Whole body computed tomography for trauma patients in the Nordic countries 2014: survey shows significant differences and a need for common guidelines

Differences in Presentation, Radiological Features, and Outcomes in Traumatic Versus Spontaneous Acute Subdural Hematomas-A Single-Institution Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous acute subdural hematoma (sASDH) is a rare neurosurgical condition, with the literature mainly consisting of case reports. In the present study, we compared sASDH with traumatic ASDH (tASDH) to determine the differences in presentation, radiological features, and outcomes in a population-based setting.

METHODS

All adult patients (age ≥18 years) who had undergone surgery for ASDH (n = 266), either spontaneous or traumatic, from 2010 to 2020 were included retrospectively. The cohort was divided into 2 groups for comparative analysis: sASDH group (n = 24) versus tASDH group (n = 242).

RESULTS

Of the 266 patients, 24 (9.0%) had presented with sASDH. The sASDH group had a mean age of 66.2 years, and sudden headache was the most common presenting symptom (83.3%). The sASDH group had a higher Glasgow coma scale score at presentation compared with the tASDH group (Glasgow coma scale scores, 10 and 8, respectively; P < 0.01). The outcomes, assessed using the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), revealed a greater incidence of more favorable outcomes (GOS score 4-5) for the sASDH group (72.7%) than for the tASDH group (41.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present population-based study of surgically evacuated ASDH cases, 9% were spontaneous without previous trauma. The outcomes (GOS scores) were significantly more favorable for those with sASDH than for those with tASDH. In one half of the patients with sASDH, arterial bleeding was noted perioperatively, although the preoperative radiological examinations revealed no abnormalities for most patients. However, the lack of sufficient examinations such as computed tomography angiography made it difficult to establish the most common etiology of bleeding in those with sASDH. Further research is warranted to determine the reference standard method for the investigation of sASDH.

Trauma Computed Tomography in the Modern Era: Not Always Quick and Safe

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) has emerged as the diagnostic modality of choice in trauma patients. Recent studies suggest its use in hemodynamically unstable patients is safe and potentially lifesaving; however, the incidence of adverse events (AE) during the trauma CT scanning process remains unknown.

STUDY DESIGN

Over a 6-month period at a Level 1 trauma center, data on patients undergoing trauma CT (whole-body CT (WBCT) +/- additional CT studies) were prospectively collected. All patients requiring a trauma team activation (TTA) were included. Adverse events and specific time intervals were recorded from the time of TTA notification to the time of return to the resuscitation bay from the CT suite.

RESULTS

Of the 94 consecutive patients included in the study, 47.9% experienced 1 or more AE. Median duration away from the resuscitation bay for all patients was 24 minutes. Patients with AE spent a significantly longer time away from the resuscitation bay and had longer scan times. Vasopressor support and ongoing transfusion requirement at the time of CT scanning were associated with AE.

CONCLUSION

Adverse events of varying clinical significance occur frequently in patients undergoing emergent trauma CT. A standard trauma CT protocol could improve the efficiency and safety of the scanning process.

Selection of CT variables and prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with traumatic brain injury

Background

Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) are associated with high risk of morbidity and mortality. Early outcome prediction in patients with TBI require reliable data input and stable prognostic models. The aim of this investigation was to analyze different CT classification systems and prognostic calculators in a representative population of TBI-patients, with known outcomes, in a neurointensive care unit (NICU), to identify the most suitable CT scoring system for continued research.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively included 158 consecutive patients with TBI admitted to the NICU at a level 1 trauma center in Sweden from 2012 to 2016. Baseline data on admission was recorded, CT scans were reviewed, and patient outcome one year after trauma was assessed according to Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). The Marshall classification, Rotterdam scoring system, Helsinki CT score and Stockholm CT score were tested, in addition to the IMPACT and CRASH prognostic calculators. The results were then compared with the actual outcomes.

Results

Glasgow Coma Scale score on admission was 3–8 in 38%, 9–13 in 27.2%, and 14–15 in 34.8% of the patients. GOS after one year showed good recovery in 15.8%, moderate disability in 27.2%, severe disability in 24.7%, vegetative state in 1.3% and death in 29.7%. When adding the variables from the IMPACT base model to the CT scoring systems, the Stockholm CT score yielded the strongest relationship to actual outcome. The results from the prognostic calculators IMPACT and CRASH were divided into two subgroups of mortality (percentages); ≤50% (favorable outcome) and > 50% (unfavorable outcome). This yielded favorable IMPACT and CRASH scores in 54.4 and 38.0% respectively.

Conclusion

The Stockholm CT score and the Helsinki score yielded the closest relationship between the models and the actual outcomes in this consecutive patient series, representative of a NICU TBI-population. Furthermore, the Stockholm CT score yielded the strongest overall relationship when adding variables from the IMPACT base model and would be our method of choice for continued research when using any of the current available CT score models.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13049-021-00901-6.

Whole-body computed tomography in trauma patients: optimization of the patient scanning position significantly shortens examination time while maintaining diagnostic image quality

Background

The study was conducted to compare examination time and artifact vulnerability of whole-body computed tomographies (wbCTs) for trauma patients using conventional or optimized patient positioning.

Patients and methods

Examination time was measured in 100 patients scanned with conventional protocol (Group A: arms positioned alongside the body for head and neck imaging and over the head for trunk imaging) and 100 patients scanned with optimized protocol (Group B: arms flexed on a chest pillow without repositioning). Additionally, influence of two different scanning protocols on image quality in the most relevant body regions was assessed by two blinded readers.

Results

Total wbCT duration was about 35% or 3:46 min shorter in B than in A. Artifacts in aorta (27 vs 6%), liver (40 vs 8%) and spleen (27 vs 5%) occurred significantly more often in B than in A. No incident of non-diagnostic image quality was reported, and no significant differences for lungs and spine were found.

Conclusion

An optimized wbCT positioning protocol for trauma patients allows a significant reduction of examination time while still maintaining diagnostic image quality.