains low. OBJECTIVES This work examines how the timing and extent of PC involvement impacts outcomes and the patient experience in mNSCLC in the era of immunotherapy. METHODS This retrospective review analyzed patients with mNSCLC who initiated first-line treatment with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combined chemoimmunotherapy at Duke University between March 2015 and July 2019. PC consultation and outcomes data were abstracted through November 2022. EoL care variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS 152 patients were stratified based on whether PC was consulted during their disease course. 80 patients (53%) never saw PC, while the 72 patients (47%) who saw PC were further stratified by time to first PC encounter and total number of PC visits. 31% were seen within two months of diagnosis (early), 33% between two and six months (intermediate), and 36% after 6 months (late). Patients who received early PC had longer median time on hospice (35 days), had lower rates of aggressive EoL care (43%), and experienced less frequent in-hospital death (14%) compared to other groups. CONCLUSION This real-world study reveals that referrals to PC still occur late or not at all in mNSCLC despite demonstrated benefits of early PC integration. Early outpatient PC referrals resulted in longer time on hospice, lower frequency of aggressive EoL care, and lower rates of in-hospital death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron J Oswalt
- Duke Cancer Institute (C.J.O., S.C.L., T.W.L.B.,), Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| | - Morgan M Nakatani
- Medicine-Psychiatry Resident (M.M.N.), Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jesse Troy
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (J.T., S.W.), Division of Biostatistics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Steven Wolf
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (J.T., S.W.), Division of Biostatistics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Susan C Locke
- Duke Cancer Institute (C.J.O., S.C.L., T.W.L.B.,), Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Duke Cancer Institute (C.J.O., S.C.L., T.W.L.B.,), Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brenne AT, Løhre ET, Knudsen AK, Lund JÅ, Thronæs M, Driller B, Brunelli C, Kaasa S. Standardizing Integrated Oncology and Palliative Care Across Service Levels: Challenges in Demonstrating Effects in a Prospective Controlled Intervention Trial. Oncol Ther 2024; 12:345-362. [PMID: 38744750 PMCID: PMC11187047 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-024-00278-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with cancer often want to spend their final days at home. In Norway, most patients with cancer die in institutions. We hypothesized that full integration of oncology and palliative care services would result in more time spent at home during end-of-life. METHODS A prospective non-randomized intervention trial was conducted in two rural regions of Mid-Norway. The hospitals' oncology and palliative care outpatient clinics and surrounding communities participated. An intervention including information, education, and a standardized care pathway was developed and implemented. Adult non-curative patients with cancer were eligible. Proportion of last 90 days of life spent at home was the primary outcome. RESULTS We included 129 patients in the intervention group (I) and 76 patients in the comparison group (C), of whom 82% of patients in I and 78% of patients in C died during follow-up. The mean proportion of last 90 days of life spent at home was 0.62 in I and 0.72 in C (p = 0.044), with 23% and 36% (p = 0.073), respectively, dying at home. A higher proportion died at home in both groups compared to pre-study level (12%). During the observation period the comparison region developed and implemented an alternative intervention to the study intervention, with the former more focused on end-of-life care. CONCLUSION A higher proportion of patients with cancer died at home in both groups compared to pre-study level. Patients with cancer in I did not spend more time at home during end-of-life compared to those in C. The study intervention focused on the whole disease trajectory, while the alternative intervention was more directed towards end-of-life care. "Simpler" and more focused interventions on end-of-life care may be relevant for future studies on integration of palliative care into oncology. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02170168.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Tove Brenne
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Erik Torbjørn Løhre
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Anne Kari Knudsen
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jo-Åsmund Lund
- Department of Oncology, Møre Og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences in Ålesund, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Morten Thronæs
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Bardo Driller
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Oncology, Møre Og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
- Department for Research and Innovation, Møre Og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Cinzia Brunelli
- Palliative Care, Pain Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Stein Kaasa
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- European Palliative Care Research Centre (PRC), Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bankole AO, Burse NR, Crowder V, Chan YN, Hirschey R, Jung A, Tan KR, Coppola S, Pergolotti M, Richardson DR, Bryant AL. "A strong reason why I enjoy coming to work": Clinician acceptability of a palliative and supportive care intervention (PACT) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia and their care partners. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101740. [PMID: 38513534 PMCID: PMC11088930 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studies about clinician acceptability of integrative palliative care interventions in the inpatient and outpatient cancer settings are limited. In this study, we examined clinician acceptability of a NIH-funded interdisciplinary PAlliative and Supportive Care inTervention (PACT) for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and their care partners that transcends both inpatient and outpatient settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data was collected using semi-structured interviews with clinicians who were directly involved in PACT. The domains of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability were used to guide the qualitative analysis. RESULTS The clinicians consisted of occupational therapists (37%), physical therapists (25%), registered nurses (25%), and a clinical rehabilitation manager (13%). Five themes were identified in the thematic analysis: (1) Emotions and affect towards the intervention, (2) Intervention coherence and self-efficacy, (3) Barriers, burden, and opportunity costs of delivering the intervention, (4) Usefulness and effectiveness of the intervention, and (5) Recommendations to improve intervention delivery. DISCUSSION All clinicians found the PACT intervention highly acceptable and expressed the positive impact of the intervention on job fulfillment and satisfaction. Our findings provide evidence to inform the delivery and implementation of future large scale integrative palliative care intervention trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayomide Okanlawon Bankole
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
| | - Natasha Renee Burse
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
| | - Victoria Crowder
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
| | - Ya-Ning Chan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Rachel Hirschey
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
| | - Ahrang Jung
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, United States of America.
| | - Kelly R Tan
- School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
| | - Susan Coppola
- Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
| | - Mackenzi Pergolotti
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; ReVital Cancer Rehabilitation, Select Medical, Inc, Mechanicsburg, PA United States of America.
| | - Daniel R Richardson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
| | - Ashley Leak Bryant
- School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Baird A, Nasser A, Tanuseputro P, Webber C, Wheatley-Price P, Munro C. Involvement of Palliative Care in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients and Associations with Survival and End-of-Life Outcomes. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1028-1034. [PMID: 38392070 PMCID: PMC10888381 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31020076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is a rare, aggressive, and incurable cancer with a poor prognosis and high symptom burden. For these patients, little is known about the impact of palliative care consultation on outcomes such as mortality, hospital admissions, or emergency department visits. The aim of this study is to determine if referral to supportive and palliative care in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma is associated with survival and decreased hospital admissions and emergency department visits. This is a retrospective chart review. Study participants include all malignant pleural mesothelioma patients seen at The Ottawa Hospital-an acute care tertiary center-between January 2002 and March 2019. In total, 223 patients were included in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 72.4 years and 82.5% were male. Of the patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2010, only 11 (9.6%) were referred to palliative care. By comparison, of those diagnosed between 2011 and 2019, 49 (45.4%) were referred to palliative care. Median time from diagnosis to referral was 4.1 months. There was no significant difference in the median survival of patients referred for palliative care compared to those who did not receive palliative care (p = 0.46). We found no association between receiving palliative care and the mean number of hospital admissions (1.04 vs. 0.91) from diagnosis to death, and an increase in mean number of emergency department visits in the palliative care group (2.30 vs. 1.18). Although there was increased utilization of palliative care services, more than half of the MPM patients did not receive palliative care despite their limited survival. There was an increase in emergency department visits in the palliative care group; this may represent an increase in the symptom burden (i.e., indication bias) in those referred to palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Baird
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (A.B.); (P.W.-P.)
| | - Abdullah Nasser
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, ON N8W 2X3, Canada
| | - Peter Tanuseputro
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (A.B.); (P.W.-P.)
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1R 6M1, Canada
- ICES, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - Colleen Webber
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1R 6M1, Canada
- ICES, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - Paul Wheatley-Price
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (A.B.); (P.W.-P.)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - Camille Munro
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; (A.B.); (P.W.-P.)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Majed M, Ayaad O, AlHasni NS, Ibrahim R, AlHarthy SH, Hassan KK, Al-Zadjali R, Al-Awaisi H, Al-Baimani K. Reducing the Risk of Fall among Oncology Patients using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2024; 25:689-697. [PMID: 38415557 PMCID: PMC11077118 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2024.25.2.689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This project aimed to mitigate the risk of falls among oncology patients using Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) in the outpatient setting.
Methods: The project was conducted within outpatient settings, specifically encompassing outpatient clinics, daycare, radiology and radiotherapy, and rehabilitation at the SQCCCRC. The project employed an observational analytical design to assess the fall risk assessment procedure in outpatient settings. The project integrated a 7-step procedure for conducting an FMEA methodology, including defining the system or process, identifying potential failure mode, evaluating the effects of each failure mode, Assigning severity, likelihood, and detection of occurrence ratings, and identifying and implement corrective actions. In addition, Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) were used to identify the impact of the interventions in reducing the risk of patient fall assessment and management.
Result: In the patient fall screening process, interventions yielded substantial reductions in RPNs for failure modes like "Wrong assessment" (57% decrease) and "Complex risk assessment scale" (63% decrease), addressing knowledge gaps and simplifying risk assessment. Similarly, the "Missed fall assessment" failure mode saw an impressive 80% reduction in RPN, rectifying unclear processes and knowledge gaps. In the Fall risk precaution measures process, interventions led to noteworthy RPN reductions, such as 80% for "Unclear fall precaution measures-responsibilities" and 57% for "Missed bracelets for high risk," demonstrating successful risk mitigation. Moreover, interventions in the Patient Education process achieved significant RPN reductions (57% and 55%) for "No/improper education" and "Unuse of educational material and resources," enhancing staff education and patient awareness. The total reduction in RPNs was 62% in all failure modes in the fall assessment and management process.
Conclusion: Overall, FMEA is a valuable strategy for reducing fall risks among oncology patients, but its success depends on addressing these limitations and ensuring the thorough execution and maintenance of the identified corrective actions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Majed
- Department of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
| | - Omar Ayaad
- Quality and Accreditation Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
| | - Nabiha Said AlHasni
- Department of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
| | - Rawan Ibrahim
- Quality and Accreditation Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
| | - Shinnona Hamed AlHarthy
- Admission, Discharge, and Transfer Office, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
| | - Kefah Kaid Hassan
- Department of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
| | - Razzan Al-Zadjali
- Quality and Accreditation Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
| | - Huda Al-Awaisi
- Department of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
| | - Khalid Al-Baimani
- Quality and Accreditation Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
- Medical Oncology Department, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care and Research Centre (SQCCCRC), Muscat, Oman.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Birkner DR, Schettle M, Feuz M, Blum D, Hertler C. Outpatient Palliative Care Service Involvement: A Five-Year Experience from a Tertiary Hospital in Switzerland. Palliat Med Rep 2024; 5:10-19. [PMID: 38249832 PMCID: PMC10797309 DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The value of early integration of palliative care has been demonstrated increasingly for the past years in both oncological and nononcological diseases. Outpatient palliative care services might represent a feasible approach to implement supportive care in early disease. In this study, we aimed at evaluating which patients use and benefit from outpatient palliative care services, which symptoms are addressed most, and which support services are installed in this early phase of disease. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the entire patient collective of a recently developed palliative care outpatient clinic within the leading university hospital in Switzerland for a period of five years. Sociodemographics, symptoms, and information on disease as well as patient-reported outcomes were retrieved from the electronic patient files. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed by descriptive statistics between groups and survival was analyzed by means of Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank test. Results We report on 642 consultations of 363 patients between 2016 and 2020. Patients had a mean of 1.8 visits (range 1-10), with n = 340 patients (93.7%) of patients suffering from an oncological disease. Overall symptom load was high, with n = 401 (73.7%) of patient-reported outcomes reporting two or more symptoms. Distress levels of 5 or higher were reported in n = 78 (30.4%) of available patient-reported outcomes. Independent of the origin of primary disease and the length of the disease trajectory, patients were referred to the palliative care service in median only four months before death. Conclusion We identify high symptom load and distress in the outpatient palliative patient population. Patients benefitted from supportive medication, improvement of ambulatory support systems and advance care planning, and more than one-third of patients remained in follow-up, indicating a good acceptance of the service. Overcoming the overall late referral could, however, further increase the quality of life at earlier stages of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Markus Schettle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Markus Feuz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - David Blum
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Hertler
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Competence Center Palliative Care, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Arian M, Hajiabadi F, Amini Z, Oghazian MB, Valinejadi A, Sahebkar A. Introduction of Various Models of Palliative Oncology Care: A Systematic Review. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2024; 19:109-126. [PMID: 38155467 DOI: 10.2174/0115748871272511231215053624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to synthesize the existing evidence on various palliative care (PC) models for cancer patients. This effort seeks to discern which facets of PC models are suitable for various patient cohorts, elucidate their mechanisms, and clarify the circumstances in which these models operate. METHODS A comprehensive search was performed using MeSH terms related to PC and cancer across various databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and a comprehensive evidence map were also applied. RESULTS Thirty-three reviews were published between 2009 and 2023. The conceptual PC models can be classified broadly into time-based, provider-based, disease-based, nurse-based, issue-based, system-based, team-based, non-hospice-based, hospital-based, community-based, telehealth-based, and setting-based models. The study argues that the outcomes of PC encompass timely symptom management, longitudinal psychosocial support, enhanced communication, and decision-making. Referral methods to specialized PC services include oncologist-initiated referral based on clinical judgment alone, via referral criteria, automatic referral at the diagnosis of advanced cancer, or referral based on symptoms or other triggers. CONCLUSION The gold standard for selecting a PC model in the context of oncology is a model that ensures broad availability of early PC for all patients and provides well-timed, scheduled, and specialized care for patients with the greatest requirement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahdieh Arian
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Hajiabadi
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Zakiyeh Amini
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
| | - Mohammad Bagher Oghazian
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran
| | - Ali Valinejadi
- Department of Health Information Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
| | - Amirhossein Sahebkar
- Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pilgrim CHC, Finn N, Stuart E, Philip J, Steel S, Croagh D, Lee B, Tebbutt NC. Changing patterns of care for pancreas cancer in Victoria: the 2022 Pancreas Tumour Summit. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:2638-2647. [PMID: 37221964 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Victorian Government convened the second Pancreas Cancer Summit in 2021 to identify unwarranted variation in care 2016-2019, and to assess trends compared with the first Summit 2017 (reporting 2011-2015). State-wide administrative data were assessed at population level in alignment with optimal care pathways across all stages of the cancer care continuum. METHODS Data linkage performed by Centre for Victorian Data Linkage combined data from Victorian Cancer Registry with other administrative data sets including Victorian Admitted Episodes Dataset, Victorian Radiotherapy Minimum Data Set, Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset and Victorian Death Index. A Cancer Service Performance Indicator audit was carried out providing an in-depth analysis of identified areas of interest. RESULTS Of 3138 Victorians diagnosed with pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma 2016-2019, 63% were metastatic at diagnosis. One-year survival increased between time periods, from 29.7% overall 2011-2015 (59.1% for non-metastatic, and 15.1% metastatic) to 32.5% overall 2016-2019 (P < 0.001), 61.2% non-metastatic (P = 0.008), 15.7% metastatic (P = NS). A higher proportion of non-metastatic patients progressed to surgery (35% vs. 31%, P = 0.020), and more received neoadjuvant therapy (16% vs. 4%, P < 0.001). Postoperative mortality following pancreatectomy at 30 and 90 days remained low at 2%. Utilization of 5FU-based chemotherapy regimens increased between 2016 and 2020. Multidisciplinary Meeting (MDM) presentation was still below the 85% target (74%) as was supportive care screening (39%, target 80%). CONCLUSIONS Surgical outcomes remain world-class and there has been an appropriate shift in chemotherapy administration towards neoadjuvant timing with increasing use of 5FU-based regimens. MDM presentation rates, supportive care and overall care coordination remain areas of deficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles H C Pilgrim
- Hepatopancreaticobiliary Surgery, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Norah Finn
- Victorian Cancer Registry, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health, Cancer Support, Treatment and Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ella Stuart
- Victorian Cancer Registry, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Health, Cancer Support, Treatment and Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Philip
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simone Steel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peninsula Private Hospital, Langwarrin, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dan Croagh
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Northern Health, Epping, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Personalised Oncology, Walter & Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Niall C Tebbutt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Møller JJK, la Cour K, Pilegaard MS, Dalton SO, Bidstrup P, Möller S, Jarlbaek L. The use and timing of rehabilitation and palliative care to cancer patients, and the influence of social vulnerability - a population-based study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004487. [PMID: 37816594 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify and investigate different cohorts of cancer patients' use of physical rehabilitation and specialised palliative care (SPC) services, focusing on patients with incurable cancer and the impact of social vulnerability. METHODS The sample originated from patients diagnosed during 2013-2018 and alive 1 January 2015. Use of physical rehabilitation and/or SPC units were identified from contacts registered in population-based administrative databases. Competing-risks regression models were applied to investigate disparities with regard to social vulnerability, disease duration, gender and age. RESULTS A total of 101 268 patients with cancer were included and 60 125 survived longer than 3 years after their diagnosis. Among the 41 143 patients, who died from cancer, 66%, survived less than 1 year, 23% survived from 1 to 2 years and 11% survived from 2 to 3 years. Contacts regarding physical rehabilitation services appeared in the entire cancer trajectory, whereas contacts regarding SPC showed a steep increase as time drew closer to death. The largest disparity was related to disease duration. Socially vulnerable patients had less contact with SPC, while a larger proportion of the socially vulnerable cancer survivors used rehabilitation, compared with the non-vulnerable patients. CONCLUSIONS This study provides a previously unseen detailed overview of the use of physical rehabilitation and/or SPC among patients with incurable cancer. The services appeared to overlap at a group level in the cancer trajectory, emphasising the importance of awareness with regard to coordination and combination of the services. Disparities between socially vulnerable or non-vulnerable patients were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens-Jakob Kjer Møller
- REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, Nyborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karen la Cour
- Research Unit for User Perspectives and Community-based Interventions, the Research Group for Occupational Science, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Marc Sampedro Pilegaard
- DEFACTUM, Central Region Denmark, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Herning, Denmark
| | - Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton
- Survivorship and Inequality in Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Pernille Bidstrup
- Psychological Aspects of Cancer, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- Research unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lene Jarlbaek
- REHPA, The Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, Odense University Hospital, Nyborg, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Newport KB, Webb JA. Innovations and Opportunities for the Integration of Palliative Care in Cancer Care. Curr Probl Cancer 2023; 47:101016. [PMID: 37806918 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.101016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina B Newport
- Section of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Jason A Webb
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mah K, Chow B, Swami N, Pope A, Rydall A, Earle C, Krzyzanowska M, Le L, Hales S, Rodin G, Hannon B, Zimmermann C. Early palliative care and quality of dying and death in patients with advanced cancer. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023; 13:e74-e77. [PMID: 33619220 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Early palliative care (EPC) in the outpatient setting improves quality of life for patients with advanced cancer, but its impact on quality of dying and death (QODD) and on quality of life at the end of life (QOL-EOL) has not been examined. Our study investigated the impact of EPC on patients' QODD and QOL-EOL and the moderating role of receiving inpatient or home palliative care. METHOD Bereaved family caregivers who had provided care for patients participating in a cluster-randomised trial of EPC completed a validated QODD scale and indicated whether patients had received additional home palliative care or care in an inpatient palliative care unit (PCU). We examined the effects of EPC, inpatient or home palliative care, and their interactions on the QODD total score and on QOL-EOL (last 7 days of life). RESULTS A total of 157 caregivers participated. Receipt of EPC showed no association with QODD total score. However, when additional palliative care was included in the model, intervention patients demonstrated better QOL-EOL than controls (p=0.02). Further, the intervention by PCU interaction was significant (p=0.02): those receiving both EPC and palliative care in a PCU had better QOL-EOL than those receiving only palliative care in a PCU (mean difference=27.10, p=0.002) or only EPC (mean difference=20.59, p=0.02). CONCLUSION Although there was no association with QODD, EPC was associated with improved QOL-EOL, particularly for those who also received inpatient care in a PCU. This suggests a long-term benefit from early interdisciplinary palliative care on care throughout the illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (#NCT01248624).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Mah
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brittany Chow
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nadia Swami
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ashley Pope
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anne Rydall
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig Earle
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika Krzyzanowska
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lisa Le
- Department of Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Hales
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gary Rodin
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Breffni Hannon
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kayastha N, Kavanaugh AR, Webb JA, LeBlanc TW. Innovations for the integration of palliative care for hematologic malignancies. Curr Probl Cancer 2023; 47:101011. [PMID: 37718232 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.101011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Specialist palliative care provides additional support to facilitate living well with a serious illness, like cancer, even while pursuing disease-directed therapy. For patients with hematologic malignancies, integrated specialist palliative care improves symptom burden, mood, and quality of life, with benefits even extending to caregivers. Despite this, patients with hematologic malignancies continue to have significant unmet palliative care needs and typically access palliative care late in their disease trajectories, if at all. In this paper, we will define specialist palliative care and review its benefits for patients with hematologic malignancies. We will discuss the unmet palliative care needs of this patient population and the barriers to integrating palliative care and oncologic care. Finally, we will explore innovations and areas of future research to enhance and optimize palliative care integration into usual cancer care treatment for patients with hematologic malignancies. We will explore the importance of ongoing clinical trials that are examining the correct "dose" of palliative care; the use of technology and telehealth; and the use of novel treatments for this patient population. Together, we will consider innovative avenues to provide palliative care to patients with hematologic malignancies and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Kayastha
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.
| | - Alison R Kavanaugh
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jason A Webb
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Han HJ, Pilgrim CR, Buss MK. Integrating palliative care into the evolving landscape of oncology. Curr Probl Cancer 2023; 47:101013. [PMID: 37714795 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2023.101013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
Patients with cancer have many palliative care needs. Robust evidence supports the early integration of palliative care into the care of patients with advanced cancer. International organizations, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), have recommended early, longitudinal integration of palliative care into oncology care throughout the cancer trajectory. In this review, we pose a series of clinical questions related to the current state of early palliative care integration into oncology. We review the evidence to address each of these questions and highlight areas for further investigation. As cancer care continues to evolve, incorporating new treatment modalities and improving patient outcomes, we reflect on how to apply the existing evidence supporting early palliative care-oncology integration into this ever-changing therapeutic landscape and how specialty palliative care might adapt to meet the evolving needs of patients, caregivers, and the multidisciplinary oncology team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry J Han
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston MA.
| | - Carol R Pilgrim
- Division of Palliative Care, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Mary K Buss
- Division of Palliative Care, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Loosen SH, Schwartz J, Grewe S, Krieg S, Krieg A, Luedde T, Batzler YN, Kostev K, Neukirchen M, Roderburg C. Drug landscape in patients receiving general outpatient palliative care in Germany: results from a retrospective analysis of 10,464 patients. BMC Palliat Care 2023; 22:118. [PMID: 37596590 PMCID: PMC10439623 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-023-01231-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to § 27 and § 87 1b of the German Social Code, Book V, general outpatient palliative care (GOPC) aims to promote, maintain, and improve the quality of life and self-determination of seriously ill people. It should enable them to live in dignity until death in their preferred environment. Instead of a curative approach GOPC treatment focuses on the multiprofessional objective of alleviating symptoms and suffering on a case-by-case basis using medication or other measures, as well as the management of an individual treatment plan. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate to what extent medication differs from 12 months prior GOPC treatment within 12 months following GOPC treatment. METHODS A retrospective database cross sectional study based on the IQVIA Disease Analyzer (DA) was performed, including adult patients with cancer diagnosis and at least one documentation of palliative support between January 1st, 2018 and December 31st, 2021, in 805 general practices (GP). RESULTS The results of this study show, that in the context of general general outpatient palliative care, there is a significant increase in the prescription of opioids (18.3% vs. 37.7%), sedatives (7.8% vs. 16.2%) and antiemetics (5.3% vs. 9.7%), as well as a significant reduction in other medications such as statins (21.4% vs. 11.5%), proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (41.2% vs. 35.3%), or antihypertensives (57.5% vs. 46.6%). CONCLUSIONS Our results support the role of GOPC as an important element in improving pharmacological symptom control and deprescription to improve quality of life of patients at the end of their life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven H Loosen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty of Heinrich, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| | - Jacqueline Schwartz
- Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heinrich, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Steven Grewe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty of Heinrich, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Sarah Krieg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty of Heinrich, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Krieg
- Department of Surgery (A), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine- University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Tom Luedde
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty of Heinrich, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Yann-Nicolas Batzler
- Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heinrich, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Martin Neukirchen
- Interdisciplinary Center for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty of Heinrich, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty of Heinrich, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Christoph Roderburg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medical Faculty of Heinrich, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chow R, Mathews JJ, Cheng EY, Lo S, Wong J, Alam S, Hannon B, Rodin G, Nissim R, Hales S, Kavalieratos D, Quinn KL, Tomlinson G, Zimmermann C. Interventions to improve outcomes for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2023; 115:896-908. [PMID: 37279594 PMCID: PMC10407714 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family caregivers of patients with advanced cancer often have poor quality of life (QOL) and mental health. We examined the effectiveness of interventions offering support for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer on caregiver QOL and mental health outcomes. METHODS We searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases from inception through June 2021. Eligible studies reported on randomized controlled trials for adult caregivers of adult patients with advanced cancer. Meta-analysis was conducted for primary outcomes of QOL, physical well-being, mental well-being, anxiety, and depression, from baseline to follow-up of 1-3 months; secondary endpoints were these outcomes at 4-6 months and additional caregiver burden, self-efficacy, family functioning, and bereavement outcomes. Random effects models were used to generate summary standardized mean differences (SMD). RESULTS Of 12 193 references identified, 56 articles reporting on 49 trials involving 8554 caregivers were eligible for analysis; 16 (33%) targeted caregivers, 19 (39%) patient-caregiver dyads, and 14 (29%) patients and their families. At 1- to 3-month follow-up, interventions had a statistically significant effect on overall QOL (SMD = 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.10 to 0.39); I2 = 52.0%), mental well-being (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.25; I2 = 0.0%), anxiety (SMD = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.49; I2 = 74.0%), and depression (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.16 to 0.52; I2 = 64.4) compared with standard care. In narrative synthesis, interventions demonstrated improvements in caregiver self-efficacy and grief. CONCLUSIONS Interventions targeting caregivers, dyads, or patients and families led to improvements in caregiver QOL and mental health. These data support the routine provision of interventions to improve well-being in caregivers of patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Chow
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jean J Mathews
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine and Department of Oncology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Emily YiQin Cheng
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samantha Lo
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joanne Wong
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sorayya Alam
- Palliative Medicine, Sobell House, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Breffni Hannon
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gary Rodin
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rinat Nissim
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah Hales
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Dio Kavalieratos
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kieran L Quinn
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Sinai Health System, Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George Tomlinson
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chen Y, Qiao C, Zhang X, Li W, Yang H. The Effect of Tele-palliative Care on Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2023; 40:907-925. [PMID: 36113129 DOI: 10.1177/10499091221123566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To describe the use of tele-palliative care in patients with advanced disease and assess its effectiveness on quality of life (QOL), symptom burden and other outcomes for patients and their caregivers. Methods: We searched for randomised controlled trials to assess the outcomes of tele-palliative care on patients with advanced disease and their caregivers. Eight databases were searched for studies published in Chinese or English from inception to November 27, 2021. Data from the included trials were extracted independently by 2 reviewers and evaluated independently for methodological quality using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. A narrative synthesis of the results of all trials was performed. Results: Thirty trials were included ultimately with more than one half of the studies were moderate to high quality, including, which involved 19 665 patients and 1153 caregivers. Results from 10/15 included trials (reporting patient QOL), 5/14 trials (reporting patient symptoms), 1/3 trials (reporting survival), 8/13 trials (reporting patient mood), 3/6 trials (reporting ACP related indicators), 3/7 trials (reporting resource utilization) showed statistically significant between tele-palliative care and control care groups. Of 30 trials, 8 measured caregiver outcomes, 1/4 trials (reporting caregiver QOL) showed statistically significant, and results from 3/3 trials (reporting caregiver mood), 3/4 trials (reporting caregiver burden) showed benefit in at least 1 domain at 1 or more time points. Conclusions: This systematic review suggests that although tele-palliative care can improve patient physical, patient and caregiver psychological health outcomes to some extent, there is still a lack of sufficient evidence to substantiate its application effects. Moreever, regional and cultural characteristics should also be taken into account when tele-palliative care interventions are carried out.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiping Chen
- School of nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Province, China
- Department of Neurology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Caihong Qiao
- Department of Neurology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Xianhui Zhang
- School of nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Province, China
- Department of Neurology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Wei Li
- International Medical Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Yang
- School of nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Province, China
- Department of Neurology, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moyett JM, Howell EP, Broadwater G, Greene M, Secord AA, Watson CH, Davidson BA. Understanding the spectrum of malignant bowel obstructions in gynecologic cancers and the application of the Henry score. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:114-120. [PMID: 37182431 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Malignancy-associated bowel obstruction (MBO) is a potential sequela of advanced gynecologic cancers, adversely impacting both quality of life and prognosis. The Henry score (HS) was developed in a gastrointestinal cancer-predominant population to predict 30-day mortality. We aim to characterize MBO in gynecologic cancers and assess the utility of the HS in this population. METHODS This is a retrospective review of patients with gynecologic cancer and MBO admitted to a single academic institution from 2016 to 2021. The primary outcome is to characterize malignant small and large bowel obstructions in primary and recurrent gynecologic cancer using readmission and mortality rates. Secondary outcomes are to assess the Henry score and inpatient MBO management. RESULTS 179 patients totaling 269 were admissions identified, most commonly affecting patients with ovarian cancer. The majority (89.4%) were managed non-operatively while 10.6% were managed surgically. No significant differences were observed in survival for medical versus surgical management. Thirty-day mortality increased with increasing HS (0%, 0-1; 14.3%, 2-3; 40.9%, 4-5). Over 1/3 (34.1%) of patients were readmitted for recurrent or persistent MBO. Goals of care conversations were documented for 56.8% of patients with HS 4-5. Mortality rates across the entire cohort were high-20.1% and 60.9% had died by 1 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Survival rates following an initial MBO admission are poor. The HS has utility in gynecologic cancers for assessing 30-day mortality and may be a useful tool to aid in the management and counseling of patients with gynecologic cancer and MBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth P Howell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gloria Broadwater
- Biostatistics Shared Resources, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Angeles Alvarez Secord
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Catherine H Watson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brittany A Davidson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yao J, Novosel M, Bellampalli S, Kapo J, Joseph J, Prsic E. Lung Cancer Supportive Care and Symptom Management. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2023; 37:609-622. [PMID: 37024385 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Lung cancer carries significant mortality and morbidity. In addition to treatment advances, supportive care may provide significant benefit for patients and their caregivers. A multidisciplinary approach is critical in addressing complications of lung cancer, including disease- and treatment-related complications, oncologic emergencies, symptom management and supportive care, and addressing the psychosocial needs of affected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johnathan Yao
- Yale Internal Medicine-Traditional Residency Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208030, New Haven, CT 06520-8030, USA
| | - Madison Novosel
- Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Shreya Bellampalli
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Jennifer Kapo
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208025, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Julia Joseph
- Yale Internal Medicine-Traditional Residency Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208030, New Haven, CT 06520-8030, USA
| | - Elizabeth Prsic
- Section of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208028, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ochoa-Arnedo C, Arizu-Onassis A, Medina JC, Flix-Valle A, Ciria-Suarez L, Gómez-Fernández D, Souto-Sampera A, Brao I, Palmero R, Nadal E, González-Barboteo J, Serra-Blasco M. An eHealth ecosystem for stepped and early psychosocial care in advanced lung cancer: Rationale and protocol for a randomized control trial. Internet Interv 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
|
22
|
Breaking New Ground in Palliative Care: Examining the Impact of Al Ain – Palliative Care Outreach Program on Patients With Advanced Cancer in the United Arab Emirates. Cureus 2023; 15:e36756. [PMID: 36992813 PMCID: PMC10042392 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Palliative Outreach Program in improving the quality of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer in a Tertiary Hospital in the Al Ain region of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Methods & Material One hundred patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study and administered the patient version of the Consumer Quality (CQ) Index Palliative Care Instrument to assess their perception of the quality of care they received. The demographics, diagnosis, and questionnaire responses were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of the Palliative Outreach Program. Results A total of one hundred patients met the criteria for the study. Most patients were above 50, female, female, Non-Emiratis, and had high school certificates. The top three cancer diagnoses were breast (22%), lung (15%), and head & neck (13%). The patients reported high levels of support from their caregivers regarding physical, psychological, and spiritual well-being, as well as information and expertise. The mean scores for most variables were favorable, except for information (mean = 2.9540, SD= 0.25082) and general appreciation (mean = 6.7150, sd = 0.82344). Overall, the patients rated the care they received positively, with high mean scores for physical/psychological well-being (mean = 3.4950, SD = 0.28668), autonomy (mean = 3.7667, SD= 0.28623), privacy (mean = 3.6490, SD = 0.23159), and spiritual well-being (mean =3.7500, SD = 0.54356). The patients would recommend their caregivers to others in similar situations. Discussion The findings demonstrate that the Palliative Outreach Program effectively improves the quality of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer in the UAE. The CQ Index Palliative Care Instrument proved a novel method for assessing palliative care quality from patients' perspectives. However, there is room for improvement in providing more favorable information and general appreciation outcomes. Caregivers should focus on all areas to enhance their physical/psychological well-being, autonomy, privacy, spiritual well-being, expertise, and general appreciation of their patients. Conclusion In conclusion, the Palliative Outreach Program is an effective intervention to improve the quality of palliative care for patients with advanced cancer in the UAE. The patients reported high levels of support from their caregivers in all aspects of care, except for information and general appreciation. These findings provide valuable insights into the effectiveness of palliative care interventions and highlight the need for continued efforts to improve the quality of care for patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
|
23
|
Integrating Palliative Care into Oncology Care Worldwide: The Right Care in the Right Place at the Right Time. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:353-372. [PMID: 36913164 PMCID: PMC10009840 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01060-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT While the benefits of early palliative care are indisputable, most of the current evidence has emerged from resource-rich settings in urban areas of high-income countries, with an emphasis on solid tumors in outpatient settings; this model of palliative care integration is not currently scalable internationally. A shortage of specialist palliative care clinicians means that in order to meet the needs of all patients who require support at any point along their advanced cancer trajectory, palliative care must also be provided by family physicians and oncology clinicians who require training and mentorship. Models of care that facilitate the timely provision of seamless palliative care across all settings (inpatient, outpatient, and home-based care), with clear communication between clinicians, are crucial to the provision of patient-centred palliative care. The unique needs of patients with hematological malignancies must be further explored and existing models of palliative care provision modified to meet these needs. Finally, care must be provided in an equitable and culturally sensitive manner, recognizing the challenges associated with the delivery of high-quality palliative care to both patients in high-income countries who live in rural areas, as well as to those in low- and middle-income countries. A one-size-fits-all model will not suffice, and there is an urgent need to develop innovative context-specific models of palliative care integration worldwide, in order to provide the right care, in the right place, and at the right time.
Collapse
|
24
|
Tabuyo-Martin A, Torres-Morales A, Pitteloud MJ, Kshetry A, Oltmann C, Pearson JM, Khawand M, Schlumbrecht MP, Sanchez JC. Palliative Medicine Referral and End-of-Life Interventions Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Gynecologic Cancer. Cancer Control 2023; 30:10732748231157191. [PMID: 36762494 PMCID: PMC9943963 DOI: 10.1177/10732748231157191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Referral to palliative medicine (PM) has been shown to improve quality of life, reduce hospitalizations, and improve survival. Limited data exist about PM utilization among racial minorities with gynecologic malignancies. Our objective was to assess differences in palliative medicine referrals and end of life interventions (within the last 30 days of life) by race and ethnicity in a diverse population of gynecologic oncology patients. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of patients receiving gynecologic oncologic care at a tertiary referral center between 2017 - 2019 was conducted. Patients had either metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis or recurrence. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted. Exploratory analyses were done using chi-square and rank sum tests. Tests were two-sided with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS A total of 186 patients were included. Of those, 82 (44.1%) were referred to palliative medicine. Underrepresented minorities accounted for 47.3% of patients. English was identified as the primary language for 69.9% of the patients and Spanish in 24.2%. Over 90% of patients had insurance coverage. Ovarian cancer (37.6%) and uterine cancer (32.8%) were the most common sites of origin. Most patients (75%) had advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Race and language spoken were not associated with referral to PM. Black patients were more likely to have been prescribed appetite stimulants compared to White patients (41% vs 24%, P = .038). Black patients also had a higher number of emergency department visits compared to White patients during the study timeframe. Chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life was also more likely to be given to Black patients compared to White (P = .019). CONCLUSIONS Race was associated with variation in interventions and healthcare utilization near end-of-life. Understanding the etiologies of these differences is crucial to inform interventions for care optimization as it relates specifically to the health of minority patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Tabuyo-Martin
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology,
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and
Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA,Angel Tabuyo-Martin, Gynecology Oncology,
University of Miami, 1121 NW 14th St, Suite 345C, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Angelica Torres-Morales
- Division of Geriatrics and
Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Marie J. Pitteloud
- Division of Geriatrics and
Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Alisha Kshetry
- Division of Geriatrics and
Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Carina Oltmann
- Division of Geriatrics and
Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Joseph Matthew Pearson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology,
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and
Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Mariana Khawand
- Division of Geriatrics and
Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matthew P. Schlumbrecht
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology,
Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and
Reproductive Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Julia C. Sanchez
- Division of Geriatrics and
Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of
Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zimmermann C, Buss MK, Rabow MW, Hannon B, Hui D. Should Outpatient Palliative Care Clinics in Cancer Centers be Stand Alone or Embedded? J Pain Symptom Manage 2023; 65:e165-e170. [PMID: 36437178 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Outpatient palliative care facilitates timely symptom management, psychosocial care and care planning. A growing number of cancer centers have either stand-alone or embedded outpatient palliative care clinics. In this "Controversies in Palliative Care" article, three groups of thought leaders independently answer this question. Specifically, each group provides a synopsis of the key studies that inform their thought processes, share practical advice on their clinical approach, and highlight the opportunities for future research. One group advocates for stand-alone clinics, another for embedded, and the third group tries to find a balance. In the absence of evidence that directly compares the two models, factors such as cancer center size, palliative care team composition, clinic space availability, and financial considerations may drive the decision-making process at each institution. Stand-alone clinics may be more appropriate for larger academic cancer centers or palliative care programs with a more comprehensive interdisciplinary team, while embedded clinics may be more suited for smaller palliative care programs or community oncology programs to stimulate referrals. As outpatient clinic models continue to evolve, investigators need to document the referral and patient outcomes to inform practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care (C.Z., B.H.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (C.Z.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care (M.K.B.), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (M.W.R.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Palliative Care (D.H.), Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary K Buss
- Department of Supportive Care (C.Z., B.H.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (C.Z.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care (M.K.B.), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (M.W.R.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Palliative Care (D.H.), Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael W Rabow
- Department of Supportive Care (C.Z., B.H.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (C.Z.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care (M.K.B.), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (M.W.R.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Palliative Care (D.H.), Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Breffni Hannon
- Department of Supportive Care (C.Z., B.H.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (C.Z.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care (M.K.B.), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (M.W.R.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Palliative Care (D.H.), Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David Hui
- Department of Supportive Care (C.Z., B.H.), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (C.Z., B.H.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Dalla Lana School of Public Health (C.Z.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care (M.K.B.), Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine (M.W.R.), University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Palliative Care (D.H.), Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bodd MH, Locke SC, Wolf SP, Antonia S, Crawford J, Hartman J, Herring KW, Ready NE, Stinchcombe TE, Troy JD, Williams C, Clarke JM, LeBlanc TW. Patient-Reported Distress and Clinical Outcomes with Immuno-Oncology Agents in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC): A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study. Lung Cancer 2023; 175:17-26. [PMID: 36442383 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There are limited real-world data about patient-reported outcomes with immunotherapies (IO) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). We describe patient-reported distress and clinical outcomes with IO-based treatments or cytotoxic chemotherapies (Chemo). METHODS We conducted a single-institution retrospective chart review of adults with mNSCLC treated at Duke from 03/2015 to 06/2020. At each visit, patients self-reported their distress level and sources of distress using the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT) and its 39-item Problem List. We abstracted demographic, clinical, distress, and investigator assessed-clinical response data, then analyzed these using descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equations. RESULTS Data from 152 patients were analyzed in four groups: Chemo alone, IO + Chemo, single agent IO, dual agent IO. Distress was worse before treatment start in all groups, and the odds of actionable distress (DT score > 4) decreased by 10 % per month. The most frequent sources of distress were physical symptoms (e.g., fatigue, pain), which remained high longitudinally. Patients receiving IO had higher clinical response rates and a lower rate of unplanned healthcare encounters compared to patients treated with Chemo alone. Only one-third of all patients were seen by palliative care. CONCLUSIONS This single-center, real-world evidence study demonstrates that patients with mNSCLC experience significant distress prior to starting first-line treatment. IO treatment was associated with higher clinical benefit rates and lower healthcare utilization compared to chemotherapy. Symptom distress persists over time, highlighting potential unmet palliative and supportive care needs in mNSCLC care in the IO treatment era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Susan C Locke
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Steve P Wolf
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Scott Antonia
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jeffrey Crawford
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Neal E Ready
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas E Stinchcombe
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jesse D Troy
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey M Clarke
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hui D, Paiva BSR, Paiva CE. Personalizing the Setting of Palliative Care Delivery for Patients with Advanced Cancer: "Care Anywhere, Anytime". Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:1-11. [PMID: 36576706 PMCID: PMC9795143 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-01044-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The specialty of palliative care has evolved over time to provide symptom management, psychosocial support, and care planning for patients with cancer throughout the disease continuum and in multiple care settings. This review examines the delivery and impact of palliative care in the outpatient, inpatient, and community-based settings. The article will discuss how these 3 palliative care settings can work together to optimize patient outcomes under a unifying model of palliative care "anywhere, anytime" and how to prioritize palliative care services when resources are limited. Many patients with advanced cancer receive care from each of the 3 branches of palliative care-outpatient, inpatient, and community-based settings-at some point along their disease trajectory. Early on, outpatient clinics provide longitudinal supportive care concurrent with active disease-modifying treatments. Telemedicine appointments can serve patients remotely to minimize their need to travel. When patients experience functional decline, community-based palliative care services can provide support and monitoring for patients at home. When patients develop acute symptomatic complications requiring admission, inpatient care consultation teams are essential for symptom management and goals-of-care discussions. For patients in severe distress, receiving care in a palliative care unit that provides intensive symptom control and facilitates complex discharge planning is ideal. Under a unifying model of palliative care designed to offer care "anywhere, anytime," the 3 branches of palliative care could work in unison to support each other, minimize gaps in care, and optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hui
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, Unit 1414, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Bianca Sakamoto Ribeiro Paiva
- Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Learning and Research Institute, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP 14784-400 Brazil
| | - Carlos Eduardo Paiva
- Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Learning and Research Institute, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP 14784-400 Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Loosen SH, Krieg S, Eschrich J, Luedde M, Krieg A, Schallenburger M, Schwartz J, Neukirchen M, Luedde T, Kostev K, Roderburg C. The Landscape of Outpatient Palliative Care in Germany: Results from a Retrospective Analysis of 14,792 Patients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14885. [PMID: 36429604 PMCID: PMC9691170 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care comprises multiprofessional, integrated, person-centered healthcare services for patients and their families facing problems related to progressive or advanced diseases and limited life expectancy. Although non-oncology patients' needs are similar to those of tumor patients, they are often underestimated. The purpose of our study was to investigate the actual utilization of palliative care services in Germany, especially in the outpatient setting. METHODS Using the IQVIA Disease Analyzer database, a total of 14,792 outpatients from 805 primary care practices in Germany with documented palliative care and related diagnosis between 2018 and 2021 were analyzed. Proportions of different diagnoses among patients receiving outpatient palliative care were stratified by gender and different age groups. RESULTS The most common underlying diagnosis for outpatient palliative care was cancer (55%), followed by heart failure (16%) and dementia (8%), with age- and sex-specific differences found in the proportion of diagnoses for utilization. While the relative proportions of cancers decreased with age (87% in the 18- to 50-year-old age group versus 37% in the 80-plus age group), the proportion of palliative care related to heart failure increased in the older population (2% in the 18- to 50-year-old age group versus 25% in the 80-plus age group). CONCLUSIONS This study provides an overview of the situation of outpatient palliative care in Germany and shows age- and gender-specific trends regarding the underlying medical diagnoses. Based on these data, palliative care should be adapted to current demographic developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven H. Loosen
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Sarah Krieg
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Johannes Eschrich
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Krieg
- Department of Surgery (A), University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Manuela Schallenburger
- Interdisciplinary Center of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Jacqueline Schwartz
- Interdisciplinary Center of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Neukirchen
- Interdisciplinary Center of Palliative Medicine, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Tom Luedde
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Roderburg
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Raijmakers NJH, van Zuylen L, Fürst CJ. Timely integration of palliative care into cancer care. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13764. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Natasja Johanna Helen Raijmakers
- Department of Research and Development Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL) Utrecht The Netherlands
- Netherlands Association for Palliative Care (PZNL) Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Lia van Zuylen
- Department of Medical Oncology Amsterdam UMC Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Carl Johan Fürst
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden
- The Institute for Palliative Care Lund University and Region Skåne Lund Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
CHEN GH, FAN MY, CHANG XS, WU ZX, ZHANG HB, GUO XF, HE YH. Application of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in daily cancer pain management by acupuncture: retrospective analysis of data from an inpatient oncology department and a pilot prospective study 埃德蒙顿症状评估量表在针灸治疗癌痛患者中的应用:基于肿瘤科住院患者的回顾性分析和一项前瞻性预试验. WORLD JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE-MOXIBUSTION 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wjam.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
31
|
Collins A, Sundararajan V, Le B, Mileshkin L, Hanson S, Emery J, Philip J. The feasibility of triggers for the integration of Standardised, Early Palliative (STEP) Care in advanced cancer: A phase II trial. Front Oncol 2022; 12:991843. [PMID: 36185312 PMCID: PMC9520487 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.991843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While multiple clinical trials have demonstrated benefits of early palliative care for people with cancer, access to these services is frequently very late if at all. Establishing evidence-based, disease-specific ‘triggers’ or times for the routine integration of early palliative care may address this evidence-practice gap. Aim To test the feasibility of using defined triggers for the integration of standardised, early palliative (STEP) care across three advanced cancers. Method Phase II, multi-site, open-label, parallel-arm, randomised trial of usual best practice cancer care +/- STEP Care conducted in four metropolitan tertiary cancer services in Melbourne, Australia in patients with advanced breast, prostate and brain cancer. The primary outcome was the feasibility of using triggers for times of integration of STEP Care, defined as enrolment of at least 30 patients per cancer in 24 months. Triggers were based on hospital admission with metastatic disease (for breast and prostate cancer), or development of disease recurrence (for brain tumour cohort). A mixed method study design was employed to understand issues of feasibility and acceptability underpinning trigger points. Results The triggers underpinning times for the integration of STEP care were shown to be feasible for brain but not breast or prostate cancers, with enrolment of 49, 6 and 10 patients across the three disease groups respectively. The varied feasibility across these cancer groups suggested some important characteristics of triggers which may aid their utility in future work. Conclusions Achieving the implementation of early palliative care as a standardized component of quality care for all oncology patients will require further attention to defining triggers. Triggers which are 1) linked to objective points within the illness course (not dependent on recognition by individual clinicians), 2) Identifiable and visible (heralded through established service-level activities) and 3) Not reliant upon additional screening measures may enhance their feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Collins
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- *Correspondence: Anna Collins,
| | - Vijaya Sundararajan
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Brian Le
- Parkville Integrated Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Linda Mileshkin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Jon Emery
- Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jennifer Philip
- Department of Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Parkville Integrated Palliative Care Service, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre & The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Palliative Care Service, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kayastha N, LeBlanc TW. Palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies: are we meeting patients' needs early enough? Expert Rev Hematol 2022; 15:813-820. [PMID: 36062508 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2022.2121696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Palliative care for patients with cancer, and more recently for patients with hematologic malignancies, has increasingly been shown to be beneficial, with mounting evidence pointing to its vast benefits both to patients and caregivers. Despite this, there is a significant gap in integration of palliative care into usual cancer care for patients with hematologic malignancies. AREAS COVERED In this paper, we will define palliative care and discuss its benefits broadly for patients with hematologic malignancies. We will then discuss the late access to palliative care, the unmet needs in this patient population, and some of the barriers to access to palliative care. EXPERT OPINION With all this information and the clear benefit for early integrated palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies, there is a need for novel models of palliative care and cancer care integration. Given the various needs of patients with different hematologic malignancies, we propose how palliative care can meet the unique needs of patients with hematologic malignancy by disease subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Kayastha
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine.,Duke Cancer Institute
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Grudzen CR, Barker PC, Bischof JJ, Cuthel AM, Isaacs ED, Southerland LT, Yamarik RL. Palliative care models for patients living with advanced cancer: a narrative review for the emergency department clinician. EMERGENCY CANCER CARE 2022; 1:10. [PMID: 35966217 PMCID: PMC9362452 DOI: 10.1186/s44201-022-00010-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Eighty-one percent of persons living with cancer have an emergency department (ED) visit within the last 6 months of life. Many cancer patients in the ED are at an advanced stage with high symptom burden and complex needs, and over half is admitted to an inpatient setting. Innovative models of care have been developed to provide high quality, ambulatory, and home-based care to persons living with serious, life-limiting illness, such as advanced cancer. New care models can be divided into a number of categories based on either prognosis (e.g., greater than or less than 6 months), or level of care (e.g., lower versus higher intensity needs, such as intravenous pain/nausea medication or frequent monitoring), and goals of care (e.g., cancer-directed treatment versus symptom-focused care only). We performed a narrative review to (1) compare models of care for seriously ill cancer patients in the ED and (2) examine factors that may hasten or impede wider dissemination of these models.
Collapse
|
34
|
Hoomani Majdabadi F, Ashktorab T, Ilkhani M. Impact of palliative care on quality of life in advanced cancer: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13647. [PMID: 35830961 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to examine the impact of palliative care on the life quality of adults with advanced cancer. METHODS After a comprehensive and regular search using [MeSH] keywords in some important databases, 25 published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving 5160 adults with advanced cancer were selected and examined through meta-analysis. RESULTS Analysis of 36 reports in 1-3 months follow-up, and 19 reports in 4-7 months follow-up, showed that compared to usual care (g = 0.25; 95%CI: 0.1 to 0.41), palliative care had a significant impact on quality of life (QOL) (g = 0.1; 95%CI: 0.019 to 0.18) of advanced cancer patients. Also, based on the analysis of 15 reports on outpatients (g = 0.27; 95%CI: 0.04 to 0.4), 10 reports of early (g = 0.27; 95%CI: 0.029 to 0.52), and 8 reports of end-of-life (g = 0.24; 95%CI: 0.06 to 0.47) palliative care in 4-7 months follow-up, a significant impact on life quality was shown. However, in four reports, the impact of palliative care on health related quality of life in ≥10 months follow-up (g = 0.19; 95%CI: -0.03 to 0.42) was not significant. CONCLUSION Systematic QOL assessment with valid tool in palliative care setting would establish quality assurance and could further develop the application of this pretty new discipline in oncology care worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatemeh Hoomani Majdabadi
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Tahereh Ashktorab
- Nursing Management Department, Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahnaz Ilkhani
- Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Montagut-Martínez P, Pérez-Cruzado D, Gutiérrez-Sánchez D. Cancer-related fatigue measures in palliative care: A psychometric systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2022; 31:e13642. [PMID: 35822246 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In palliative care, the prevention and relief of fatigue are regarded as crucial goals in patients with cancer. METHODS A systematic review was carried out according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments methodology. Searches were conducted in Medline (through PubMed), Web of Science, Open Gray, Scielo, Cochrane, CINAHL and EMBASE. All instruments found in each study were assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments checklist and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS A total of 5598 articles were identified in the different databases. In total, 57 studies describing 19 instruments were included in this study. The main properties evaluated were internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, hypotheses testing and responsiveness. All studies were evaluated with the Strobe scale with a score greater than 6 points. CONCLUSIONS According to the quality methodological results, Edmonton Symptom Assessment System, Problems and Needs in Palliative Care Questionnaire, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life 15-item Questionnaire for Palliative Care and Palliative Care Quality of Life Instrument are the recommended instruments used for assessing cancer-related fatigue in palliative care. PROPESRO registration number: CRD42020206783.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David Pérez-Cruzado
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Universidad Catolica de Murcia UCAM, Murcia, Spain.,Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - Daniel Gutiérrez-Sánchez
- Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.,Department of Nursing and Podiatry, University of Málaga, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tenge T, Santer D, Schlieper D, Schallenburger M, Schwartz J, Meier S, Akhyari P, Pfister O, Walter S, Eckstein S, Eckstein F, Siegemund M, Gaertner J, Neukirchen M. Inpatient Specialist Palliative Care in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD): A Retrospective Case Series. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:879378. [PMID: 35845069 PMCID: PMC9280978 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.879378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundRepeat hospitalizations, complications, and psychosocial burdens are common in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Specialist palliative care (sPC) involvement supports patients during decision-making until end-of-life. In the United States, guidelines recommend early specialist palliative care (esPC) involvement prior to implantation. Yet, data about sPC and esPC involvement in Europe are scarce.Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective descriptive study of deceased LVAD patients who had received sPC during their LVAD-related admissions to two university hospitals in Duesseldorf, Germany and Basel, Switzerland from 2010 to 2021. The main objectives were to assess: To which extent have LVAD patients received sPC, how early is sPC involved? What are the characteristics of those, how did sPC take place and what are key challenges in end-of-life care?ResultsIn total, 288 patients were implanted with a LVAD, including 31 who received sPC (11%). Twenty-two deceased LVAD patients (19 male) with sPC were included. Mean patient age at the time of implantation was 67 (range 49–79) years. Thirteen patients (59%) received LVAD as destination therapy, eight patients (36%) were implanted as bridge to transplantation (BTT), and one as an emergency LVAD after cardiogenic shock (5%). None of the eight BTT patients received a heart transplantation before dying. Most (n = 13) patients lived with their family and mean Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was three. Mean time between LVAD implantation and first sPC contact was 1.71 years, with a range of first sPC contact from 49 days prior to implantation to more than 6 years after. Two patients received esPC before implantation. In Duesseldorf, mean time between first sPC contact and in-hospital death was 10.2 (1–42) days. In Basel, patients died 16 (0.7–44) months after first sPC contact, only one died on the external sPC unit. Based on thorough examination of two case reports, we describe key challenges of sPC in LVAD patients including the necessity for sPC expertise, ethical and communicative issues as well as the available resources in this setting.ConclusionDespite unequivocal recommendations for sPC in LVAD patients, the integration of sPC for these patients is yet not well established.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Tenge
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - David Santer
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Schlieper
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Manuela Schallenburger
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Jacqueline Schwartz
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefan Meier
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Payam Akhyari
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Otmar Pfister
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Silke Walter
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Practice Development Nursing, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Eckstein
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- *Correspondence: Sandra Eckstein,
| | - Friedrich Eckstein
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin Siegemund
- Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jan Gaertner
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Palliative Care Center Hildegard, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Martin Neukirchen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Palliative Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Xu L, Li Q, Yin D, Song G, Wu H. The clinical efficacy of integrated care in combination with vasopressin for cardiogenic shock induced by acute myocardial infarction: A randomized controlled study protocol. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e28985. [PMID: 35512064 PMCID: PMC9276314 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most serious complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with high mortality, and the conventional nursing mode can not meet the clinical needs. Studies have shown that integrated care model has advantages for critical and chronic diseases. However, there is no clinical study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of this nursing model on cardiogenic shock induced by acute myocardial infarction (CS-AMI). METHODS This is a prospective randomized controlled trial to study the clinical efficacy of integrated care combined with vasopressin in the treatment of CS-AMI. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive integrated care combined with vasopressin in the treatment group and conventional care combined with vasopressin in the control group. The patients will be followed up for 3 months after systematic treatment. Observation indicators include: length of hospital stay, quality of life score, blood pressure level, and nursing satisfaction score. Finally, SPASS 20.0 software will be used for statistical analysis of the data. DISCUSSION This study will evaluate the clinical efficacy of integrated nursing combined with vasopressin in the treatment of CS-AMI. The results of this study will provide a reference for selecting appropriate nursing programs for CS-AMI patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION OSF Registration number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/K8CN4.
Collapse
|
38
|
Zimmermann C, Mathews J. Palliative Care Is the Umbrella, Not the Rain-A Metaphor to Guide Conversations in Advanced Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:681-682. [PMID: 35297961 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.8210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Zimmermann
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jean Mathews
- Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine and Department of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bugaj TJ, Oeljeklaus L, Haun MW. Initiating early palliative care for older people with advanced cancer and its barriers. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2022; 16:14-18. [PMID: 34789651 DOI: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Early palliative care (EPC) is known to generally improve both health-related quality of life (QoL) and symptom intensity at small effect sizes. However, it is unclear whether EPC is effective in older people, a population that is notoriously unaccounted for. This review summarizes the recent evidence concerning the efficacy of EPC in older patients with advanced cancer and delineates existing barriers to accessing respective services. RECENT FINDINGS The search for studies published in MEDLINE from January 2020 to September 2021 yielded six relevant records. Data from a recent feasibility trial and subgroups from larger randomised trials point to a somewhat lesser decline in QoL for patients undergoing EPC compared to those receiving treatment as usual. However, enrolling older patients in such trials remains a major challenge mostly due to them feeling too ill to participate. SUMMARY For older patients, the efficacy of EPC, like many other medical interventions, has hardly been studied so far. Existing work yielded several specific barriers for older patients to access this type of care. Future research should prioritize efficacy trials of EPC tailored to the needs of older patients enabling clinicians to enter truly evidence-based shared decision-making with their patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till J Bugaj
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg
| | - Lydia Oeljeklaus
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg
- Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Markus W Haun
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Timely Palliative Care: Personalizing the Process of Referral. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14041047. [PMID: 35205793 PMCID: PMC8870673 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Timely palliative care is a systematic process to identify patients with high supportive care needs and to refer these individuals to specialist palliative care in a timely manner based on standardized referral criteria. It requires four components: (1) routine screening of supportive care needs at oncology clinics, (2) establishment of institution-specific consensual criteria for referral, (3) a system in place to trigger a referral when patients meet criteria, and (4) availability of outpatient palliative care resources to deliver personalized, timely patient-centered care aimed at improving patient and caregiver outcomes. In this review, we discuss the conceptual underpinnings, rationale, barriers and facilitators for timely palliative care referral. Timely palliative care provides a more rational use of the scarce palliative care resource and maximizes the impact on patients who are offered the intervention. Several sets of referral criteria have been proposed to date for outpatient palliative care referral. Studies examining the use of these referral criteria consistently found that timely palliative care can lead to a greater number of referrals and earlier palliative care access than routine referral. Implementation of timely palliative care at each institution requires oncology leadership support, adequate palliative care infrastructure, integration of electronic health record and customization of referral criteria.
Collapse
|
41
|
Early Palliative Care in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030478. [PMID: 35158746 PMCID: PMC8833517 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Several novel targeted therapies seem to improve the outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Nonetheless, the 5-year survival rate remains below 40%, and the trajectory of the disease remains physically and emotionally challenging, with little time to make relevant decisions. For patients with advanced solid tumors, the integration of early palliative care (EPC) with standard oncologic care a few weeks after diagnosis has demonstrated several benefits. However, this model is underutilized in patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods: In this article, we analyze the palliative care (PC) needs of AML patients, examine the operational aspects of an integrated model, and review the evidence in favor of EPC integration in the AML course. Results: AML patients have a high burden of physical and psychological symptoms and high use of avoidant coping strategies. Emerging studies, including a phase III randomized controlled trial, have reported that EPC is feasible for inpatients and outpatients, improves quality of life (QoL), promotes adaptive coping, reduces psychological symptoms, and enhances the quality of end-of-life care. Conclusions: EPC should become the new standard of care for AML patients. However, this raises issues about the urgent development of adequate programs of education to increase timely access to PC.
Collapse
|
42
|
Hildenbrand JD, Park HS, Casarett DJ, Corbett C, Ellis AM, Herring KW, Kamal AH, Power S, Troy JD, Wolf S, Zafar SY, Leblanc TW. Patient-reported distress as an early warning sign of unmet palliative care needs and increased healthcare utilization in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:3419-3427. [PMID: 34997315 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06727-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cancer patients' sources of distress are often unaddressed, and patient-reported distress data could be utilized to identify those with unmet and impending care needs. We explored the association between moderate/severe distress and healthcare utilization in a large sample of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Adult patients treated between July 2013 and March 2019. Data from the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT) and the accompanying "Problem List" were extracted from the EHR. A DT score of ≥ 4 indicates "actionable distress." Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive analysis for patient characteristics, clinical outcomes, and sources of distress. Generalized linear mixed models were fit to determine the relationship between distress and healthcare utilization (hospitalization, emergency department (ED) visit, or both). RESULTS The ten most frequently reported problems were from the Physical and Emotional domains of the Problem List. Distress was mostly related to physical symptoms (pain, fatigue) and emotional issues (worry, fears, sadness, nervousness). Patients with actionable distress generally reported more problems across all their visits. Actionable distress was associated with higher odds of the composite outcome measure of hospitalization or visiting the ED, within both the next 3 months (OR = 1.37; 95% CI = 1.19, 1.58; p < 0.001) and 6 months (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.03, 1.37; p = 0.019). CONCLUSION Patients with significant distress had marked utilization of ED and inpatient services. DT scores are a source of untapped data in the EHR that can highlight patients in need of intervention, including palliative care and cancer support services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David J Casarett
- Department of Palliative Care, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC, Box 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Alicia M Ellis
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC, Box 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Kris W Herring
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC, Box 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Arif H Kamal
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC, Box 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Steve Power
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC, Box 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Jesse D Troy
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC, Box 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Steven Wolf
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC, Box 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Syed Y Zafar
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC, Box 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Thomas W Leblanc
- Duke Cancer Institute, DUMC, Box 2715, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. .,Division of Hematological Malignancy and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Pasquarella AV, Islam S, Ramdhanny A, Gendy M, Pinto P, Braunstein MJ. Outcomes of Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Who Received Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e688-e696. [PMID: 34986010 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Palliative care (PC) plays an established role in improving outcomes in patients with solid tumors, yet these services are underutilized in hematologic malignancies (HMs). We reviewed records of hospitalized patients with active HM to determine associations between PC consultation and length of stay, intensive care unit stay, 30-day readmission, and 6-month mortality compared with those who were not seen by PC. METHODS We reviewed all oncology admissions at our institution between 2013 and 2019 and included patients with HM actively on treatment, stratified by those seen by PC to controls not seen by PC. Groups were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests on the basis of the type and distribution of data. Multiple logistic regression models with stepwise variable selection methods were used to find predictors of outcomes. RESULTS Three thousand six hundred fifty-four admissions were reviewed, among which 370 unique patients with HM were included. Among these, 102 (28%) patients saw PC, whereas the remaining 268 were controls with similar comorbidities. When compared with controls, PC consultation was associated with a statistically significant reduction in 30-day readmissions (16% v 27%; P = .024), increased length of stay (11.5 v 6 days; P < .001), increased intensive care unit admission (28% v 9%; P < .001), and increased 6-month mortality (67% v 15%; P < .001). These data were confirmed in multivariable models. CONCLUSION In this retrospective study, more than two thirds of patients with HM did not receive PC consultation despite having similar comorbidities, suggesting that inpatient PC consultation is underutilized in patients with HM, despite the potential for decreased readmission rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony V Pasquarella
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology-Hematology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, Mineola, NY
| | - Shahidul Islam
- Department of Biostatistics, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| | - Angela Ramdhanny
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology-Hematology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, Mineola, NY
| | - Mina Gendy
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology-Hematology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, Mineola, NY
| | - Priya Pinto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Palliative Care, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY
| | - Marc J Braunstein
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology-Hematology, NYU Long Island School of Medicine, NYU Perlmutter Cancer Center, Mineola, NY
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Formagini T, Poague C, O'Neal A, Brooks JV. "When I Heard the Word Palliative": Obscuring and Clarifying Factors Affecting the Stigma Around Palliative Care Referral in Oncology. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e72-e79. [PMID: 34310185 PMCID: PMC8758121 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Palliative care (PC) can help patients with cancer manage symptoms and achieve a greater quality of life. However, there are many barriers to patients with cancer receiving referrals to PC, including the stigmatizing association of PC with end of life. This study explores factors that obscure or clarify the stigma around PC referrals and its associations with end of life in cancer care. METHODS A qualitative descriptive design using grounded theory components was designed to investigate barriers to PC referrals for patients receiving treatment at an outpatient cancer center. Interviews with patients, caregivers, and oncology professionals were audio-recorded, transcribed, and independently coded by three investigators to ensure rigor. Participants were asked about their perceptions of PC and PC referral experiences. RESULTS Interviews with 44 participants revealed both obscuring and clarifying factors surrounding the association of PC as end of life. Prognostic uncertainty, confusion about PC's role, and social network influence all perpetuated an inaccurate and stigmatizing association of PC with end of life. Contrarily, familiarity with PC, prognostic confidence, and clear referral communication helped delineate PC as distinct from end of life. CONCLUSION To reduce the stigmatizing association of PC with end of life, referring clinicians should clearly communicate prognosis, PC's role, and the reason for referral within the context of each patient and his or her unique cancer trajectory. The oncology team plays a vital role in framing the messaging surrounding referrals to PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taynara Formagini
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Claire Poague
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Alicia O'Neal
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS
| | - Joanna Veazey Brooks
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS,University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS,Joanna Veazey Brooks, MBE, PhD, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 3044, Kansas City, KS 66106; e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schneider F, Giolo SR, Kempfer SS. Core competencies for the training of advanced practice nurses in oncology: a Delphi study. Rev Bras Enferm 2022; 75:e20210573. [DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: To map out and validate the core competencies for the training of advanced practice nurses in oncology. Methods: Exploratory-descriptive research with a quantitative approach using the Delphi technique. Initially, a matrix composed of six domains outlining 112 core competencies of the clinical nurse specialist in oncology was elaborated. The Likert scale was used to measure the degree of agreement. Data collection took place through the Google Forms® platform from February to May 2021. Data were compiled and analyzed based on expert suggestions and literature. Results: 100 competencies achieved consensus (agreement level above 85.7%) in the first round; 13 new competencies were proposed by expert members; and 125 were validated during the Delphi technique. Conclusion: The mapping and validation of core competencies will allow the development of new training models aimed at advanced practice in oncology and future educational harmonization.
Collapse
|
46
|
Chyr LC, DeGroot L, Waldfogel JM, Hannum SM, Sloan DH, Cotter VT, Zhang A, Heughan JA, Wilson RF, Robinson KA, Dy SM. Implementation and Effectiveness of Integrating Palliative Care Into Ambulatory Care of Noncancer Serious Chronic Illness: Mixed Methods Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20:77-83. [PMID: 35074772 PMCID: PMC8786411 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To perform a mixed methods review to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of models for integrating palliative care into ambulatory care for US adults with noncancer serious chronic illness. METHODS We searched 3 electronic databases from January 2000 to May 2020 and included qualitative, mixed methods studies and randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. For each study, 2 reviewers abstracted data and independently assessed for quality. We conducted meta-analyses as appropriate and graded strength of evidence (SOE) for quantitative outcomes. RESULTS Quantitative analysis included 14 studies of 2,934 patients. Compared to usual care, models evaluated were not more effective for improving patient health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (standardized mean difference [SMD] of 4 of 8 studies, 0.19; 95% CI, ‒0.03 to 0.41) (SOE: moderate) or for patient depressive symptom scores (SMD of 3 of 9 studies, ‒0.09; 95% CI, ‒0.35 to 0.16) (SOE: moderate). Models might have little to no effect on patient satisfaction (SOE: low) but were more effective for increasing advance directive (AD) documentation (relative risk, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.35 to 1.94) (SOE: moderate). Qualitative analysis included 5 studies of 146 patients. Patient preferences for appropriate timing of palliative care varied; costs, additional visits, and travel were considered barriers to implementation. CONCLUSION Models might have little to no effect on decreasing overall symptom burden and were not more effective than usual care for improving HRQOL or depressive symptom scores but were more effective for increasing AD documentation. Additional research should focus on identifying and addressing characteristics and implementation factors critical to integrating models to improve ambulatory, patient-centered outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda C Chyr
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lyndsay DeGroot
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Susan M Hannum
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Danetta H Sloan
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Valerie T Cotter
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Allen Zhang
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - JaAlah-Ai Heughan
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Renee F Wilson
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Karen A Robinson
- Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sydney M Dy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kayastha N, LeBlanc TW. Why Are We Failing to Do What Works? Musings on Outpatient Palliative Care Integration in Cancer Care. JCO Oncol Pract 2021; 18:255-257. [PMID: 34936378 DOI: 10.1200/op.21.00794] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Neha Kayastha
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Thomas W LeBlanc
- Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC.,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bayly J, Bone AE, Ellis-Smith C, Tunnard I, Yaqub S, Yi D, Nkhoma KB, Cook A, Combes S, Bajwah S, Harding R, Nicholson C, Normand C, Ahuja S, Turrillas P, Kizawa Y, Morita T, Nishiyama N, Tsuneto S, Ong P, Higginson IJ, Evans CJ, Maddocks M. Common elements of service delivery models that optimise quality of life and health service use among older people with advanced progressive conditions: a tertiary systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048417. [PMID: 34853100 PMCID: PMC8638152 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Health and social care services worldwide need to support ageing populations to live well with advanced progressive conditions while adapting to functional decline and finitude. We aimed to identify and map common elements of effective geriatric and palliative care services and consider their scalability and generalisability to high, middle and low-income countries. METHODS Tertiary systematic review (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Embase, January 2000-October 2019) of studies in geriatric or palliative care that demonstrated improved quality of life and/or health service use outcomes among older people with advanced progressive conditions. Using frameworks for health system analysis, service elements were identified. We used a staged, iterative process to develop a 'common components' logic model and consulted experts in geriatric or palliative care from high, middle and low-income countries on its scalability. RESULTS 78 studies (59 geriatric and 19 palliative) spanning all WHO regions were included. Data were available from 17 739 participants. Nearly half the studies recruited patients with heart failure (n=36) and one-third recruited patients with mixed diagnoses (n=26). Common service elements (≥80% of studies) included collaborative working, ongoing assessment, active patient participation, patient/family education and patient self-management. Effective services incorporated patient engagement, patient goal-driven care and the centrality of patient needs. Stakeholders (n=20) emphasised that wider implementation of such services would require access to skilled, multidisciplinary teams with sufficient resource to meet patients' needs. Identified barriers to scalability included the political and societal will to invest in and prioritise palliative and geriatric care for older people, alongside geographical and socioeconomic factors. CONCLUSION Our logic model combines elements of effective services to achieve optimal quality of life and health service use among older people with advanced progressive conditions. The model transcends current best practice in geriatric and palliative care and applies across the care continuum, from prevention of functional decline to end-of-life care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020150252.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Bayly
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
- St Barnabas Hospice, Worthing, UK
| | - Anna E Bone
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Clare Ellis-Smith
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - India Tunnard
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Shuja Yaqub
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Deokhee Yi
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Kennedy B Nkhoma
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Amelia Cook
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Combes
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
- St Christopher's Hospice, London, UK
- University of Surrey Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Guildford, UK
| | - Sabrina Bajwah
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Harding
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Caroline Nicholson
- St Christopher's Hospice, London, UK
- University of Surrey Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Guildford, UK
| | - Charles Normand
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Shalini Ahuja
- Health Service and Population Research Department, King's College London Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience, London, UK
| | - Pamela Turrillas
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Tatsuya Morita
- Palliative and Supportive Care Division, Seirei Mikatahara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Nanako Nishiyama
- Graduate School of Comprehensive Rehabilitation, Osaka Prefecture University, Habikino, Japan
| | - Satoru Tsuneto
- Department of Human Health Sciences, Department of Palliative Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Paul Ong
- WHO Centre for Health Development (WKC), Kobe, Japan
| | - Irene J Higginson
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Catherine J Evans
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
- Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Matthew Maddocks
- Cicely Saunders Institute for Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Implementing a Standardized Care Pathway Integrating Oncology, Palliative Care and Community Care in a Rural Region of Mid-Norway. Oncol Ther 2021; 9:671-693. [PMID: 34731447 PMCID: PMC8593089 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-021-00176-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To improve quality across levels of care, we developed a standardized care pathway (SCP) integrating palliative and oncology services for hospitalized and home-dwelling palliative cancer patients in a rural region. METHODS A multifaceted implementation strategy was directed towards a combination of target groups. The implementation was conducted on a system level, and implementation-related activities were registered prospectively. Adult patients with advanced cancer treated with non-curative intent were included and interviewed. Healthcare leaders (HCLs) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the development of the SCP or exposed to the implementation strategy were interviewed. In addition, HCLs and HCPs exposed to the implementation strategy answered standardized questionnaires. Hospital admissions were registered prospectively. RESULTS To assess the use of the SCP, 129 cancer patients were included. Fifteen patients were interviewed about their experiences with the patient-held record (PHR). Sixty interviews were performed among 1320 HCPs exposed to the implementation strategy. Two hundred and eighty-seven HCPs reported on their training in and use of the SCP. Despite organizational cultural differences, developing an SCP integrating palliative and oncology services across levels of care was feasible. Both HCLs and HCPs reported improved quality of care in the wake of the implementation process. Two and a half years after the implementation was launched, 28% of the HCPs used the SCP and 41% had received training in its use. Patients reported limited use and benefit of the PHR. CONCLUSION An SCP may be a usable tool for integrating palliative and oncology services across care levels in a rural region. An extensive implementation process resulted in improvements of process outcomes, yet still limited use of the SCP in clinical practice. HCLs and HCPs reported improved quality of cancer care following the implementation process. Future research should address mandatory elements for usefulness and successful implementation of SCPs for palliative cancer patients.
Collapse
|
50
|
Perry LM, Sartor O, Malhotra S, Alonzi S, Kim S, Voss HM, Rogers JL, Robinson W, Harris K, Shank J, Morrison DG, Lewson AB, Fuloria J, Miele L, Lewis B, Mossman B, Hoerger M. Increasing Readiness for Early Integrated Palliative Oncology Care: Development and Initial Evaluation of the EMPOWER 2 Intervention. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:987-996. [PMID: 33864847 PMCID: PMC8526633 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.03.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Early integrated palliative care improves quality of life, but palliative care programs are underutilized. Psychoeducational interventions explaining palliative care may increase patients' readiness for palliative care. OBJECTIVES To 1) collaborate with stakeholders to develop the EMPOWER 2 intervention explaining palliative care, 2) examine acceptability, 3) evaluate feasibility and preliminary efficacy. METHODS The research was conducted at a North American cancer center and involved 21 stakeholders and 10 patient-participants. Investigators and stakeholders iteratively developed the intervention. Stakeholders rated acceptability of the final intervention. Investigators implemented a pre-post trial to examine the feasibility of recruiting 10 patients with metastatic cancer within one month and with a ≥50% consent rate. Preliminary efficacy outcomes were changes in palliative care knowledge and attitudes. RESULTS Using feedback from four stakeholder meetings, we developed a multimedia intervention tailored to three levels of health-literacy. The intervention provides knowledge and reassurance about the purpose and nature of palliative care, addressing cognitive and emotional barriers to utilization. Stakeholders rated the intervention and design process highly acceptable (3.78/4.00). The pilot met a priori feasibility criteria (10 patients enrolled in 14 days; 83.3% consent rate). The intervention increased palliative care knowledge by 83.1% and improved attitudes by 18.9 points on a 0 to 51 scale (Ps < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS This formative research outlines the development of a psychoeducational intervention about palliative care. The intervention is acceptable, feasible, and demonstrated promising pilot test results. This study will guide clinical teams in improving patients' readiness for palliative care and inform the forthcoming EMPOWER 3 randomized clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sonia Malhotra
- Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA; University Medical Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | | | - Seowoo Kim
- Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | | | | | - William Robinson
- University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | | | | | - David G Morrison
- The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Ashley B Lewson
- Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jyotsna Fuloria
- University Medical Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Lucio Miele
- Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Brian Lewis
- Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | | | - Michael Hoerger
- Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA; University Medical Center New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
| |
Collapse
|