Ultrasound evaluation of postsurgical shoulder after rotator cuff repair: comparison of clinical results

Pre-operative transverse tendon thickness in small and mid-sized rotator cuff tears does not affect clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies on rotator cuff tears have examined both clinical and radiographic parameters which may influence post-operative clinical outcomes. While rotator cuff tears are frequently classified by size or depth, there is currently no literature available examining the thickness of the remnant tendon, and its impact on post-operative outcomes. We hypothesize that decreased pre-operative transverse tendon thickness will result in poorer post-operative clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of small to medium full-thickness rotator cuff tears. These patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years post-operatively. Basic biodata, as well as Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Constant-Murley Score (CMS), UCLA Shoulder Score (USS), and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at 3 different time points (pre-operatively, 1 year post-operatively, and 2 years post-operatively) were collected. Transverse tendon thickness was measured by independent blinded radiologists on pre-operative ultrasonographic images. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare outcome scores and multivariable robust linear model was fitted to assess the effect of transverse tendon thickness on post-operative scores.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were enrolled in this study, predominantly female (65%) and had a median age of 72 years. Pre-operatively, the median transverse cuff thickness was 5.0 ​mm and median tear size was 1.4 ​cm. The median VAS at preoperative was 7, which reduced to 0 ​at 2 year post-operative, indicating statistically significant improvement in pain levels (p ​< ​0.001). Statistically significant improvement in shoulder function measured by CMS, UCLA score and OSS were also seen over time (p ​< ​0.001). Robust regression analysis revealed that transverse cuff thickness had no statistically significant effect on VAS (p ​= ​0.99), CMS (p ​= ​0.84), UCLA score (p ​= ​0.22), and OSS scores (p ​= ​0.73) at 2 years postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

Pre-operative transverse tendon thickness of small- to mid-sized supraspinatus tears does not influence clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair. Differences in transverse tendon thickness may have an association with tendon healing but do not translate to an association with post-operative outcomes in terms of pain, function, and patient-reported outcome measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Sonographic and elastographic findings after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparison with clinical results

OBJECTIVE

We assessed the relationship between early postoperative clinical outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) and observations obtained by postsurgical ultrasound (US) and strain elastography (SE) of repaired supraspinatus tendons (SSTs).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 42 cases in which the patient underwent ARCR followed by postoperative US and SE. The Korean Shoulder Scoring (KSS) system was used to assess preoperative and postoperative conditions. The thickness of the repaired SST and subdeltoid fluid was measured by US. SE scores were classified into four grades (1 to 4) according to elasticity of repaired SST. In addition, SE scores were divided into two groups: soft (SE scores of 1 and 2) and hard (SE scores of 3 and 4). The relationship between clinical outcomes and US parameters and SE scores was determined by KSS.

RESULTS

Postoperative SE scores observed by two readers correlated significantly with function (p = 0.021 and p = 0.021, respectively) and muscle strength (p = 0.008 and p = 0.015, respectively). SE scores were significantly correlated with a difference value of muscle strength of KSS scores (p = 0.002 and p = 0.014). In a comparison of hard and soft groups of repaired SSTs, function (p = 0.008 and p = 0.010, respectively) and muscle strength (p = 0.002 and p = 0.014, respectively) in postoperative KSS scores were statistically higher in the hard SE scores than the soft SE scores. The difference value of function (p = 0.021 and p = 0.021,) and muscle strength (p = 0.008 and p = 0.015) of KSS scores was significantly higher in the hard SE scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative SE scores of repaired tendons correlated significantly with muscle strength and function after ARCR. Postoperative US images including thickness of repaired tendon and subdeltoid fluid did not correlate with clinical outcome.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

SE evaluations of repaired SST may provide important information about postoperative muscle strength and function.

[Postoperative Imaging of Rotator Cuff Tear]

Postoperative imaging of the rotator cuff may be performed routinely, even if pain or disability develops after surgery or if there are no symptoms. Postoperative images are obtained through MRI or US, and the purpose is to confirm the integrity of the restored tendon in general. Postoperative MRI has a relatively poor diagnostic accuracy compared to that of preoperative images because various materials used in surgeries deteriorate the image quality. US can dynamically check the condition of the restored tendon and avoid artifacts from the surgical instruments used for recovery. Although imaging findings are not always consistent with the clinical symptoms or prognosis, sub-deltoid fluid retention is more important for pain and functional recovery than the thickness of the reconstructed tendon. Strain elastography can also be a useful method for predicting the prognosis.

How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures

The objective of this review was to compile validated functional shoulder assessment tools and analyse the methodological quality of their validations. Secondarily, we aimed to provide a comparison of the tools, including parameter descriptions, indications/applications, languages and operating instructions, to choose the most suitable for future clinical and research approaches. A systematic review (PRISMA) was conducted using: PubMed, WoS Scopus, CINHAL, Dialnet and reference lists until 2020. The main criteria for inclusion were that papers were original studies of validated tools or validation studies. Pre-established tables showed tools, validations, items/components, etc. The QUADAS-2 and COSMIN-RB were used to assess the methodological quality of validations. Ultimately, 85 studies were selected, 32 tools and 111 validations. Risk of bias scored lower than applicability, and patient selection got the best scores (QUADAS-2). Internal consistency had the highest quality and PROMs development the lowest (COSMIN-RB). Responsiveness was the most analysed metric property. Modified UCLA and SST obtained the highest quality in shoulder instability surgery, and SPADI in pain. The most approached topic was activities of daily living (81%). We compiled 32 validated functional shoulder assessment tools, and conducted an analysis of the methodological quality of 111 validations associated with them. Modified UCLA and SST showed the highest methodological quality in instability surgery and SPADI in pain.