The benefit of negative tests in non-ulcer dyspepsia

Vicious circles in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease can present with a bewildering array of disease manifestations whose overall impact on patient health is difficult to disentangle. The multitude of disease complications and therapeutic side effects result in conflicting ideas on how to best manage a patient. The aim of the study is to test the usefulness of influence diagrams in resolving conflicts centered on managing complex disease processes.

METHODS

The influences of a disease process and the ensuing medical interventions on the health of a patient with inflammatory bowel disease are modeled by an influence diagram. Patient health is the focal point of multiple influences affecting its overall strength. Any downstream influence represents the focal point of other preceding upstream influences. The mathematics underlying the influence diagram is similar to that of a decision tree. Its formalism allows one to consider additive and inhibitory influences and include in the same analysis qualitatively different types of parameters, such as diagnoses, complications, side effects, and therapeutic outcomes.

RESULTS

Three exemplary cases are presented to illustrate the potential use of influence diagrams. In all three case scenarios, Crohn's disease resulted in disease manifestations that seemingly interfered with its own therapy. The presence of negative feedback loops rendered the management of each case particularly challenging. The analyses by influence diagrams revealed subtle interactions among the multiple influences and their joint contributions to the patient's overall health that would have been difficult to appreciate by verbal reasoning alone.

CONCLUSION

Influence diagrams represent a decision tool that is particularly suited to improve decision-making in inflammatory bowel disease. They highlight key factors of a complex disease process and help to assess their quantitative interactions.

Health-related anxiety and the effect of open-access endoscopy in US patients with dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

The role of endoscopy in dyspepsia is the subject of debate. The detection of lesions is infrequent, but patients may benefit from the knowledge that the examination is normal. We sought to determine the prevalence of health-related anxiety in dyspeptic patients referred for open-access endoscopy and to investigate the effect of endoscopy on health-related anxiety.

METHODS

Consecutive patients referred for open-access endoscopy from primary care were studied using a validated questionnaire for health-related anxiety before and after endoscopy, at 1 month and 6 months. Symptoms were assessed using a validated questionnaire at 1 and 6 months.

RESULTS

One hundred and nine patients were studied (69 women and 40 men; mean age, 49 +/- 15 years). Thirty-six of the 109 patients (33%) had high anxiety scores at baseline (mean score, 41 +/- 1), which decreased after endoscopy to 35 +/- 1 (P < 0.05). The changes persisted at 1 month (33 +/- 1) and 6 months (33 +/- 1). Endoscopic findings were as follows: normal examination, 120; erosive oesophagitis, 11 (Grade A); erosive duodenitis (all Helicobacter pylori-negative), 6. Scales for preoccupation with health and fear of illness and death showed significant improvement after endoscopy, and the effects were preserved for 6 months. Anxiety scores in our population were substantially higher than in a corresponding UK population.

CONCLUSIONS

Health-related anxiety is common in dyspeptic patients referred for endoscopy. Endoscopy decreases the preoccupation with health and fear of illness and death in patients with severe anxiety, and the effects persist for 6 months.