The role of follow-up ultrasound and clinical parameters after abdominal MDCT in patients with multiple trauma

Tertiary survey ultrasound has no diagnostic benefit in trauma patients without abdominal injuries on standardised initial whole-body computed tomography

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of a routine tertiary survey ultrasound (US) on patient management in major trauma patients without trauma-related abdominal findings on standardised initial whole-body CT (WBCT).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, all WBCT scans acquired in major trauma patients between 07/2017 and 12/2019 at a university hospital and level I trauma centre were screened. 1,024 patients were included in the final analysis. Results of tertiary survey US and patient information (demographic data, trauma mechanism, imaging findings, clinical course, medical history, and anticoagulative medication) were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

Routine tertiary survey US revealed new abdominal findings in six out of 1,024 patients (0.6%). None of the patients had to undergo surgery or minimally invasive intervention, nor did any of the patients die as a result of abdominal injuries. Additional abdominal imaging after tertiary survey US was ordered in 39 patients (38 US, 1 US + CT). None of these patients required further treatment for abdominal injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine tertiary survey US after inconspicuous standardised initial WBCT did not change clinical outcome for abdominal trauma patients.

Diagnostic value of abdominal follow-up sonography in polytrauma patients: A retrospective study

In many German trauma centres, it is routine to perform abdominal follow-up sonography (AFS) 6 h after admission for patients with multiple trauma, even if the clinical course is uneventful and multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) reveals no abdominal pathology. However, this approach is not recommended in the German Guidelines for trauma, and recent studies have questioned the value of AFS to these patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the revised German Guidelines for trauma with respect to the omission of AFS.We included patients with multiple injuries with no clinical signs of abdominal trauma and with normal abdominal MSCT. We collected clinical data of 370 consecutive patients who underwent AFS (Group A) and another 370 consecutive patients who did not undergo AFS (Group B).No abdominal injury was missed by the omission of AFS, and thus, no patient suffered from its omission or benefitted from the use of AFS. In our study population, the negative predictive value of normal MSCT results combined with no clinical signs of abdominal trauma was 100% (95% confidence interval: 99.5%-100.0%).This single-centre study conducted in a large German trauma centre demonstrates AFS to have no utility in the diagnosis of abdominal injury. Moreover, omission of AFS for conscious patients without clinical signs of abdominal trauma and with negative abdominal MSCT does not appear to have negative consequences in terms of missed abdominal injury.Therefore, AFS can be safely omitted in the majority of cases of polytrauma, which simplifies the imaging workup tremendously.

The use of double lumen cannula for veno-venous ECMO in trauma patients with ARDS

Background

The use of a double lumen cannula for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (v.v. ECMO) offers several advantages such as cannulation with only one cannula, patient comfort and the earlier mobilization and physiotherapy. The cannulation should be performed under visual wire and cannula placement into the right atrium, which is associated with risks of malposition and right ventricular perforation. The aim of this patient series is to describe the use of double lumen cannula in trauma patients with posttraumatic ARDS.

Material and methods

Criteria for the v.v ECMO treatment were defined as hypoxaemia (pO2/FiO2 < 200 mmHg, FiO2 0.8-1,0); tidal volume >4-6 ml/kg ideal body weight; mean inspiratory pressure (Pinsp) >32-34 mmHg; respiratory acidosis pH <7.25; and arterial saturation (SaO2) <90%. The analysis included the Injury Severity Score (ISS), the types of injury, time of treatment, complications and outcomes.

Results

A total of 24 patients with major trauma were treated for posttraumatic ARDS with v.v. ECMO. The double lumen cannula (Avalon®, Fa. Maquet, Rastatt, Germany) was used in six male patients. The mean ISS was 31 (20–48). The ECMO therapy was started in an average on the third day after trauma. The mean ECMO run time was 7 days ± 5 (6–18), and the hospital stay was in mean of 60 days ± 34 (21–105).

Conclusion

The use of double lumen cannula for v.v ECMO therapy in trauma patients is a feasible treatment option. No higher risk of bleeding could be found in this case series. A PTT-controlled heparinization is recommended using double lumen cannula. Therefore the use of this cannula type in trauma patients with high risk of bleeding is to discuss controversially.