Application of T2 relaxometry in lateralization and localization of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and corresponding comparison with MR volumetry

Comparison of test-retest reproducibility of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for water T 1 and T 2 mapping

Purpose

Relaxometry, specifically T 1 and T 2 mapping, has become an essential technique for assessing the properties of biological tissues related to various physiological and pathological conditions. Many techniques are being used to estimate T 1 and T 2 relaxation times, ranging from the traditional inversion or saturation recovery and spin-echo sequences to more advanced methods. Choosing the appropriate method for a specific application is critical since the precision and accuracy of T 1 and T 2 measurements are influenced by a variety of factors including the pulse sequence and its parameters, the inherent properties of the tissue being examined, the MRI hardware, and the image reconstruction. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the test-retest reproducibility of two advanced MRI relaxometry techniques (Driven Equilibrium Single Pulse Observation of T 1 and T 2, DESPOT, and 3D Quantification using an interleaved Look-Locker acquisition Sequence with a T 2 preparation pulse, QALAS), for T 1 and T 2 mapping in a healthy volunteer cohort.

Methods

10 healthy volunteers underwent brain MRI at 1.3 mm3 isotropic resolution, acquiring DESPOT and QALAS data (~11.8 and ~5 minutes duration, including field maps, respectively), test-retest with subject repositioning, on a 3.0 Tesla Philips Ingenia Elition scanner. To reconstruct the T 1 and T 2 maps, we used an equation-based algorithm for DESPOT and a dictionary-based algorithm that incorporates inversion efficiency and B 1 -field inhomogeneity for QALAS. The test-retest reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots.

Results

Our results indicate that both the DESPOT and QALAS techniques demonstrate good levels of test-retest reproducibility for T 1 and T 2 mapping across the brain. Higher whole-brain voxel-to-voxel ICCs are observed in QALAS for T 1 (0.84 ± 0.039) and in DESPOT for T 2 (0.897 ± 0.029). The Bland-Altman plots show smaller bias and variability of T 1 estimates for QALAS (mean of -0.02 s, and upper and lower limits of -0.14 and 0.11 s, 95% CI) than for DESPOT (mean of -0.02 s, and limits of -0.31 and 0.27 s). QALAS also showed less variability (mean 1.08 ms, limits -1.88 to 4.04 ms) for T 2 compared to DESPOT (mean of 2.56 ms, and limits -17.29 to 22.41 ms). The within-subject CoVs for QALAS range from 0.6% (T 2 in CSF) to 5.8% (T 2 in GM), while for DESPOT they range from 2.1% (T 2 in CSF) to 6.7% (T 2 in GM). The between-subject CoVs for QALAS range from 2.5% (T 2 in GM) to 12% (T 2 in CSF), and for DESPOT they range from 3.7% (T 2 in WM) to 9.3% (T 2 in CSF).

Conclusion

Overall, QALAS demonstrated better reproducibility for T 1 and T 2 measurements than DESPOT, in addition to reduced acquisition time.

Advances in Image Processing for Epileptogenic Zone Detection with MRI

Focal epilepsy is a common and severe neurologic disorder. Neuroimaging aims to identify the epileptogenic zone (EZ), preferably as a macroscopic structural lesion. For approximately a third of patients with chronic drug-resistant focal epilepsy, the EZ cannot be precisely identified using standard 3.0-T MRI. This may be due to either the EZ being undetectable at imaging or the seizure activity being caused by a physiologic abnormality rather than a structural lesion. Computational image processing has recently been shown to aid radiologic assessments and increase the success rate of uncovering suspicious regions by enhancing their visual conspicuity. While structural image analysis is at the forefront of EZ detection, physiologic image analysis has also been shown to provide valuable information about EZ location. This narrative review summarizes and explains the current state-of-the-art computational approaches for image analysis and presents their potential for EZ detection. Current limitations of the methods and possible future directions to augment EZ detection are discussed.

A Magnetic Resonance-Relaxometry-Based Technique to Identify Blood Products in Brain Parenchyma: An Experimental Study on a Rabbit Model

Magnetic resonance relaxometry is a quantitative technique that estimates T1/T2 tissue relaxation times. This has been proven to increase MRI diagnostic accuracy of brain disorders in human medicine. However, literature in the veterinary field is scarce. In this work, a T1 and T2-based relaxometry approach has been developed. The aim is to investigate its performance in characterizing subtle brain lesions obtained with autologous blood injections in rabbits. This study was performed with a low-field scanner, typically present in veterinary clinics. The approach consisted of a semi-automatic hierarchical classification of different regions, selected from a T2 map. The classification was driven according to the relaxometry properties extracted from a set of regions selected by the radiologist to compare the suspected lesion with the healthy parenchyma. Histopathological analyses were performed to estimate the performance of the proposed classifier through receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. The classifier resulted in moderate accuracy in terms of lesion characterization.

A myriad spectrum of seizures on magnetic resonance imaging - A pictorial essay

Patients with seizures represent a challenging clinical population both in pediatrics and adults. Accurate diagnosis of the cause of a seizure is important in choosing an effective treatment modality, surgical planning, predicting a prognosis, and follow-up. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging using a dedicated epilepsy protocol plays a key role in the workup of these patients. Additional MR techniques such as T2 relaxometry and MR spectroscopy show a promising role to arrive at a final diagnosis. The spectrum of epileptogenic causes is broad. Radiologists and physicians need to be updated and require a patterned approach in light of clinical history and electroencephalogram findings to arrive at a reasonable differential diagnosis. This pictorial essay aims to review a few of the common and uncommon causes of seizures and their imaging features.

Automated detection of hippocampal sclerosis: Comparison of a composite MRI-based index with conventional MRI measures

PURPOSE

This study aims to compare the performance of an MRI-based composite index (HSI) with conventional MRI-based measures in hippocampal sclerosis (HS) detection and postoperative outcome estimation.

METHODS

Seventy-two temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients with pathologically confirmed HS and fifteen TLE patients without HS were included retrospectively. The T1-weighted and FLAIR images of these patients were processed with AccuBrain to quantify the hippocampal volume (HV) and the hippocampal FLAIR signal. The HSI index that considered both HV and hippocampal FLAIR signal was also calculated. Two experienced neuropathologists rated the HS severity with the resected tissue and reached an agreement for all cases. The asymmetry indices of the MRI measures were used to lateralize the sclerotic side, and the original MRI measures were applied to detect HS vs. normal hippocampi. Operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses were performed for these predictions. We also investigated the sensitivity of the ipsilateral MRI measures in characterizing the pathological severity of HS and the associations of the MRI measures with postoperative outcomes (Engel class categories).

RESULTS

With the optimal cutoffs, the asymmetry indices of HSI and HV both achieved excellent performance in differentiating left vs. right HS (accuracy = 100 %), and the absolute value of the asymmetry index of HSI performed best in differentiating unilateral vs. bilateral HS (accuracy = 91.7 %). Regarding the detection of HS, HSI performed better in sensitivity (94.4 % vs. 87.5 %) while HV performed better in specificity (93.6 % vs. 89.4 %) when the contralateral site of unilateral HS and both sides of non-HS patients were considered as the normal reference, and HSI performed even better than HV when only both sides of non-HS patients were considered as the normal reference (AUC: 0.956 vs. 0.934, p = 0.038). The ipsilateral HSI presented the strongest association with the pathological rating of HS severity (r = 0.405, p < 0.001). None of the ipsilateral or contralateral MRI measures was associated with the postoperative outcomes. Among the asymmetry indices, only the absolute value of the asymmetry index of HV presented a significant association with the Engel classifications for the Year 2∼3 visit (r = -0.466, p = 0.004) or the latest visit with >1 year follow-up (r = -0.374, p = 0.003) while controlling for disease duration and follow-up duration.

CONCLUSION

The HSI index and HV presented comparable good performance in HS detection, and HSI may have better sensitivity than HV in differentiating pathological HS severity. Higher magnitude of HV dissymmetry may indicate better post-surgical outcomes for HS patients.

Automated volumetry of hippocampus is useful to confirm unilateral mesial temporal sclerosis in patients with radiologically positive findings

Background and purpose We evaluated two methods to identify mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS): visual inspection by experienced epilepsy neuroradiologists based on structural magnetic resonance imaging sequences and automated hippocampal volumetry provided by a processing pipeline based on the FMRIB Software Library. Methods This retrospective study included patients from the epilepsy monitoring unit database of our institution. All patients underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging in 1.5T and 3T scanners with protocols that included thin coronal T2, T1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and isometric T1 acquisitions. Two neuroradiologists with experience in epilepsy and blinded to clinical data evaluated magnetic resonance images for the diagnosis of MTS. The diagnosis of MTS based on an automated method included the calculation of a volumetric asymmetry index between the two hippocampi of each patient and a threshold value to define the presence of MTS obtained through statistical tests (receiver operating characteristics curve). Hippocampi were segmented for volumetric quantification using the FIRST tool and fslstats from the FMRIB Software Library. Results The final cohort included 19 patients with unilateral MTS (14 left side): 14 women and a mean age of 43.4 ± 10.4 years. Neuroradiologists had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 73.3% to detect MTS (gold standard, k = 0.755). Automated hippocampal volumetry had a sensitivity of 84.2% and specificity of 86.7% (k = 0.704). Combined, these methods had a sensitivity of 84.2% and a specificity of 100% (k = 0.825). Conclusions Automated volumetry of the hippocampus could play an important role in temporal lobe epilepsy evaluation, namely on confirmation of unilateral MTS diagnosis in patients with radiological suggestive findings.