Normal development of the fetal spinal canal and spinal cord at T12 on 3.0-T MRI

Comparison between MRI and the Combination of 2D and 3D US in the Prenatal Diagnosis of Closed Spina Bifida

INTRODUCTION

Closed spina bifida (CSB) is a rare condition with a challenging prenatal diagnosis. Herein, we assess the conventional two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound (US) combined with three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the prenatal diagnosis of CSB.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we included 20 cases of fetal CSB confirmed by postnatal MRI, post-mortem pathological examination, or postpartum surgery. Prenatal 2D US complemented with the 3D US was performed in all fetuses to evaluate the characteristics of the conus, vertebral arch, and scoliosis. Moreover, MRI was performed to establish the split vertebrae, with or without a bulging mass. Thereafter, we compared the performance of the US and MRI.

RESULTS

Diagnosis accuracy of US was comparable with MRI (70% vs. 75%, κ = 0.62); US detected more cases with interpediculate distance ≥95% (55% vs. 35%, κ = 0.22) than MRI. On the other hand, MRI had a superior capacity for identifying vertebral arch fissures (20% vs. 35%, κ = 0.39). MRI and ultrasound had good agreement in the conus medullaris (65% vs. 70%, κ = 0.42) and scoliosis (45% vs. 35%, κ = 0.59). Both US and MRI detected 1 (5.0%) case with "lemon sign" and "banana sign." The missed diagnosis rates of US and MRI were 15% (3/20) and 5% (1/20), respectively. The misdiagnosis rates of US and MRI were 15.0% (3/20) and 20.0% (4/20), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both MRI and 2D US combined with the 3D US had excellent performance in prenatal diagnosis of CSB.

Ascent of the conus medullaris in human foetuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify when the ascent of the conus medullaris occurs in human foetuses considering differences in evaluation methods and sample characteristics. Five databases were searched for relevant articles using different combinations of keywords. Article selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. Disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. The variables were distributed into four groups according to the gestational age of the specimens: I (13-18 weeks); II (19-25 weeks); III (26-32 weeks); IV (33 weeks to the probable date of birth). Eighteen articles were included. The majority used imaging exams as the evaluation method. Cadaveric dissections were reported in the remaining articles. Only morphological studies were included in the meta-analysis. Significant ascent occurs between groups I and III as well as groups II and IV. Despite the considerable heterogeneity among the studies included in the present review, the findings enabled the determination that the conus medullaris reaches its normal birth level by the 26th week. Further analyses should be performed based on nationality and ethnicity to diminish the heterogeneity of the data.

Fetal magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar spine development in vivo: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to describe MR imaging appearances of the fetal lumbar spine in vivo at different gestational ages (GAs).

METHODS

This retrospective study was approved by the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. We collected MR images and clinical data of 93 fetuses in our hospital. All the MR images were obtained by 3-T MR. All had the mid-sagittal plane of steady state free precession sequence (Trufi) of the lumbar spine, which could show the lumbar vertebra and conus medullaris (CM). Regression analysis was made between GA and heights of lumbar vertebral body ossification center (LVBOC), lengths of LVBOC, and heights of intervertebral gap (IVG).

RESULTS

There were good linear correlations between the heights of LVBOC and GA (P < 0.001), lengths of LVBOC and GA (P < 0.001), and heights of IVG and GA (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We showed the different development of each LVBOC and IVG which caused the difference of the shape of LVBOC and IVG.