Comparison of treatment outcomes in lumbar disc herniation patients treated with epidural steroid injections: interlaminar versus transforaminal approach

Comparing Functional Efficacy of Transforaminal vs Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection for Lumbar Disc Disease!! Do We Really Need Transforaminal Epidural Route Injections?

This study compared the functional efficacy of therapeutic transforaminal versus interlaminar epidural steroid injection. Adult patients were selected and randomized using an online research randomizer website and assigned into two groups and were given epidural injection either via transforaminal route or interlaminar route. The outcome was measured based on the Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association back index score (mJOA), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analog scale (VAS) over a follow-up on 1st, 3rd, and 6th month postinjection period. It was found that there was no significant difference seen in m JOA, ODI, and VAS score at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months between transforaminal and interlaminar epidural steroid injection. Pain management in the epidural route was comparable to the interlaminar route. Even though the transforaminal epidural route has the advantage of being a selective nerve route block, it has similar results as the interlaminar route at 6 months follow-up.

Clinical outcomes of 3T magnetic resonance imaging-guided lumbar and sacral foraminal injections

PURPOSE

This article evaluates the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of MRI-guided lumbar or sacral nerve root infiltration for chronic back pain. We compared the outcomes of our MRI-guided infiltrations with data from CT-guided infiltrations reported in the literature and explored the potential advantages of MRI guidance.

METHOD

Forty-eight MRI-guided nerve root infiltrations were performed using a 3 T MRI machine. The optimal needle path was determined using breathhold T2-weighted sequences, and the needle was advanced under interleaved guidance based on breathhold PD-weighted images. Pain levels were assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) before the procedure and up to 5 months after, during follow-up. Procedure success was evaluated by comparing patients' pain levels before and after the infiltration.

RESULTS

The MRI-guided infiltrations yielded pain reduction 1 week after the infiltration in 92% of cases, with an average NRS substantial change of 3.9 points. Pain reduction persisted after 5 months for 51% of procedures. No procedure-related complications occurred. The use of a 22G needle and reconstructed subtraction images from T2 FatSat sequences improved the workflow.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that MRI-guided nerve root infiltration is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment option for chronic back pain. Precise positioning of the needle tip and accurate distribution of the injected solution contributed to the effectiveness of MRI-guided infiltration, which appeared to be as accurate as CT-guided procedures. Further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of metal artifact reduction sequences to optimize chronic back pain management.

CT-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection for discogenic lumbar radiculopathy: influence of contrast dispersion and radiologist's experience on clinical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of contrast dispersion pattern/location during lumbar CT-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) and experience of the performing radiologist on therapeutic outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this single-center retrospective cohort study, two observers analyzed contrast dispersion during CT-guided TFESI of 204 patients (age 61.1 ± 14 years) with discogenic unilateral single-level L4 or L5 radiculopathy. The contrast dispersion pattern was classified as "focal," "linear," or "tram-track"; the location was divided into "extraforaminal," "foraminal," or "recessal." Pain was assessed before and 4 weeks after treatment using a numerical rating scale (0, no pain; 10, intolerable pain). Additionally, the patient global impression of change (PGIC) was assessed. The TFESI was performed by musculoskeletal radiologists (experience range: first year of musculoskeletal fellowship training to 19 years). Contrast pattern/location and radiologist's experience were compared between "good responder" (≥ 50% pain reduction) and "poor responder" (< 50%). A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Overall, CT-guided TFESI resulted in a substantial pain reduction in 46.6% of patients with discogenic radiculopathy. The contrast dispersion pattern and location had no effect on pain relief (p = 0.75 and p = 0.09) and PGIC (p = 0.70 and p = 0.21) 4 weeks after TFESI. Additionally, the experience of the radiologist had no influence on pain reduction (p = 0.92) or PGIC (p = 0.75). Regarding pre-interventional imaging findings, both the location and grading of nerve compression had no effect on pain relief (p = 0.91 and p = 0.85) and PGIC (p = 0.18 and p = 0.31).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that neither contrast agent dispersion/location nor the experience of the radiologist allows predicting the therapeutic outcome 4 weeks after the procedure.

Predictive value of immediate pain relief after lumbar transforaminal epidural injection with local anesthetics and steroids for single level radiculopathy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictive value of immediate pain-relief after CT-guided transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) including local anesthetics for longer-term pain relief and patients' global impression of change (PGIC) after 4 weeks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-three patients (age 55.4 ± 14.9) with single-level discogenic lumbar radiculopathy and subsequent TFESI were included. Pain scores were recorded before (NRS₀), 15 min (NRS_15min), and 4 weeks (NRS_4w) after treatment using a numerical-rating-scale (NRS; 0, no pain; 10, intolerable pain). Additionally, the PGIC was assessed after 4 weeks. Two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated nerve compression of the injected level and contrast dispersion. Spearman's rank and point-biserial correlation were applied to assess associations between outcome variables and demographics/imaging findings. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

There was a significant positive correlation between immediate pain-relief and longer-term pain-reduction (r = 0.24, p = 0.001) with an odds ratio of 2.0 (CI: 1.1-3.6). A good short-term response (NRS_15min ≥ 50% reduction) was associated with a persistent longer-term good response (NRS_4w ≥ 50% reduction) in 59.7% (CI: 50.9-68.0%) of patients. There was no association between short-term pain-relief and PGIC after 4 weeks (p = 0.18). Extent and location of nerve compression and contrast dispersion during TFESI did not correlate with longer-term pain-relief (all p ≥ 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate a significant positive correlation between immediate post-procedural and longer-term pain relief after TFESI in patients with lumbar radiculopathy; however, no effect of short-term pain relief is seen on PGIC after 4 weeks. Patients with good longer-term outcome (≥ 50% pain reduction) are twice as likely to have already shown good immediate pain reduction after TFESI.

Clinical effects of transforaminal approach vs interlaminar approach in treating lumbar disc herniation: A clinical study protocol

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) has routinely performed in recent years for lumbar disc herniation because of the advances in technology of minimally invasive spine surgery. Two common operating routes for PELD have been introduced in the literature: transforaminal approach (TA) and interlaminar approach (IA). The purpose of our current retrospective clinical trial was to study whether the effect of IA-PELD is better than TA-PELD in the incidence of complications and clinical prognosis scores in the patients with L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

Our present research was approved by the institutional review board in the Second Hospital of Nanjing. All the patients offered the informed consent. All the procedures containing human participants were conducted on the basis of the Helsinki Declaration. A retrospective analysis was implemented on 126 patients with L5-S1 disc herniated radiculopathy from March 2016 to March 2018, who were treated with the PELD utilizing the IA technique or the TA technique. Relevant data, such as the patients demographics, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, complications were recorded. In our work, the outcomes of patients were determined at baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months after treatment. The measure of primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index score. The other outcomes measured were Numeric Rating Scale pain scale, surgical duration, length of hospital stay, and complications. The software of SPSS Version 22.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY) was applied for the analysis of all the statistical data. When P value <.05, it was considered to be significant in statistics.

RESULTS

This protocol will provide a solid theoretical basis for exploring which PELD approach is better in treatment of lumbar disc herniation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5988).

Role of transforaminal epidural injections or selective nerve root blocks in the management of lumbar radicular syndrome - A narrative, evidence-based review

OBJECTIVE

Lumbar radicular Syndrome (LRS) is a common spinal pathology and is attributed to complex interplay of mechanical, inflammatory and immunological processes. Epidural injection of steroids has a significant therapeutic role in mitigating the inflammatory component of LRS. Trans-foraminal approach under image guidance enables a targeted drug delivery. The current narrative review discusses the various aspects related to lumbar trans-foraminal epidural injection of steroid (LTFIS).

METHODS

An elaborate search on PubMed, Google and Medline databases was made using keywords "lumbar selective nerve root block", "lumbar trans-foraminal epidural steroid injection", "selective nerve root block in lumbar disc prolapse", "trans-foraminal epidural steroid injection in lumbar prolapse", "selective nerve root block in lumbar radiculopathy", and "trans-foraminal epidural steroid injection in lumbar radiculopathy" The articles were selected based on specific inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Our search identified 539 articles. All articles discussing alternate procedures, LTFIS in other pathologies, diagnostic roles of LTFIS, not pertaining to concerned questions, in non-English language and duplicate articles were excluded. Review articles, randomised controlled trials or level 1 studies were given preference. Overall, 108 articles were included. Being a focussed narrative review, further screening [Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) or Methodological Index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) criteria] was not performed to select articles. Based on the evidence, LTFIS is an effective and useful treatment modality. It is offered to patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) presenting with persistent, unilateral, radiculopathy after a course of conservative measures for around 6 weeks' duration. It has been reported to yield better results than caudal or inter-laminar epidural injections. The anti-inflammatory and nociceptive signal stabilization actions of steroids, as well as mechanical effects of washout of inflammatory mediators and neural lysis contribute to its efficacy. The three different approaches include sub-pedicular, retro-neural and retro-discal. The procedure is performed under image guidance using a water-soluble contrast under fluoroscopy. The four described radiculogram patterns include "arm", "arrow", "linear" and "splash". Computerised tomography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging are other modalities, which may be helpful in performing LTFIS. The use of particulate versus non-particulate steroids is controversial.

CONCLUSION

The overall success rate of SNRB is reported to be 76-88%. The majority of benefits are observed during immediate and early post-injection period. Clinical factors including duration and severity of symptoms, and radiological factors like presence of osteophytes, location, size and type of disc prolapse influence outcomes. The radiculogram "splash" pattern is associated with poor outcomes.