Assessment of the interaction between a partial agonist and a full agonist of benzodiazepine receptors, based on psychomotor performance and memory, in healthy volunteers

The interactive walkway provides fit-for-purpose fall-risk biomarkers in the elderly: Comparison of zolpidem and suvorexant

Dynamic balance assessments such as walking adaptability may yield a more realistic prediction of drug-induced falls compared with postural stability measurements, as falls often result from limited gait adjustments when walking. The Interactive Walkway (IWW) measures walking adaptability but sensitivity to medication effects is unknown. If proven sensitive and specific, IWW could serve as a biomarker for targeted fall-risk assessments in early clinical drug development. In this three-way crossover study, 18 healthy elderly (age: 65-80 years) subjects received 5 mg zolpidem, 10 mg suvorexant, or placebo in the morning. Assessments were performed pre-dose and approximately hourly until 9 h post-dose. IWW assessments included an 8-meter walking test, goal-directed stepping, obstacle-avoidance, and tandem-walking. Other pharmacodynamic measurements were the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test at a comfortable and fast pace, adaptive tracking, and body sway. A decline in performance was observed for zolpidem compared with placebo for 3 h post-dose in IWW walking adaptability outcome measures, TUG, adaptive tracking, and body sway. For the IWW tasks, a decrease in walking speed (among others) was observed. IWW parameters were not affected by suvorexant compared with placebo at any timepoint. However, an increase of 9.8% (95%CI: 1.8%, 18.5%) in body sway was observed for suvorexant compared with placebo up to 3 h post-dose. The IWW successfully quantified drug effects of two hypnotic drugs and distinguished between zolpidem and suvorexant regarding their effects on walking. As a biomarker, the IWW demonstrated sensitivity in assessing dynamic balance and potential fall risk in early phase clinical drug development.

Anxioselective anxiolytics: on a quest for the Holy Grail

The discovery of benzodiazepine receptors provided the impetus to discover and develop anxioselective anxiolytics ('Valium without the side effects'). The market potential for an anxioselective based on the γ-aminobutyric acid A (GABA(A)) receptor resulted in clinical trials of multiple compounds. In contrast to the anxioselective profile displayed in preclinical models, compounds such as bretazenil, TPA023, and MRK 409 produced benzodiazepine-like side effects (sedation, dizziness) in Phase I studies, whereas alpidem and ocinaplon exhibited many of the characteristics of an anxioselective in the clinic. Alpidem was briefly marketed for the treatment of anxiety, but was withdrawn because of liver toxicity. Reversible elevations in liver enzymes halted development of ocinaplon in Phase III. The clinical profiles of these two molecules demonstrate that it is possible to develop GABA(A) receptor-based anxioselectives. However, despite the formidable molecular toolbox at our disposal, we are no better informed about the GABA(A) receptors responsible for an anxioselective profile in the clinic. Here, I discuss the evolution of a quest, spanning four decades, for molecules that retain the rapid and robust anti-anxiety actions of benzodiazepines without the side effects that limit their usefulness.

Probe of CYP3A by a single-point blood measurement after oral administration of midazolam in healthy elderly volunteers

BACKGROUND

Midazolam (MDZ) is used as an assessment of human cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) activity. A single blood measurement is used as a marker of its activity based on an observed correlation between MDZ clearance and the 1'-hydroxymidazolam (1'-OH-MDZ): MDZ plasma ratio is assessed at 0.5 h followig the intake of a single 7.5 mg oral dose of MDZ in healthy young volunteers. In addition, a 4-h plasma MDZ measurement has been found to be an excellent predictor of AUC and CYP3A activity.

OBJECTIVES

The main aim of this study was to define a single-point blood sampling in healthy elderly volunteers. The secondary objective was to investigate the pharmacological effects of a low oral dose of MDZ (5 mg) and its potential psychometric changes.

METHODS

Eight healthy elderly Caucasian volunteers participated in a single-dose, open-label, non-comparative study. Each subject received a single 5 mg oral dose of MDZ. Plasma concentrations of MDZ and its major metabolite, 1'-OH-MDZ, were assayed over 12 h. Secondary assessments of critical flicker fusion (CFF), body sway and mini-mental state examination were also carried out during the 12-h post-administration period.

RESULTS

A moderate correlation was observed between MDZ clearance and the 1'-OH-MDZ: MDZ plasma concentration ratio at 9 h post-dosing (Rho=0.81; p=0.04), but an even better correlation (Rho=0.99; p<0.009) was found between MDZ AUC and MDZ plasma concentration at 6 h post-dosing, with the latter value corresponding approximately to the average mean residence time (MRT) determined in our trial. This study was well-tolerated despite a significant transitory decrease (relative to baseline) in cortical arousal at 1 h post-dosing, as assessed by CFF, and a non-significant decrease (relative to baseline) in balance and vigilance also measured at 1 h and assessed on body sway, compared to baseline values.

CONCLUSION

Despite the small sample size, based on the results of healthy, elderly volunteers, a single MDZ plasma measurement taken at 6 h post-oral administration may represent an accurate marker of CYP3A phenotype. This single-time-point method could be used safely for predicting drug-drug or diet interactions and identifying individuals with genetic polymorphism that affect CYP3A activity.

Gender differences in response to lorazepam in a human drug discrimination study

Gender differences in the discriminative stimulus properties of drugs of abuse have sometimes been reported, although we have previously found no differences in subjective or discriminative responses in human subjects acquiring an alcohol discrimination. The aim of the present work was to determine if there were gender differences in the effects of lorazepam, a benzodiazepine-receptor agonist which substituted for the alcohol stimulus in trained social drinkers. Volunteers who had already acquired an alcohol (0.2g/kg) placebo discrimination were administered (double-blind) either placebo (nine females, nine males) or lorazepam 2mg (six females, six males). They then sampled a series of five drinks and rated each one for likeness to the training stimulus (the generalization response). In addition they completed rating scales for subjective effects and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Lorazepam substituted for the alcohol stimulus equally in both sexes and increased associated scores for lightheadedness. Females however, showed a much greater DSST performance impairment following lorazepam, compared with males. This effect was independent of body weight differences and sedation. These results are discussed in the light of current knowledge of gender differences in response to drugs of abuse and suggest that the stimulus and cognitive effects of benzodiazepine-receptor agonists are modulated by different brain mechanisms.

Postural Instability and Consequent Falls and Hip Fractures Associated with Use of Hypnotics in the Elderly

The aim of this review is to establish the relationship between treatment with hypnotics and the risk of postural instability and as a consequence, falls and hip fractures, in the elderly. A review of the literature was performed through a search of the MEDLINE, Ingenta and PASCAL databases from 1975 to 2005. We considered as hypnotics only those drugs approved for treating insomnia, i.e. some benzodiazepines and the more recently launched 'Z'-compounds, i.e. zopiclone, zolpidem and zaleplon. Large-scale surveys consistently report increases in the frequency of falls and hip fractures when hypnotics are used in the elderly (2-fold risk). Benzodiazepines are the major class of hypnotics involved in this context; falls and fractures in patients taking Z-compounds are less frequently reported, and in this respect, zolpidem is considered as at risk in only one study. It is important to note, however, that drug adverse effect relationships are difficult to establish with this type of epidemiological data-mining. On the other hand, data obtained in laboratory settings, where confounding factors can be eliminated, prove that benzodiazepines are the most deleterious hypnotics at least in terms of their effects on body sway. Z-compounds are considered safer, probably because of their pharmacokinetic properties as well as their selective pharmacological activities at benzodiazepine-1 (BZ(1)) receptors. The effects of hypnotics on balance, gait and equilibrium are the consequence of differential negative impacts on vigilance and cognitive functions, and are highly dose- and time-dependent. Z-compounds have short half-lives and have less cognitive and residual effects than older medications. Some practical rules need to be followed when prescribing hypnotics in order to prevent falls and hip fractures as much as possible in elderly insomniacs, whether institutionalised or not. These are: (i) establish a clear diagnosis of the sleep disorder; (ii) take into account chronic conditions leading to balance and gait difficulties (motor and cognitive status); (iii) search for concomitant prescription of psychotropics and sedatives; (iv) use half the recommended adult dosage; and (v) declare any adverse effect to pharmacovigilance centres. Comparative pharmacovigilance studies focused on the impact of hypnotics on postural stability are very much needed.

Clinical pharmacology of psychotropic drugs

No Abstract