1
|
Pereira LFF, dos Santos RS, Bonomi DO, Franceschini J, Santoro IL, Miotto A, de Sousa TLF, Chate RC, Hochhegger B, Gomes A, Schneider A, de Araújo CA, Escuissato DL, Prado GF, Costa-Silva L, Zamboni MM, Ghefter MC, Corrêa PCRP, Torres PPTES, Mussi RK, Muglia VF, de Godoy I, Bernardo WM. Lung cancer screening in Brazil: recommendations from the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, Brazilian Thoracic Association, and Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging. J Bras Pneumol 2024; 50:e20230233. [PMID: 38536982 PMCID: PMC11095927 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20230233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Although lung cancer (LC) is one of the most common and lethal tumors, only 15% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. Smoking is still responsible for more than 85% of cases. Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose CT (LDCT) reduces LC-related mortality by 20%, and that reduction reaches 38% when LCS by LDCT is combined with smoking cessation. In the last decade, a number of countries have adopted population-based LCS as a public health recommendation. Albeit still incipient, discussion on this topic in Brazil is becoming increasingly broad and necessary. With the aim of increasing knowledge and stimulating debate on LCS, the Brazilian Society of Thoracic Surgery, the Brazilian Thoracic Association, and the Brazilian College of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging convened a panel of experts to prepare recommendations for LCS in Brazil. The recommendations presented here were based on a narrative review of the literature, with an emphasis on large population-based studies, systematic reviews, and the recommendations of international guidelines, and were developed after extensive discussion by the panel of experts. The following topics were reviewed: reasons for screening; general considerations about smoking; epidemiology of LC; eligibility criteria; incidental findings; granulomatous lesions; probabilistic models; minimum requirements for LDCT; volumetric acquisition; risks of screening; minimum structure and role of the multidisciplinary team; practice according to the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System; costs versus benefits of screening; and future perspectives for LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz Fernando Ferreira Pereira
- . Serviço de Pneumologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | - Ricardo Sales dos Santos
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
- . Programa ProPulmão, SENAI CIMATEC e SDS Healthline, Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | - Daniel Oliveira Bonomi
- . Departamento de Cirurgia Torácica, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG - Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | - Juliana Franceschini
- . Programa ProPulmão, SENAI CIMATEC e SDS Healthline, Salvador (BA) Brasil
- . Fundação ProAR, Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | - Ilka Lopes Santoro
- . Disciplina de Pneumologia, Departamento de Medicina, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | - André Miotto
- . Disciplina de Cirurgia Torácica, Departamento de Cirurgia, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - UNIFESP - São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | - Thiago Lins Fagundes de Sousa
- . Serviço de Pneumologia, Hospital Universitário Alcides Carneiro, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande - UFCG - Campina Grande (PB) Brasil
| | - Rodrigo Caruso Chate
- . Serviço de Radiologia, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | - Bruno Hochhegger
- . Department of Radiology, University of Florida, Gainesville (FL) USA
| | - Artur Gomes
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Maceió, Maceió (AL) Brasil
| | - Airton Schneider
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital São Lucas, Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| | - César Augusto de Araújo
- . Programa ProPulmão, SENAI CIMATEC e SDS Healthline, Salvador (BA) Brasil
- . Departamento de Radiologia, Faculdade de Medicina da Bahia - UFBA - Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | - Dante Luiz Escuissato
- . Departamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal Do Paraná - UFPR - Curitiba (PR) Brasil
| | | | - Luciana Costa-Silva
- . Serviço de Diagnóstico por Imagem, Instituto Hermes Pardini, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | - Mauro Musa Zamboni
- . Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva, Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil
- . Centro Universitário Arthur Sá Earp Neto/Faculdade de Medicina de Petrópolis -UNIFASE - Petrópolis (RJ) Brasil
| | - Mario Claudio Ghefter
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | | | | | - Ricardo Kalaf Mussi
- . Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - UNICAMP - Campinas (SP) Brasil
| | - Valdair Francisco Muglia
- . Departamento de Imagens Médicas, Oncologia e Hematologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo - USP - Ribeirão Preto (SP) Brasil
| | - Irma de Godoy
- . Disciplina de Pneumologia, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu (SP) Brasil
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hammer MM, Gupta S, Byrne SC. Volume Doubling Times of Benign and Malignant Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2023; 52:515-518. [PMID: 37451949 PMCID: PMC10592400 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.06.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to measure the fractions of benign and malignant nodules in lung cancer screening that grow on follow-up, and to measure the volume doubling time (VDT) of those that grow. In this retrospective study, we included nodules from CT lung cancer screening in our healthcare network, for which a follow-up CT performed at least 2 months later showed the nodule to be persistent. The nodules were measured using semiautomated volumetric segmentation software at both timepoints. Growth was defined as an increase in volume by 25%. VDTs were calculated, and the fraction <400 days was recorded. Categorical variables were compared with Fisher's exact test, and continuous variables by the Wilcoxon test. The study included 153 nodules, of which 44 were malignant and 109 benign. Thirty (68%) of malignant nodules and 36 (33%) of benign nodules grew (P < 0.001). For growing nodules, VDT was 318 days for malignant nodules and 389 for benign nodules (P = 0.21). For growing solid nodules, VDT was 204 days for malignant nodules and 386 days for benign nodules (P = 0.01); of these, VDT was <400 days for 12/13 (92%) of malignant nodules and 15/26 (58%) of benign nodules. In conclusion, malignant nodules were more likely to grow, and solid malignant nodules grew faster, than benign nodules. However, there was substantial overlap between benign and malignant nodules. This limits the utility of volume doubling time in determining malignant nodules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark M Hammer
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - Sumit Gupta
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Suzanne C Byrne
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guedes Pinto E, Penha D, Ravara S, Monaghan C, Hochhegger B, Marchiori E, Taborda-Barata L, Irion K. Factors influencing the outcome of volumetry tools for pulmonary nodule analysis: a systematic review and attempted meta-analysis. Insights Imaging 2023; 14:152. [PMID: 37741928 PMCID: PMC10517915 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01480-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Health systems worldwide are implementing lung cancer screening programmes to identify early-stage lung cancer and maximise patient survival. Volumetry is recommended for follow-up of pulmonary nodules and outperforms other measurement methods. However, volumetry is known to be influenced by multiple factors. The objectives of this systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42022370233) are to summarise the current knowledge regarding factors that influence volumetry tools used in the analysis of pulmonary nodules, assess for significant clinical impact, identify gaps in current knowledge and suggest future research. Five databases (Medline, Scopus, Journals@Ovid, Embase and Emcare) were searched on the 21st of September, 2022, and 137 original research studies were included, explicitly testing the potential impact of influencing factors on the outcome of volumetry tools. The summary of these studies is tabulated, and a narrative review is provided. A subset of studies (n = 16) reporting clinical significance were selected, and their results were combined, if appropriate, using meta-analysis. Factors with clinical significance include the segmentation algorithm, quality of the segmentation, slice thickness, the level of inspiration for solid nodules, and the reconstruction algorithm and kernel in subsolid nodules. Although there is a large body of evidence in this field, it is unclear how to apply the results from these studies in clinical practice as most studies do not test for clinical relevance. The meta-analysis did not improve our understanding due to the small number and heterogeneity of studies testing for clinical significance. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Many studies have investigated the influencing factors of pulmonary nodule volumetry, but only 11% of these questioned their clinical relevance in their management. The heterogeneity among these studies presents a challenge in consolidating results and clinical application of the evidence. KEY POINTS: • Factors influencing the volumetry of pulmonary nodules have been extensively investigated. • Just 11% of studies test clinical significance (wrongly diagnosing growth). • Nodule size interacts with most other influencing factors (especially for smaller nodules). • Heterogeneity among studies makes comparison and consolidation of results challenging. • Future research should focus on clinical applicability, screening, and updated technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erique Guedes Pinto
- R. Marquês de Ávila E Bolama, Universidade da Beira Interior Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, 6201-001, Covilhã, Portugal.
| | - Diana Penha
- R. Marquês de Ávila E Bolama, Universidade da Beira Interior Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, 6201-001, Covilhã, Portugal
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Dr, Liverpool, L14 3PE, UK
| | - Sofia Ravara
- R. Marquês de Ávila E Bolama, Universidade da Beira Interior Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, 6201-001, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Colin Monaghan
- Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Dr, Liverpool, L14 3PE, UK
| | | | - Edson Marchiori
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Bloco K - Av. Carlos Chagas Filho, 373 - 2º Andar, Sala 49 - Cidade Universitária da Universidade Federal Do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro - RJ, 21044-020, Brasil
- Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Marquês Do Paraná, 303 - Centro, Niterói - RJ, 24220-000, Brasil
| | - Luís Taborda-Barata
- R. Marquês de Ávila E Bolama, Universidade da Beira Interior Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde, 6201-001, Covilhã, Portugal
| | - Klaus Irion
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Rd, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Peters AA, Christe A, von Stackelberg O, Pohl M, Kauczor HU, Heußel CP, Wielpütz MO, Ebner L. "Will I change nodule management recommendations if I change my CAD system?"-impact of volumetric deviation between different CAD systems on lesion management. Eur Radiol 2023; 33:5568-5577. [PMID: 36894752 PMCID: PMC10326095 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09525-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate and compare the measurement accuracy of two different computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems regarding artificial pulmonary nodules and assess the clinical impact of volumetric inaccuracies in a phantom study. METHODS In this phantom study, 59 different phantom arrangements with 326 artificial nodules (178 solid, 148 ground-glass) were scanned at 80 kV, 100 kV, and 120 kV. Four different nodule diameters were used: 5 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, and 12 mm. Scans were analyzed by a deep-learning (DL)-based CAD and a standard CAD system. Relative volumetric errors (RVE) of each system vs. ground truth and the relative volume difference (RVD) DL-based vs. standard CAD were calculated. The Bland-Altman method was used to define the limits of agreement (LOA). The hypothetical impact on LungRADS classification was assessed for both systems. RESULTS There was no difference between the three voltage groups regarding nodule volumetry. Regarding the solid nodules, the RVE of the 5-mm-, 8-mm-, 10-mm-, and 12-mm-size groups for the DL CAD/standard CAD were 12.2/2.8%, 1.3/ - 2.8%, - 3.6/1.5%, and - 12.2/ - 0.3%, respectively. The corresponding values for the ground-glass nodules (GGN) were 25.6%/81.0%, 9.0%/28.0%, 7.6/20.6%, and 6.8/21.2%. The mean RVD for solid nodules/GGN was 1.3/ - 15.2%. Regarding the LungRADS classification, 88.5% and 79.8% of all solid nodules were correctly assigned by the DL CAD and the standard CAD, respectively. 14.9% of the nodules were assigned differently between the systems. CONCLUSIONS Patient management may be affected by the volumetric inaccuracy of the CAD systems and hence demands supervision and/or manual correction by a radiologist. KEY POINTS • The DL-based CAD system was more accurate in the volumetry of GGN and less accurate regarding solid nodules than the standard CAD system. • Nodule size and attenuation have an effect on the measurement accuracy of both systems; tube voltage has no effect on measurement accuracy. • Measurement inaccuracies of CAD systems can have an impact on patient management, which demands supervision by radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan A Peters
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Lung Research Center (DZL), Marsilius-Arkaden 130, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Freiburgstrasse, Switzerland.
| | - Andreas Christe
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Freiburgstrasse, Switzerland
| | - Oyunbileg von Stackelberg
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Lung Research Center (DZL), Marsilius-Arkaden 130, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Moritz Pohl
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Lung Research Center (DZL), Marsilius-Arkaden 130, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Peter Heußel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Lung Research Center (DZL), Marsilius-Arkaden 130, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark O Wielpütz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Lung Research Center (DZL), Marsilius-Arkaden 130, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology With Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Roentgenstrasse 1, 69126, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Ebner
- Department of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3010, Freiburgstrasse, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Pulmonary nodules are a common finding on CT scans of the chest. In the United Kingdom, management should follow British Thoracic Society Guidelines, which were published in 2015. This review covers key aspects of nodule management also looks at new and emerging evidence since then.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma L O’Dowd
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, David Evans Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - David R Baldwin
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, David Evans Building, Nottingham City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nam JG, Goo JM. Evaluation and Management of Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Computed Tomography in Asymptomatic Subjects: The Principles of Nodule Guidelines. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 43:851-861. [PMID: 35803268 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1753474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
With the rapidly increasing number of chest computed tomography (CT) examinations, the question of how to manage lung nodules found in asymptomatic patients has become increasingly important. Several nodule management guidelines have been developed that can be applied to incidentally found lung nodules (the Fleischner Society guideline), nodules found during lung cancer screening (International Early Lung Cancer Action Program protocol [I-ELCAP] and Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System [Lung-RADS]), or both (American College of Chest Physicians guideline [ACCP], British Thoracic Society guideline [BTS], and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline [NCCN]). As the radiologic nodule type (solid, part-solid, and pure ground glass) and size are significant predictors of a nodule's nature, most guidelines categorize nodules in terms of these characteristics. Various methods exist for measuring the size of nodules, and the method recommended in each guideline should be followed. The diameter can be manually measured as a single maximal diameter or as an average of two-dimensional diameters, and software can be used to obtain volumetric measurements. It is important to properly evaluate and measure nodules and familiarize ourselves with the relevant guidelines to appropriately utilize medical resources and minimize unnecessary radiation exposure to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ju G Nam
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Mo Goo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Intra- and Inter-Reader Variations in Lung Nodule Measurements: Influences of Nodule Size, Location, and Observers. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12102319. [PMID: 36292008 PMCID: PMC9600531 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Accurate measurement of lung-nodule size is necessary, but whether a three-dimensional volume measurement is better or more reliable than the one-dimensional method is still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-reader variations according to nodule type, size, three-dimensional volume measurements, and one-dimensional linear measurements. (2) Methods: This retrospective study included computed tomography (CT) examinations of lung nodules and volume measurements performed from October to December 2016. Two radiologists independently performed all measurements. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots were used for analysis. (3) Results: The overall variability in the calculated volume was larger than when using the semiautomatic volume measurement. Nodules <6 mm tended to have larger variability than nodules ≥6 mm in both one-dimensional and calculated volume measurements. The isolated type showed smaller variability in both intra- and inter-reader comparisons. The juxta-vascular type showed the largest variability in both one-dimensional and calculated volume measurements. The variability was decreased when using the 3D volume semiautomated software. (4) Conclusions: The present study suggests that 3D semiautomatic volume measurements showed lower variability than the calculated volume measurement. Nodule size and location influence measurement variability. The intra- and inter-reader variabilities in nodule volume measurement were considerable.
Collapse
|
8
|
Shu J, Wen D, Xu Z, Meng X, Zhang Z, Lin S, Zheng M. Improved interobserver agreement on nodule type and Lung-RADS classification of subsolid nodules using computer-aided solid component measurement. Eur J Radiol 2022; 152:110339. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Murchison JT, Ritchie G, Senyszak D, Nijwening JH, van Veenendaal G, Wakkie J, van Beek EJR. Validation of a deep learning computer aided system for CT based lung nodule detection, classification, and growth rate estimation in a routine clinical population. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266799. [PMID: 35511758 PMCID: PMC9070877 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In this study, we evaluated a commercially available computer assisted diagnosis system (CAD). The deep learning algorithm of the CAD was trained with a lung cancer screening cohort and developed for detection, classification, quantification, and growth of actionable pulmonary nodules on chest CT scans. Here, we evaluated the CAD in a retrospective cohort of a routine clinical population. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, a number of 337 scans of 314 different subjects with reported nodules of 3-30 mm in size were included into the evaluation. Two independent thoracic radiologists alternately reviewed scans with or without CAD assistance to detect, classify, segment, and register pulmonary nodules. A third, more experienced, radiologist served as an adjudicator. In addition, the cohort was analyzed by the CAD alone. The study cohort was divided into five different groups: 1) 178 CT studies without reported pulmonary nodules, 2) 95 studies with 1-10 pulmonary nodules, 23 studies from the same patients with 3) baseline and 4) follow-up studies, and 5) 18 CT studies with subsolid nodules. A reference standard for nodules was based on majority consensus with the third thoracic radiologist as required. Sensitivity, false positive (FP) rate and Dice inter-reader coefficient were calculated. RESULTS After analysis of 470 pulmonary nodules, the sensitivity readings for radiologists without CAD and radiologist with CAD, were 71.9% (95% CI: 66.0%, 77.0%) and 80.3% (95% CI: 75.2%, 85.0%) (p < 0.01), with average FP rate of 0.11 and 0.16 per CT scan, respectively. Accuracy and kappa of CAD for classifying solid vs sub-solid nodules was 94.2% and 0.77, respectively. Average inter-reader Dice coefficient for nodule segmentation was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.39, 0.96) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.51, 0.95) for CAD versus readers. Mean growth percentage discrepancy of readers and CAD alone was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.02, 2.21) and 1.35 (95% CI: 1.01, 4.99), respectively. CONCLUSION The applied CAD significantly increased radiologist's detection of actionable nodules yet also minimally increasing the false positive rate. The CAD can automatically classify and quantify nodules and calculate nodule growth rate in a cohort of a routine clinical population. Results suggest this Deep Learning software has the potential to assist chest radiologists in the tasks of pulmonary nodule detection and management within their routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John T. Murchison
- Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- * E-mail: (JTM); (JHN)
| | - Gillian Ritchie
- Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - David Senyszak
- Edinburgh Imaging facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Edwin J. R. van Beek
- Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Edinburgh Imaging facility QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lin FY, Chang YC, Huang HY, Li CC, Chen YC, Chen CM. A radiomics approach for lung nodule detection in thoracic CT images based on the dynamic patterns of morphological variation. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:3767-3777. [PMID: 35020016 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08456-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To propose and evaluate a set of radiomic features, called morphological dynamics features, for pulmonary nodule detection, which were rooted in the dynamic patterns of morphological variation and needless precise lesion segmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two datasets were involved, namely, university hospital (UH) and LIDC datasets, comprising 72 CT scans (360 nodules) and 888 CT scans (2230 nodules), respectively. Each nodule was annotated by multiple radiologists. Denoted the category of nodules identified by at least k radiologists as ALk. A nodule detection algorithm, called CAD-MD algorithm, was proposed based on the morphological dynamics radiomic features, characterizing a lesion by ten sets of the same features with different values extracted from ten different thresholding results. Each nodule candidate was classified by a two-level classifier, including ten decision trees and a random forest, respectively. The CAD-MD algorithm was compared with a deep learning approach, the N-Net, using the UH dataset. RESULTS On the AL1 and AL2 of the UH dataset, the AUC of the AFROC curves were 0.777 and 0.851 for the CAD-MD algorithm and 0.478 and 0.472 for the N-Net, respectively. The CAD-MD algorithm achieved the sensitivities of 84.4% and 91.4% with 2.98 and 3.69 FPs/scan and the N-Net 74.4% and 80.7% with 3.90 and 4.49 FPs/scan, respectively. On the LIDC dataset, the CAD-MD algorithm attained the sensitivities of 87.6%, 89.2%, 92.2%, and 95.0% with 4 FPs/scan for AL1-AL4, respectively. CONCLUSION The morphological dynamics radiomic features might serve as an effective set of radiomic features for lung nodule detection. KEY POINTS • Texture features varied with such CT system settings as reconstruction kernels of CT images, CT scanner models, and parameter settings, and so on. • Shape and first-order statistics were shown to be the most robust features against variation in CT imaging parameters. • The morphological dynamics radiomic features, which mainly characterized the dynamic patterns of morphological variation, were shown to be effective for lung nodule detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan-Ya Lin
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
| | - Yeun-Chung Chang
- Department of Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Chia-Chen Li
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chang Chen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Imaging, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Ming Chen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine and College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, 100, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Balagurunathan Y, Beers A, McNitt-Gray M, Hadjiiski L, Napel S, Goldgof D, Perez G, Arbelaez P, Mehrtash A, Kapur T, Yang E, Moon JW, Bernardino G, Delgado-Gonzalo R, Farhangi MM, Amini AA, Ni R, Feng X, Bagari A, Vaidhya K, Veasey B, Safta W, Frigui H, Enguehard J, Gholipour A, Castillo LS, Daza LA, Pinsky P, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K. Lung Nodule Malignancy Prediction in Sequential CT Scans: Summary of ISBI 2018 Challenge. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING 2021; 40:3748-3761. [PMID: 34264825 PMCID: PMC9531053 DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2021.3097665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Lung cancer is by far the leading cause of cancer death in the US. Recent studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of screening using low dose CT (LDCT) in reducing lung cancer related mortality. While lung nodules are detected with a high rate of sensitivity, this exam has a low specificity rate and it is still difficult to separate benign and malignant lesions. The ISBI 2018 Lung Nodule Malignancy Prediction Challenge, developed by a team from the Quantitative Imaging Network of the National Cancer Institute, was focused on the prediction of lung nodule malignancy from two sequential LDCT screening exams using automated (non-manual) algorithms. We curated a cohort of 100 subjects who participated in the National Lung Screening Trial and had established pathological diagnoses. Data from 30 subjects were randomly selected for training and the remaining was used for testing. Participants were evaluated based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of nodule-wise malignancy scores generated by their algorithms on the test set. The challenge had 17 participants, with 11 teams submitting reports with method description, mandated by the challenge rules. Participants used quantitative methods, resulting in a reporting test AUC ranging from 0.698 to 0.913. The top five contestants used deep learning approaches, reporting an AUC between 0.87 - 0.91. The team's predictor did not achieve significant differences from each other nor from a volume change estimate (p =.05 with Bonferroni-Holm's correction).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Sandy Napel
- Dept. of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University (SU), CA
| | | | - Gustavo Perez
- Biomedical computer vision lab (BCV), Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
| | - Pablo Arbelaez
- Biomedical computer vision lab (BCV), Universidad de los Andes, Colombia
| | - Alireza Mehrtash
- Robotics and Control Laboratory (RCL), Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
- Surgical Planning Laboratory (SPL), Radiology Department, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 02130
| | - Tina Kapur
- Surgical Planning Laboratory (SPL), Radiology Department, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 02130
| | - Ehwa Yang
- Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, Korea
| | - Jung Won Moon
- Human Medical Imaging & Intervention Center, Seoul 06524, Korea
| | - Gabriel Bernardino
- Centre Suisse d’Électronique et de Microtechnique, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | | | - M. Mehdi Farhangi
- Medical Imaging Laboratory, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. USA
- Computer Engineering and Computer Science, University of Louisville
| | - Amir A. Amini
- Medical Imaging Laboratory, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. USA
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. USA
| | | | - Xue Feng
- Spingbok Inc
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
| | | | | | - Benjamin Veasey
- Medical Imaging Laboratory, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. USA
- Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY. USA
| | - Wiem Safta
- Computer Engineering and Computer Science, University of Louisville
| | - Hichem Frigui
- Computer Engineering and Computer Science, University of Louisville
| | - Joseph Enguehard
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School
| | - Ali Gholipour
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School
| | | | - Laura Alexandra Daza
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Paul Pinsky
- Divsion of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Washington DC
| | | | - Keyvan Farahani
- Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Washington DC
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
El Ayachy R, Giraud N, Giraud P, Durdux C, Giraud P, Burgun A, Bibault JE. The Role of Radiomics in Lung Cancer: From Screening to Treatment and Follow-Up. Front Oncol 2021; 11:603595. [PMID: 34026602 PMCID: PMC8131863 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.603595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Lung cancer represents the first cause of cancer-related death in the world. Radiomics studies arise rapidly in this late decade. The aim of this review is to identify important recent publications to be synthesized into a comprehensive review of the current status of radiomics in lung cancer at each step of the patients' care. METHODS A literature review was conducted using PubMed/Medline for search of relevant peer-reviewed publications from January 2012 to June 2020. RESULTS We identified several studies at each point of patient's care: detection and classification of lung nodules (n=16), determination of histology and genomic (n=10) and finally treatment outcomes predictions (=23). We reported the methodology of those studies and their results and discuss the limitations and the progress to be made for clinical routine applications. CONCLUSION Promising perspectives arise from machine learning applications and radiomics based models in lung cancers, yet further data are necessary for their implementation in daily care. Multicentric collaboration and attention to quality and reproductivity of radiomics studies should be further consider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radouane El Ayachy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR 1138 Team 22: Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, Cordeliers Research Centre, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Giraud
- INSERM UMR 1138 Team 22: Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, Cordeliers Research Centre, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
- Radiation Oncology Department, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - Paul Giraud
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR 1138 Team 22: Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, Cordeliers Research Centre, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Catherine Durdux
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Giraud
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Anita Burgun
- Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR 1138 Team 22: Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, Cordeliers Research Centre, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - Jean Emmanuel Bibault
- Radiation Oncology Department, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine-Integrated Cancer Research Center (SIRIC), Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- INSERM UMR 1138 Team 22: Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, Cordeliers Research Centre, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Snoeckx A, Franck C, Silva M, Prokop M, Schaefer-Prokop C, Revel MP. The radiologist's role in lung cancer screening. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:2356-2367. [PMID: 34164283 PMCID: PMC8182709 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is still the deadliest cancer in men and women worldwide. This high mortality is related to diagnosis in advanced stages, when curative treatment is no longer an option. Large randomized controlled trials have shown that lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (CT) can detect lung cancers at earlier stages and reduce lung cancer-specific mortality. The recent publication of the significant reduction of cancer-related mortality by 26% in the Dutch-Belgian NELSON LCS trial has increased the likelihood that implementation of LCS in Europe will move forward. Radiologists are important stakeholders in numerous aspects of the LCS pathway. Their role goes beyond nodule detection and nodule management. Being part of a multidisciplinary team, radiologists are key players in numerous aspects of implementation of a high quality LCS program. In this non-systematic review we discuss the multifaceted role of radiologists in LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemiek Snoeckx
- Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Caro Franck
- Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Mario Silva
- Scienze Radiologiche, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Mathias Prokop
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marie-Pierre Revel
- Department of Radiology, Cochin Hospital, APHP Centre, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fernandes S, Williams G, Williams E, Ehrlich K, Stone J, Finlayson N, Bradley M, Thomson RR, Akram AR, Dhaliwal K. Solitary pulmonary nodule imaging approaches and the role of optical fibre-based technologies. Eur Respir J 2021; 57:2002537. [PMID: 33060152 PMCID: PMC8174723 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02537-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) are a clinical challenge, given there is no single clinical sign or radiological feature that definitively identifies a benign from a malignant SPN. The early detection of lung cancer has a huge impact on survival outcome. Consequently, there is great interest in the prompt diagnosis, and treatment of malignant SPNs. Current diagnostic pathways involve endobronchial/transthoracic tissue biopsies or radiological surveillance, which can be associated with suboptimal diagnostic yield, healthcare costs and patient anxiety. Cutting-edge technologies are needed to disrupt and improve, existing care pathways. Optical fibre-based techniques, which can be delivered via the working channel of a bronchoscope or via transthoracic needle, may deliver advanced diagnostic capabilities in patients with SPNs. Optical endomicroscopy, an autofluorescence-based imaging technique, demonstrates abnormal alveolar structure in SPNs in vivo Alternative optical fingerprinting approaches, such as time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy and fluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopy, have shown promise in discriminating lung cancer from surrounding healthy tissue. Whilst fibre-based Raman spectroscopy has enabled real-time characterisation of SPNs in vivo Fibre-based technologies have the potential to enable in situ characterisation and real-time microscopic imaging of SPNs, which could aid immediate treatment decisions in patients with SPNs. This review discusses advances in current imaging modalities for evaluating SPNs, including computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography-CT. It explores the emergence of optical fibre-based technologies, and discusses their potential role in patients with SPNs and suspected lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Fernandes
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Gareth Williams
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Elvira Williams
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Katjana Ehrlich
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James Stone
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Photonics and Photonic Materials, Dept of Physics, The University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Neil Finlayson
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute for Integrated Micro and Nano Systems, School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark Bradley
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- EaStCHEM, School of Chemistry, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert R. Thomson
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Institute of Photonics and Quantum Sciences, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ahsan R. Akram
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kevin Dhaliwal
- Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gierada DS, Rydzak CE, Zei M, Rhea L. Improved Interobserver Agreement on Lung-RADS Classification of Solid Nodules Using Semiautomated CT Volumetry. Radiology 2020; 297:675-684. [PMID: 32930652 PMCID: PMC7706890 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020200302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Revised: 07/05/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Classification of lung cancer screening CT scans depends on measurement of lung nodule size. Information about interobserver agreement is limited. Purpose To assess interobserver agreement in the measurements and American College of Radiology Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) classifications of solid lung nodules detected at lung cancer screening using manual measurements of average diameter and computer-aided semiautomated measurements of average diameter and volume (CT volumetry). Materials and Methods Two radiologists and one radiology resident retrospectively measured lung nodules from screening CT scans obtained between September 2016 and June 2018 with a Lung-RADS (version 1.0) classification of 2, 3, 4A, or 4B in the clinical setting. Average manual diameter and semiautomated computer-aided diameter and volume measurements were converted to the corresponding Lung-RADS categories. Interobserver agreement in raw measurements was assessed using intraclass correlation and Bland-Altman indexes, and interobserver agreement in Lung-RADS classification was assessed using bi-rater κ. Results One hundred twenty patients (mean age, 63 years ± 6 [standard deviation]; 67 women) were evaluated. All manual, semiautomated diameter, and semiautomated volume measurements were obtained by all three readers in 120 of 147 nodules (82%). Intraclass correlation coefficients were greater than or equal to 0.95 for all reader pairs using all measurement methods and were highest using volumetry. Bias and 95% limits of agreement for average diameter were smaller with semiautomated measurements than with manual measurements. κ values across all Lung-RADS classifications were greater than or equal to 0.81, with the lowest being for manual measurements and the highest being for volumetric measurements. Forty-three of 120 (36%) of the nodules were classified into a lower Lung-RADS category on the basis of volumetry compared with using manual diameter measurements by at least one reader, whereas the reverse occurred for four of 120 (3%) of the nodules. Conclusion Interobserver agreement was high with manual diameter measurements and increased with semiautomated CT volumetric measurements. Semiautomated CT volumetry enabled classification of more nodules into lower Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System categories than manual or semiautomated diameter measurements. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Nishino in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S. Gierada
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (D.S.G., C.E.R., M.Z.) and Department of Biostatistics (L.R.), School of Medicine, Washington University, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110
| | | | - Markus Zei
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (D.S.G., C.E.R., M.Z.) and Department of Biostatistics (L.R.), School of Medicine, Washington University, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110
| | - Lee Rhea
- From the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (D.S.G., C.E.R., M.Z.) and Department of Biostatistics (L.R.), School of Medicine, Washington University, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dyer SC, Bartholmai BJ, Koo CW. Implications of the updated Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS version 1.1) for lung cancer screening. J Thorac Dis 2020; 12:6966-6977. [PMID: 33282402 PMCID: PMC7711402 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2019-cptn-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) has been proven to aid in early detection of lung cancer and reduce disease specific mortality. In 2014, the American College of Radiology (ACR) released version 1.0 of the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) as a quality tool to standardize the reporting of lung cancer screening LDCT. In 2019, 5 years after the implementation of Lung-RADS version 1.0 the ACR released the updated Lung-RADS version 1.1 which incorporates initial experience with lung cancer screening. In this review, we outline the implications of the changes and additions in Lung-RADS version 1.1 and examine relevant literature for many of the updates. We also highlight several challenges and opportunities as Lung-RADS version 1.1 is implemented in lung cancer screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spencer C Dyer
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Chi Wan Koo
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Soo E, Edey A, Mak S, Moser J, Mohammadi S, Rodrigues T, Duffy S, Field J, Baldwin D, Nair A, Devaraj A. Impact of choice of volumetry software and nodule management guidelines on recall rates in lung cancer screening. Eur J Radiol 2019; 120:108646. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
18
|
McNulty W, Baldwin D. Management of pulmonary nodules. BJR Open 2019; 1:20180051. [PMID: 33178935 PMCID: PMC7592490 DOI: 10.1259/bjro.20180051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 03/17/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Pulmonary nodules are frequently detected during clinical practice and require a structured approach in their management in order to identify early lung cancers and avoid harm from over investigation. The article reviews the 2015 British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of pulmonary nodules and the evidence behind them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William McNulty
- King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - David Baldwin
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, City Campus, Hucknall Road, Nottingham, England
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Effect of Reconstruction Parameters on the Quantitative Analysis of Chest Computed Tomography. J Thorac Imaging 2019; 34:92-102. [DOI: 10.1097/rti.0000000000000389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
20
|
Bueno J, Landeras L, Chung JH. Updated Fleischner Society Guidelines for Managing Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Common Questions and Challenging Scenarios. Radiographics 2018; 38:1337-1350. [PMID: 30207935 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2018180017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The new guidelines for managing incidental pulmonary nodules published by the Fleischner Society in 2017 reflect an improved understanding of the risk factors and biologic features of lung cancer. Specific topics emphasized in the updated guidelines include a new threshold size for follow-up, the importance of the morphologic features of nodules, accurate nodule measurements, recognition of subsolid components, understanding interval growth or change in nodule morphology, and knowledge of patient risk factors. The updated guidelines enable greater personal flexibility in the decision-making process and encourage individualized management of pulmonary nodules. These factors may introduce new challenges for radiologists, who previously used solely nodule size to make management recommendations. The authors describe eight scenarios that illustrate the challenges potentially encountered when applying the new guidelines to pulmonary nodule management. ©RSNA, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Bueno
- From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Medical Center, 1215 Lee St, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (J.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (L.L., J.H.C.)
| | - Luis Landeras
- From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Medical Center, 1215 Lee St, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (J.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (L.L., J.H.C.)
| | - Jonathan H Chung
- From the Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Medical Center, 1215 Lee St, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (J.B.); and Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill (L.L., J.H.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hochhegger B, Zanon M, Altmayer S, Pacini GS, Balbinot F, Francisco MZ, Dalla Costa R, Watte G, Santos MK, Barros MC, Penha D, Irion K, Marchiori E. Advances in Imaging and Automated Quantification of Malignant Pulmonary Diseases: A State-of-the-Art Review. Lung 2018; 196:633-642. [DOI: 10.1007/s00408-018-0156-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
22
|
Heuvelmans MA, Oudkerk M. Pulmonary nodules measurements in CT lung cancer screening. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:S2100-S2102. [PMID: 30023131 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.05.166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein A Heuvelmans
- Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
de Margerie-Mellon C, Heidinger BH, Bankier AA. 2D or 3D measurements of pulmonary nodules: preliminary answers and more open questions. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:547-549. [PMID: 29608182 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Benedikt H Heidinger
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander A Bankier
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
A Comparison of Lung Nodule Segmentation Algorithms: Methods and Results from a Multi-institutional Study. J Digit Imaging 2018; 29:476-87. [PMID: 26847203 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9859-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor volume estimation, as well as accurate and reproducible borders segmentation in medical images, are important in the diagnosis, staging, and assessment of response to cancer therapy. The goal of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility of a multi-institutional effort to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of nodule borders and volume estimate bias of computerized segmentation algorithms in CT images of lung cancer, and to provide results from such a study. The dataset used for this evaluation consisted of 52 tumors in 41 CT volumes (40 patient datasets and 1 dataset containing scans of 12 phantom nodules of known volume) from five collections available in The Cancer Imaging Archive. Three academic institutions developing lung nodule segmentation algorithms submitted results for three repeat runs for each of the nodules. We compared the performance of lung nodule segmentation algorithms by assessing several measurements of spatial overlap and volume measurement. Nodule sizes varied from 29 μl to 66 ml and demonstrated a diversity of shapes. Agreement in spatial overlap of segmentations was significantly higher for multiple runs of the same algorithm than between segmentations generated by different algorithms (p < 0.05) and was significantly higher on the phantom dataset compared to the other datasets (p < 0.05). Algorithms differed significantly in the bias of the measured volumes of the phantom nodules (p < 0.05) underscoring the need for assessing performance on clinical data in addition to phantoms. Algorithms that most accurately estimated nodule volumes were not the most repeatable, emphasizing the need to evaluate both their accuracy and precision. There were considerable differences between algorithms, especially in a subset of heterogeneous nodules, underscoring the recommendation that the same software be used at all time points in longitudinal studies.
Collapse
|
25
|
Balagurunathan Y, Beers A, Kalpathy-Cramer J, McNitt-Gray M, Hadjiiski L, Zhao B, Zhu J, Yang H, Yip SSF, Aerts HJWL, Napel S, Cherezov D, Cha K, Chan HP, Flores C, Garcia A, Gillies R, Goldgof D. Semi-automated pulmonary nodule interval segmentation using the NLST data. Med Phys 2018; 45:1093-1107. [PMID: 29363773 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Revised: 01/04/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the variability in volume change estimates of pulmonary nodules due to segmentation approaches used across several algorithms and to evaluate these effects on the ability to predict nodule malignancy. METHODS We obtained 100 patient image datasets from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) that had a nodule detected on each of two consecutive low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans, with an equal proportion of malignant and benign cases (50 malignant, 50 benign). Information about the nodule location for the cases was provided by a screen capture with a bounding box and its axial location was indicated. Five participating quantitative imaging network (QIN) institutions performed nodule segmentation using their preferred semi-automated algorithms with no manual correction; teams were allowed to provide additional manually corrected segmentations (analyzed separately). The teams were asked to provide segmentation masks for each nodule at both time points. From these masks, the volume was estimated for the nodule at each time point; the change in volume (absolute and percent change) across time points was estimated as well. We used the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) to compare the similarity of computed nodule volumes (absolute and percent change) across algorithms. We used Logistic regression model on the change in volume (absolute change and percent change) of the nodules to predict the malignancy status, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and confidence intervals were reported. Because the size of nodules was expected to have a substantial effect on segmentation variability, analysis of change in volumes was stratified by lesion size, where lesions were grouped into those with a longest diameter of <8 mm and those with longest diameter ≥ 8 mm. RESULTS We find that segmentation of the nodules shows substantial variability across algorithms, with the CCC ranging from 0.56 to 0.95 for change in volume (percent change in volume range was [0.15 to 0.86]) across the nodules. When examining nodules based on their longest diameter, we find the CCC had higher values for large nodules with a range of [0.54 to 0.93] among the algorithms, while percent change in volume was [0.3 to 0.95]. Compared to that of smaller nodules which had a range of [-0.0038 to 0.69] and percent change in volume was [-0.039 to 0.92]. The malignancy prediction results showed fairly consistent results across the institutions, the AUC using change in volume ranged from 0.65 to 0.89 (Percent change in volume was 0.64 to 0.86) for entire nodule range. Prediction improves for large nodule range (≥ 8 mm) with AUC range 0.75 to 0.90 (percent change in volume was 0.74 to 0.92). Compared to smaller nodule range (<8 mm) with AUC range 0.57 to 0.78 (percent change in volume was 0.59 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS We find there is a fairly high concordance in the size measurements for larger nodules (≥8 mm) than the lower sizes (<8 mm) across algorithms. We find the change in nodule volume (absolute and percent change) were consistent predictors of malignancy across institutions, despite using different segmentation algorithms. Using volume change estimates without corrections shows slightly lower predictability (for two teams).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Beers
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Hao Yang
- Columbia University (CUMU), New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen S F Yip
- Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCC), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and Harvard Medical School (HMC), Boston, MA, USA.,Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCC) Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and Harvard Medical School (HMC), Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hugo J W L Aerts
- Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCC), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and Harvard Medical School (HMC), Boston, MA, USA.,Radiology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCC) Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) and Harvard Medical School (HMC), Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Dmitrii Cherezov
- H.L.Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC), Tampa, FL, USA.,University of South Florida (USF), Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kenny Cha
- University of Michigan (UMICH), Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Carlos Flores
- University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Dmitry Goldgof
- H.L.Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC), Tampa, FL, USA.,University of South Florida (USF), Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Milanese G, Eberhard M, Martini K, Vittoria De Martini I, Frauenfelder T. Vessel suppressed chest Computed Tomography for semi-automated volumetric measurements of solid pulmonary nodules. Eur J Radiol 2018; 101:97-102. [PMID: 29571809 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2017] [Revised: 02/09/2018] [Accepted: 02/14/2018] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether vessel-suppressed computed tomography (VSCT) can be reliably used for semi-automated volumetric measurements of solid pulmonary nodules, as compared to standard CT (SCT) MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-three SCT were elaborated by dedicated software (ClearRead CT, Riverain Technologies, Miamisburg, OH, USA), that allows subtracting vessels from lung parenchyma. Semi-automated volumetric measurements of 65 solid nodules were compared between SCT and VSCT. The measurements were repeated by two readers. For each solid nodule, volume measured on SCT by Reader 1 and Reader 2 was averaged and the average volume between readers acted as standard of reference value. Concordance between measurements was assessed using Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC). Limits of agreement (LoA) between readers and CT datasets were evaluated. RESULTS Standard of reference nodule volume ranged from 13 to 366 mm3. The mean overestimation between readers was 3 mm3 and 2.9 mm3 on SCT and VSCT, respectively. Semi-automated volumetric measurements on VSCT showed substantial agreement with the standard of reference (Lin's CCC = 0.990 for Reader 1; 0.985 for Reader 2). The upper and lower LoA between readers' measurements were (16.3, -22.4 mm3) and (15.5, -21.4 mm3) for SCT and VSCT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS VSCT datasets are feasible for the measurements of solid nodules, showing an almost perfect concordance between readers and with measurements on SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Milanese
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Matthias Eberhard
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Katharina Martini
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Ilaria Vittoria De Martini
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Thomas Frauenfelder
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Ramistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Silva M, Milanese G, Seletti V, Ariani A, Sverzellati N. Pulmonary quantitative CT imaging in focal and diffuse disease: current research and clinical applications. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20170644. [PMID: 29172671 PMCID: PMC5965469 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The frenetic development of imaging technology-both hardware and software-provides exceptional potential for investigation of the lung. In the last two decades, CT was exploited for detailed characterization of pulmonary structures and description of respiratory disease. The introduction of volumetric acquisition allowed increasingly sophisticated analysis of CT data by means of computerized algorithm, namely quantitative CT (QCT). Hundreds of thousands of CTs have been analysed for characterization of focal and diffuse disease of the lung. Several QCT metrics were developed and tested against clinical, functional and prognostic descriptors. Computer-aided detection of nodules, textural analysis of focal lesions, densitometric analysis and airway segmentation in obstructive pulmonary disease and textural analysis in interstitial lung disease are the major chapters of this discipline. The validation of QCT metrics for specific clinical and investigational needs prompted the translation of such metrics from research field to patient care. The present review summarizes the state of the art of QCT in both focal and diffuse lung disease, including a dedicated discussion about application of QCT metrics as parameters for clinical care and outcomes in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Silva
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Gianluca Milanese
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Valeria Seletti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Alarico Ariani
- Department of Medicine, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Nicola Sverzellati
- Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kakinuma R, Muramatsu Y, Yamamichi J, Gomi S, Oubel E, Moriyama N. Evaluation of the 95% limits of agreement of the volumes of 5-year clinically stable solid nodules for the development of a follow-up system for indeterminate solid nodules in CT lung cancer screening. J Thorac Dis 2018; 10:175-189. [PMID: 29600047 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background This study sought to evaluate the 95% limits of agreement of the volumes of 5-year clinically stable solid nodules for the development of a follow-up system for indeterminate solid nodules. Methods The volumes of 226 solid nodules that had been clinically stable for 5 years were measured in 186 patients (53 female never-smokers, 36 male never-smokers, 51 males with <30 pack-years, and 46 males with ≥30 pack-years) using a three-dimensional semiautomated method. Volume changes were evaluated using three methods: percent change, proportional change and growth rate. The 95% limits of agreement were evaluated using the Bland-Altman method. Results The 95% limits of agreement were as follows: range of percent change, from ±34.5% to ±37.8%; range of proportional change, from ±34.1% to ±36.8%; and range of growth rate, from ±39.2% to ±47.4%. Percent change-based, proportional change-based, and growth rate-based diagnoses of an increase or decrease in ten solid nodules were made at a mean of 302±402, 367±455, and 329±496 days, respectively, compared with a clinical diagnosis made at 809±616 days (P<0.05). Conclusions The 95% limits of agreement for volume change in 5-year stable solid nodules may enable the detection of an increase or decrease in the solid nodule at an earlier stage than that enabled by a clinical diagnosis, possibly contributing to the development of a follow-up system for reducing the number of additional Computed tomography (CT) scans performed during the follow-up period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryutaro Kakinuma
- Division of Cancer Screening, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Cancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Pulmonology, Tokyo General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukio Muramatsu
- Division of Cancer Screening, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Radiology, E-Medical Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junta Yamamichi
- Division of Cancer Screening, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Global Healthcare IT Project, Medical Equipment Group, Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiho Gomi
- Division of Cancer Screening, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Estanislao Oubel
- MEDIAN Technologies, Valbonne Sophia Antipolis, Valbonne, France
| | - Noriyuki Moriyama
- Division of Cancer Screening, Research Center for Cancer Prevention and Screening, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Radiology, Tokyo Midtown Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Larici AR, Farchione A, Franchi P, Ciliberto M, Cicchetti G, Calandriello L, del Ciello A, Bonomo L. Lung nodules: size still matters. Eur Respir Rev 2017; 26:26/146/170025. [DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0025-2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The incidence of indeterminate pulmonary nodules has risen constantly over the past few years. Determination of lung nodule malignancy is pivotal, because the early diagnosis of lung cancer could lead to a definitive intervention. According to the current international guidelines, size and growth rate represent the main indicators to determine the nature of a pulmonary nodule. However, there are some limitations in evaluating and characterising nodules when only their dimensions are taken into account. There is no single method for measuring nodules, and intrinsic errors, which can determine variations in nodule measurement and in growth assessment, do exist when performing measurements either manually or with automated or semi-automated methods. When considering subsolid nodules the presence and size of a solid component is the major determinant of malignancy and nodule management, as reported in the latest guidelines. Nevertheless, other nodule morphological characteristics have been associated with an increased risk of malignancy. In addition, the clinical context should not be overlooked in determining the probability of malignancy. Predictive models have been proposed as a potential means to overcome the limitations of a sized-based assessment of the malignancy risk for indeterminate pulmonary nodules.
Collapse
|
30
|
Han D, Heuvelmans MA, Vliegenthart R, Rook M, Dorrius MD, de Jonge GJ, Walter JE, van Ooijen PMA, de Koning HJ, Oudkerk M. Influence of lung nodule margin on volume- and diameter-based reader variability in CT lung cancer screening. Br J Radiol 2017; 91:20170405. [PMID: 28972803 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of nodule margin on inter- and intrareader variability in manual diameter measurements and semi-automatic volume measurements of solid nodules detected in low-dose CT lung cancer screening. METHODS: 25 nodules of each morphological category (smooth, lobulated, spiculated and irregular) were randomly selected from 93 participants of the Dutch-Belgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NELSON). Semi-automatic volume measurements were performed using Syngo LungCARE® software (Version Somaris/5 VB10A-W, Siemens, Forchheim, Germany). Three radiologists independently measured mean diameters manually. Impact of nodule margin on interreader variability was evaluated based on systematic error and 95% limits of agreement. Interreader variability was compared with the nodule growth cut-off as used in Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (LungRADS; +1.5-mm diameter) and the Dutch-Belgian Randomized Lung Cancer Screening Trial(acronym: NELSON) /British Thoracic Society (+25% volume). RESULTS: For manual diameter measurements, a significant systematic error (up to 1.2 mm) between readers was found in all morphological categories. For semi-automatic volume measurements, no statistically significant systematic error was found. The interreader variability in mean diameter measurements exceeded the 1.5-mm cut-off for nodule growth for all morphological categories [smooth: ±1.9 mm (+27%), lobulated: ±2.0 mm (+33%), spiculated: ±3.5 mm (+133%), irregular: ±4.5 mm (+200%)]. The 25% vol growth cut-off was exceeded slightly for spiculated [28% (+12%)] and irregular [27% (+8%)] nodules. CONCLUSION: Lung nodule sizing based on manual diameter measurement is affected by nodule margin. Interreader variability increases especially for nodules with spiculated and irregular margins, and causes substantial misclassification of nodule growth. This effect is almost neglectable for semi-automated volume measurements. Semi-automatic volume measurements are superior for both size and growth determination of pulmonary nodules. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Nodule assessment based on manual diameter measurements is susceptible to nodule margin. This effect is almost neglectable for semi-automated volume measurements. The larger interreader variability for manual diameter measurement results in inaccurate lung nodule growth detection and size classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiwei Han
- 1 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands , Groningen , Netherlands
| | - Marjolein A Heuvelmans
- 1 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands , Groningen , Netherlands.,2 Department of Pulmonology, Medisch Spectrum Twente , Enschede , Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
- 1 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands , Groningen , Netherlands.,3 Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands
| | - Mieneke Rook
- 1 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands , Groningen , Netherlands
| | - Monique D Dorrius
- 1 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands , Groningen , Netherlands.,3 Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands
| | - Gonda J de Jonge
- 3 Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands
| | - Joan E Walter
- 1 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands , Groningen , Netherlands
| | - Peter M A van Ooijen
- 1 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands , Groningen , Netherlands.,3 Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands
| | - Harry J de Koning
- 4 Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, University Medical Center Rotterdam , Rotterdam , Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- 1 University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands , Groningen , Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Devaraj A, van Ginneken B, Nair A, Baldwin D. Use of Volumetry for Lung Nodule Management: Theory and Practice. Radiology 2017; 284:630-644. [DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2017151022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Anand Devaraj
- From the Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, England (A.D.); Department of of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England (A.N.); and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England
| | - Bram van Ginneken
- From the Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, England (A.D.); Department of of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England (A.N.); and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England
| | - Arjun Nair
- From the Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, England (A.D.); Department of of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England (A.N.); and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England
| | - David Baldwin
- From the Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, Sydney St, London SW3 6NP, England (A.D.); Department of of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (B.v.G.); Department of Radiology, Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, England (A.N.); and Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Han D, Heuvelmans MA, Oudkerk M. Volume versus diameter assessment of small pulmonary nodules in CT lung cancer screening. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2017; 6:52-61. [PMID: 28331824 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2017.01.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Currently, lung cancer screening by low-dose chest CT is implemented in the United States for high-risk persons. A disadvantage of lung cancer screening is the large number of small-to-intermediate sized lung nodules, detected in around 50% of all participants, the large majority being benign. Accurate estimation of nodule size and growth is essential in the classification of lung nodules. Currently, manual diameter measurements are the standard for lung cancer screening programs and routine clinical care. However, European screening studies using semi-automated volume measurements have shown higher accuracy and reproducibility compared to diameter measurements. In addition to this, with the optimization of CT scan techniques and reconstruction parameters, as well as advances in segmentation software, the accuracy of nodule volume measurement can be improved even further. The positive results of previous studies on volume and diameter measurements of lung nodules suggest that manual measurements of nodule diameter may be replaced by semi-automated volume measurements in the (near) future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiwei Han
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein A Heuvelmans
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Graham RNJ, Baldwin DR, Callister MEJ, Gleeson FV. Return of the pulmonary nodule: the radiologist's key role in implementing the 2015 BTS guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20150776. [PMID: 26781558 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The British Thoracic Society has published new comprehensive guidelines for the management of pulmonary nodules. These guidelines are significantly different from those previously published, as they use two malignancy prediction calculators to better characterize the risk of malignancy. There are recommendations for a higher nodule size threshold for follow-up (≥5 mm or ≥80 mm(3)) and a reduction of the follow-up period to 1 year for solid pulmonary nodules; both of these will reduce the number of follow-up CT scans. PET-CT plays a crucial role in characterization also, with an ordinal scale being recommended for reporting. Radiologists will be the key in implementing these guidelines, and routine use of volumetric image-analysis software will be required to manage patients with pulmonary nodules correctly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard N J Graham
- 1 Department of Radiology, Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
| | - David R Baldwin
- 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Baldwin DR, Callister ME, Graham R, Gleeson F. Pulmonary nodules again? The 2015 British Thoracic Society guidelines on the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Clin Radiol 2016; 71:18-22. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2015] [Revised: 09/09/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
35
|
Callister MEJ, Baldwin DR, Akram AR, Barnard S, Cane P, Draffan J, Franks K, Gleeson F, Graham R, Malhotra P, Prokop M, Rodger K, Subesinghe M, Waller D, Woolhouse I. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax 2015; 70 Suppl 2:ii1-ii54. [PMID: 26082159 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 560] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M E J Callister
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, UK
| | - D R Baldwin
- Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - A R Akram
- Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - S Barnard
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - P Cane
- Department of Histopathology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - J Draffan
- University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton on Tees, UK
| | - K Franks
- Clinical Oncology, St James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds, UK
| | - F Gleeson
- Department of Radiology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | | | - P Malhotra
- St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, UK
| | - M Prokop
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - K Rodger
- Respiratory Medicine, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - M Subesinghe
- Department of Radiology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - D Waller
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
| | - I Woolhouse
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Morgan A, Slade M. Pulmonary nodules: bringing order out of chaos. Thorax 2015; 70:716-7. [DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
37
|
Pulmonary Nodule Characterization, Including Computer Analysis and Quantitative Features. J Thorac Imaging 2015; 30:139-56. [DOI: 10.1097/rti.0000000000000137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
38
|
Rosenkrantz AB, Mendiratta-Lala M, Bartholmai BJ, Ganeshan D, Abramson RG, Burton KR, Yu JPJ, Scalzetti EM, Yankeelov TE, Subramaniam RM, Lenchik L. Clinical utility of quantitative imaging. Acad Radiol 2015; 22:33-49. [PMID: 25442800 PMCID: PMC4259826 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2014] [Revised: 08/25/2014] [Accepted: 08/25/2014] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Quantitative imaging (QI) is increasingly applied in modern radiology practice, assisting in the clinical assessment of many patients and providing a source of biomarkers for a spectrum of diseases. QI is commonly used to inform patient diagnosis or prognosis, determine the choice of therapy, or monitor therapy response. Because most radiologists will likely implement some QI tools to meet the patient care needs of their referring clinicians, it is important for all radiologists to become familiar with the strengths and limitations of QI. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Quantitative Imaging Task Force has explored the clinical application of QI and summarizes its work in this review. We provide an overview of the clinical use of QI by discussing QI tools that are currently used in clinical practice, clinical applications of these tools, approaches to reporting of QI, and challenges to implementing QI. It is hoped that these insights will help radiologists recognize the tangible benefits of QI to their patients, their referring clinicians, and their own radiology practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Rosenkrantz
- Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016.
| | - Mishal Mendiratta-Lala
- Henry Ford Hospital, Abdominal and Cross-sectional Interventional Radiology, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Brian J Bartholmai
- Division of Radiology Informatics, Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Richard G Abramson
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Kirsteen R Burton
- Department of Medical Imaging and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John-Paul J Yu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ernest M Scalzetti
- Department of Radiology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse New York
| | - Thomas E Yankeelov
- Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, and Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Leon Lenchik
- Department of Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|