Computed tomography angiography of coronary artery bypass grafts: robustness in emergency and clinical routine settings

CAD-RADS: Pushing the Limits

Coronary CT angiography is now established as the first-line diagnostic imaging test to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD) in the population at low to intermediate risk. Wide variability exists in both the reporting of coronary CT angiography and the interpretation of these reports by referring physicians. The CAD Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) is sponsored by multiple societies and is a collaborative effort to provide standard classification of CAD, which is then integrated into patient clinical care. The main goals of the CAD-RADS are to decrease variability among readers; enhance communication between interpreting and referring clinicians, allowing collaborative determination of the best course of patient care; and generate consistent data for auditing, data mining, quality improvement, research, and education. There are several scenarios in which the CAD-RADS guidelines are ambiguous or do not provide definite recommendations for further management of CAD. The authors discuss the CAD-RADS categories and modifiers, highlight a variety of complex or ambiguous scenarios, and provide recommendations for managing these scenarios. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2020 See discussion on this article by Aviram and Wolak.

Cardiac Computed Tomography: Before and After Cardiac Surgery

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is a noninvasive imaging technique that has been rapidly adopted into clinical practice. Over the past decade, technological advances have improved CCTA accuracy, and there is an increasing amount of data supporting its prognostic value in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Recently, "appropriate use criteria" has been used as a tool to minimize inappropriate testing and reduce patient exposure to unnecessary risk and inconclusive studies. This review will summarize the appropriate uses of CCTA in patients before and after cardiac surgery. Although the most common indication for CCTA is assessment of patency of native coronary arteries, other potential perioperative uses (eg, assessment of congenital heart disease, valvular heart disease, pericardial disease, myocardial disease, cardiac anatomy, bypass grafts, aortic disease, and cardiac masses) will be reviewed.

CT angio for the evaluation of graft patency

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is the traditional method for the follow-up of graft patency in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. Nevertheless, the advent of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) opened new perspectives for using a noninvasive, equally reliable method to study CABG patients. This review article will analyze the current feasibility of modern multi-slice MDCT, as well as its future perspectives.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts

PURPOSE

The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of more recent computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the assessment of graft patency after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed using nine electronic databases from their dates of inception to July 2015. Predefined inclusion criteria included studies reporting on comparative outcomes using ≥64 slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and ICA. The primary endpoints included graft occlusion and significant graft stenosis ≥50%. Secondary analyses included the comparison of arterial versus venous graft conduits, and the use of different MDCT techniques.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were identified according to selection criteria, involving 1975 patients with 5364 assessed grafts. Combined assessment of stenosis and occlusion for all grafts demonstrated a sensitivity of 96.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 94.3-97.4%] and specificity of 96.3% (95% CI 95.1-97.3%). CTCA assessment of venous grafts demonstrated higher sensitivity compared to arterial grafts, when testing for both occlusion and stenosis (97.6% vs 89.2%, p=0.004).

CONCLUSION

Results of this study demonstrated that CTCA had a relatively high pooled sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value compared to ICA. However, patient baseline characteristics varied between studies, and the results should be interpreted with caution. Nonetheless, our results indicate that CTCA should be recognized as an accurate and non-invasive investigation for graft patency in symptomatic patients after CABG.

Early detection of asymptomatic bypass graft abnormalities using a cardiac troponin I ratio following coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

We sought to identify the best cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) ratio to detect asymptomatic graft or anastomoses anomalies after myocardial revascularization.

METHODS

Patients with a rising cTnI profile, based on measurements at 6 and 12 hours (cTnI 12 hours : 6 hours ratio >1) after the last anastomosis in off-pump surgery or after cardiopulmonary bypass in on-pump surgery, underwent a coronary angiogram, despite an uncomplicated postoperative course and absence of electrocardiogram changes. The optimal threshold value for the ratio was determined using a receiving operator characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

From April 2005 to May 2011, among 1693 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), 29 (1.7%) had a cTnI ratio >1 and underwent postoperative angiography. Twenty abnormalities were observed in 16 patients (55%). In the anastomoses, there were four occlusions and four stenosis. In the grafts, there were 12 stenosis: two of the Y graft anastomosis, two dissections, five hematomas and three kinking. TIMI flow grade based on results of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction trial was 3 in six patients, 1 in five, and 0 in five. In the 16 patients with lesions, the cTnI ratio was 2.1 ± 1.4 versus 1.4 ± 0.3 in patients with no lesions (p = 0.09). A ratio of 1.3 (p = 0.003) was determined by ROC curve analysis as having the greatest discriminant capacity, with associated sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 62%.

CONCLUSION

A cTnI 12 hours : 6 hours ratio >1.3 may be indicative of these abnormalities. Early identification of these anomalies may avoid adverse outcomes.