An economic analysis of strategies for the use of contrast media for diagnostic cardiac catheterization

Economic burden of contrast-induced nephropathy: implications for prevention strategies

SUMMARY Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is the third most common cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure. There is increasing evidence that CIN has a significant adverse impact on patient morbidity and mortality. The objective of this study was to estimate the in-hospital and 1-year direct healthcare costs related to CIN. Using the values obtained from the literature review, a decision analytic model was developed to estimate the in-hospital and 1-year costs of CIN. Patients who develop CIN are more likely to experience adverse events, to undergo prolonged dialysis, to have longer hospital and intensive care unit stays and to have higher mortality rates. The average in-hospital cost of CIN is $10,345. The 1-year cost of treating a patient with CIN is $11,812. Overall, the economic burden associated with CIN is high. Adopting targeted interventions will reduce the incidence of CIN and its overall economic burden.

Cost-effectiveness of iodixanol in patients at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Acute renal failure after contrast-induced nephropathy is a clinically important and costly complication after the use of iodine-based contrast media. We investigated the cost and cost-effectiveness of 2 contrast media in patients at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.

METHODS

The analyses were based on a randomized, prospective, multinational clinical study comparing the nephrotoxic effects of an isosmolar nonionic contrast medium, iodixanol, with those of a low-osmolar nonionic contrast medium, iohexol. Resource utilization data were obtained from the study and from a retrospective review of patients' hospital records. Swedish, German, and French unit prices were applied to resources used. Between-group differences in average costs were analyzed using a nonparametric bootstrap method.

RESULTS

Resource utilization data for 125 patients were analyzed. Seven contrast media-related serious adverse reactions, of which 6 were acute renal failures, were noted in 6 patients receiving iohexol. Two patients in the iodixanol group had 1 nonserious reaction each. The mean hospitalization cost per patient was Euros 489, Euros 573, and Euros 393 lower after iodixanol than after iohexol using Swedish, German, and French unit prices, respectively. The mean per-patient costs of treating adverse drug reactions were Euros 371, Euros 399, and Euros 445 lower after iodixanol than after iohexol, using the respective unit prices (P < or = 0.01). Iodixanol was cost-effective compared with iohexol, with both lower costs and better effects related to fewer adverse drug reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The isosmolar contrast medium iodixanol appears to be cost-effective when compared with a low-osmolar contrast medium, iohexol, in diabetic patients with renal impairment undergoing angiography.

Health-related quality of life after stroke a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We performed a comprehensive review of all quality-of-life (QOL) estimates for stroke appearing in the peer-reviewed literature between 1985 and 2000. We examine variation in QOL weights and the rigor of methods used to assess QOL and discuss the implications for cost-utility assessment and resource allocation decisions.

METHODS

Through a systematic search, we identified 67 articles that met our inclusion criteria. A team of trained researchers read each article and followed detailed guidelines to extract QOL weights and other parameters. This effort yielded 161 QOL estimates for stroke-related health states. All estimates were measured on a 0 to 1 scale, with 0 representing the worst outcome and 1 representing the best.

RESULTS

QOL estimates range from -0.02 to 0.71 (n=67) for major stroke, from 0.12 to 0.81 (n=14) for moderate stroke, from 0.45 to 0.92 (n=38) for minor stroke, and from 0.29 to 0.903 (n=42) for general stroke. Although QOL should decrease with severity, there were many instances in which the QOL for major stroke as reported by one study exceeded the QOL for moderate stroke as reported by another. The same reversal was found for moderate and minor stroke, and it occurred even when both authors used similar assessment methods and subject populations. Authors of cost-utility and decision analyses rarely base their choice of QOL weights on their own primary data (19%). When obtaining weights from secondary sources, some authors (23%) chose QOL weights for a severity of stroke that did not match the severity for which they sought data.

CONCLUSIONS

QOL estimates for stroke vary greatly and are not always estimated in sound fashion. This impedes the comparability and quality of the cost-effectiveness studies that use these QOL weights and hampers good resource allocation decisions.

Use of a decision-analytic model to support the use of a new oral US contrast agent in patients with abdominal pain

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors performed this study to compare the cost and diagnostic abilities of ultrasound (US) performed with and without the use of an oral contrast material recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An interactive decision-analytic model was constructed to compare US performed with and without contrast material (SonoRx; Bracco Diagnostics) for the evaluation of patients with abdominal pain who were suspected of having pancreatic disease. The model considered all resources that might be used to evaluate a patient suspected of having pancreatic disease (eg, US, computed tomography [CT], endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, fine-needle aspiration biopsy, and open biopsy). The literature and an expert panel were the clinical data sources. Cost estimates were based on Medicare and non-Medicare reimbursements. The primary cost-effectiveness measure was the cost to achieve a diagnosis.

RESULTS

SonoRx-enhanced US was less expensive than unenhanced US ($714 vs $808, respectively, with Medicare costs; $1,612 vs $1,878, respectively, with non-Medicare costs) and as effective (0.785 vs 0.782, respectively). SonoRx-enhanced US was more cost-effective than unenhanced US ($909 vs $1,034, respectively, with Medicare costs; $2,052 vs $2,401, respectively, with non-Medicare costs). This relationship was maintained throughout extensive sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

SonoRx-enhanced US is more cost-effective than unenhanced US, primarily because it avoids the need for CT. CT may be avoided owing to the higher probability of obtaining optimal US scans with oral contrast material.

The measurement of indirect costs in the health economics evaluation literature. A review

In this paper we develop a framework to categorize the concepts used to estimate indirect costs in economic evaluation. We apply this framework in a literature review of economic evaluation studies. We searched all English language literature from 1994-96. Following the application of a search algorithm, which yielded 25 articles, we abstracted information from these articles to determine the methods used to identify the relative contribution of indirect costs of the cost-effectiveness ratio, the time horizon selected by the authors, the identification of those activities that were foregone, the time given up by these activities, and the valuation placed on this time. These methods were then assessed. Indirect costs, as they have been measured, significantly influence efficiency ratios. A wide variation exists among studies in how they incorporate each of the components of indirect costs. All of the four components that were identified will affect the measurement of indirect cost. Future guidelines in this area should address the entire measurement process.

Measuring patient preferences by willingness to pay to avoid: the case of acute otitis media

The aim of this study was to evaluate willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid as a method of eliciting relative values for use in expected-value (EV) decision making. Parents' preferences for the events and outcomes associated with acute otitis media (AOM) and its treatment were quantified by means of a questionnaire asking how much they would be willing to pay to avoid them. Their responses were then used to calculate the EVs of treating or not treating presumed AOM with antibiotics. The advantages of the WTP method were its simplicity, its analogy with everyday financial transactions, its explicit recognition of illness and its management as involving decreases in value, and its face validity. The disadvantages included the need to use another method (the standard gamble) to derive a value for death and the wide ranges and the poor test-retest reliability of individual parents' responses. Nonetheless, median WTP values and their ranges may prove useful in defining for physicians and policymakers the parameters of their practical management decisions. In the case of AOM, the EV of treating with antibiotics was, for the aggregate sample and for most individual parents, robustly superior because of parents' desire to avoid any increased risk of their children's death.

Safety and criteria for selective use of low-osmolality contrast for cardiac angiography

OBJECTIVES

Recommendations to restrict low-osmolality contrast to high-risk patients having cardiac angiography have been challenged because of safety and uncertainty about selection criteria. The authors document frequency and severity of adverse events with diagnostic cardiac angiography under the influence of guidelines for selective use of low-osmolality contrast in high-risk patients and refine high-risk criteria.

METHODS

Subjects of this prospective cohort study were 7,448 unselected patients having diagnostic cardiac angiography in St. John's, Newfoundland or Ottawa, Ontario. Measures included prespecified risk factors, procedure, contrast, and adverse events such as death within 24 hours, myocardial infarction, stroke, arrhythmias, hypotension, and anaphylactoid reactions.

RESULTS

Patients were similar at both sites. Fourteen point two percent received low-osmolality nonionic agents in St. John's. Thirty-four point one percent received low-osmolality (mostly ionic) media in Ottawa. Overall adverse event rates were similar at both sites: death, 0.07%; myocardial infarction or stroke, 0.03%; moderate events, 2%; and mild events, 16.8%. Event rates were low in those given high-osmolality media: death, 0.02%; myocardial infarction or stroke, 0.24%; moderate events, 1.6%; and mild events, 18%. The risk with cardiogenic shock and prior severe reaction to contrast could not be examined, but otherwise only current heart failure and markers of recent ischemia were associated with events after high-osmolality media.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians, using guidelines, can identify high-risk patients and should be able to safely limit use of low-osmolality media to them.

Primer on medical decision analysis: Part 1--Getting started

This paper is Part 1 of a five-part series covering practical issues in the performance of decision analysis. The intended audience is individuals who are learning how to perform decision analyses, not just read them. The series assumes familiarity with the basic concepts of decision analysis. It imparts many of the recommendations the authors have learned in teaching a one-semester course in decision analysis to graduate students. Part 1 introduces the topic and covers questions such as choosing an appropriate question, determining the tradeoff between accuracy and simplicity, and deciding on a time frame.

Costing methods in the Canadian literature on the economic evaluation of health care. A survey and assessment

We reviewed the Canadian literature on cost-effectiveness from 1980-95 with regard to costing methodologies. We abstracted each study using a list of data elements that describe costing methodology, and evaluated costing methodologies in the light of biases in costing methods, site, and case-mix selection.